Quoted:
Wood Burning Stove Insert or Natural Gas Logs Insert.
Betting this has been covered before, if so and u have a link plz share.
Thanks in Advance!
View Quote
Quoted:
Wood Burning Stove Insert or Natural Gas Logs Insert.
Betting this has been covered before, if so and u have a link plz share.
Thanks in Advance!
View Quote
Solar, as in ...
1)Not needing heating in the first place. Granted, not always possible but man is it nice to go to the beach and toast a bit under the sun while others worry about heating.
2) Second best option. In places where winter gets cold, passive solar heating means the design of the house itself heats as needed. This is of course the most cost officient form of heating. You will need an architect to get it right, and build a house from zero, all that costs money, but then you have no aditional cost. I know of a home in the south of Chile (gets pretty cold) where pasive solar is all they ever need.
3)Using the most reliable fuel. This may not always be the most cost effective, and maybe its not a good option for everyday, but for survival purposes you want something you can count on. Example, say electricity is cheap wherever it is that you are, Id still want to have a kero heater even if its more expensive because that I can count on while all it takes is a snow storm or blackout to leave me freezing.
4)Using the most cost effective fuel. If you produce your own wood, then thats probably your best option, but then again you have to balance it with how much it costs you in terms of money/time. Here's where a lot of people will be well served by a combined setup using both gas and wood.
But answering your question, Id say gas is in general is more practical and more cost effective (unless its particularly expensive in your area) while wood is a bit more time consuming, more messy and higher maintenance but more reliable during long term disasters.
FeFAL