User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 11:20:30 AM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_37/593212_Any_one_visit_Impact_Guns_in_South_Salt_Lake_.html&page=2#i6630868 http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_37/593212_Any_one_visit_Impact_Guns_in_South_Salt_Lake_.html&page=2#i6630868 "there was a CO LGS member posting in GD, like this winner. Another young buck who with his vast firearm knowledge @ 23 yrs of age. Did the same thing, running down a customer who was new to guns, etc. I sent that one to the stores contact e-mail. To say the owner was less than thrilled .....next day said forum member / lgs employee was looking for work." Forum member "jim" talks about arocking a fellow forum member and getting him fired from his job. I would like the forum member who was the gun store employee in Colorado who got fired. No need to call yourself out in this thread. Instead, i would like for you to IM mod "medicmandan" and let him know. There was no arocking. The owner sent me an e-mail saying said employee would no longer be working there. he was not impressed at all. Now if said owner did or did not dismiss this wonderful person. That was his business. FWIW: i was not the only one who read that guys post and contacted the owner. However i have no issue stepping up and taking responsibility for what i did. That guy was a complete fuktard. Saying how he would over charge or his overall treatment of customers. Then like the the fine lgs worker in NV, post about it. Question for you . IF this was your business would you not like to know what is happening, why your business is slow and why people do not come in? If there's an issue you have with that. By all means say something. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 11:36:52 AM EDT
[#2]
You got a guy fired by arocking him in real life, by your own admission. I am done talking to you.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 11:40:18 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You got a guy fired by arocking him in real life, by your own admission. I am done talking to you. Oh no! Some jackass from Iowa isn't talking to Jim! Why don't you take your ball and go home? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 12:11:35 PM EDT
[#4]
I have no idea what's going on, just here to watch the drama.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 3:05:43 PM EDT
[#5]
Oh boy.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 3:50:15 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You got a guy fired by arocking him in real life, by your own admission. I am done talking to you. You think him getting fired was by Jim's actions? We are responsible for our own deeds and no one else's. Jim didn't force him to post that content on here. Grow up. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 6:00:55 PM EDT
[#7]
Arocking is doing something with malicious intent, on baseless grounds. If the member in question posted about how he was a jerk to customers, and acting in such a way that would warrant termination normally, then it is a basic duty of a customer to notify the employer and let them know. Jim didn't get the guy fired, the guy did it himself. It's not like this site, or GD in particular is a catholic confessional. This is public domain, and if you brag about being an idiot, there is nothing, zero, zilch to keep anyone from telling the employer about it. What if the guy was bragging about how he steals from his boss? Would that be arocking to let the employer know that they have someone on their payroll stealing? Heck no it wouldn't, that's helping karma along. For someone to bash jim for what he did, that stinks of millennial self centered-not responsible for anything they did-entitlement mentality. Next thing you know, there will be members on here actually believing the guns did an accidental discharge, and not the gun holder. If the site bans jim for doing the right thing, then they can move me right out with him. Next thing you know, some member from iowa(know the acronym?) will whine about how they were mistreated at a business. Sorry dude, someone knew about it, was going to let the employer know, but didn't want to be accused of arocking someone and get banned from facebook, or wherever. Go back to the liberal state mr quad cities.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 6:09:06 PM EDT
[#8]
Someone doesnt know the definition of "arocking".
Open a book |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 6:38:14 PM EDT
[#9]
BTW Bettendorf,
Since you are claiming military, currently in IA, and using a Pineland picture as your avatar thus representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC, what is your class number? There is no SF unit in IA and not many 18s go back to a regular army unit. Please explain, use PM if necessary. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 6:50:01 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: BTW Bettendorf, Since you are claiming military, currently in IA, and using a Pineland picture as your avatar thus representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC, what is your class number? There is no SF unit in IA and not many 18s go back to a regular army unit. Please explain, use PM if necessary. Fat chance. Grow up. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 6:55:49 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why, so you can AROCK me? Fat chance. Grow up. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
BTW Bettendorf, Since you are claiming military, currently in IA, and using a Pineland picture as your avatar thus representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC, what is your class number? There is no SF unit in IA and not many 18s go back to a regular army unit. Please explain, use PM if necessary. Fat chance. Grow up. No. Your mentality is not consistent with a graduate of SFQC. If you're legit, then you have nothing to fear. If you're a poser, the SF community will be notified as well as your CoC. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 6:59:29 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No. Your mentality is not consistent with a graduate of SFQC. If you're legit, then you have nothing to fear. If you're a poser, the SF community will be notified as well as your CoC. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: BTW Bettendorf, Since you are claiming military, currently in IA, and using a Pineland picture as your avatar thus representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC, what is your class number? There is no SF unit in IA and not many 18s go back to a regular army unit. Please explain, use PM if necessary. Fat chance. Grow up. No. Your mentality is not consistent with a graduate of SFQC. If you're legit, then you have nothing to fear. If you're a poser, the SF community will be notified as well as your CoC. Grow up. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:09:50 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Someone doesnt know the definition of "arocking". Open a book Would you point us to a book could we find that in? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:11:03 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Would you point us to a book could we find that in? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Someone doesnt know the definition of "arocking". Open a book Would you point us to a book could we find that in? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:16:26 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Someone doesnt know the definition of "arocking". Open a book Well, by book, do you mean the Merriam Webster dictionary? I went to their site, just to humor you, and alas, they don't possess such a word. Try again. Now for urbandictionary, anyone, or any millennial can go on there and make up a word and their own definition of it. That does not mean it is legit. I could make up a word, say Bettendork and give an interesting definition. Does that make it automatically law? No. So using make believe words somehow makes you right? I don't think so. Classic hypocrite, complaining about someone not minding their business by letting an employer know about the misdeeds an employee brags about in public, and making it their business now, which they were never a party of themselves. That's what the "arock" premise is basically about, isn't it? Not minding your own business? Here you are, trying to stir up trouble with a moderator over something that some time ago, and doesn't concern you. It's not even in the same state. Boy, aren't we mature. No one can accept responsibility for what they do. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:16:30 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No. Your mentality is not consistent with a graduate of SFQC. If you're legit, then you have nothing to fear. If you're a poser, the SF community will be notified as well as your CoC. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
BTW Bettendorf, Since you are claiming military, currently in IA, and using a Pineland picture as your avatar thus representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC, what is your class number? There is no SF unit in IA and not many 18s go back to a regular army unit. Please explain, use PM if necessary. Fat chance. Grow up. No. Your mentality is not consistent with a graduate of SFQC. If you're legit, then you have nothing to fear. If you're a poser, the SF community will be notified as well as your CoC. So are you claiming military? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:24:13 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You may be on to something. You better call up my CoC Grow up. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
BTW Bettendorf, Since you are claiming military, currently in IA, and using a Pineland picture as your avatar thus representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC, what is your class number? There is no SF unit in IA and not many 18s go back to a regular army unit. Please explain, use PM if necessary. Fat chance. Grow up. No. Your mentality is not consistent with a graduate of SFQC. If you're legit, then you have nothing to fear. If you're a poser, the SF community will be notified as well as your CoC. Grow up. His boss's number is 867-5309 |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:25:16 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
BTW Bettendorf, Since you are claiming military, currently in IA, and using a Pineland picture as your avatar thus representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC, what is your class number? There is no SF unit in IA and not many 18s go back to a regular army unit. Please explain, use PM if necessary. Lol what do you army guys call it? ETS? Does ever 18 guy stick around Bragg? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:25:22 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No. Your mentality is not consistent with a graduate of SFQC. If you're legit, then you have nothing to fear. If you're a poser, the SF community will be notified as well as your CoC. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: BTW Bettendorf, Since you are claiming military, currently in IA, and using a Pineland picture as your avatar thus representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC, what is your class number? There is no SF unit in IA and not many 18s go back to a regular army unit. Please explain, use PM if necessary. Fat chance. Grow up. No. Your mentality is not consistent with a graduate of SFQC. If you're legit, then you have nothing to fear. If you're a poser, the SF community will be notified as well as your CoC. Oh man. That's rich. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:25:50 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Someone doesnt know the definition of "arocking". Open a book Btw, have you looked up your username on urban dictionary? Based on what you said, if someone makes up a definition, it's the law, right? Wondering, were you born before 1989? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:29:46 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Notify the SF community. Oh man. That's rich. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: BTW Bettendorf, Since you are claiming military, currently in IA, and using a Pineland picture as your avatar thus representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC, what is your class number? There is no SF unit in IA and not many 18s go back to a regular army unit. Please explain, use PM if necessary. Fat chance. Grow up. No. Your mentality is not consistent with a graduate of SFQC. If you're legit, then you have nothing to fear. If you're a poser, the SF community will be notified as well as your CoC. Oh man. That's rich. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:38:14 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
google book. did you just get the internet? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Someone doesnt know the definition of "arocking". Open a book Would you point us to a book could we find that in? Searched Barnes and Noble and it appears they don't sell "Google book". I'll try Amazon, BRB. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:38:58 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He should do it. Threats of arocking don't get bans. As evident with the fact that john-in-austin is still posting. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:42:36 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:There was no arocking. Wrong...it's an AROCK all day long. It doesn't matter if you did the right thing or not, if I as a business owner would want to know, etc. It was an AROCK, and AROCKing is verboten here. If you are so noble that you feel morally obligated to notify the owner anyways despite the forum rules, then by all means, adhere to your moral code...hell I might even agree with it. But you still knowingly violate the rules of this place, and therefore should gladly and nobly accept the ban that comes from an AROCKing. You made the decision, even boasted about it, either embrace the nobility of your actions completely and die on the hill you chose, or you know...wuss out of it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:50:09 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
BTW Bettendorf, Since you are claiming military, currently in IA, and using a Pineland picture as your avatar thus representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC, what is your class number? There is no SF unit in IA and not many 18s go back to a regular army unit. Please explain, use PM if necessary. I don't think he is claiming to be in the military. I think the tank under the name means someone has been vetted and is confirmed to be in the military. In addition to that, the .mil forum polices itself incredibly well when it comes to shit like what you are insinuating. You can make accusations and drop subtle accusatory hints all you want, but you are probably barking up the wrong tree. I have no dog in this fight and it is kind of fun watching someone shoot themselves in the foot, but you're getting kind of crazy talking about calling peoples chain of command in regards to the subject matter of this thread. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:51:45 PM EDT
[#26]
Dude can call my CoC.
Wait.... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:52:38 PM EDT
[#27]
If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:53:34 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:54:56 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wrong...it's an AROCK all day long. It doesn't matter if you did the right thing or not, if I as a business owner would want to know, etc. It was an AROCK, and AROCKing is verboten here. If you are so noble that you feel morally obligated to notify the owner anyways despite the forum rules, then by all means, adhere to your moral code...hell I might even agree with it. But you still knowingly violate the rules of this place, and therefore should gladly and nobly accept the ban that comes from an AROCKing. You made the decision, even boasted about it, either embrace the nobility of your actions completely and die on the hill you chose, or you know...wuss out of it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:There was no arocking. Wrong...it's an AROCK all day long. It doesn't matter if you did the right thing or not, if I as a business owner would want to know, etc. It was an AROCK, and AROCKing is verboten here. If you are so noble that you feel morally obligated to notify the owner anyways despite the forum rules, then by all means, adhere to your moral code...hell I might even agree with it. But you still knowingly violate the rules of this place, and therefore should gladly and nobly accept the ban that comes from an AROCKing. You made the decision, even boasted about it, either embrace the nobility of your actions completely and die on the hill you chose, or you know...wuss out of it. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_37/593212_Any_one_visit_Impact_Guns_in_South_Salt_Lake_.html&page=2#i6630868 Scroll down to the last (as of now ) reply. I at least man up to what i do and accept the outcome of said actions. What's sad is a lot of you (possibly you included) BITCH about gun store employees on a monthly basis. How they acted, treated you, talked down etc. YET No one has the balls to call someone on it? I have no doubt an easy 3/4 of this site have no issue going to yelp or other place to bitch about their service at X eatery . The CO member when ever, thought it was ok to post his disdain for the customer[s]. then his actions where and should be held accountable. Just as i am willing to be held. So please, stop your or anyone else OUTRAGE over what i as i'm sure others here have done. BUT not man enough to say so. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 7:58:11 PM EDT
[#30]
John-in-Austin is still a bitch
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:00:18 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wrong...it's an AROCK all day long. It doesn't matter if you did the right thing or not, if I as a business owner would want to know, etc. It was an AROCK, and AROCKing is verboten here. If you are so noble that you feel morally obligated to notify the owner anyways despite the forum rules, then by all means, adhere to your moral code...hell I might even agree with it. But you still knowingly violate the rules of this place, and therefore should gladly and nobly accept the ban that comes from an AROCKing. You made the decision, even boasted about it, either embrace the nobility of your actions completely and die on the hill you chose, or you know...wuss out of it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:There was no arocking. Wrong...it's an AROCK all day long. It doesn't matter if you did the right thing or not, if I as a business owner would want to know, etc. It was an AROCK, and AROCKing is verboten here. If you are so noble that you feel morally obligated to notify the owner anyways despite the forum rules, then by all means, adhere to your moral code...hell I might even agree with it. But you still knowingly violate the rules of this place, and therefore should gladly and nobly accept the ban that comes from an AROCKing. You made the decision, even boasted about it, either embrace the nobility of your actions completely and die on the hill you chose, or you know...wuss out of it. So, are you going to internet arock him now, so he can get banned? Then maybe you should be banned too. Because I'll go and make a new definition of arock to include being a tattle tail to the mods. If guy is a turd furgeson, then he brought it on himself. End of story. Karma and Darwin's law are needed filter out the pool water in the gene pool. This whole arock pointing the fingers game is childish. If the guy was just expressing his opinion, then that's one thing, and wrong. If the guy is acting like a retard, giving us all a bad name, while at work, his boss should hear about it, and make the judgement call. There are no victims here, the idiot who started this whole mess here in Colorado, brought it upon himself. Bet if it was your business, and your numbers were down, you'd appreciate the intel. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:00:37 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:03:54 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. You should stop while you are ahead. Suffice to say that Bettendorf has the background necessary to use that flag as his avatar. Oh, and if you take shit posted on ARFCOM and use it to impact the poster's real life, regardless of whether or not it's deserved, that's arocking. There was a time when that shit earned the offender a permanent ban. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:06:18 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. I agree. You should get this checked out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:08:26 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I agree. You should get this checked out. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. I agree. You should get this checked out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:09:14 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. You're precious |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:09:50 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Grow up Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. I have a confession to make. I'm not actually a fat dude on a Jazzy Scooter. Someone should call AARP and report me as a poser. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:11:55 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He should call the SF community. Maybe my chain of command as well. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. I agree. You should get this checked out. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:12:30 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, are you going to internet arock him now, so he can get banned? Then maybe you should be banned too. Because I'll go and make a new definition of arock to include being a tattle tail to the mods. If guy is a turd furgeson, then he brought it on himself. End of story. Karma and Darwin's law are needed filter out the pool water in the gene pool. This whole arock pointing the fingers game is childish. If the guy was just expressing his opinion, then that's one thing, and wrong. If the guy is acting like a retard, giving us all a bad name, while at work, his boss should hear about it, and make the judgement call. There are no victims here, the idiot who started this whole mess here in Colorado, brought it upon himself. Bet if it was your business, and your numbers were down, you'd appreciate the intel. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:There was no arocking. Wrong...it's an AROCK all day long. It doesn't matter if you did the right thing or not, if I as a business owner would want to know, etc. It was an AROCK, and AROCKing is verboten here. If you are so noble that you feel morally obligated to notify the owner anyways despite the forum rules, then by all means, adhere to your moral code...hell I might even agree with it. But you still knowingly violate the rules of this place, and therefore should gladly and nobly accept the ban that comes from an AROCKing. You made the decision, even boasted about it, either embrace the nobility of your actions completely and die on the hill you chose, or you know...wuss out of it. So, are you going to internet arock him now, so he can get banned? Then maybe you should be banned too. Because I'll go and make a new definition of arock to include being a tattle tail to the mods. If guy is a turd furgeson, then he brought it on himself. End of story. Karma and Darwin's law are needed filter out the pool water in the gene pool. This whole arock pointing the fingers game is childish. If the guy was just expressing his opinion, then that's one thing, and wrong. If the guy is acting like a retard, giving us all a bad name, while at work, his boss should hear about it, and make the judgement call. There are no victims here, the idiot who started this whole mess here in Colorado, brought it upon himself. Bet if it was your business, and your numbers were down, you'd appreciate the intel. He outed himself when he boasted about getting him fired. And since I have no interest in knowing is identity or outing him in the real world, it isn't even close to an AROCKing. Are you really this thick? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:14:00 PM EDT
[#40]
Jim contacted an ar15.com posting member's employer, about something posted online.
That's Arocking. What is we say about arock? Pos, worthless, etc. Same thing will be said about Jim when he gets banned for Arocking |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:14:17 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He should call the SF community. Maybe my chain of command as well. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. I agree. You should get this checked out. Isn't there like an SF hotline number I can call? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:16:34 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Isn't there like an SF hotline number I can call? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. I agree. You should get this checked out. Isn't there like an SF hotline number I can call?  |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:18:04 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Isn't there like an SF hotline number I can call? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. I agree. You should get this checked out. Isn't there like an SF hotline number I can call? It was posted on page 1. It's 867-5309. That's the direct line to the secretary of the JFK Special Warfare Center's Commander. I think the secretary's name is Jenny. She'll help him get to the bottom of this shit, that's for certain. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:18:19 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You should stop while you are ahead. Suffice to say that Bettendorf has the background necessary to use that flag as his avatar. Oh, and if you take shit posted on ARFCOM and use it to impact the poster's real life, regardless of whether or not it's deserved, that's arocking. There was a time when that shit earned the offender a permanent ban. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. You should stop while you are ahead. Suffice to say that Bettendorf has the background necessary to use that flag as his avatar. Oh, and if you take shit posted on ARFCOM and use it to impact the poster's real life, regardless of whether or not it's deserved, that's arocking. There was a time when that shit earned the offender a permanent ban. Then he can easily verify with me via pm. I'll take a ban to out a confirmed poser. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:20:21 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Then he can easily verify with me via pm. I'll take a ban to out a confirmed poser. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. You should stop while you are ahead. Suffice to say that Bettendorf has the background necessary to use that flag as his avatar. Oh, and if you take shit posted on ARFCOM and use it to impact the poster's real life, regardless of whether or not it's deserved, that's arocking. There was a time when that shit earned the offender a permanent ban. Then he can easily verify with me via pm. I'll take a ban to out a confirmed poser. Why are you trying so hard to distract from Jim Arocking a guy? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:22:28 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Then he can easily verify with me via pm. I'll take a ban to out a confirmed poser. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. You should stop while you are ahead. Suffice to say that Bettendorf has the background necessary to use that flag as his avatar. Oh, and if you take shit posted on ARFCOM and use it to impact the poster's real life, regardless of whether or not it's deserved, that's arocking. There was a time when that shit earned the offender a permanent ban. Then he can easily verify with me via pm. I'll take a ban to out a confirmed poser. What the hell is your problem Napoleon? Bettendorf is legit, put down your pecker and go play with the dog or something |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:22:32 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Then he can easily verify with me via pm. I'll take a ban to out a confirmed poser. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. You should stop while you are ahead. Suffice to say that Bettendorf has the background necessary to use that flag as his avatar. Oh, and if you take shit posted on ARFCOM and use it to impact the poster's real life, regardless of whether or not it's deserved, that's arocking. There was a time when that shit earned the offender a permanent ban. Then he can easily verify with me via pm. I'll take a ban to out a confirmed poser. Why does he need to? And who are you to demand that he do it based on a Pineland Flag Avatar? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:23:27 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Then he can easily verify with me via pm. I'll take a ban to out a confirmed poser. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. You should stop while you are ahead. Suffice to say that Bettendorf has the background necessary to use that flag as his avatar. Oh, and if you take shit posted on ARFCOM and use it to impact the poster's real life, regardless of whether or not it's deserved, that's arocking. There was a time when that shit earned the offender a permanent ban. Then he can easily verify with me via pm. I'll take a ban to out a confirmed poser. Grow up |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:26:29 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No. Your mentality is not consistent with a graduate of SFQC. If you're legit, then you have nothing to fear. If you're a poser, the SF community will be notified as well as your CoC. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
BTW Bettendorf, Since you are claiming military, currently in IA, and using a Pineland picture as your avatar thus representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC, what is your class number? There is no SF unit in IA and not many 18s go back to a regular army unit. Please explain, use PM if necessary. Fat chance. Grow up. No. Your mentality is not consistent with a graduate of SFQC. If you're legit, then you have nothing to fear. If you're a poser, the SF community will be notified as well as your CoC. what...in the fuck? What the fuck do you know? Stay in your lane. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/22/2016 8:36:19 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Then he can easily verify with me via pm. I'll take a ban to out a confirmed poser. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you are falsely representing yourself as a graduate of SFQC and being selected, then yes, the SF community has an issue with you using their work and blood to make yourself look good. By your responses to my question, it is safe to say that my assumption is true as verifications are never considered a hassle in SOF; rather they are usually appreciated. I will hold judgement and actions until verified but yes, falsely representing yourself as SF will get you "arocked" by legitimate SF members who have earned that right. You should stop while you are ahead. Suffice to say that Bettendorf has the background necessary to use that flag as his avatar. Oh, and if you take shit posted on ARFCOM and use it to impact the poster's real life, regardless of whether or not it's deserved, that's arocking. There was a time when that shit earned the offender a permanent ban. Then he can easily verify with me via pm. I'll take a ban to out a confirmed poser. I dunno Bettendorf, you better verify with him. 
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
