I see you're making almost as much sense as usual.  

If your square-one position were not "The Police Are Always Right", you could see that the most unjust and wide ranging deprivation of liberty precipitated upon us by the War On Un-Taxed Drugs was and has been accomplished via asset forfeiture.

People, like Donald Scott, are stolen from, abused, and even murdered in pursuit of seizing their assets (especially money), and, based on your statements, that's good by you.  

Nobody was prosecuted or even fired for the conspiracy and obvious lies that resulted in Scott being shot to death in his own home.  

Not even ONE pot plant or joint was found.  

In light of that sort of outcome, yes, I would rather see dope dealers keep their second-hand 'Vette's or off-lease Lexus.  

Still, Yaaaaay for gettin' them dopers!

Thanks for clearing things up for me.

Edit for spelling/grammar.

The county sheriff down in Junction had one for a while. Of course he had nothing better to do than cruise up and down I-10 catching speeders.

It saves you the taxpayer from funding stuff the agency needs

You keep citing one example.
If someone could have been proven to have acted criminally in the Scott case then they should have been prosecuted
You don't always find drugs when you execute a warrant
That doesn't mean there wasn't justification for filing for and obtaining the warrant....DESPITE what happened in one case that you are hung up on
I get it that you're pro-street drugs.
I would hope for more from law-abiding gun owners, myself
I am always disappointed to read people who should be law-abiding posting in support of stuff like illicit drugs
Inevitably they sink to the "alcohol is worse" argument, which I also disagree with.

No kidding.  I'm always paranoid about not having a front plate and here these guys don't either.

Like what? Enforcing the Law?

I keep citing that example because it is the archetype, and a strong argument can be made that it set the tone and model for the whole regime of asset forfeiture.

And, I can see that you don't like to even touch on the idea that our liberty is curtailed in a particularly egregious way by this practice, and by those in LE, like yourself, who defend the practice.

Again, thanks for making your position clear.

You keep citing that one example because you want to believe that it fits your narrative on every warrant execution and every instance of asset forfeiture
No, I don't believe that our liberties are encroached upon by going after the assets of criminals
Criminals should not benefit from their criminal activities.

A couple of addenda for you.

What's TX law on tinted headlights?  Those things look blacked out.

Vehicle regs?  

That's for little people.