User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:08:25 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By xd341: Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft!  Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT |
|
|
|
TN, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:08:32 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Your idea of Rights is totally flawed anyways because you're arguing from the positive. Rights should be argued from the negative Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: The British didn't say "oh man wooooow bro great points you can govern yourself guys sorry we just didn't know man. We just needed some great words on a page, here's your self governance"  You are asserting that the philosophy and morality which underpins any action is fake and gay and meaningless, which is ridiculous. You spend great deal of time reading classics of western philosophy which is apparently a colossal waste of time if their thoughts are completely inconsequential The thoughts are VERY important. But you have to also realize that you have to have enforcement mechanisms. And if you give those enforcement mechanisms power, they in turn can decide to be who decides the law as well as who enforces it. (Looks to ATF) Enforcement mechanisms which ultimately reduce down to the individual level, where one derives his or her right to defend themselves and their rights from their own inherent self-worth, not their physical ability. If that right does not exist on the individual level it cannot apply on a broader societal level Rights do not exist, period. They simply do not exist. Society making some up and enforcing them can be good, but the government doing so is usually a shitshow. The 2nd only exists because there's just a bunch of retards like us with guns running around. Which is awesome, I love having a bunch of guns. But that doesn't make the second amendment real. It's been violated a bunch of times. It's not a right. A right isn’t “the ability to do something,” it’s the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Your idea of Rights is totally flawed anyways because you're arguing from the positive. Rights should be argued from the negative My idea of what? What should be argued from the negative? |
|
|
TN, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:09:20 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:09:47 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn’t “the ability to do something,” it’s the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Rights and genders are social constructs. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:10:52 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By iwouldntknow: Rights and genders are social constructs. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:11:16 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT You should be mad. FUCK SQUIRRELS. YOU had a right to grow those peanuts and they couldn't prove ownership before eating them. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:12:47 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By perfectsilence: Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts Buy raw peanuts from the grocery store Throw them at squirrels then let them lay 1" under soil. Shoot squirrels Shoot squirrel QRF Shoot squirrel reinforcements Enjoy peanuts. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:13:38 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By xd341: it's all a hologram Reality exists in the organic chemistry experiment that exists in a sound and light proof container. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:13:42 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT You should have eaten the squirrels |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:14:36 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By perfectsilence: My idea of what? What should be argued from the negative? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: The British didn't say "oh man wooooow bro great points you can govern yourself guys sorry we just didn't know man. We just needed some great words on a page, here's your self governance" You are asserting that the philosophy and morality which underpins any action is fake and gay and meaningless, which is ridiculous. You spend great deal of time reading classics of western philosophy which is apparently a colossal waste of time if their thoughts are completely inconsequential The thoughts are VERY important. But you have to also realize that you have to have enforcement mechanisms. And if you give those enforcement mechanisms power, they in turn can decide to be who decides the law as well as who enforces it. (Looks to ATF) Enforcement mechanisms which ultimately reduce down to the individual level, where one derives his or her right to defend themselves and their rights from their own inherent self-worth, not their physical ability. If that right does not exist on the individual level it cannot apply on a broader societal level Rights do not exist, period. They simply do not exist. Society making some up and enforcing them can be good, but the government doing so is usually a shitshow. The 2nd only exists because there's just a bunch of retards like us with guns running around. Which is awesome, I love having a bunch of guns. But that doesn't make the second amendment real. It's been violated a bunch of times. It's not a right. A right isn’t “the ability to do something,” it’s the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Your idea of Rights is totally flawed anyways because you're arguing from the positive. Rights should be argued from the negative My idea of what? What should be argued from the negative? In Western thought, rights as described required nothing other then inaction. So the first and second amendments do not require the government to do anything. In fact they encourage the government to do nothing. If the government didn't act, both would be safe. Positive rights require action. "I have a right to Healthcare". This requires others to act, possibly against their will. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:14:55 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT |
|
|
|
MD, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:17:05 PM EDT
[#12]
American Taliban thread.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:17:06 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By iwouldntknow: Reality exists in the organic chemistry experiment that exists in a sound and light proof container. How was it observed? Schrodingers chemistry? Open the container, let the hologram in! boom! 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:17:48 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: In Western thought, rights as described required nothing other then inaction. So the first and second amendments do not require the government to do anything. In fact they encourage the government to do nothing. If the government didn't act, both would be safe. Positive rights require action. "I have a right to Healthcare". This requires others to act, possibly against their will. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:20:08 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By perfectsilence: Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts They're pretty cool. You just plant them (the seed peanuts have the red wrapper intact unlike roasted) They grow above ground, flower, then reverse course and go back into the ground. They are cool |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:21:28 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Naamah: You should have eaten the squirrels Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Naamah: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT You should have eaten the squirrels I was not there for the crime, unfortunately. Luckily I have no rights so I accept the squirrels used their stealth to steal my property |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:21:50 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By xd341: My FIL is has declared an intifada on red squires. Seriously, he's all in, got like a gitmo in the back yard, there's enhanced interrogation, drone strikes....the whole GWOS thing. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:23:52 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By xd341: The first and 2nd are in fact barriers to government action. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: In Western thought, rights as described required nothing other then inaction. So the first and second amendments do not require the government to do anything. In fact they encourage the government to do nothing. If the government didn't act, both would be safe. Positive rights require action. "I have a right to Healthcare". This requires others to act, possibly against their will. Correct. So OP is technically correct, the best type of correct in that women are owed no positive rights. Neither are men. Therefore the entire women's rights movement is based on nothing. Nothing in reality (force), nothing in Western tradition. |
|
|
|
TN, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:24:30 PM EDT
[Last Edit: perfectsilence]
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: In Western thought, rights as described required nothing other then inaction. So the first and second amendments do not require the government to do anything. In fact they encourage the government to do nothing. If the government didn't act, both would be safe. Positive rights require action. "I have a right to Healthcare". This requires others to act, possibly against their will. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: The British didn't say "oh man wooooow bro great points you can govern yourself guys sorry we just didn't know man. We just needed some great words on a page, here's your self governance" You are asserting that the philosophy and morality which underpins any action is fake and gay and meaningless, which is ridiculous. You spend great deal of time reading classics of western philosophy which is apparently a colossal waste of time if their thoughts are completely inconsequential The thoughts are VERY important. But you have to also realize that you have to have enforcement mechanisms. And if you give those enforcement mechanisms power, they in turn can decide to be who decides the law as well as who enforces it. (Looks to ATF) Enforcement mechanisms which ultimately reduce down to the individual level, where one derives his or her right to defend themselves and their rights from their own inherent self-worth, not their physical ability. If that right does not exist on the individual level it cannot apply on a broader societal level Rights do not exist, period. They simply do not exist. Society making some up and enforcing them can be good, but the government doing so is usually a shitshow. The 2nd only exists because there's just a bunch of retards like us with guns running around. Which is awesome, I love having a bunch of guns. But that doesn't make the second amendment real. It's been violated a bunch of times. It's not a right. A right isn’t “the ability to do something,” it’s the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Your idea of Rights is totally flawed anyways because you're arguing from the positive. Rights should be argued from the negative My idea of what? What should be argued from the negative? In Western thought, rights as described required nothing other then inaction. So the first and second amendments do not require the government to do anything. In fact they encourage the government to do nothing. If the government didn't act, both would be safe. Positive rights require action. "I have a right to Healthcare". This requires others to act, possibly against their will. Right, and those negative rights as described do in fact exist at least insofar as one is justified in acting to protect them if another attempts to violate them. I agree that positive rights, at least as defined as rights which require action of others, exist only insofar as the others who are compelled to act agree to do so or are sufficiently forced to do so. |
|
|
TN, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:25:28 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: They're pretty cool. You just plant them (the seed peanuts have the red wrapper intact unlike roasted) They grow above ground, flower, then reverse course and go back into the ground. They are cool Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts They're pretty cool. You just plant them (the seed peanuts have the red wrapper intact unlike roasted) They grow above ground, flower, then reverse course and go back into the ground. They are cool Do they need to be grown on a slope for drainage or is that just Jimmy Carter propaganda |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:28:54 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By perfectsilence: Do they need to be grown on a slope for drainage or is that just Jimmy Carter propaganda Don't believe democrat lies |
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:29:41 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Skyler2000: American Taliban thread. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:30:57 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By perfectsilence: Do they need to be grown on a slope for drainage or is that just Jimmy Carter propaganda Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts They're pretty cool. You just plant them (the seed peanuts have the red wrapper intact unlike roasted) They grow above ground, flower, then reverse course and go back into the ground. They are cool Do they need to be grown on a slope for drainage or is that just Jimmy Carter propaganda Jimmy Carter horseshit. I legit buy these $15/4 bags from Amazon and grow my potatoes and peanuts in those. Both do need well draining soil, but the holes in the bag work fine. 
|
|
|
|
TN, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:36:24 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Jimmy Carter horseshit. I legit buy these $15/4 bags from Amazon and grow my potatoes and peanuts in those. Both do need well draining soil, but the holes in the bag work fine. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/Screenshot_20240427_163046_Gallery-3199506.jpg Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts They're pretty cool. You just plant them (the seed peanuts have the red wrapper intact unlike roasted) They grow above ground, flower, then reverse course and go back into the ground. They are cool Do they need to be grown on a slope for drainage or is that just Jimmy Carter propaganda Jimmy Carter horseshit. I legit buy these $15/4 bags from Amazon and grow my potatoes and peanuts in those. Both do need well draining soil, but the holes in the bag work fine. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/Screenshot_20240427_163046_Gallery-3199506.jpg Ace, thanks amigo 
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:43:39 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Jimmy Carter horseshit. I legit buy these $15/4 bags from Amazon and grow my potatoes and peanuts in those. Both do need well draining soil, but the holes in the bag work fine. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/Screenshot_20240427_163046_Gallery-3199506.jpg Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts They're pretty cool. You just plant them (the seed peanuts have the red wrapper intact unlike roasted) They grow above ground, flower, then reverse course and go back into the ground. They are cool Do they need to be grown on a slope for drainage or is that just Jimmy Carter propaganda Jimmy Carter horseshit. I legit buy these $15/4 bags from Amazon and grow my potatoes and peanuts in those. Both do need well draining soil, but the holes in the bag work fine. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/Screenshot_20240427_163046_Gallery-3199506.jpg I'm tired of seeing potatoes. About 5000 seeds in the ground, another 2500 to go. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:48:35 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By perfectsilence: Ace, thanks amigo Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts They're pretty cool. You just plant them (the seed peanuts have the red wrapper intact unlike roasted) They grow above ground, flower, then reverse course and go back into the ground. They are cool Do they need to be grown on a slope for drainage or is that just Jimmy Carter propaganda Jimmy Carter horseshit. I legit buy these $15/4 bags from Amazon and grow my potatoes and peanuts in those. Both do need well draining soil, but the holes in the bag work fine. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/Screenshot_20240427_163046_Gallery-3199506.jpg Ace, thanks amigo They've been holding up pretty good for two years, and they're easy to store. They also make harvest super easy |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:50:07 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By -daddy: I'm tired of seeing potatoes. About 5000 seeds in the ground, another 2500 to go. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By -daddy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts They're pretty cool. You just plant them (the seed peanuts have the red wrapper intact unlike roasted) They grow above ground, flower, then reverse course and go back into the ground. They are cool Do they need to be grown on a slope for drainage or is that just Jimmy Carter propaganda Jimmy Carter horseshit. I legit buy these $15/4 bags from Amazon and grow my potatoes and peanuts in those. Both do need well draining soil, but the holes in the bag work fine. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/Screenshot_20240427_163046_Gallery-3199506.jpg I'm tired of seeing potatoes. About 5000 seeds in the ground, another 2500 to go. This must be your profession. Couple quick questions, are you growing determinate or indeterminate? Also I've heard there's significant potatoes left behind during harvest, accurate? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 4:51:04 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Geralt55]
[#28]
Originally Posted By thepantydropper: You can make the argument all rights are illusory, but women’s rights definitely are. Let’s think this through logically. In order for a right to exist, it must be enforced. To enforce a right, you must use force. Force is entirely under the dominion of men. If you follow this allll the way to the end of it's thinking, you end up with "might makes right", a brutal law of nature. This would include: Someone is bigger and younger than you. As in, if you were say, an average 50-anything year old, the jacked SARM-goblin college kid, could probably kick your ass and live in your house. Boomers would have to fist fight the 20 year old male trainee for their CEO spot too apparently, and I know the GD average boomer can still 1RM 400lbs on the bench with no wraps, but for non-GD boomers, they're going to get their asses kicked. @JLPettimoreIII (And that would include a small % of women, who would be able to win in fisticuffs with older boomers, for CEO spots) It wouldn't just be "Men" generally. It would be SOME men. The most competent at dishing out force. And/or, the most willing to.  Then you get into a debate about what kind of force is not allowed. Apparently to push half the population into irrelevance, somehow only fistfights count to make this work (weapons change everything). For example, if all men woke up tomorrow and decided women no longer had rights, there is nothing women could do to stop it. Sex strike  We'd end up with half the number of men pretty quickly in the civil war to fix that. Women wouldn't simply take it, they would use their negotiating power (non-physical) to push back. "Well, we would simply tell em what to do" Right and how would that go. You could build/have a functioning society that way? You could not. Alternatively, if women woke up tomorrow and decided men no longer had rights, they would be unable to enforce it because men could easily stop it. Alright - but this is "fist fight only" universe. On paper if alllll the women had all the firearms, and men had none, (weapons change everything), how would the men easily stop it? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:00:10 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: They've been holding up pretty good for two years, and they're easy to store. They also make harvest super easy Suburban hipster bullshit wow they aren't real. Plant in the ground. Prepare for the inevitable. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:01:14 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Geralt55: If you follow this allll the way to the end of it's thinking, you end up with "might makes right", a brutal law of nature. This would include: Someone is bigger and younger than you. As in, if you were say, an average 50-anything year old, the jacked SARM-goblin college kid, could probably kick your ass and live in your house. Boomers would have to fist fight the 20 year old male trainee for their CEO spot too apparently, and I know the GD average boomer can still 1RM 400lbs on the bench with no wraps, but for non-GD boomers, they're going to get their asses kicked. @JLPettimoreIII (And that would include a small % of women, who would be able to win in fisticuffs with older boomers, for CEO spots) It wouldn't just be "Men" generally. It would be SOME men. The most competent at dishing out force. And/or, the most willing to. Then you get into a debate about what kind of force is not allowed. Apparently to push half the population into irrelevance, somehow only fistfights count to make this work (weapons change everything). Sex strike We'd end up with half the number of men pretty quickly in the civil war to fix that. Women wouldn't simply take it, they would use their negotiating power (non-physical) to push back. "Well, we would simply tell em what to do" Right and how would that go. You could build/have a functioning society that way? You could not. Alright - but this is "fist fight only" universe. On paper if alllll the women had all the firearms, and men had none, (weapons change everything), how would the men easily stop it? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Geralt55: Originally Posted By thepantydropper: You can make the argument all rights are illusory, but women’s rights definitely are. Let’s think this through logically. In order for a right to exist, it must be enforced. To enforce a right, you must use force. Force is entirely under the dominion of men. If you follow this allll the way to the end of it's thinking, you end up with "might makes right", a brutal law of nature. This would include: Someone is bigger and younger than you. As in, if you were say, an average 50-anything year old, the jacked SARM-goblin college kid, could probably kick your ass and live in your house. Boomers would have to fist fight the 20 year old male trainee for their CEO spot too apparently, and I know the GD average boomer can still 1RM 400lbs on the bench with no wraps, but for non-GD boomers, they're going to get their asses kicked. @JLPettimoreIII (And that would include a small % of women, who would be able to win in fisticuffs with older boomers, for CEO spots) It wouldn't just be "Men" generally. It would be SOME men. The most competent at dishing out force. And/or, the most willing to. Then you get into a debate about what kind of force is not allowed. Apparently to push half the population into irrelevance, somehow only fistfights count to make this work (weapons change everything). For example, if all men woke up tomorrow and decided women no longer had rights, there is nothing women could do to stop it. Sex strike We'd end up with half the number of men pretty quickly in the civil war to fix that. Women wouldn't simply take it, they would use their negotiating power (non-physical) to push back. "Well, we would simply tell em what to do" Right and how would that go. You could build/have a functioning society that way? You could not. Alternatively, if women woke up tomorrow and decided men no longer had rights, they would be unable to enforce it because men could easily stop it. Alright - but this is "fist fight only" universe. On paper if alllll the women had all the firearms, and men had none, (weapons change everything), how would the men easily stop it? If Bob was ur aunt who's your uncle? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:03:23 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By iwouldntknow: Suburban hipster bullshit wow they aren't real. Plant in the ground. Prepare for the inevitable. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By iwouldntknow: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: They've been holding up pretty good for two years, and they're easy to store. They also make harvest super easy Suburban hipster bullshit wow they aren't real. Plant in the ground. Prepare for the inevitable. They definitely aren't real, someone could just grab them lmao |
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:04:28 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: This must be your profession. Couple quick questions, are you growing determinate or indeterminate? Also I've heard there's significant potatoes left behind during harvest, accurate? Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By -daddy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts They're pretty cool. You just plant them (the seed peanuts have the red wrapper intact unlike roasted) They grow above ground, flower, then reverse course and go back into the ground. They are cool Do they need to be grown on a slope for drainage or is that just Jimmy Carter propaganda Jimmy Carter horseshit. I legit buy these $15/4 bags from Amazon and grow my potatoes and peanuts in those. Both do need well draining soil, but the holes in the bag work fine. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/Screenshot_20240427_163046_Gallery-3199506.jpg I'm tired of seeing potatoes. About 5000 seeds in the ground, another 2500 to go. This must be your profession. Couple quick questions, are you growing determinate or indeterminate? Also I've heard there's significant potatoes left behind during harvest, accurate? Technically we planted both determinate and indeterminate but it doesn't matter too much as we stagger our harvest across all of the varieties. Yeah, there are a lot that get missed, there are plenty of volunteer plants the following season. We are a small operation with older equipment and just enough hands. |
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:05:23 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By iwouldntknow: Suburban hipster bullshit wow they aren't real. Plant in the ground. Prepare for the inevitable. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By iwouldntknow: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: They've been holding up pretty good for two years, and they're easy to store. They also make harvest super easy Suburban hipster bullshit wow they aren't real. Plant in the ground. Prepare for the inevitable. He went all fancy. I just plant in empty coir and soil bags at my house. |
|
|
TN, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:06:06 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By -daddy: Technically we planted both determinate and indeterminate but it doesn't matter too much as we stagger our harvest across all of the varieties. Yeah, there are a lot that get missed, there are plenty of volunteer plants the following season. We are a small operation with older equipment and just enough hands. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By -daddy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By -daddy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts They're pretty cool. You just plant them (the seed peanuts have the red wrapper intact unlike roasted) They grow above ground, flower, then reverse course and go back into the ground. They are cool Do they need to be grown on a slope for drainage or is that just Jimmy Carter propaganda Jimmy Carter horseshit. I legit buy these $15/4 bags from Amazon and grow my potatoes and peanuts in those. Both do need well draining soil, but the holes in the bag work fine. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/Screenshot_20240427_163046_Gallery-3199506.jpg I'm tired of seeing potatoes. About 5000 seeds in the ground, another 2500 to go. This must be your profession. Couple quick questions, are you growing determinate or indeterminate? Also I've heard there's significant potatoes left behind during harvest, accurate? Technically we planted both determinate and indeterminate but it doesn't matter too much as we stagger our harvest across all of the varieties. Yeah, there are a lot that get missed, there are plenty of volunteer plants the following season. We are a small operation with older equipment and just enough hands. Have you considered hiring Irish farmhands to take care of the left-behinds? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:08:15 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By -daddy: Technically we planted both determinate and indeterminate but it doesn't matter too much as we stagger our harvest across all of the varieties. Yeah, there are a lot that get missed, there are plenty of volunteer plants the following season. We are a small operation with older equipment and just enough hands. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By -daddy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By -daddy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts They're pretty cool. You just plant them (the seed peanuts have the red wrapper intact unlike roasted) They grow above ground, flower, then reverse course and go back into the ground. They are cool Do they need to be grown on a slope for drainage or is that just Jimmy Carter propaganda Jimmy Carter horseshit. I legit buy these $15/4 bags from Amazon and grow my potatoes and peanuts in those. Both do need well draining soil, but the holes in the bag work fine. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/Screenshot_20240427_163046_Gallery-3199506.jpg I'm tired of seeing potatoes. About 5000 seeds in the ground, another 2500 to go. This must be your profession. Couple quick questions, are you growing determinate or indeterminate? Also I've heard there's significant potatoes left behind during harvest, accurate? Technically we planted both determinate and indeterminate but it doesn't matter too much as we stagger our harvest across all of the varieties. Yeah, there are a lot that get missed, there are plenty of volunteer plants the following season. We are a small operation with older equipment and just enough hands. That's awesome, how many pounds you think you get? Do you hold your own seed potatoes for next year? Dude I think this is really cool. This is now a potato thread |
|
|
|
MO, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:10:48 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By iwouldntknow: Buy raw peanuts from the grocery store Throw them at squirrels then let them lay 1" under soil. Shoot squirrels Shoot squirrel QRF Shoot squirrel reinforcements Enjoy peanuts. food fertilized by dead enemies has a special flavor |
|
|
MO, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:15:09 PM EDT
[#37]
the only rights you have are the ones you're willing to kill and die to keep. live your days expecting to do both at any second.
better to live free than die a slave |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:18:13 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By hoodonit00: I honestly can’t stand the opinions about women’s right that some of you have. Oh no....  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:18:13 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Geralt55: If you follow this allll the way to the end of it's thinking, you end up with "might makes right", a brutal law of nature. This would include: Someone is bigger and younger than you. As in, if you were say, an average 50-anything year old, the jacked SARM-goblin college kid, could probably kick your ass and live in your house. Boomers would have to fist fight the 20 year old male trainee for their CEO spot too apparently, and I know the GD average boomer can still 1RM 400lbs on the bench with no wraps, but for non-GD boomers, they're going to get their asses kicked. @JLPettimoreIII (And that would include a small % of women, who would be able to win in fisticuffs with older boomers, for CEO spots) It wouldn't just be "Men" generally. It would be SOME men. The most competent at dishing out force. And/or, the most willing to. Then you get into a debate about what kind of force is not allowed. Apparently to push half the population into irrelevance, somehow only fistfights count to make this work (weapons change everything). Sex strike We'd end up with half the number of men pretty quickly in the civil war to fix that. Women wouldn't simply take it, they would use their negotiating power (non-physical) to push back. "Well, we would simply tell em what to do" Right and how would that go. You could build/have a functioning society that way? You could not. Alright - but this is "fist fight only" universe. On paper if alllll the women had all the firearms, and men had none, (weapons change everything), how would the men easily stop it? In most of that time women had no rights and didn't grab all the swords and make it equal by force, men taking up arms to change the status quo was rare even. Modern firearms levels that field some I'll grant, but not dramatically. We may all agree that a might makes right brutal society is not a pleasant thought but there is no logic that demands that it couldn't happen again. In fact I'd point you to countries where law and order breaks down, force becomes the law. The most violent and capable men rule and often women suffer more than men. Maintaining law and order is a good thing. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:20:44 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By HangfiresGhost: Keep telling yourself that. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By HangfiresGhost: Originally Posted By thepantydropper: He who controls the power controls the ass. Keep telling yourself that. Women's primary motivation is security and they will eventually give up that ass for it. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:22:22 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Geralt55: If you follow this allll the way to the end of it's thinking, you end up with "might makes right", a brutal law of nature. This would include: Someone is bigger and younger than you. As in, if you were say, an average 50-anything year old, the jacked SARM-goblin college kid, could probably kick your ass and live in your house. Boomers would have to fist fight the 20 year old male trainee for their CEO spot too apparently, and I know the GD average boomer can still 1RM 400lbs on the bench with no wraps, but for non-GD boomers, they're going to get their asses kicked. @JLPettimoreIII (And that would include a small % of women, who would be able to win in fisticuffs with older boomers, for CEO spots) It wouldn't just be "Men" generally. It would be SOME men. The most competent at dishing out force. And/or, the most willing to. Then you get into a debate about what kind of force is not allowed. Apparently to push half the population into irrelevance, somehow only fistfights count to make this work (weapons change everything). Sex strike We'd end up with half the number of men pretty quickly in the civil war to fix that. Women wouldn't simply take it, they would use their negotiating power (non-physical) to push back. "Well, we would simply tell em what to do" Right and how would that go. You could build/have a functioning society that way? You could not. Alright - but this is "fist fight only" universe. On paper if alllll the women had all the firearms, and men had none, (weapons change everything), how would the men easily stop it?  Attached File |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:22:27 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By HELOBRAVO: Women's primary motivation is security and they will eventually give up that ass for it. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By HELOBRAVO: Originally Posted By HangfiresGhost: Originally Posted By thepantydropper: He who controls the power controls the ass. Keep telling yourself that. Women's primary motivation is security and they will eventually give up that ass for it. |
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:24:15 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: That's awesome, how many pounds you think you get? Do you hold your own seed potatoes for next year? Dude I think this is really cool. This is now a potato thread Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By -daddy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By -daddy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts They're pretty cool. You just plant them (the seed peanuts have the red wrapper intact unlike roasted) They grow above ground, flower, then reverse course and go back into the ground. They are cool Do they need to be grown on a slope for drainage or is that just Jimmy Carter propaganda Jimmy Carter horseshit. I legit buy these $15/4 bags from Amazon and grow my potatoes and peanuts in those. Both do need well draining soil, but the holes in the bag work fine. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/Screenshot_20240427_163046_Gallery-3199506.jpg I'm tired of seeing potatoes. About 5000 seeds in the ground, another 2500 to go. This must be your profession. Couple quick questions, are you growing determinate or indeterminate? Also I've heard there's significant potatoes left behind during harvest, accurate? Technically we planted both determinate and indeterminate but it doesn't matter too much as we stagger our harvest across all of the varieties. Yeah, there are a lot that get missed, there are plenty of volunteer plants the following season. We are a small operation with older equipment and just enough hands. That's awesome, how many pounds you think you get? Do you hold your own seed potatoes for next year? Dude I think this is really cool. This is now a potato thread Hrmm... I honestly don't know. With some roughstimate math, I think each pallet had around 2500-2700 pounds of taters and we had 10 or so pallets after the final harvest. We purposely save some of our own for seed though the majority of our own seed stock is stuff we didn't sell during the winter, we purchase the vast majority of our seed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:29:45 PM EDT
[#44]
Legal rights are merely that - legal constructs, whose applicability and enforcement may vary from what is literally written into the laws. Such is the nature of everything in the realm of the law.
Legal rights generally attempt to ground themselves on some form of philosophical rights. Such rights do exist - at least, unless you subscribe to the view that nothing metaphysical actually exists. Legal rights are generally an attempt to acknowledge and codify these true rights. The lack of a legal right existing at all, or the lack of proper recognition and enforcement, does not change the existence of true rights. Similarly, legal rights can be created that are not based on true rights, but are a complete legal fiction - virtually all "positive rights" fall into this category. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:30:48 PM EDT
[#45]
Do the women in Iran pick all the potatoes?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:33:00 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By -daddy: Hrmm... I honestly don't know. With some roughstimate math, I think each pallet had around 2500-2700 pounds of taters and we had 10 or so pallets after the final harvest. We purposely save some of our own for seed though the majority of our own seed stock is stuff we didn't sell during the winter, we purchase the vast majority of our seed. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By -daddy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By -daddy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By -daddy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts They're pretty cool. You just plant them (the seed peanuts have the red wrapper intact unlike roasted) They grow above ground, flower, then reverse course and go back into the ground. They are cool Do they need to be grown on a slope for drainage or is that just Jimmy Carter propaganda Jimmy Carter horseshit. I legit buy these $15/4 bags from Amazon and grow my potatoes and peanuts in those. Both do need well draining soil, but the holes in the bag work fine. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/Screenshot_20240427_163046_Gallery-3199506.jpg I'm tired of seeing potatoes. About 5000 seeds in the ground, another 2500 to go. This must be your profession. Couple quick questions, are you growing determinate or indeterminate? Also I've heard there's significant potatoes left behind during harvest, accurate? Technically we planted both determinate and indeterminate but it doesn't matter too much as we stagger our harvest across all of the varieties. Yeah, there are a lot that get missed, there are plenty of volunteer plants the following season. We are a small operation with older equipment and just enough hands. That's awesome, how many pounds you think you get? Do you hold your own seed potatoes for next year? Dude I think this is really cool. This is now a potato thread Hrmm... I honestly don't know. With some roughstimate math, I think each pallet had around 2500-2700 pounds of taters and we had 10 or so pallets after the final harvest. We purposely save some of our own for seed though the majority of our own seed stock is stuff we didn't sell during the winter, we purchase the vast majority of our seed. What's the biggest potato you've ever seen? I got this one at the grocery store just because lol 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:37:06 PM EDT
[#47]
Even when the founding fathers said "all men are created equal", their belief in and allowance of slavery showed that they didn't practice what they preached. So what many people call "rights" are only granted because the majority of the society have voted them to be allowed or maintained.
If the majority of society voted to make rape legal, it wouldn't make it morally correct, but it could be voted in as a "right". Hence the difficulty with mob rule, or with allowing the majority of a society to decide what they believe to be a "right". In truth, "rights" are only temporary privileges that the majority of the mob of society decided to make currently legal. A couple of other examples of "rights" would be same sex marriages, or interracial marriages. In 1920 either one of those things would have come against the majority of American society voting against them. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:37:46 PM EDT
[#48]
Men are stronger than women. Women are sneakier. People suck.
|
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:38:11 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: What's the biggest potato you've ever seen? I got this one at the grocery store just because lol https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/Screenshot_20220917_105539-2529345.jpg Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By -daddy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By -daddy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By -daddy: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: Originally Posted By WhiskersTheCat: Originally Posted By xd341: Originally Posted By perfectsilence: A right isn't "the ability to do something," it's the idea that you should be allowed to do something even if someone is preventing you from doing so (which is what violating a right is). If violating a right causes that right to no longer exist, then it is absurd on its face to claim that a right has been violated. Don't mind him....he's just a Roman farmer. pfft! I'm growing potatoes this year because some dick squirrels ate all my Virginia peanuts I planted. I'm not even that mad I'm sure they were like FUCKING JACKPOT Pls send growing plans for peanuts. I want to grow peanuts They're pretty cool. You just plant them (the seed peanuts have the red wrapper intact unlike roasted) They grow above ground, flower, then reverse course and go back into the ground. They are cool Do they need to be grown on a slope for drainage or is that just Jimmy Carter propaganda Jimmy Carter horseshit. I legit buy these $15/4 bags from Amazon and grow my potatoes and peanuts in those. Both do need well draining soil, but the holes in the bag work fine. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/Screenshot_20240427_163046_Gallery-3199506.jpg I'm tired of seeing potatoes. About 5000 seeds in the ground, another 2500 to go. This must be your profession. Couple quick questions, are you growing determinate or indeterminate? Also I've heard there's significant potatoes left behind during harvest, accurate? Technically we planted both determinate and indeterminate but it doesn't matter too much as we stagger our harvest across all of the varieties. Yeah, there are a lot that get missed, there are plenty of volunteer plants the following season. We are a small operation with older equipment and just enough hands. That's awesome, how many pounds you think you get? Do you hold your own seed potatoes for next year? Dude I think this is really cool. This is now a potato thread Hrmm... I honestly don't know. With some roughstimate math, I think each pallet had around 2500-2700 pounds of taters and we had 10 or so pallets after the final harvest. We purposely save some of our own for seed though the majority of our own seed stock is stuff we didn't sell during the winter, we purchase the vast majority of our seed. What's the biggest potato you've ever seen? I got this one at the grocery store just because lol https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/Screenshot_20220917_105539-2529345.jpg Some of the bigger ones I could describe as "baby heads" from size and shape. |
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 4/27/2024 5:38:51 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By WhirlyGirl45: Men are stronger than women. Women are sneakier. People suck. Men will choke a bitch. Women will poison a fucker. |
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
