User Panel
Quoted:
I am not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV. But I do have 1 million ass in the seat miles on United, not frequent flyer miles not bonus miles but actual ass in the seat miles. If you'd like some bedtime reading I'll post a link to the contract of carriage. United Airlines contract of carriage View Quote Under the law, there are only a few, very specific reasons for which that can be done. |
|
Quoted:
Please quote the FAR they violated when they removed him.. I'll wait. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
False. If it isn't a listed term in the contract then it isn't acceptable. his or her duties, or fails to obey the instruction of any member of the flight crew; 8) When the passenger’s behavior may be hazardous to himself/herself, the crew, or other passengers; 10) When the passenger’s conduct creates an unreasonable risk of offense or annoyance to other passengers; Any of those offer enough plenty of wiggle room to justify removal of just about anyone. Especially the second clause of #4. It does not make a distinction as to the nature of the instruction. Just that you may be refused transport if you fail to obey it. I'll wait. It's enough of a reason if one of the cockpit crew has to come back and chastise you. "Passengers who, through and as a result of their conduct, cause a disturbance such that the captain or member of the cockpit crew must leave the cockpit in order to attend to the disturbance;" |
|
Quoted:
Passenger Noncompliance. Passenger noncompliance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety regulations may result in interference with a crewmember. This is a violation of 14 CFR part 121 and may also be a criminal violation under Title 49 of the United States Code (49 U.S.C.) § 46318(a). Air carriers should have procedures in their manuals to ensure that crewmembers know what actions to take if a passenger does not comply with the safety regulations and/or interferes with a crewmember. I know this is going to be rebutted with "well if I'm just sitting and reading a book following the rules they can't tell me to get up!" WRONG. Let's say the right engine has caused some magic light flashing in the cockpit. Captian gives a crewmember instructions to look out of the only window that gives a view of that engine to give a quick inspection. That window is right beside you. You are asked to de-ass your seat, without any reason. Because you know, the word "fire" or "engine trouble" tends to make folks lose their shit. You refuse because you believe in the land of purple sky that you 'deserve' a valid reason. Well you don't, and that just became passenger noncompliance. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
NO that is how it has been. That is the way it was when they removed the doctor. If you are obeying the rules and not causing trouble, you can not be forcibly removed. That's why airlines offer money to get people to give up their seats and that is appropriate. People pay their money, the deal is made. AFTER completing an agreement is not the time to rescind your service or product when someone that has purchased your service or product is playing by the rules. Think about this exact same thing in other aspects of life and what would happen. If the grocery store took back the last Thanksgiving turkey you paid for while your loading your car or a theater owner taking you out of your seat for someone else, or...... Airlines have been getting away with shit for a LONG time. View Quote The GA is not supposed to let any intoxicated persons on the plane. It does happen and it's actually illegal for an impaired person to fly. FAs can remove ill passengers after a review with pilot. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Opinions aren't facts. You sir, are not correct. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
If you are obeying the rules and not causing trouble, you can not be forcibly removed. That's why airlines offer money to get people to give up their seats and that is appropriate. http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/united-cites-wrong-rule-for-illegally-de-boarding-passenger/ http://www.newsweek.com/why-united-were-legally-wrong-deplane-dr-dao-583535 |
|
Quoted:
And that is what happened here? On the ground? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Passenger Noncompliance. Passenger noncompliance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety regulations may result in interference with a crewmember. This is a violation of 14 CFR part 121 and may also be a criminal violation under Title 49 of the United States Code (49 U.S.C.) § 46318(a). Air carriers should have procedures in their manuals to ensure that crewmembers know what actions to take if a passenger does not comply with the safety regulations and/or interferes with a crewmember. I know this is going to be rebutted with "well if I'm just sitting and reading a book following the rules they can't tell me to get up!" WRONG. Let's say the right engine has caused some magic light flashing in the cockpit. Captian gives a crewmember instructions to look out of the only window that gives a view of that engine to give a quick inspection. That window is right beside you. You are asked to de-ass your seat, without any reason. Because you know, the word "fire" or "engine trouble" tends to make folks lose their shit. You refuse because you believe in the land of purple sky that you 'deserve' a valid reason. Well you don't, and that just became passenger noncompliance. So now you can either get off or be drug off. Once everyone is off maintenance checks it out, adds a bit of air while everyone in the terminal watches through the windows, and signs it off. Now you may reboard the aircraft. Guess who isn't getting back on. See how simple that is? That's why the argument that "once boarded always boarded" is so simple-mindedly juvenile. I can come up with many reasons off the top of my head, any one of which will lead to deplaning all the passengers. Tires look low. Gear struts look low. I want a security sweep... I can get you and everyone else off that plane real easy. Then we can reorganize the seat map to our hearts content. What laws, regulations, ordinances, royal edicts, international agreements, legal contracts (written or verbal), or interstellar treatise did I violate? None. |
|
Quoted:
Thanks for offering your opinion anyway. http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/united-cites-wrong-rule-for-illegally-de-boarding-passenger/ http://www.newsweek.com/why-united-were-legally-wrong-deplane-dr-dao-583535 View Quote I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". |
|
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". View Quote And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. |
|
Quoted:
Yeah; "simple". What a clever plan. https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/6b/a7/ab/6ba7ab9fa79bf82e9528d28374f06f50.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Passenger Noncompliance. Passenger noncompliance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety regulations may result in interference with a crewmember. This is a violation of 14 CFR part 121 and may also be a criminal violation under Title 49 of the United States Code (49 U.S.C.) § 46318(a). Air carriers should have procedures in their manuals to ensure that crewmembers know what actions to take if a passenger does not comply with the safety regulations and/or interferes with a crewmember. I know this is going to be rebutted with "well if I'm just sitting and reading a book following the rules they can't tell me to get up!" WRONG. Let's say the right engine has caused some magic light flashing in the cockpit. Captian gives a crewmember instructions to look out of the only window that gives a view of that engine to give a quick inspection. That window is right beside you. You are asked to de-ass your seat, without any reason. Because you know, the word "fire" or "engine trouble" tends to make folks lose their shit. You refuse because you believe in the land of purple sky that you 'deserve' a valid reason. Well you don't, and that just became passenger noncompliance. So now you can either get off or be drug off. Once everyone is off maintenance checks it out, adds a bit of air while everyone in the terminal watches through the windows, and signs it off. Now you may reboard the aircraft. Guess who isn't getting back on. See how simple that is? That's why the argument that "once boarded always boarded" is so simple-mindedly juvenile. I can come up with many reasons off the top of my head, any one of which will lead to deplaning all the passengers. Tires look low. Gear struts look low. I want a security sweep... I can get you and everyone else off that plane real easy. Then we can reorganize the seat map to our hearts content. What laws, regulations, ordinances, royal edicts, international agreements, legal contracts (written or verbal), or interstellar treatise did I violate? None. What a clever plan. https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/6b/a7/ab/6ba7ab9fa79bf82e9528d28374f06f50.jpg Try this one on. "Folks, we can't find any evidence of this aircraft's required daily security sweep. We're going to have to ask everyone to grab all of your belongings and exit the aircraft. We'll notify you when the security sweep is complete. Shouldn't be more than 10 minutes. Thank you." I can go all day long but the simple take away is that if I want you off the plane, have faith, your ass will be off the plane. |
|
Quoted:
Go ahead then. And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. View Quote But if there is a reason, and the airline wants you off the plane, you are getting off the plane. I'm sorry if that hurts your feelings. |
|
Quoted:
Go ahead then. And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. |
|
|
Quoted:
Look, it's not good business, so you are not going to be kicked off for no reason. But if there is a reason, and the airline wants you off the plane, you are getting off the plane. I'm sorry if that hurts your feelings. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Go ahead then. And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. But if there is a reason, and the airline wants you off the plane, you are getting off the plane. I'm sorry if that hurts your feelings. |
|
People have legal rights. lo fucking l. Troutman is correct, if the airline wants you off, you're getting off. Feel free to complain to the gate agent, write a letter to corporate, hire a lawyer or call up Jesus for some high power curses. The Captain is King on HIS aircraft. You're off.
|
|
Quoted:
What, like a security sweep? For maintenance? Go ahead. Call your lawyer. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. You keep concocting schemes worthy of Pinky and The Brain or Wiley Coyote. |
|
Quoted:
You're the guy who just claimed you could quote legitimate sources of legal opinion to back your asinine assertions, but instead, you just dribbled more turd out of your ass again in the form of your own opinion. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Look man, I live in the real world and I'm telling you how it's is.Regardless of your opinion, there are several legal "catch alls" that give the airlines the power to assert their will. Chief among them, safety and PIC discretion. Several airline pilots have chimed in with examples. It's how it is amigo. Get over it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You're the guy who just claimed you could quote legitimate sources of legal opinion to back your asinine assertions, but instead, you just dribbled more turd out of your ass again in the form of your own opinion. |
|
Quoted:
That's nice dear; now deliver what you promised or GTFO. View Quote I made fun of you for posting irrelevant opinion pieces. It has been explained to you why and how you are wrong, by the people who do it for a living. Concede the point and move on. |
|
Quoted:
I didn't promise anything. I said opinions aren't facts. Which they aren't, because yours is wrong. I made fun of you for posting irrelevant opinion pieces. It has been explained to you why and how you are wrong, by the people who do it for a living. Concede the point and move on. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That's nice dear; now deliver what you promised or GTFO. I made fun of you for posting irrelevant opinion pieces. It has been explained to you why and how you are wrong, by the people who do it for a living. Concede the point and move on. |
|
|
Quoted:
I provided links to two independent, legitimate, sources of legal opinion that enumerated in detail, the specific circumstances under which an already boarded passenger can legally be removed. You keep concocting schemes worthy of Pinky and The Brain or Wiley Coyote. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. You keep concocting schemes worthy of Pinky and The Brain or Wiley Coyote. You've clearly been watching too many cartoons. |
|
|
Quoted:
Do you deny my ability to carry through with what I claim? You're delusional. Seriously, you're delusional. It's not some fanciful sceme. I've deplaned aircraft for both of those reasons already. And another I might add. We had a faulty cover on the "Passenger O2" switch light once. It allowed the switch to be inadvertently depressed without the cover being moved out of the way. Every goddamned mask dropped including the 2 in the lavatory. It's what we call "the rubber jungle". It happened as we were preparing to push back from the gate. This kinda shit happens from time to time. Everyone had to get off so maintenance could fix the switch and stow the masks one by one. This is reality. People will be boarded and upon occasion they will all be asked to get off again. But you go ahead and tell yourself otherwise because of some dumbasses "legal opinion". You've clearly been watching too many cartoons. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. You keep concocting schemes worthy of Pinky and The Brain or Wiley Coyote. You've clearly been watching too many cartoons. Your non sequitur "example" for clearing an entire airplane is one in which there was an actual issue with the aircraft rather than the contrived bullshit scenario you provided as "proof" for your assertions. |
|
Quoted:
In spite of what the social justice warriors in this thread and others want you to believe....Flying is a great way to travel. Yes there are some ass holes....both workers and passengers. But, there are FAR more ass holes driving our nation's roadways. Some even post in this thread....... View Quote We also take the dogs and parrot, really not the flying type. |
|
Quoted:
For all the people bitching about the airlines.... Since they are so bad......quit fucking flying. You can't or won't follow instructions? Quit fucking flying. Don't like the TSA? Quit fucking flying. Did your mommy tell that you are special? Guess what? You aren't. View Quote Nobody likes the TSA, people just tolerate them. |
|
Quoted:
I'm sure his ambulance chaser could take on a Legacy Airline's legal team. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What, like a security sweep? For maintenance? Go ahead. Call your lawyer. This thread truly delivers. |
|
Quoted:
Your non sequitur "example" for clearing an entire airplane is one in which there was an actual issue with the aircraft rather than the contrived bullshit scenario you provided as "proof" for your assertions. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. You keep concocting schemes worthy of Pinky and The Brain or Wiley Coyote. You've clearly been watching too many cartoons. Your non sequitur "example" for clearing an entire airplane is one in which there was an actual issue with the aircraft rather than the contrived bullshit scenario you provided as "proof" for your assertions. Enjoy your "legal opinions". |
|
It doesn't matter if you are already on the aircraft or not.
denied boarding " means a refusal to carry passengers on a flight" It is spelled out by EU and Brit airlines, and most others. It isn't spelled out in that many words in the US airline 'contracts of carriage' , but the US airlines use the same definition, and so does the FAA After the dust settles, I predict all the US airlines will spell it out just like that in their 'contracts' That is how it has always been used and it will continue to be used that way. |
|
Quoted:
It doesn't matter if you are already on the aircraft or not. denied boarding " means a refusal to carry passengers on a flight" It is spelled out by EU and Brit airlines, and most others. It isn't spelled out in that many words in the US airline 'contracts of carriage' , but the US airlines use the same definition, and so does the FAA After the dust settles, I predict all the US airlines will spell it out just like that in their 'contracts' That is how it has always been used and it will continue to be used that way. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
There will be a number of people here that deny that simple fact because of "legal opinions" they read online. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It doesn't matter if you are already on the aircraft or not. denied boarding " means a refusal to carry passengers on a flight" It is spelled out by EU and Brit airlines, and most others. It isn't spelled out in that many words in the US airline 'contracts of carriage' , but the US airlines use the same definition, and so does the FAA After the dust settles, I predict all the US airlines will spell it out just like that in their 'contracts' That is how it has always been used and it will continue to be used that way. |
|
Quoted:
Do you deny my ability to carry through with what I claim? You're delusional. Seriously, you're delusional. It's not some fanciful sceme. I've deplaned aircraft for both of those reasons already. And another I might add. We had a faulty cover on the "Passenger O2" switch light once. It allowed the switch to be inadvertently depressed without the cover being moved out of the way. Every goddamned mask dropped including the 2 in the lavatory. It's what we call "the rubber jungle". It happened as we were preparing to push back from the gate. This kinda shit happens from time to time. Everyone had to get off so maintenance could fix the switch and stow the masks one by one. This is reality. People will be boarded and upon occasion they will all be asked to get off again. But you go ahead and tell yourself otherwise because of some dumbasses "legal opinion". . View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. You keep concocting schemes worthy of Pinky and The Brain or Wiley Coyote. . Whose assessment of applicable law is more likely to be correct? Hmmmmmmmmmmm? That's a tough choice to make. |
|
Quoted:
Your non sequitur "example" for clearing an entire airplane is one in which there was an actual issue with the aircraft rather than the contrived bullshit scenario you provided as "proof" for your assertions. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. You keep concocting schemes worthy of Pinky and The Brain or Wiley Coyote. You've clearly been watching too many cartoons. Your non sequitur "example" for clearing an entire airplane is one in which there was an actual issue with the aircraft rather than the contrived bullshit scenario you provided as "proof" for your assertions. |
|
Quoted:
When a pax who checks his bag and then does not board means a bag dump, this was started after 9/11, every bag comes off till they find the bag whose name matches the pax who missed the flight View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. You keep concocting schemes worthy of Pinky and The Brain or Wiley Coyote. You've clearly been watching too many cartoons. Your non sequitur "example" for clearing an entire airplane is one in which there was an actual issue with the aircraft rather than the contrived bullshit scenario you provided as "proof" for your assertions. But an airline would never do such a thing, or falsify a maintenance issue, to empty an entire plane full of passengers and remove their baggage simply as a ruse to manipulate a passenger into deplaning so they could prevent him from reboarding the aircraft and reassign his seat. |
|
Quoted:
Some "dumbasses " who happen to be law professors, interpretations of applicable law, versus your own august opinion....... Whose assessment of applicable law is more likely to be correct? Hmmmmmmmmmmm? That's a tough choice to make. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. You keep concocting schemes worthy of Pinky and The Brain or Wiley Coyote. . Whose assessment of applicable law is more likely to be correct? Hmmmmmmmmmmm? That's a tough choice to make. Make sure you send him the link to the online legal opinion you found too. He's gonna need all the help he can get. |
|
Quoted:
Yes, it happened to my wife and I after we boarded a flight to Jamaica to attend my daughter's wedding. But an airline would never do such a thing, or falsify a maintenance issue, to empty an entire plane full of passengers and remove their baggage simply as a ruse to manipulate a passenger into deplaning so they could prevent him from reboarding the aircraft and reassign his seat. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. You keep concocting schemes worthy of Pinky and The Brain or Wiley Coyote. You've clearly been watching too many cartoons. Your non sequitur "example" for clearing an entire airplane is one in which there was an actual issue with the aircraft rather than the contrived bullshit scenario you provided as "proof" for your assertions. But an airline would never do such a thing, or falsify a maintenance issue, to empty an entire plane full of passengers and remove their baggage simply as a ruse to manipulate a passenger into deplaning so they could prevent him from reboarding the aircraft and reassign his seat. *ziiiip. flop.* "suck it." |
|
|
Quoted:
Some "dumbasses " who happen to be law professors, interpretations of applicable law, versus your own august opinion....... Whose assessment of applicable law is more likely to be correct? Hmmmmmmmmmmm? That's a tough choice to make. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. You keep concocting schemes worthy of Pinky and The Brain or Wiley Coyote. . Whose assessment of applicable law is more likely to be correct? Hmmmmmmmmmmm? That's a tough choice to make. |
|
Quoted:
Obama taught Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago, are you willing to gobble up his idiotic interpretations of the Constitution as well? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. You keep concocting schemes worthy of Pinky and The Brain or Wiley Coyote. . Whose assessment of applicable law is more likely to be correct? Hmmmmmmmmmmm? That's a tough choice to make. And no; I wouldn't "gobble up his idiotic interpretations of the Constution..." which obviates the law cited by two independent sources in the links I provided. Oh wait.......you've just introduced an obviously irrelevant straw man. |
|
Quoted:
Well of course we wouldn't. *ziiiip. flop.* "suck it." View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. You keep concocting schemes worthy of Pinky and The Brain or Wiley Coyote. You've clearly been watching too many cartoons. Your non sequitur "example" for clearing an entire airplane is one in which there was an actual issue with the aircraft rather than the contrived bullshit scenario you provided as "proof" for your assertions. But an airline would never do such a thing, or falsify a maintenance issue, to empty an entire plane full of passengers and remove their baggage simply as a ruse to manipulate a passenger into deplaning so they could prevent him from reboarding the aircraft and reassign his seat. *ziiiip. flop.* "suck it." And of course, you can cite proven examples to back it up right? |
|
Quoted:When a pax who checks his bag and then does not board means a bag dump, this was started after 9/11, every bag comes off till they find the bag whose name matches the pax who missed the flight View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Again, you don't know what you are talking about. All domestic flights have checked bags screened for explosives. If someone does not get on or they get off the aircraft after they board, their bags stay on the aircraft and go where the aircraft goes without them. That changed more than a decade ago. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:When a pax who checks his bag and then does not board means a bag dump, this was started after 9/11, every bag comes off till they find the bag whose name matches the pax who missed the flight |
|
Quoted:
The way this plays out on the ground is simple. Plane is boarded, positive space crewmembers walk up needing to get on. Nobody gets off. First Officer goes outside to perform preflight walk-around inspection. FO informs the Capt and maintenance that the main gear tires appear to be a little low on air pressure. Maintenance says "no problem, be right there. Deplane the entire aircraft of passengers and bags so we can get an accurate reading." So now you can either get off or be drug off. Once everyone is off maintenance checks it out, adds a bit of air while everyone in the terminal watches through the windows, and signs it off. Now you may reboard the aircraft. Guess who isn't getting back on. See how simple that is? That's why the argument that "once boarded always boarded" is so simple-mindedly juvenile. I can come up with many reasons off the top of my head, any one of which will lead to deplaning all the passengers. Tires look low. Gear struts look low. I want a security sweep... I can get you and everyone else off that plane real easy. Then we can reorganize the seat map to our hearts content. What laws, regulations, ordinances, royal edicts, international agreements, legal contracts (written or verbal), or interstellar treatise did I violate? None. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Passenger Noncompliance. Passenger noncompliance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety regulations may result in interference with a crewmember. This is a violation of 14 CFR part 121 and may also be a criminal violation under Title 49 of the United States Code (49 U.S.C.) § 46318(a). Air carriers should have procedures in their manuals to ensure that crewmembers know what actions to take if a passenger does not comply with the safety regulations and/or interferes with a crewmember. I know this is going to be rebutted with "well if I'm just sitting and reading a book following the rules they can't tell me to get up!" WRONG. Let's say the right engine has caused some magic light flashing in the cockpit. Captian gives a crewmember instructions to look out of the only window that gives a view of that engine to give a quick inspection. That window is right beside you. You are asked to de-ass your seat, without any reason. Because you know, the word "fire" or "engine trouble" tends to make folks lose their shit. You refuse because you believe in the land of purple sky that you 'deserve' a valid reason. Well you don't, and that just became passenger noncompliance. So now you can either get off or be drug off. Once everyone is off maintenance checks it out, adds a bit of air while everyone in the terminal watches through the windows, and signs it off. Now you may reboard the aircraft. Guess who isn't getting back on. See how simple that is? That's why the argument that "once boarded always boarded" is so simple-mindedly juvenile. I can come up with many reasons off the top of my head, any one of which will lead to deplaning all the passengers. Tires look low. Gear struts look low. I want a security sweep... I can get you and everyone else off that plane real easy. Then we can reorganize the seat map to our hearts content. What laws, regulations, ordinances, royal edicts, international agreements, legal contracts (written or verbal), or interstellar treatise did I violate? None. It's within limits, get back in the cockpit and fly the damn thing. Thinks the plane would need to be empty to check the tire pressure. Like we need the plane at basic weight to check the tires. |
|
Quoted:
What, like a security sweep? For maintenance? Go ahead. Call your lawyer. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/04/11/airlines-detail-flight-rules-contracts-of-carriage/100331176/ I can quote news articles too. Some Newsweek opinion or law journal doesn't change the fact that if the airline wants you off the plane for any reason, you are getting off. Moreover, you agree to as much in the 69 pages of fine print when you click "I agree". And fuck what the attorneys and the professors of law who write in law journals have to say because you say otherwise. And BTW: people have legal rights in addition to those spelled out in a contract they agreed to, and those legal rights supercede the contract. There are specific circumstances under which a boarded passenger can be removed and "for any reason" isn't among them. |
|
Quoted:
Except the good Dr. and his wife, who is not in the video, did accept the deal, until he flipped out and ran into the plane. FA cannot and will not forcibly remove you from a plane. They can notify the Pilot who calls authorities. The GA is not supposed to let any intoxicated persons on the plane. It does happen and it's actually illegal for an impaired person to fly. FAs can remove ill passengers after a review with pilot. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
NO that is how it has been. That is the way it was when they removed the doctor. If you are obeying the rules and not causing trouble, you can not be forcibly removed. That's why airlines offer money to get people to give up their seats and that is appropriate. People pay their money, the deal is made. AFTER completing an agreement is not the time to rescind your service or product when someone that has purchased your service or product is playing by the rules. Think about this exact same thing in other aspects of life and what would happen. If the grocery store took back the last Thanksgiving turkey you paid for while your loading your car or a theater owner taking you out of your seat for someone else, or...... Airlines have been getting away with shit for a LONG time. The GA is not supposed to let any intoxicated persons on the plane. It does happen and it's actually illegal for an impaired person to fly. FAs can remove ill passengers after a review with pilot. |
|
Quoted:
So Obama has now entered the discussion and rendered his opinion on the efficacy of the actions of United Airlines and the Chicago Aviation Police? And no; I wouldn't "gobble up his idiotic interpretations of the Constution..." which obviates the law cited by two independent sources in the links I provided. Oh wait.......you've just introduced an obviously irrelevant straw man. View Quote ^^^^Obnoxious, isn't it? You want to argue that these two lawyers are so perfectly competent and qualified to make such a statement, but then scream STRAWMAN ARGUMENT!!! like a petulant child because I point out how your argument is actually a logical fallacy? That actually deserves an LOL. Lawyers have nothing to gain by making statements on high profile events like this, right? It's not like they're attention whores or anything. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.