Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 5/12/2015 4:31:24 PM EDT
http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/35pi9d/science_ama_series_hi_im_dr_suzanne_bell/

"When a gun is fired, a wealth of chemical and physical evidence is produced. This residue is deposited on surfaces near the shooter including then hands. The chemical evidence is a complex combination ranging from tiny particulates containing heavy metal oxides and sulfides, particles of burnt and partially burnt propellant, and condensed gases. Each type of evidence can be characterized analytically and used to help answer key forensic questions such as who did (or did not) fire the weapon."
View Quote
Link Posted: 5/14/2015 9:57:41 PM EDT
[#1]
I watched her presentation today. Some very significant errors and oversights. One of her assertions is that her version of GSR testing can tell who fired a gun. No such test exists and her approach isnt changing that.  The only common GSR testing done anymore in crime labs is distance determination, (which she didnt explain correctly/ completely either).
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top