User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 1:17:20 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wife: What are you doing? Me: Calling George Soros. W: Who's GS? M: GFS, babe. He's like one of the most powerful MFrs on the planet. W:  JC
M: He got FBHO elected. F his VM's full. W: You are spending too much time on this wiki shit. M: But, but babe GFS! W: 
I might have to different thread soon.  You know what to do, it's your duty now, pack her suitcase. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 1:19:09 PM EDT
[#2]
Raytheon is a parent company to ELCAN.
Cucknadian Garbage! Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 1:20:35 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Nothing new, or damning. But it's about something started by some members here. Just a general email from From:[email protected] to podesta about the CO recalls "And here we go with another important election here in Colorado. This time, a small group of far-right conservatives is trying to recall two Colorado senators. Why? Because those two Senators voted in a way hard right conservatives didn't like. " thought it was funny. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18097 All started by some awesome Arfcommers. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 1:21:16 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is there anything we can do? Lawsuit? This sh*t is beyond insane. The jury box (lawsuits) don't work when courts refuse to uphold or apply the law. The ballot box (elections) don't work when politicians refuse to participate fairly. The soap box (social media, media, etc) doesn't work when people refuse to listen and/or willfully censor opposing viewpoints. That leaves one last box, and discussing it is frowned upon, for good reason. It is a terrible place to be driven to. The bitter truth is that laws (including the Constitution) only mean what we're willing to make them mean. And that involves more than words. It doesn't necessarily mean shooting people, but it does mean opposing and resisting in more ways than simply talking. My 2 cents, at least. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 1:30:52 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Already enough evidence in the Morocco emails for an indictment. In fact it's overwhelming. What's it going to take? Can someone explain the significance of the Morroco emails please? Raytheon wins $129M contract to supply Bahrain and Morocco with TOW missiles Snackbar Results 
We're watching a multitude of high-level scandals erupt in real-time, with the ability to gain intimate details of how the pay-to-play scheme worked, and how the weapons were transferred. I wonder what was on the container ships leaving Libya to Turkey? Turkey wants Assad gone for many reasons. They are enemies with Russia, and hate Assad. I wonder if they would cooperate with arms smuggling to "rebels". |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 1:33:36 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Snackbar Results https://www.funker530.com/wp-content/uploads/Rebel-TOW-2.jpg We're watching a multitude of high-level scandals erupt in real-time, with the ability to gain intimate details of how the pay-to-play scheme worked, and how the weapons were transferred. I wonder what was on the container ships leaving Libya to Turkey? Turkey wants Assad gone for many reasons. They are enemies with Russia, and hate Assad. I wonder if they would cooperate with arms smuggling to "rebels". Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Already enough evidence in the Morocco emails for an indictment. In fact it's overwhelming. What's it going to take? Can someone explain the significance of the Morroco emails please? Raytheon wins $129M contract to supply Bahrain and Morocco with TOW missiles Snackbar Results https://www.funker530.com/wp-content/uploads/Rebel-TOW-2.jpg We're watching a multitude of high-level scandals erupt in real-time, with the ability to gain intimate details of how the pay-to-play scheme worked, and how the weapons were transferred. I wonder what was on the container ships leaving Libya to Turkey? Turkey wants Assad gone for many reasons. They are enemies with Russia, and hate Assad. I wonder if they would cooperate with arms smuggling to "rebels". An enemy of out enemy is still out enemy? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 1:43:34 PM EDT
[#7]
I'm definitely loving the Wikileaks emails...
The Dems defense is 'we're a victim of a cybercrime'... To me that's the equivalent of Jeffrey Dahmer complaining that he paid the guy that ran out of the house (the guy that flagged down the cops, handcuff on one wrist) $100 for nude pics, so he was ripped off, and the police should ignore the bodies in the house..... |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 1:49:03 PM EDT
[#8]
No dirt, but it makes me proud of where I live
 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23626
 " />
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 1:50:40 PM EDT
[#9]
I wonder if shareholders in some of these media and wall St companies could bring lawsuits or file complaints to FINRA under the argument that these companies are not disclosing material information on the nature of business practices to the shareholders?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 2:08:06 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I wonder if shareholders in some of these media and wall St companies could bring lawsuits or file complaints to FINRA under the argument that these companies are not disclosing material information on the nature of business practices to the shareholders? FINRA won't do jack. The are a self regulatory body for broker dealers. You would need the SEC to step in. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 2:10:38 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
FINRA won't do jack. The are a self regulatory body for broker dealers. You would need the SEC to step in. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I wonder if shareholders in some of these media and wall St companies could bring lawsuits or file complaints to FINRA under the argument that these companies are not disclosing material information on the nature of business practices to the shareholders? FINRA won't do jack. The are a self regulatory body for broker dealers. You would need the SEC to step in. OK. SEC. Same question. It seems like it could be an interesting angle to go after the collusion. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 2:23:19 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
With all of this information that has come out in the past year one thing kinda surprised me. It's really cheap to buy off the most powerful government in the world. I would have thought buying the influence that the banks and foreign govs have would have cost much more. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25201 Mention of how to get around potential restrictions on foreign donations in the event HRC becomes president, i.e. "membership alternatives," so that foreign donors can still donate. Courtesy of the autists. With all of this information that has come out in the past year one thing kinda surprised me. It's really cheap to buy off the most powerful government in the world. I would have thought buying the influence that the banks and foreign govs have would have cost much more. That's what shocked me the most. They've been selling us out big time and on the CHEAP. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 2:26:35 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There isn't a media blackout. The incriminating stuff has been posted on CNN, Huffpo, Slate. Democrats/progressives don't care. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
In on 1 for the continued media blackout. There isn't a media blackout. The incriminating stuff has been posted on CNN, Huffpo, Slate. Democrats/progressives don't care. Links? On a scale of incriminating stuff available from 1-10, I've seen them post stuff in the 5-7 range, never 8-10. And they spin it as something else. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 4:54:58 PM EDT
[#14]
Now this is stuff that needs to get out there to the female voters http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/wikileaks-clinton-foundation-paid-women-less-men/
Overall, the average salary for women and men was close. But men out-earned women. Men earned $68,164 compared to $64,118 for women, on average. The median salary also was higher for men, $55,200 compared with $50,000.
The spreadsheet included 62 employees, 37 women and 25 men. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 5:07:01 PM EDT
[#15]
It would be terrible if someone signed Soros up for health insurance quotes. Excuse me...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 5:10:58 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No dirt, but it makes me proud of where I live https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23626
http://i67.tinypic.com/bil4k1.jpg" /> It's "lose" John, not "loose." |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 5:56:13 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's "lose" John, not "loose." Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
No dirt, but it makes me proud of where I live https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/23626
http://i67.tinypic.com/bil4k1.jpg" /> It's "lose" John, not "loose." I'm surprised he got it that cloose. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 9:35:44 PM EDT
[#18]
New tweet from wikileaks
We have updated the Stochastic Terminator algorithim. Whats that mean? no links or anything. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 9:40:27 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
New tweet from wikileaks We have updated the Stochastic Terminator algorithim. Whats that mean? no links or anything. Stochastic modeling is the math behind predicting random statistics. Basically they've updated their timeline if Julian Assange is found dead. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 9:42:29 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
New tweet from wikileaks We have updated the Stochastic Terminator algorithim. Whats that mean? no links or anything. https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5740ib/stochastic_terminator_wikileaks_algorithm_may/ I'm not 100% understanding this either but I think the email release time has changed. More frequently / less frequently, only time will tell. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 9:50:54 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Stochastic modeling is the math behind predicting random statistics. Basically they've updated their timeline if Julian Assange is found dead. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
New tweet from wikileaks We have updated the Stochastic Terminator algorithim. Whats that mean? no links or anything. Stochastic modeling is the math behind predicting random statistics. Basically they've updated their timeline if Julian Assange is found dead. I would wager it is an algo for a Stochastic process |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 9:57:09 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The jury box (lawsuits) don't work when courts refuse to uphold or apply the law. The ballot box (elections) don't work when politicians refuse to participate fairly. The soap box (social media, media, etc) doesn't work when people refuse to listen and/or willfully censor opposing viewpoints. That leaves one last box, and discussing it is frowned upon, for good reason. It is a terrible place to be driven to. The bitter truth is that laws (including the Constitution) only mean what we're willing to make them mean. And that involves more than words. It doesn't necessarily mean shooting people, but it does mean opposing and resisting in more ways than simply talking. My 2 cents, at least. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Is there anything we can do? Lawsuit? This sh*t is beyond insane. The jury box (lawsuits) don't work when courts refuse to uphold or apply the law. The ballot box (elections) don't work when politicians refuse to participate fairly. The soap box (social media, media, etc) doesn't work when people refuse to listen and/or willfully censor opposing viewpoints. That leaves one last box, and discussing it is frowned upon, for good reason. It is a terrible place to be driven to. The bitter truth is that laws (including the Constitution) only mean what we're willing to make them mean. And that involves more than words. It doesn't necessarily mean shooting people, but it does mean opposing and resisting in more ways than simply talking. My 2 cents, at least. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 9:57:23 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The jury box (lawsuits) don't work when courts refuse to uphold or apply the law. The ballot box (elections) don't work when politicians refuse to participate fairly. The soap box (social media, media, etc) doesn't work when people refuse to listen and/or willfully censor opposing viewpoints. That leaves one last box, and discussing it is frowned upon, for good reason. It is a terrible place to be driven to. The bitter truth is that laws (including the Constitution) only mean what we're willing to make them mean. And that involves more than words. It doesn't necessarily mean shooting people, but it does mean opposing and resisting in more ways than simply talking. My 2 cents, at least. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Is there anything we can do? Lawsuit? This sh*t is beyond insane. The jury box (lawsuits) don't work when courts refuse to uphold or apply the law. The ballot box (elections) don't work when politicians refuse to participate fairly. The soap box (social media, media, etc) doesn't work when people refuse to listen and/or willfully censor opposing viewpoints. That leaves one last box, and discussing it is frowned upon, for good reason. It is a terrible place to be driven to. The bitter truth is that laws (including the Constitution) only mean what we're willing to make them mean. And that involves more than words. It doesn't necessarily mean shooting people, but it does mean opposing and resisting in more ways than simply talking. My 2 cents, at least. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:08:29 PM EDT
[#24]
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22651 Re: From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2011-11-02 15:05 Subject: Re: Thank you John. I am sorry for the panic last night - we are all deeply profoundly sad at my grandmother's passing and all more sensitive - I also was deeply concerned when my Dad called last night and was very upset and couldn't reach Cheryl and knew he needed some other heads. I hope you connected with him or do connect with him and I will call you after 6:30 tonight, thank you. I had to have minor surgery this morning (all fine) but will be back up by then. Thanks. On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:58 PM, John Podesta <[email protected]>wrote: > Sorry,still getting used to the email tags. I'm around between 3:00 > and 5:00 and after 6:30 tonight. Want to talk? Any of those times > work? > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Anna James <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi John - if you get this please call me. Thank you. 917-856-5644. > |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/21/2016 10:21:15 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is there anything we can do? Lawsuit? This sh*t is beyond insane. The jury box (lawsuits) don't work when courts refuse to uphold or apply the law. The ballot box (elections) don't work when politicians refuse to participate fairly. The soap box (social media, media, etc) doesn't work when people refuse to listen and/or willfully censor opposing viewpoints. That leaves one last box, and discussing it is frowned upon, for good reason. It is a terrible place to be driven to. The bitter truth is that laws (including the Constitution) only mean what we're willing to make them mean. And that involves more than words. It doesn't necessarily mean shooting people, but it does mean opposing and resisting in more ways than simply talking. My 2 cents, at least. Still on the ballot box for now. But these interesting times are far too interesting. Hopefully the O'keefe video and the next set of dumps are great! |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 8:08:55 AM EDT
[#26]
Since its been a couple days since the last leak that this is going to be the last one?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 8:21:04 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Since its been a couple days since the last leak that this is going to be the last one? The last leak was yesterday, m-f there have been leaks. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 8:31:37 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The last leak was yesterday, m-f there have been leaks. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Since its been a couple days since the last leak that this is going to be the last one? The last leak was yesterday, m-f there have been leaks. When I logged on I looked for a new leak thread and didn't see one. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 8:57:18 AM EDT
[#29]
Dump 15 email id# 25204-26299
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2016 9:09:08 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is there anything we can do? Lawsuit? This sh*t is beyond insane. The jury box (lawsuits) don't work when courts refuse to uphold or apply the law. The ballot box (elections) don't work when politicians refuse to participate fairly. The soap box (social media, media, etc) doesn't work when people refuse to listen and/or willfully censor opposing viewpoints. That leaves one last box, and discussing it is frowned upon, for good reason. It is a terrible place to be driven to. The bitter truth is that laws (including the Constitution) only mean what we're willing to make them mean. And that involves more than words. It doesn't necessarily mean shooting people, but it does mean opposing and resisting in more ways than simply talking. My 2 cents, at least. This is the discussion I was hoping to drive. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
.jpg)
