Quote History Quoted:
I respectfully disagree. This breeder has gone to great lengths to avoid any, even the tiniest, chance of inbreeding or facilitating any genetics problems. Several of her dogs have gone to cops who did have them trained for personal protection; I also know of at least one who competed in agility. Why she doesn't advertise that aspect of her line(s), I don't know. As for strong nerved, mine has subletly threatened a few people and a few dogs, none have tested him any further than the stare and low growl. We got him because I deployed a lot back then, he's my wife's dog and devotedly so.
Yeah, you hit a little bit of a nerve. I'd write more but I'm thumb typing on an iPad and I've pretty much exceeded my abilities at his point. As for Dee Robison, again, I respectfully disagree with your points. Not many of her lines' offspring are on her website, so your evaluation of her as a breeder is incomplete. She should do better by her website, but since she doesn't advertise, I guess she never felt the need to. She's not a personal or family friend, just the person we got our dog from. I found out about her when two of her dogs were thinking about eating me when I went to buy a car at a guys house north of Spokane. I had to call the guy for his driveway because I wasn't sure I'd live if I opened the door. He lived in the boonies and wanted protection dogs. He told me where he got them.
I'd recommend her dogs for whatever purpose you propose and I'm sure she'd have references and examples. All her puppies are sold before they're born and she doesn't sell to just anybody. When Murphy finally passes on (mostly likely this year or next), we'll have already reserved another male.
Lastly, unless I missed it, you didn't mention or post a picture of your Doberman....
Now my thumbs are really hatin' life.
View Quote
I don't mean to offend you or your dog. I don't even bear ill will towards the breeder, it's just a case where the information available indicates a prime example of a breeder that is NOT breeding for temperament.
Like many things in life, we don't know what it is that we don't know. A breeder who doesn't train, title and/or compete in the dogs job CANNOT know what is needed from dogs in order to do the work.
Using guns as an example, would you recommend a "gunsmith" that does not test his creations? If someone advertised that they produce 1,000 yard accurate rifles, would you believe them if they had zero long range experience? If all the 'smith's customers never shoot further than 100 yards and the gunsmith has no long range experience himself, what credibility does the 'smith have for building 1000 yard rifles?
Pointing out that some Cops bought dogs from someone to train as their personal dogs as evidence that the dogs are good, is no different from saying that since some cops buy reconditioned washing machines from Joe's Appliance store they must be good washers. Unless a cop has vast experience training dogs for a hobby outside work, just being a cop makes him as much of a dog expert as a washing machine expert. Cops can get duped and deceived when buying dogs just like anyone else.
Back to the gun analogy, if a gunsmith has no long range experience himself, you might still consider a rifle from him IF you could see he was using known quality components (ie, barrels from a proven manufacturer, etc). This is roughly the equivalent of having dogs with temperament titles in a pedigree. Nobody with any experience in long range shooting is going to buy from a gunsmith with NO long range knowledge AND who also uses components of unproven quality. A breeder who does not participate in activities involving a breeds job AND who also does not have any proven dogs in their breeding program is no different from a "gunsmith" who doesn't shoot and doesn't use components of a known quality. The guns might be safe, they might be pretty and some might even shoot well, BUT there is zero reason to believe they are 1000 yard accurate rifles. Nobody who understands specialty guns would consider such a "gunsmith" to be legitimate. Nobody who's life, livelihood, family or hobby depended on a long range rifle would buy from that "gunsmith"- UNLESS they didn't know what they don't know....
There is a HUGE difference between a gunsmith who has documentation of their knowledge/experience and real world results proving they can apply it, vs a "gunsmith" who doesn't even shoot but has a few customers (including cops) who are happy with their guns.
The Dobermann breed is dying off as a working dog. Breeders who are not well versed (or don't care) about temperament are killing it. One can make a valid argument that breeders are simply responding to the pet market. GOOD breeders produce what's correct for the breed regardless of the market. I doubt one person can make a huge difference, but I can try to educate as the opportunity arises.
If you are happy with your dog then I'm happy for you. I don't have any desire to tell someone else what kind of dog they should own. That is a personal decision. What I am frustrated with is the state of the breed. I'm frustrated with breeders who have contributed to the downfall. I'm frustrated with the lack of knowledge regarding correct, breed specific, temperament in all breeds, but especially with the Dobermann because the breed has a special place in my heart.
Here are a few pics of my Dobermann. He's been dead about three years now. I don't bring him up often in these sorts of discussions because I still miss him every day
, plus, the point I try to make isn't a my dog vs someone elses dog issue; the point is that the Dobermann is supposed to have working traits that "breeders" are allowing to die off.
I've have searched on and off for another Dobermann but have not yet found a US breeder that inspires enough confidence. I don't have trustworthy overseas contacts and the fed .gov has made importation of puppies more difficult than it used to be. It's this lack of working Dobermann's in the USA that has me so sad/frustrated.