I am in the process of writing a proposal to revamp our issued patrol rifles, going across the board with 11.5" guns with a can. I have found a few decent articles with some sciency-type information relating to Db levels with and without cans, and where the 'agency is now paying disability' level is, which is good information, but I'm always looking for more info, if I can find it.
Does anyone here work at an agency with cans on their patrol rifles? If so, are you aware of any studies--done by your own agency or any others--citing information as it relates to suppressors being cheaper in the long run than disability payouts for hearing loss? I know there are a number of reasons why an agency might cave in and buy cans for everyone, but history tells me this is my best bet.
Also, since I know the question will be asked--for those who do have cans on their patrol rifles, and the rifle is kept in a standard locking rifle rack in a cruiser, how does your agency deal with the can being removable/stealable (even if the rifle remains locked in the rack) in a vehicle burglary? Mandate taking the rifle indoors overnight? Leave it in the rack overnight and accept the risk?
Thanks