User Panel
Quoted:
I really hope SQ42 comes out at the end of this year or the beginning of next year. I'm pretty sure it will bring in a lot of new blood into the game. I can't wait to see where this game is 4-5 years after development is complete with how many new ships and classes of ship they come up with. View Quote They will probably have a polished demo out by Christmas, but I don't expect that SQ42 will be released until the summer at the earliest. I expect that they will "officially release" the PU or at least move into the beta phase by Christmas of next year. It looks like 4.0 will be nearly feature complete. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Quoted:
They will probably have a polished demo out by Christmas, but I don't expect that SQ42 will be released until the summer at the earliest. I expect that they will "officially release" the PU or at least move into the beta phase by Christmas of next year. It looks like 4.0 will be nearly feature complete. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I really hope SQ42 comes out at the end of this year or the beginning of next year. I'm pretty sure it will bring in a lot of new blood into the game. I can't wait to see where this game is 4-5 years after development is complete with how many new ships and classes of ship they come up with. They will probably have a polished demo out by Christmas, but I don't expect that SQ42 will be released until the summer at the earliest. I expect that they will "officially release" the PU or at least move into the beta phase by Christmas of next year. It looks like 4.0 will be nearly feature complete. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Holiday season '17 for SQ42 would not surprise me. |
|
Quoted:
Holiday season '17 for SQ42 would not surprise me. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I really hope SQ42 comes out at the end of this year or the beginning of next year. I'm pretty sure it will bring in a lot of new blood into the game. I can't wait to see where this game is 4-5 years after development is complete with how many new ships and classes of ship they come up with. They will probably have a polished demo out by Christmas, but I don't expect that SQ42 will be released until the summer at the earliest. I expect that they will "officially release" the PU or at least move into the beta phase by Christmas of next year. It looks like 4.0 will be nearly feature complete. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Holiday season '17 for SQ42 would not surprise me. I'll be happy if we get a single chapter of it to play while they work on the rest. |
|
The first shot of the Polaris, where they showed the white box version and the Gladius in the bay, it looked like a little care would let you put 2 in there.
|
|
Quoted:
The first shot of the Polaris, where they showed the white box version and the Gladius in the bay, it looked like a little care would let you put 2 in there. View Quote I want a Polaris without the bay. Same firepower, same equipment, no pocket carrier. That machine would be a handful. |
|
Quoted:
The first shot of the Polaris, where they showed the white box version and the Gladius in the bay, it looked like a little care would let you put 2 in there. View Quote Yeah, despite the hanger being described as "for a single light fighter", there's a lot of talk of fitting up to a Cutlass-size ship (or more than one Gladius) in there. |
|
Quoted:
I want a Polaris without the bay. Same firepower, same equipment, no pocket carrier. That machine would be a handful. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The first shot of the Polaris, where they showed the white box version and the Gladius in the bay, it looked like a little care would let you put 2 in there. I want a Polaris without the bay. Same firepower, same equipment, no pocket carrier. That machine would be a handful. I would have liked to see it without the bay, too, but it seems like they want every ship Connie-sized up be able to carry a launchable craft of some sort. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
No they won't. Basic foundation mechanics are still not working and/or broken. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
They will probably have a polished demo out by Christmas, but I don't expect that SQ42 will be released until the summer at the earliest. No they won't. Basic foundation mechanics are still not working and/or broken. That's not what Erin Roberts said. There were a couple of animation issues they didn't get worked out in time but that everything was there and ready for a demo. We'll see it in November. |
|
|
Quoted:
http://youtu.be/pdCFTF8j7yI Procedural Planets v2 video, now with higher framerate and resolution, and sans commentary. OMG. View Quote I'm gonna watch it again tonight. I can't control my horny level. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
So Sabre and smaller fit in the Polaris bay.
I was really hoping for a Cutlass to fit, the combination of logistics and combat would be nice. Q&A 1 Kharn |
|
Quoted:
So Sabre and smaller fit in the Polaris bay. I was really hoping for a Cutlass to fit, the combination of logistics and combat would be nice. Q&A 1 Kharn View Quote I'm interested to see if they put artificial restrictions to prevent things like the Dragonfly in the Freelancer hold. If they don't (and they said they won't), there's still a chance you can squeeze a Cutlass in there. The dimensions of the bay seem to be large enough. |
|
Quoted: That's not what Erin Roberts said. There were a couple of animation issues they didn't get worked out in time but that everything was there and ready for a demo. We'll see it in November. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: They will probably have a polished demo out by Christmas, but I don't expect that SQ42 will be released until the summer at the earliest. No they won't. Basic foundation mechanics are still not working and/or broken. That's not what Erin Roberts said. There were a couple of animation issues they didn't get worked out in time but that everything was there and ready for a demo. We'll see it in November. I'll wager some pmags (or $$$ for .22LR) on this and I'll even push the date out to 12/31/16. |
|
Quoted:
I'll wager some pmags (or $$$ for .22LR) on this and I'll even push the date out to 12/31/16. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They will probably have a polished demo out by Christmas, but I don't expect that SQ42 will be released until the summer at the earliest. No they won't. Basic foundation mechanics are still not working and/or broken. That's not what Erin Roberts said. There were a couple of animation issues they didn't get worked out in time but that everything was there and ready for a demo. We'll see it in November. I'll wager some pmags (or $$$ for .22LR) on this and I'll even push the date out to 12/31/16. Let's make it easy and fun. I'll bet you one pmag well see the mission in November. |
|
Quoted:
I'm interested to see if they put artificial restrictions to prevent things like the Dragonfly in the Freelancer hold. If they don't (and they said they won't), there's still a chance you can squeeze a Cutlass in there. The dimensions of the bay seem to be large enough. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So Sabre and smaller fit in the Polaris bay. I was really hoping for a Cutlass to fit, the combination of logistics and combat would be nice. Q&A 1 Kharn I'm interested to see if they put artificial restrictions to prevent things like the Dragonfly in the Freelancer hold. If they don't (and they said they won't), there's still a chance you can squeeze a Cutlass in there. The dimensions of the bay seem to be large enough. I'd be very happy if they go with the "If it fits it sits". Could do some serious cargo hauling with the Idris. |
|
Quoted:
I'd be very happy if they go with the "If it fits it sits". Could do some serious cargo hauling with the Idris. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So Sabre and smaller fit in the Polaris bay. I was really hoping for a Cutlass to fit, the combination of logistics and combat would be nice. Q&A 1 Kharn I'm interested to see if they put artificial restrictions to prevent things like the Dragonfly in the Freelancer hold. If they don't (and they said they won't), there's still a chance you can squeeze a Cutlass in there. The dimensions of the bay seem to be large enough. I'd be very happy if they go with the "If it fits it sits". Could do some serious cargo hauling with the Idris. That's a lot of space porn to ship |
|
I'm thinking a Hornet Ghost or a Hornet Tracker would be a fantastic pairing with the Polaris. Ghost can fly ahead, scout, and come back, and going by stated targets for final balancing of armor/etc, will be able to hang in a fight and survive longer than a Sabre for an eventual to return to the Polaris for repair. Alternately, a Hornet Tracker could fly ahead acting like an AWACS and picking out any nasty surprises that could be waiting ahead for the Polaris, while again being able to hang in a fight.
Avenger Warlock would probably be amazing as well for combat engagements against known assailants. Use that huge engine and its small size to blast by an opposing cap ship, EMP it, and let the Polaris get some free torpedo hits in. I'm guessing the Retaliator will probably be the Polaris' biggest non-capital enemy by a wide margin. Warlock would probably be helpful here too... force the Retaliator to drift on a straight line long enough for the Polaris to blast it. I'm also thinking a Polaris with 2-4 Vanguards flying its wing would be a pretty slick recon-in-force setup that can go a long way out and back without having to bring a Starfarer along. |
|
Quoted:
I'm thinking a Hornet Ghost or a Hornet Tracker would be a fantastic pairing with the Polaris. Ghost can fly ahead, scout, and come back, and going by stated targets for final balancing of armor/etc, will be able to hang in a fight and survive longer than a Sabre for an eventual to return to the Polaris for repair. Alternately, a Hornet Tracker could fly ahead acting like an AWACS and picking out any nasty surprises that could be waiting ahead for the Polaris, while again being able to hang in a fight. Avenger Warlock would probably be amazing as well for combat engagements against known assailants. Use that huge engine and its small size to blast by an opposing cap ship, EMP it, and let the Polaris get some free torpedo hits in. I'm guessing the Retaliator will probably be the Polaris' biggest non-capital enemy by a wide margin. Warlock would probably be helpful here too... force the Retaliator to drift on a straight line long enough for the Polaris to blast it. I'm also thinking a Polaris with 2-4 Vanguards flying its wing would be a pretty slick recon-in-force setup that can go a long way out and back without having to bring a Starfarer along. View Quote I'm not really sold on the Terrapin yet, but I think it would fit the role of "AWACS" better than a Hornet Tracker. If the docking bay on the Polaris allows the Tracker to swap modules to become a Super Hornet (or just more combat focused) while out on patrol, that could be a significant consideration. |
|
have yall seen this?
Did they actually say that? |
|
Quoted:
have yall seen this? http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/237434-star-citizen-single-player-delayed-indefinitely Did they actually say that? View Quote No, some cocksuckers are going the whole hyperbole route because SQ42 was pushed back to a teaser in a month or two. That said, I am getting nervous that 3.0 won't be out by Christmas. If that one doesn't come out, IMO it won't bode well with the masses after all the hype. |
|
Quoted:
have yall seen this? http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/237434-star-citizen-single-player-delayed-indefinitely Did they actually say that? View Quote Indefinitely as in not a definitive date that it will be released was and is a true statement. |
|
Quoted:
have yall seen this? http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/237434-star-citizen-single-player-delayed-indefinitely Did they actually say that? View Quote LOL reads like something wanting to start an internet drama war based on pure speculation and from a standpoint of wanting to see the project fail. The bias it's strong in that article. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
I personally have zero expectations for 3.0 to release anytime in 2016. At best it'll be a PTU release to avocados in late Dec.
|
|
View Quote A backwards P90 magazine? They missed the whole point of that arrangement. And nothing says combat ready like exposed electrical wires. Kharn Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Quoted:
No, some cocksuckers are going the whole hyperbole route because SQ42 was pushed back to a teaser in a month or two. That said, I am getting nervous that 3.0 won't be out by Christmas. If that one doesn't come out, IMO it won't bode well with the masses after all the hype. View Quote 3.0 by Christmas? That would mean they get the interim release of 2.6 out the door probably within the next week, and then work really fast on 3.0. I'd personally expect 2.6 sometime in November, with 3.0 in 2017 given CIG's past track record. |
|
Quoted:
3.0 by Christmas? That would mean they get the interim release of 2.6 out the door probably within the next week, and then work really fast on 3.0. I'd personally expect 2.6 sometime in November, with 3.0 in 2017 given CIG's past track record. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
No, some cocksuckers are going the whole hyperbole route because SQ42 was pushed back to a teaser in a month or two. That said, I am getting nervous that 3.0 won't be out by Christmas. If that one doesn't come out, IMO it won't bode well with the masses after all the hype. 3.0 by Christmas? That would mean they get the interim release of 2.6 out the door probably within the next week, and then work really fast on 3.0. I'd personally expect 2.6 sometime in November, with 3.0 in 2017 given CIG's past track record. Oh I agree. It was (I think) gamescom when CR said they were aiming for the holiday for 3.0 though. |
|
RSI Polaris Q&A - Part 2
Will Polaris have any other rooms not shown on layout?
Rooms not listed in the brochure include an armoury, med bay, brig, Captains Quarters and secondary quarters for the fighter pilot or second in command. View Quote My Polaris is now my bounty hunter ship |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
RSI Polaris Q&A - Part 2 Will Polaris have any other rooms not shown on layout?
Rooms not listed in the brochure include an armoury, med bay, brig, Captains Quarters and secondary quarters for the fighter pilot or second in command. My Polaris is now my bounty hunter ship Every ship with an airlock has a brig. Take away their suit, disable the controls, and tell them if they misbehave they get spaced. |
|
Quoted:
Every ship with an airlock has a brig. Take away their suit, disable the controls, and tell them if they misbehave they get spaced. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
RSI Polaris Q&A - Part 2 Will Polaris have any other rooms not shown on layout?
Rooms not listed in the brochure include an armoury, med bay, brig, Captains Quarters and secondary quarters for the fighter pilot or second in command. My Polaris is now my bounty hunter ship Every ship with an airlock has a brig. Take away their suit, disable the controls, and tell them if they misbehave they get spaced. Seems to me that a cryo chamber should work for most issues. Less space used than a brig. Of course, if you're on a patrol that's days long and you use the time out a punishment rather than a storage medium until you can get the malefactor back for trial, a brig might be an idea. |
|
Quoted:
Seems to me that a cryo chamber should work for most issues. Less space used than a brig. Of course, if you're on a patrol that's days long and you use the time out a punishment rather than a storage medium until you can get the malefactor back for trial, a brig might be an idea. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
RSI Polaris Q&A - Part 2 Will Polaris have any other rooms not shown on layout?
Rooms not listed in the brochure include an armoury, med bay, brig, Captains Quarters and secondary quarters for the fighter pilot or second in command. My Polaris is now my bounty hunter ship Every ship with an airlock has a brig. Take away their suit, disable the controls, and tell them if they misbehave they get spaced. Seems to me that a cryo chamber should work for most issues. Less space used than a brig. Of course, if you're on a patrol that's days long and you use the time out a punishment rather than a storage medium until you can get the malefactor back for trial, a brig might be an idea. |
|
Quoted:
http://67.media.tumblr.com/fd57401aa100f325e50b9114c542063e/tumblr_nowsu23UGi1tj5b5bo7_400.gif View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
RSI Polaris Q&A - Part 2 Will Polaris have any other rooms not shown on layout?
Rooms not listed in the brochure include an armoury, med bay, brig, Captains Quarters and secondary quarters for the fighter pilot or second in command. My Polaris is now my bounty hunter ship Every ship with an airlock has a brig. Take away their suit, disable the controls, and tell them if they misbehave they get spaced. Seems to me that a cryo chamber should work for most issues. Less space used than a brig. Of course, if you're on a patrol that's days long and you use the time out a punishment rather than a storage medium until you can get the malefactor back for trial, a brig might be an idea. http://67.media.tumblr.com/fd57401aa100f325e50b9114c542063e/tumblr_nowsu23UGi1tj5b5bo7_400.gif I will neither confirm nor deny that that very scene was playing through my head when I wrote the second part of that post |
|
Once I finish moving, I need to do a Red Dwarf marathon. Btw they are bringing it back for another season set 20 years after the last (so real time) of how they've managed. I'm kinda curious to be honest.
|
|
I thought they were already on the second season of that? I watched the miniseries, and it was pretty sad. None of them had any energy and seemed to just be going through the motions.
|
|
|
Quoted:
I'm thinking a Hornet Ghost or a Hornet Tracker would be a fantastic pairing with the Polaris. Ghost can fly ahead, scout, and come back, and going by stated targets for final balancing of armor/etc, will be able to hang in a fight and survive longer than a Sabre for an eventual to return to the Polaris for repair. Alternately, a Hornet Tracker could fly ahead acting like an AWACS and picking out any nasty surprises that could be waiting ahead for the Polaris, while again being able to hang in a fight. Avenger Warlock would probably be amazing as well for combat engagements against known assailants. Use that huge engine and its small size to blast by an opposing cap ship, EMP it, and let the Polaris get some free torpedo hits in. I'm guessing the Retaliator will probably be the Polaris' biggest non-capital enemy by a wide margin. Warlock would probably be helpful here too... force the Retaliator to drift on a straight line long enough for the Polaris to blast it. I'm also thinking a Polaris with 2-4 Vanguards flying its wing would be a pretty slick recon-in-force setup that can go a long way out and back without having to bring a Starfarer along. View Quote I wonder if the Polaris can refit ships, like changing a Hornet from dish to ball if a fight is expected, or cargo bin to make a supply run. Kharn Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
I gave the spreadsheet the grey bar look so it's a bit easier to read now.
|
|
Got a connie taurus just so I can make some money
I think I'm done pledging for new ships unless they show me a gunship like the redeemer |
|
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The only other ship I'll pledge for is the Brutus. The what https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BkjwNOvCYAABs96?format=jpg&name=large |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The only other ship I'll pledge for is the Brutus. The what https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BkjwNOvCYAABs96?format=jpg&name=large http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6F6u5TIUbI I will have it. Oh yes. It will be mine. |
|
Pre 2.6 avacado invites have gone out. They are testing features going into the 2.6 build before they finalize it for open NDA testing, etc. So we may see 2.6 before mid Nov if we are lucky.
|
|
Quoted:
Pre 2.6 avacado invites have gone out. They are testing features going into the 2.6 build before they finalize it for open NDA testing, etc. So we may see 2.6 before mid Nov if we are lucky. View Quote I really fucking hope they either fix the Avenger or let non-Warlock variant pilots exit via the canopy instead of the rear. Even though it's my cheapest ship, it's still my favorite to fly... except I just don't bother lately because I'm tired of being fired out the roof or the floor when I leave the cockpit. Free-flying the Warlock has been a dream because I can actually use my danged Avenger again. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.