I do not trust Banfield, or Petsmart with anything, since they injured my sister's Shiba, lied about it, treated him without her permission or notification, crated him in a crate too small for hours before calling her, then lied about that, then had the gall to demand payment for an additional injury that was caused by them.
All he went in for was to get groomed, and the groomers at Petsmart nicked his quick. Not an issue right? A little styptic powder and you're good right? No. They attempted to apparently heat seal the nail and quick with the rotary tool. (WTF?) Obviously he did not like that, and tried to get off the table, knocking off clippers and getting cut on the pad of his injured foot in the process. They then took him to the Banfield clinic in the Petsmart, where they wrapped his foot in plastic and put him in a crate too small for him to turn around in, let alone stand up. He's an oversized Shiba (about 17inches at the withers) and they put him in a crate for a toy or miniature. He stayed in that crate, still bleeding for ~2 hours by their own admisison before looking at the wound, which because it was wrapped in plastic, developed a hot spot and the original quick injury and pad injury were aggravated more by him chewing at it to remove the plastic. Wondering what was taking so long to get a normal grooming done, my sister called Petsmart's groomers. They said they'd have to call her back because they were busy. They then 2 hours after that wrapped the paw in gauze to try and stop the bleeding. At this point they called my sister to come and pick up her dog. My sister was wondering why Banfield was calling her back not the groomers.
When she showed up she was obviously upset. Why was her dog A) at the vet, B) not groomed C) bandaged up D)now with a hot spot on his ankle E) now having a $400 emergency vet bill (because she didn't have an appointment) which would be reduced by 50% because the groomers brought the dog over. She wanted to know why her dog was treated without her permission and without her knowledge. They also prescribed an steroid for the dog (which he is allergic too, if they'd actually asked). Banfield claimed they called and got authorization... From Mary. Except no one in my sister's household is named Mary. There's a Vanessa. There's an Evelyn. There is no Mary.
This was then escalated to the Store manager, who offered to waive the emergency vet charge, and the grooming charge! (oh yeah!) But she'd need to bring him back and be responsible for the follow up appointments. This was then escalated to the regional manager, who waived all charges, and offered to pay for follow up appointments at my sister's Vet.
So there you go. Banfield can rot in hell, and I wouldn't trust a goldfish I got from them.