Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 26
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 2/24/2014 6:51:18 AM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I agree.  Now if we could get Cin and Ric to see that he wasn't operating under the guidance of a Russian handler maybe this discussion could move forward.

As to the danger Snowden posed to the US government, I don't doubt it at all.  They are/were instituting an overly broad dragnet of American Citizen's data in order to facilitate catching no one ever.

Their ship is listing, IMO it is far more the government's fault than it is Snowden's.   Alas, I have serious doubts he took with him all that has been alleged.  They must "consider" it compromised, but frankly that's their fault too for not compartmenting information as that level classification is required and allowing too broad of access.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Honestly, I was expecting a ".gov is more dangerouser" response.

Let me make the point another way. Nation-states which engage in espionage generally take some care in making secrets known in the interest of maintaining stability in international relations. Painting a potentially hostile nation into a corner is a dangerous game.


I agree.  Now if we could get Cin and Ric to see that he wasn't operating under the guidance of a Russian handler maybe this discussion could move forward.

As to the danger Snowden posed to the US government, I don't doubt it at all.  They are/were instituting an overly broad dragnet of American Citizen's data in order to facilitate catching no one ever.

Their ship is listing, IMO it is far more the government's fault than it is Snowden's.   Alas, I have serious doubts he took with him all that has been alleged.  They must "consider" it compromised, but frankly that's their fault too for not compartmenting information as that level classification is required and allowing too broad of access.


We are generally in agreement. We do need to get past the notion that, because .gov is doing things that are outside the scope of what Joe Citizen cares about, .gov is not acting in the general best interests of the populace. I don't buy that there is an interest in using data on Americans outside of where it intersects with their mission as defined. Where it does intersect, there are standards and procedures that dictate how it is handled.

As a side note, compartmentalization goes to shit when policy is violated and credentials are shared. Not enough information available to determine whether that was the sole factor. The physical security lapse is another angle which has not been reported on.
Link Posted: 2/24/2014 6:52:54 AM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

.................

Alleged massive theft.
 They are "considering compromised" anything he may have had access to, but there's ZERO evidence to back up that consideration.  

View Quote


I think he probably stole a lot of classified stuff, including military planning info.
Link Posted: 2/24/2014 12:02:33 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Russian handlers do what Russian handlers do, and they don't do it this way.

But you're going to believe what you want.  Doesn't matter because you're wrong.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:


It would be better for a handler to keep his asset in place and quietly exfiltrating information.  For a handler to take an asset that apparently had unfettered and undetected access to government TS information and have him suddenly leave allowing the US government to realize they've been had but to also leak information internationally tipping them off 100% for certain is idiotic.

Spying is about maintaining the assets in place for as long as possible.  This doesn't fit the bill very well if at all.


You are very much mistaken.  Spying is not about the method of spying.  Spying is merely a means to acquire information, or to achieve access to enable an action; all in support of a desired end state.

On this case, Snowden's massive theft answered that mail, and the IO campaign has been very successful.  Had he slowly stolen info, and passed it bit by bit, he could have been discovered.  

Instead, he has managed to create an army of useful idiots who hail him as a heroic whistleblower, and are demanding that the NSA be eliminated/neutered.  

The idea that he could not be seen as a "spy", because he did not remain on the shadows, passing info to trench coated handlers via x marked dead drops and brush passes is just ridiculous and naive.



Russian handlers do what Russian handlers do, and they don't do it this way.

But you're going to believe what you want.  Doesn't matter because you're wrong.


You're speaking spy novel gibberish.

Just a week ago, Russians intercepted phone calls between our Ukrainian AMB and senior state department officials.  Rather than continuing to quietly collect from this source of info, they put the call out on YouTube.  They do what they do based on circumstances and how they can benefit.  

On the one hand, the Snowden lovers insist that he couldn't have been working for Russia, because there's no hard evidence.
They also claim that there's no evidence of Russian tradecraft.  That's just dumb.


Link Posted: 2/24/2014 12:11:17 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You're speaking spy novel gibberish.

Just a week ago, Russians intercepted phone calls between our Ukrainian AMB and senior state department officials.  Rather than continuing to quietly collect from this source of info, they put the call out on YouTube.  They do what they do based on circumstances and how they can benefit.  

On the one hand, the Snowden lovers insist that he couldn't have been working for Russia, because there's no hard evidence.
They also claim that there's no evidence of Russian tradecraft.  That's just dumb.


View Quote


Link and proof that it was a Russian intercept.
Link Posted: 2/24/2014 12:19:04 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Link and proof that it was a Russian intercept.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
You're speaking spy novel gibberish.

Just a week ago, Russians intercepted phone calls between our Ukrainian AMB and senior state department officials.  Rather than continuing to quietly collect from this source of info, they put the call out on YouTube.  They do what they do based on circumstances and how they can benefit.  

On the one hand, the Snowden lovers insist that he couldn't have been working for Russia, because there's no hard evidence.
They also claim that there's no evidence of Russian tradecraft.  That's just dumb.




Link and proof that it was a Russian intercept.


Try to stay more current.  
Link Posted: 2/24/2014 12:26:47 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Try to stay more current.  
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You're speaking spy novel gibberish.

Just a week ago, Russians intercepted phone calls between our Ukrainian AMB and senior state department officials.  Rather than continuing to quietly collect from this source of info, they put the call out on YouTube.  They do what they do based on circumstances and how they can benefit.  

On the one hand, the Snowden lovers insist that he couldn't have been working for Russia, because there's no hard evidence.
They also claim that there's no evidence of Russian tradecraft.  That's just dumb.




Link and proof that it was a Russian intercept.


Try to stay more current.  


So it didn't happen.
Link Posted: 2/24/2014 12:30:47 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


So it didn't happen.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You're speaking spy novel gibberish.

Just a week ago, Russians intercepted phone calls between our Ukrainian AMB and senior state department officials.  Rather than continuing to quietly collect from this source of info, they put the call out on YouTube.  They do what they do based on circumstances and how they can benefit.  

On the one hand, the Snowden lovers insist that he couldn't have been working for Russia, because there's no hard evidence.
They also claim that there's no evidence of Russian tradecraft.  That's just dumb.




Link and proof that it was a Russian intercept.


Try to stay more current.  


So it didn't happen.

It happened.  I'm driving right now and can't do a simple search for you.

Do a search for "fuck the EU"

Link Posted: 2/24/2014 12:40:26 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It happened.  I'm driving right now and can't do a simple search for you.

Do a search for "fuck the EU"

View Quote


This shit is so damn important to you that you post whilst driving...



Found it, and even though it's an interesting sidebar it doesn't prove anything WRT Snowden.

Link Posted: 2/24/2014 1:04:02 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


This shit is so damn important to you that you post whilst driving...

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
It happened.  I'm driving right now and can't do a simple search for you.

Do a search for "fuck the EU"



This shit is so damn important to you that you post whilst driving...

Obviously not, or I would have replied before heading out on the road...


Found it, and even though it's an interesting sidebar it doesn't prove anything WRT Snowden.

it proves that your assumptions regarding Russian tradecraft are flawed.  The Russians are pragmatic, if nothing else.


Wikileaks and Russian Intelligence have been cooperating throughout this whole episode. He'll, they even gave Assange his own TV show.

Wikileaks is an organization largely devoted to convincing useful idiot Americans to steal classified data, and give it to them so they can make it public.

Russia would be foolish to not make every effort to leverage such an enterprise.  Which apparently, they have.

Wikileaks has NEVER leaked a Russian document or email.  Not a one.

It's amazing how people are willing to blind themselves to something so obvious.

Link Posted: 2/24/2014 3:19:40 PM EDT
[#10]
Snowden didn't use wikileaks.
Link Posted: 2/24/2014 3:29:47 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Snowden didn't use wikileaks.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Snowden didn't use wikileaks.


Snowden was 100% facilitated by Wikileaks, and by Wikileaks comrades (Greenwald).  

He now resides in Russia with a KGB lawyer and Wikileaks advisor always at his side, FSB. "Minders" always present.

Why is it that Wikileaks is now always there?  In Russia.

  Snowden's life in Russia has been overseen by Anatoly Kucherena, a lawyer employed by the FSB, as well as Sarah Harrison, a WikiLeaks advisor who has reportedly been by Snowden's side since he was in China....      


No one is so naive as to not see what is really going on here.  A Wikileaks advisor?  There at the safe house, with the FSB?

Wake up.
Page / 26
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top