User Panel
ha, that's nothing....you should have seen the time when clinton and it went all over the and the next thing we know didn't even show for until it was and we were in until there wasn't anymore to see.
|
|
|
View Quote The original article even had a list of 47 people who had died just before they released Dirt on the Klintons |
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: ha, that's nothing....you should have seen the time when clinton and it went all over the and the next thing we know didn't even show for until it was and we were in until there wasn't anymore to see. Come again... Drinkin' early. |
|
1. Election Rigging and Fraud. This is a current scandal on the minds of voters today. As has been documented extensively in both the corporate and alternative media, this Democratic primary was rigged in countless ways for Clinton from the very beginning. The media began counting superdelegates in October as if they’d already voted even though today they still haven’t; the DNC performed something shockingly similar to money laundering for the Clinton campaign to circumvent donation maximums and funnel millions to her campaign; the debates were reduced, canceled, or scheduled at times few people would watch, which prevented Bernie Sanders from becoming better known earlier in the primary; and the primary rules as a whole were written and rewritten by DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, who happens to be a longtime Clinton friend and ally.
Even worse: voter rolls were mysteriously purged in many states; caucus rules were changed suddenly; and actual votes were flipped by the thousands in many states, according to scientific analysis. In nearly every single instance, the election fraud and rigging of the rules favored Clinton. The fact that Clinton benefited so much from all of this and never said anything about it, for many, is the straw that broke the camel’s back. It’s one thing if an imperfect system is a little bit unfair here and there. It’s another thing if the rules are systematically broken, always in favor of one candidate, and the beneficiary simply takes the spoils and runs. Mathematicians and election analysts have shown that when likely fraud is taken into account, Bernie Sanders might be rightfully winning right now going into the convention. At the very least, if Clinton values party unity, she should call for investigations and, where merited by evidence, request recounts or even revotes. That would go a long, long way to building party unity. Most voters want, first and foremost, a basic sense that the election has been fair. This scandal has gotten little corporate media coverage so far, but it has been covered extensively in alternative media. Were Clinton viewed generally as trustworthy, this might not matter so much, but as it is, it’s a reason many independent voters remain uneasy, if not outright suspicious, about Hillary. 2. The Clinton Foundation. Mentioned above, this scandal is problematic even from a nonpartisan standpoint. There is a disturbing correlation between large donations accepted by the Clinton Foundation from repressive regimes, on the one hand, and enormous weapons deals approved for those same repressive regimes by the Clinton-led State Department, on the other. To an honest, nonpartisan observer, it appears raising money for her foundation was at least as important as sending arms to repressive Middle Eastern regimes. Here’s a segment that covers this scandal in a vituperative but informative short documentary from investigative journalist Abby Martin. 3. Drug Money in Arkansas. Of the many other scandals surrounding the Clintons’ rise to power in Arkansas and Washington, DC— I’m leaving out anything to do with Bill Clinton’s affairs and alleged sexual violence?—?this one scandal, to many progressives and independents, is the most damning. You don’t have to be a Republican to become suspicious when you learn the role the Clintons played in the longstanding importation of cocaine into the rural Mena, Arkansas airport by the CIA; this took place as part of the Iran-Contra scandal, while Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas. The corporate media at first ignored the Mena story, but as numerous independent sources reported that the Clintons reaped benefits from this cocaine trafficking, it eventually broke through into the corporate media too. Millions in cash were evidently laundered through a state agency the Clintons created?—?the Arkansas Development Finance Authority?—?and some of the money was used to fund their political rise. 4. Dead People. This one is the most difficult to contemplate, most difficult to prove, and most difficult to ignore. I mention it because it would seriously stain a Clinton candidacy in the eyes of many independent voters come November. Ninety-one people who have been close, politically or personally, to the Clintons have died in unusual or unexplained circumstances during the Clintons’ time in Arkansas and national politics. Not included in that devastating count are two people who died just in the past month: Young DNC data director Seth Rich, who was managing Democratic Party voter records and had a passion for election integrity, was murdered via four shots to the back in Washington DC; and John Ashe, former UN President who was about to testify in a corruption case surrounding a Chinese businessman with connections to the Clintons, died in New York apparently from a dumbbell falling on his neck. Please note that I’m not making an allegation about either of these particular murders, just conveying the horrifying sense of this strange series of deaths. This piece recounts forty or so of the worst, if you want to read more. Perhaps it’s enough to say that many independent and progressive voters view the Clintons as actual criminals. For many people, there’s just too much evidence to reject out of hand these deaths as—to use the most anti-intellectual epithet of our time—a ‘conspiracy theory.’ It’s an ugly picture indeed. View Quote |
|
|
An interesting article and video (I've got the strangest boner right now....)
Turn the tables on the bitch and paint her as a great friend of Trump. She came to all his stuff.....she donated money to his causes. Make her look the the wanta be uber rich elite that the thinks she is..... Fracture that party. There are far far more poor hippies, communists, and stoners than rich ones. |
|
she's not even in office yet. Wait and see what she does once she has the crown and scepter.
|
|
I'm half-tempted to put it on my blog, hosted on my own EU domain on my server in Switzerland.
|
|
a lot of "news stories" you see on some of those sites are just press reelases from the WH or Hillary's campaign.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: it's all been rediscovered. The author is pretty pissed about it, ranting on FB about HuffPo censoring him View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Have you checked your cached files? it's all been rediscovered. The author is pretty pissed about it, ranting on FB about HuffPo censoring him |
|
Quoted:
I'm talkin' about looking in your browser history and digging it up from the temp files stored on your computer, or have you found the article? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Have you checked your cached files? it's all been rediscovered. The author is pretty pissed about it, ranting on FB about HuffPo censoring him found elsewhere, it has been removed from Huffpo |
|
Multiple sources now, many more people reading it than if it were just on the Huffing Paint Post...a nice example of the "Streisand Effect".
|
|
|
Quoted:
Version posted by author, I think. Full version (previous links are not), no ads. EDIT: Author commented that he has no idea why his article was pulled. https://medium.com/@tonybrasunas/the-deeper-reason-independents-and-progressives-will-not-support-hillary-clinton-db79a10b23c7#.1t68ffpby View Quote That opens Outlook for me. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Version posted by author, I think. Full version (previous links are not), no ads. EDIT: Author commented that he has no idea why his article was pulled. https://medium.com/@tonybrasunas/the-deeper-reason-independents-and-progressives-will-not-support-hillary-clinton-db79a10b23c7#.1t68ffpby That opens Outlook for me. the article in its entirety is about 10 posts up |
|
Quoted:
Multiple sources now, many more people reading it than if it were just on the Huffing Paint Post...a nice example of the "Streisand Effect". View Quote Yep. I'd have never seen it on huffpo, now I've read it in its entirety. Not that I am in any way the target audience, of course. |
|
Quoted:
the way you've got it formatted, it turns to an email link. can you fix it so it doesn't? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Version posted by author, I think. Full version (previous links are not), no ads. EDIT: Author commented that he has no idea why his article was pulled. https://medium.com/@tonybrasunas/the-deeper-reason-independents-and-progressives-will-not-support-hillary-clinton-db79a10b23c7#.1t68ffpby the way you've got it formatted, it turns to an email link. can you fix it so it doesn't? Thanks, fixed. Sorry, clicked the wrong button. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Version posted by author, I think. Full version (previous links are not), no ads. EDIT: Author commented that he has no idea why his article was pulled. https://medium.com/@tonybrasunas/the-deeper-reason-independents-and-progressives-will-not-support-hillary-clinton-db79a10b23c7#.1t68ffpby That opens Outlook for me. Yeah, my bad, looks like I clicked "insert email" button instead of "insert URL". Fixed now. Here is the proper link again, for good measure. Article is posted here, but it's nicer formatted and has links if you read it in the blog. https://medium.com/@tonybrasunas/the-deeper-reason-independents-and-progressives-will-not-support-hillary-clinton-db79a10b23c7#.fs9gp3wjm |
|
The thing is, this article was posted in their open contributor network or whatever the fuck they call it, but not representative of HuffPo or its editors/views/etc. And it still got pulled.
|
|
Quoted:
The thing is, this article was posted in their open contributor network or whatever the fuck they call it, but not representative of HuffPo or its editors/views/etc. And it still got pulled. View Quote It's not just that they objected to being associated with the information, they objected to the information itself. |
|
Quoted:
It's not just that they objected to being associated with the information, they objected to the information itself. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The thing is, this article was posted in their open contributor network or whatever the fuck they call it, but not representative of HuffPo or its editors/views/etc. And it still got pulled. It's not just that they objected to being associated with the information, they objected to the information itself. That's pretty brutal, honestly. I'm not exactly a journalist, but I collaborate with a few smaller "Russian troll" websites - and those guys pretty much never pull articles that have already been posted. Heck, I've seen a couple authors kicked out of group blogs for writing weird conspiracy shit, but the articles that caused it still weren't pulled, at most they had a disclaimer added. |
|
Quoted:
That's pretty brutal, honestly. I'm not exactly a journalist, but I collaborate with a few smaller "Russian troll" websites - and those guys pretty much never pull articles that have already been posted. Heck, I've seen a couple authors kicked out of group blogs for writing weird conspiracy shit, but the articles that caused it still weren't pulled, at most they had a disclaimer added. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The thing is, this article was posted in their open contributor network or whatever the fuck they call it, but not representative of HuffPo or its editors/views/etc. And it still got pulled. It's not just that they objected to being associated with the information, they objected to the information itself. That's pretty brutal, honestly. I'm not exactly a journalist, but I collaborate with a few smaller "Russian troll" websites - and those guys pretty much never pull articles that have already been posted. Heck, I've seen a couple authors kicked out of group blogs for writing weird conspiracy shit, but the articles that caused it still weren't pulled, at most they had a disclaimer added. Yeah, but did keeping those weird conspiracy articles up get them on the Clinton kill list? Some things are probably more motivating than others. |
|
Quoted:
Yeah, but did keeping those weird conspiracy articles up get them on the Clinton kill list? Some things are probably more motivating than others. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The thing is, this article was posted in their open contributor network or whatever the fuck they call it, but not representative of HuffPo or its editors/views/etc. And it still got pulled. It's not just that they objected to being associated with the information, they objected to the information itself. That's pretty brutal, honestly. I'm not exactly a journalist, but I collaborate with a few smaller "Russian troll" websites - and those guys pretty much never pull articles that have already been posted. Heck, I've seen a couple authors kicked out of group blogs for writing weird conspiracy shit, but the articles that caused it still weren't pulled, at most they had a disclaimer added. Yeah, but did keeping those weird conspiracy articles up get them on the Clinton kill list? Some things are probably more motivating than others. I was gonna joke about the Putin kill list*, but then I realized Putin likely assassinated far fewer people than Hillary**. Let that sink in for a minute. * one of the guys kept writing "Putin killed him" whenever anyone in UA got assassinated, whereas in reality it was probably local squabbling over coal smuggling ** not counting dropping cruise missiles on Chechen insurgent leaders and such, OFC |
|
Quoted: it's all been rediscovered. The author is pretty pissed about it, ranting on FB about HuffPo censoring him View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Have you checked your cached files? it's all been rediscovered. The author is pretty pissed about it, ranting on FB about HuffPo censoring him Link to the rant? Would like to share that on FB myself |
|
Quoted:
This was a hit piece on her from a Berner View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
a lot of "news stories" you see on some of those sites are just press reelases from the WH or Hillary's campaign. This was a hit piece on her from a Berner mine was a general statement. It has been pointed out more than once by the NRA, where some political entity sends a press release to their favored paper, who dutifully post the statistics as ground truth, without any fact-checking. It's the weak sister to the Stalinesque denial of fact. |
|
Quoted:
Thanks, fixed. Sorry, clicked the wrong button. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Version posted by author, I think. Full version (previous links are not), no ads. EDIT: Author commented that he has no idea why his article was pulled. https://medium.com/@tonybrasunas/the-deeper-reason-independents-and-progressives-will-not-support-hillary-clinton-db79a10b23c7#.1t68ffpby the way you've got it formatted, it turns to an email link. can you fix it so it doesn't? Thanks, fixed. Sorry, clicked the wrong button. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Version posted by author, I think. Full version (previous links are not), no ads. EDIT: Author commented that he has no idea why his article was pulled. https://medium.com/@tonybrasunas/the-deeper-reason-independents-and-progressives-will-not-support-hillary-clinton-db79a10b23c7#.1t68ffpby the way you've got it formatted, it turns to an email link. can you fix it so it doesn't? Thanks, fixed. Sorry, clicked the wrong button. I find your sigline to be quite appropriate for this thread. |
|
Quoted:
This was a hit piece on her from a Berner View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
a lot of "news stories" you see on some of those sites are just press reelases from the WH or Hillary's campaign. This was a hit piece on her from a Berner Yeah... and your point? |
|
Huff also pulled a review of Vaxxed, then blocked the liberal author who wrote the peice. Eventually we was able to write again, but this guy thought he was fired over a documentary review. If it doesn't fit the liberal agenda... huff post will kill it.
https://sharylattkisson.com/review-of-vaxxed-deleted-from-huffington-post/ |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
a lot of "news stories" you see on some of those sites are just press reelases from the WH or Hillary's campaign. This was a hit piece on her from a Berner Yeah... and your point? Appearently stating the truth is now called a "hit piece" |
|
Funny in that reddit thread someone posted "This information needs to get out...."
Conservative sources have been saying this for DECADES. |
|
Quoted:
Version posted by author, I think. Full version (previous links are not), no ads. EDIT: Author commented that he has no idea why his article was pulled. https://medium.com/@tonybrasunas/the-deeper-reason-independents-and-progressives-will-not-support-hillary-clinton-db79a10b23c7#.fs9gp3wjm View Quote Let me guess you were the poster in the comments who linked to this thread? Are you trying to bring trolls here? |
|
Quoted:
Funny in that reddit thread someone posted "This information needs to get out...." Conservative sources have been saying this for DECADES. View Quote I was more focused on how they were falling all over themselves debating whether the author's use of intelligent was "okay" "You mean some people on our side are being called unintelligent?!" You don't say |
|
Never happened. Also, this weeks chocolate ration has been increased to 25 grams. Just ask Snopes.
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.