Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 3/28/2024 11:17:14 PM EDT
??

Did they list a Constitutional Solution against a Tyrannical Government??
Link Posted: 3/28/2024 11:22:43 PM EDT
[#1]
No, now that you mention it I don’t think tyranny crossed their mind much.  I think for the most part they had a go along to get along approach to life.  

Link Posted: 3/28/2024 11:23:31 PM EDT
[#2]
Guns, but they failed to foresee:

A) the lack of willingness of future generations to use them
B) the ridiculously slow erosion of rights that would go almost unnoticed until it was too late
C) the rapid advancement of the technology used to create weaponry which would be made available only to tyrants
D) the right to vote given to women and idiots.
Link Posted: 3/28/2024 11:24:56 PM EDT
[Last Edit: twistedcomrade] [#3]
If women could not vote we wouldn't be in the shape we are.
Link Posted: 3/28/2024 11:25:09 PM EDT
[#4]
The entire Constitution.
Link Posted: 3/28/2024 11:32:04 PM EDT
[Last Edit: d16man] [#5]
Link Posted: 3/28/2024 11:40:50 PM EDT
[Last Edit: FlashMan-7k] [#6]
Originally Posted By Primecube:
??

Did they list a Constitutional Solution against a Tyrannical Government??
View Quote


If they had listed one, the government would have moved to specifically block it.

Basically, when things get bad enough the states can take their ball and leave the game and the fedgov can just die a horrible death of starvation (lack of money or support) and kick rocks. There doesn't have to be a written route for this. It just happens when people have had enough.
Link Posted: 3/28/2024 11:41:28 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By d16man:

You forgot beurocrats for life....

Term limits would have slowed this down.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By d16man:
Originally Posted By DegralDan:
Guns, but they failed to foresee:

A) the lack of willingness of future generations to use them
B) the ridiculously slow erosion of rights that would go almost unnoticed until it was too late
C) the rapid advancement of the technology used to create weaponry which would be made available only to tyrants
D) the right to vote given to women and idiots.

You forgot beurocrats for life....

Term limits would have slowed this down.

They would just revolving door out with their security clearances and go to work on the private sector side on government contracts.
Link Posted: 3/28/2024 11:51:03 PM EDT
[#8]
Jefferson and other Anti-Federalists didn't want a Standing Army, but lost that argument
Link Posted: 3/28/2024 11:56:16 PM EDT
[#9]
Originally Posted By Primecube:
??

Did they list a Constitutional Solution against a Tyrannical Government??
View Quote
The whole constitution and BOR were written in and effort to give the people power over government. The Declaration of Independence tells you how they dealt with tyranny and has much wisdom on the subject..

In the end it's up to the people to determine how things turn out.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 12:02:08 AM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By FlashMan-7k:


If they had listed one, the government would have moved to specifically block it.

Basically, when things get bad enough the states can take their ball and leave the game and the fedgov can just die a horrible death of starvation (lack of money or support) and kick rocks. There doesn't have to be a written route for this. It just happens when people have had enough.
View Quote

The "Declaration of Independence" shows one how the founding fathers dealt with tyranny and I would think it to be a very good guide on the subject.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 12:03:41 AM EDT
[#11]
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 12:04:50 AM EDT
[Last Edit: USMCTanker] [#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By twistedcomrade:
If women could not vote we wouldn't be in the shape we are.
View Quote


Doubt that.  Plenty of progressive men vote to “fix” what isn’t broken.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 12:20:31 AM EDT
[#13]
Great OP question.  We need one of the Hillsdale scholars to answer it.

They should have known SOCIALISM was coming but maybe they didn't foresee it.

Maybe there should have been the dealth penalty or prison terms for VIOLATING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 12:21:24 AM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nu3gawhat:
The entire Constitution.
View Quote

What he said, The constitution was written to protect us from our government
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 12:29:07 AM EDT
[#15]
Originally Posted By Primecube:
??

Did they list a Constitutional Solution against a Tyrannical Government??
View Quote

They gave us self-determination.
What we do with it is up to us.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 12:32:03 AM EDT
[#16]
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 12:55:44 AM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By hugh1:

The "Declaration of Independence" shows one how the founding fathers dealt with tyranny and I would think it to be a very good guide on the subject.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By hugh1:
Originally Posted By FlashMan-7k:


If they had listed one, the government would have moved to specifically block it.

Basically, when things get bad enough the states can take their ball and leave the game and the fedgov can just die a horrible death of starvation (lack of money or support) and kick rocks. There doesn't have to be a written route for this. It just happens when people have had enough.

The "Declaration of Independence" shows one how the founding fathers dealt with tyranny and I would think it to be a very good guide on the subject.

The history of the abuses of the crown and parliament at that time goes for a very long time and when I first started learning it I was shocked at how much crap the put up with and how many times they tried to get the parliament and than the crown to just ... follow their own rules and traditions and stop abusing them (their colonists).

The meme/joke about how we fought a war over taxation is so wrong that it's not even funny.

A really good video on the things they really were fighting for:
Why The American Revolution Was About FREE SPEECH & SELF-SUFFICIENT Economics, Not Just Taxes


It wasn't so much the tax itself, it was how the taxes would change their way of life.

It was basically the elite-driven "great reset" of their time.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 12:56:31 AM EDT
[Last Edit: FlashMan-7k] [#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By twistedcomrade:
If women could not vote we wouldn't be in the shape we are.
View Quote


The men voted for the women to get the vote, so if you really believe that, there's some soul-searching that needs to be done.

Edited to show which poster I was replying to.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 3:04:47 AM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By jollyg83:
No, now that you mention it I don’t think tyranny crossed their mind much.  I think for the most part they had a go along to get along approach to life.  

View Quote


They also had the ability to exclude hostile elements froms their lives/communities/towns/country.

Freedom of association is a safe guard against tyranny, why do you think they went after it.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 4:15:52 AM EDT
[#20]
According to a huge number of legislators and judiciary from the east and west coasts our founding fathers risked their lives and futures to fight a war in order to enshrine the right to go hunting... which was never in question at any time. But that's what happened ya' know.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 6:45:04 AM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nu3gawhat:
The entire Constitution.
View Quote
OP trolling
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 7:17:33 AM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DegralDan:
Guns, but they failed to foresee:

A) the lack of willingness of future generations to use them
B) the ridiculously slow erosion of rights that would go almost unnoticed until it was too late
C) the rapid advancement of the technology used to create weaponry which would be made available only to tyrants
D) the right to vote given to women and idiots.
View Quote


Don't forget 1) weaponization of government agencies against the people (ATF, DOJ, IRS, etc...),  and 2) a sub-category of that, lawfare (e.g. the state AWBs currently in vogue and the in-the-works Glock suits).

There are more to add to the list, but these are big weapons being used today.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 7:33:53 AM EDT
[#23]
Originally Posted By Primecube:
??

Did they list a Constitutional Solution against a Tyrannical Government??
View Quote


Ummmm 2A
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 7:46:28 AM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Rat_Patrol:
Not going to go as far as death, but no penalty at all for elected/appointed officials abusing their positions and/or infringing on our rights, even though a vote, is a MAJOR problem.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Rat_Patrol:
Originally Posted By borat:
Great OP question.  We need one of the Hillsdale scholars to answer it.

They should have known SOCIALISM was coming but maybe they didn't foresee it.

Maybe there should have been the dealth penalty or prison terms for VIOLATING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS.
Not going to go as far as death, but no penalty at all for elected/appointed officials abusing their positions and/or infringing on our rights, even though a vote, is a MAJOR problem.

Link Posted: 3/29/2024 10:18:43 AM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By FlashMan-7k:

The history of the abuses of the crown and parliament at that time goes for a very long time and when I first started learning it I was shocked at how much crap the put up with and how many times they tried to get the parliament and than the crown to just ... follow their own rules and traditions and stop abusing them (their colonists).

The meme/joke about how we fought a war over taxation is so wrong that it's not even funny.

A really good video on the things they really were fighting for:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc6Nza_nGIQ

It wasn't so much the tax itself, it was how the taxes would change their way of life.

It was basically the elite-driven "great reset" of their time.
View Quote

The following are a list of the reasons the war was fought.



"He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends."
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 10:19:55 AM EDT
[#26]
I don’t know. I was told they just really liked hunting deer and escaped slaves.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 10:20:16 AM EDT
[#27]
Limited suffrage. The rabble was never supposed to be able to vote becuase they will always make poor choices and vote themselves the treasury and be a pox on productive people.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 10:22:42 AM EDT
[#28]
The problem is not the Constitution, but the voters. The voters are not doing their job, they elect unqualified people.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 10:24:05 AM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By d16man:

You forgot beurocrats for life....

Term limits would have slowed this down.
View Quote
I don't think term limits were supposed to be a thing because didn't the Founders envision a part-time federal gubmint that was filled with unpaid elected representatives who still needed to have day jobs once the governing was done during a certain time period?

Full-time politicians paid like a regular job is one of the things that started the downfall of the country.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 10:32:12 AM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By warlord:
The problem is not the Constitution, but the voters. The voters are not doing their job, they elect unqualified people.
View Quote


That is because the average person is an idiot, and the founders seem to have recognized this, which is why they didn’t believe in universal suffrage and didn’t enumerate a right to vote in the Constitution nor the Bill of Rights.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 10:36:07 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Glck1911] [#31]
Nevermind

Link Posted: 3/29/2024 10:36:54 AM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By PeepEater:
Limited suffrage. The rabble was never supposed to be able to vote becuase they will always make poor choices and vote themselves the treasury and be a pox on productive people.
View Quote



This is also a major factor.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 10:39:22 AM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By twistedcomrade:
If women could not vote we wouldn't be in the shape we are.
View Quote

Who voted for them to have the right?
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 10:40:57 AM EDT
[#34]
The documents themselves don't do anything. They're just paper if nobody gives a shit.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 10:45:16 AM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By USMCTanker:


Doubt that.  Plenty of progressive men vote to “fix” what isn’t broken.
View Quote

Nothing "progressive" about so-called "progressives". Just tyrannical fucks by a pleasant sounding name.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 10:51:24 AM EDT
[Last Edit: warlord] [#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DaveJRSC:


That is because the average person is an idiot, and the founders seem to have recognized this, which is why they didn’t believe in universal suffrage and didn’t enumerate a right to vote in the Constitution nor the Bill of Rights.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DaveJRSC:
Originally Posted By warlord:
The problem is not the Constitution, but the voters. The voters are not doing their job, they elect unqualified people.


That is because the average person is an idiot, and the founders seem to have recognized this, which is why they didn’t believe in universal suffrage and didn’t enumerate a right to vote in the Constitution nor the Bill of Rights.
Kind of right, the Bill of Rights is important. That is one of the reasons why there is the electoral college.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 10:53:44 AM EDT
[Last Edit: CastleBravo91] [#37]
To quote the El Paso police.....whatever his rank was....in No Country for Old Men "it's the dismal tide." Ain't any one particular thing, although some carry more weight than others. It's the conglomeration of all sorts of fucked up things that got us where we are today. We're all guilty to some degree, be it our actions or inactions.
Link Posted: 3/29/2024 11:18:22 AM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nu3gawhat:
The entire Constitution.
View Quote


Yep.  They cannot do anything if what they wrote isn't applied.


Link Posted: 3/29/2024 11:21:40 AM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By DaveJRSC:


That is because the average person is an idiot, and the founders seem to have recognized this, which is why they didn’t believe in universal suffrage and didn’t enumerate a right to vote in the Constitution nor the Bill of Rights.
View Quote



This x1000

I’ve spoken and heard many a voter that thinks the Second Amendment is about hunting. And the majority of Congress, both Republicans and Democrats, think the same thing. Including both Presidential nominees. Even a lot of members of this site support it by voting for Rinos. Idiots!
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top