Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 4
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 3:09:11 AM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History

One of my all time favorites.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 3:20:11 AM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Lithuania is bringing back limited conscription and looking at a rapid purchase of IFVs to replace/supplement their M113s. Estonia is spending more,introducing mandatory military classes in high school to prepare for conscription/service academy and growing participation in the civilian Defense League,including pushing members to keep their AK4s (Swedish made G3s) and Galils at home rather than at an armory. A whole,whole bunch more Javelins and Stingers would be nice. ARTHUR and some HIMARS would be really nice but when it comes down to it: a tiny,poor nation of a million people can only do so much. Part of that so much is Russia know that taking the country is one thing,occupying it would be another.
View Quote


This is one thing that really pisses me off about U.S. foreign aid. Every year we give something like $1.5 billion to the likes of Pakistan, a nation that for all intents and purposes harbored Osama bin Laden and still likely harbors Al-Zawahiri today. Those people are not our friends. Any military aid money we give them is a complete waste. If anything, we should be bombing the fuckers rather than providing them with money and tech. The government types can spin it however they want, but Pakistan isn't nor will it ever be a friend to the United States. With that in mind, I wish we would take that annual $1.5 billion and give it to countries like Estonia. You may only have a tiny population, but I bet you could buy enough hardware with that sort of money to make any attempted Russian invasion/occupation a nightmare for them. And unlike the Pakistanis, you guys are indeed real friends deserving of such support.

And besides just defense funds, we have lots of useful hardware just sitting around not being used. I wonder just how many M113 APCs there are sitting in storage around this country. The same goes for artillery pieces. Rather than dumping surplus tanks and armored vehicles into the fucking ocean to serve as artificial reefs (a very democrat thing to do I might add), we should be giving them to our friends to help them hold off potential enemies like Putin. And there are likely hundreds or maybe even a thousand used F-16s sitting in storage at AMARC, some of them reasonably fresh. How about we pull some of those from storage, bring them up to Block 52+ or Block 60 standards and sell them at a discount price (or even donate some of them) to the Baltic states? That would greatly help them in their air policing mission and make them less dependent on NATO.

That said, you should not have to stand alone against Russia. If Russia attempts any such moves on ANY country that is a NATO member, I as an American expect my elected leadership to follow through with their obligations and bring forth a massive response in reply. I was alive for the latter portion of the Cold War and never again do I want to see any sovereign countries behind the Iron Curtain. If Russia insists on war, then by god, give it to them with both barrels. To stand around and do nothing while they attack NATO member states would be the worst thing we could do. Some things are worth fighting for. Preventing a new Soviet Union under the leadership of Vladimir Putin is one of those things. And even my old ass would be willing to fight for that cause if Uncle Sam will take me.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 6:15:15 AM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Lithuania is bringing back limited conscription and looking at a rapid purchase of IFVs to replace/supplement their M113s. Estonia is spending more,introducing mandatory military classes in high school to prepare for conscription/service academy and growing participation in the civilian Defense League,including pushing members to keep their AK4s (Swedish made G3s) and Galils at home rather than at an armory. A whole,whole bunch more Javelins and Stingers would be nice. ARTHUR and some HIMARS would be really nice but when it comes down to it: a tiny,poor nation of a million people can only do so much. Part of that so much is Russia know that taking the country is one thing,occupying it would be another.
View Quote

Statist Lithuanians attack the very Principles of Freedum' with their Indentured Gubermint Servitude.

True Lovers of Liberty would retreat to Galt's Gulch and just wait for the bad people to go away.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 6:49:52 AM EDT
[#4]
This is not 1969. Puting would get a bloody nose from the Poles. More like Miracle of Warsaw.

And yes, I am serious. The Poles would kick the Russians like the dogs they are.

No love for the Russians from my side, FVP and FBHO
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 6:51:36 AM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Historically, Poland has been hung out to dry by its other European allies - what twice? three times in the 20th century?  And Obama in the White House?  I know which way I'd be betting if I were Poland.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Georgia and Ukraine aren't NATO allies. We'd provide much more aid to Poland facing a full-fledged Russian invasion than we ever will with Ukraine fighting "separatists". If Poland gets invaded, I suspect we'd have some B-2's headed that direction within a day or two.


Historically, Poland has been hung out to dry by its other European allies - what twice? three times in the 20th century?  And Obama in the White House?  I know which way I'd be betting if I were Poland.


WTF could have France and England have done in 1939 to stop the Germans? THey declared WAR on the Nazis over Poland. I would not call that letting them hang out to dry. 1945 otoh...
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 6:59:36 AM EDT
[#6]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
WTF could have France and England have done in 1939 to stop the Germans? THey declared WAR on the Nazis over Poland. I would not call that letting them hang out to dry. 1945 otoh...
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:



Georgia and Ukraine aren't NATO allies. We'd provide much more aid to Poland facing a full-fledged Russian invasion than we ever will with Ukraine fighting "separatists". If Poland gets invaded, I suspect we'd have some B-2's headed that direction within a day or two.




Historically, Poland has been hung out to dry by its other European allies - what twice? three times in the 20th century?  And Obama in the White House?  I know which way I'd be betting if I were Poland.




WTF could have France and England have done in 1939 to stop the Germans? THey declared WAR on the Nazis over Poland. I would not call that letting them hang out to dry. 1945 otoh...
They should of gone to war far before that. The Germans repeatedly violated the treaty of Versailles in the 30s instead of smashing them early on they picked appeasement.

 
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 7:10:44 AM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They should of gone to war far before that. The Germans repeatedly violated the treaty of Versailles in the 30s instead of smashing them early on they picked appeasement.  
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Georgia and Ukraine aren't NATO allies. We'd provide much more aid to Poland facing a full-fledged Russian invasion than we ever will with Ukraine fighting "separatists". If Poland gets invaded, I suspect we'd have some B-2's headed that direction within a day or two.


Historically, Poland has been hung out to dry by its other European allies - what twice? three times in the 20th century?  And Obama in the White House?  I know which way I'd be betting if I were Poland.


WTF could have France and England have done in 1939 to stop the Germans? THey declared WAR on the Nazis over Poland. I would not call that letting them hang out to dry. 1945 otoh...
They should of gone to war far before that. The Germans repeatedly violated the treaty of Versailles in the 30s instead of smashing them early on they picked appeasement.  

You would have millions of neo nazis that way "we did not do anything and the others were the aggressor"

Better kick them with their pants down.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 7:15:42 AM EDT
[#8]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:





You would have millions of neo nazis that way "we did not do anything and the others were the aggressor"



Better kick them with their pants down.

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:


Quoted:





Historically, Poland has been hung out to dry by its other European allies - what twice? three times in the 20th century?  And Obama in the White House?  I know which way I'd be betting if I were Poland.




WTF could have France and England have done in 1939 to stop the Germans? THey declared WAR on the Nazis over Poland. I would not call that letting them hang out to dry. 1945 otoh...
They should of gone to war far before that. The Germans repeatedly violated the treaty of Versailles in the 30s instead of smashing them early on they picked appeasement.  


You would have millions of neo nazis that way "we did not do anything and the others were the aggressor"



Better kick them with their pants down.

millions of neo nazis vs 60 million deaths?

 
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 7:23:23 AM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Poland probably gets it's ass kicked, but does it really matter if on Week 5 the Russians are sipping lattes (or more likely drinking vodka) in Warsaw if two weeks later they're all dead?

Poland would put up a fearsome fight, probably lose, and then the rest of NATO would come in and stomp a new mudhole in Russia, probably to the point that they'd try to nuke us, and we'd nuke them, and they'd nuke us. It'd be a mess if Russia invaded Poland. It'll probably be a mess if Russia tries to invade the Baltic states.

Georgia and Ukraine aren't NATO allies. We'd provide much more aid to Poland facing a full-fledged Russian invasion than we ever will with Ukraine fighting "separatists". If Poland gets invaded, I suspect we'd have some B-2's headed that direction within a day or two.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Does Poland get NATO air support during those six weeks?

ETA: Are we providing them intelligence and maybe launching TLAMs at the invading Bear, or is it really Poland, isolated and alone, against the Russians?


It is Poland by itself, nobody else, for the first six weeks.  No other support except for the lame kind of support we gave our other supposed allies when the Bear decided to make a snack of them (i.e. intel support, "humanitarian" aid, sanctions, etc.).  At the end of the six weeks, it is every member of NATO and whatever NATO forces are presently located anywhere in Europe plus two U.S. heavy brigades. Air, Sea, Land, - the whole shebang.  Conventional forces only though.

Poland probably gets it's ass kicked, but does it really matter if on Week 5 the Russians are sipping lattes (or more likely drinking vodka) in Warsaw if two weeks later they're all dead?

Poland would put up a fearsome fight, probably lose, and then the rest of NATO would come in and stomp a new mudhole in Russia, probably to the point that they'd try to nuke us, and we'd nuke them, and they'd nuke us. It'd be a mess if Russia invaded Poland. It'll probably be a mess if Russia tries to invade the Baltic states.

Georgia and Ukraine aren't NATO allies. We'd provide much more aid to Poland facing a full-fledged Russian invasion than we ever will with Ukraine fighting "separatists". If Poland gets invaded, I suspect we'd have some B-2's headed that direction within a day or two.

What alternate reality are YOU living in, sunshine???? Wait, did you mean obama would send B2s in to help Putin? If so, I apologize.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 7:26:06 AM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They should of gone to war far before that. The Germans repeatedly violated the treaty of Versailles in the 30s instead of smashing them early on they picked appeasement.  
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Georgia and Ukraine aren't NATO allies. We'd provide much more aid to Poland facing a full-fledged Russian invasion than we ever will with Ukraine fighting "separatists". If Poland gets invaded, I suspect we'd have some B-2's headed that direction within a day or two.


Historically, Poland has been hung out to dry by its other European allies - what twice? three times in the 20th century?  And Obama in the White House?  I know which way I'd be betting if I were Poland.


WTF could have France and England have done in 1939 to stop the Germans? THey declared WAR on the Nazis over Poland. I would not call that letting them hang out to dry. 1945 otoh...
They should of gone to war far before that. The Germans repeatedly violated the treaty of Versailles in the 30s instead of smashing them early on they picked appeasement.  


As stupid as the declaration of "peace in our day" was, the reality is that Britain was not really in any position that early to do much of anything vis a vis Germany.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 10:51:56 AM EDT
[#11]
They will get hung out to dry.

Look at Ukraine.


Seriously look at the events in Bosnia and Yugoslavia...did intervention happen right away????

It took a WAG THE DOG event for Clinton to even intervene.


Fucken scummy communist democrats.

Link Posted: 2/28/2015 10:53:22 AM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If the 100 hottest women in Russia and the 100 hottest women in Poland were in a giant naked jello wrestling match, who would win?
View Quote


We all would.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:38:25 AM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


WTF could have France and England have done in 1939 to stop the Germans? THey declared WAR on the Nazis over Poland. I would not call that letting them hang out to dry. 1945 otoh...
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Georgia and Ukraine aren't NATO allies. We'd provide much more aid to Poland facing a full-fledged Russian invasion than we ever will with Ukraine fighting "separatists". If Poland gets invaded, I suspect we'd have some B-2's headed that direction within a day or two.


Historically, Poland has been hung out to dry by its other European allies - what twice? three times in the 20th century?  And Obama in the White House?  I know which way I'd be betting if I were Poland.


WTF could have France and England have done in 1939 to stop the Germans? THey declared WAR on the Nazis over Poland. I would not call that letting them hang out to dry. 1945 otoh...


Well, both countries could have not made promises to Poland that they knew they couldn't keep.  They could have better supported Poland's military buildup prior to the war.  After the invasion, both countries waited two days to even declare war.  France waited a week, then "counterattacked" by advancing 8 miles into Germany, stopping, and then telling the Poles to hold out at the Romanian border until the Allies could get there.  The British arrived in Europe on October 3 (Belgium, not Poland) and waited there.  Poland surrendered on October 10.  

Basically, the British knew they couldn't help Poland.  They promised help to Poland to encourage them to sacrifice themselves so Britain would have time to spool up.  Great deal for Britain; but I'm thinking Poland might have sought other alliances had they known what those promises were worth.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 2:37:00 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Some of you have WAYYYY too much faith in the Russian Military...
View Quote




No, they just don't understand that the latest reorganization and disposition of the Russian Army largely takes the conventional brigades off the table as intervention options, other than in Russia itself or on the immediate periphery, which Poland is not part of. And its not like they're gonna invade with just a few airborne regiments and naval infantry battalions.

There is simply no logistics mechanism in the current Russian army to support sending the bulk of the Leningrad and Moscow military districts 800+ miles to Poland. The days of the Soviet offensive machine are dead and gone.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 3:13:14 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:




No, they just don't understand that the latest reorganization and disposition of the Russian Army largely takes the conventional brigades off the table as intervention options, other than in Russia itself or on the immediate periphery, which Poland is not part of. And its not like they're gonna invade with just a few airborne regiments and naval infantry battalions.

There is simply no logistics mechanism in the current Russian army to support sending the bulk of the Leningrad and Moscow military districts 800+ miles to Poland. The days of the Soviet offensive machine are dead and gone.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Some of you have WAYYYY too much faith in the Russian Military...




No, they just don't understand that the latest reorganization and disposition of the Russian Army largely takes the conventional brigades off the table as intervention options, other than in Russia itself or on the immediate periphery, which Poland is not part of. And its not like they're gonna invade with just a few airborne regiments and naval infantry battalions.

There is simply no logistics mechanism in the current Russian army to support sending the bulk of the Leningrad and Moscow military districts 800+ miles to Poland. The days of the Soviet offensive machine are dead and gone.



They could do it just wouldn't be very successful. US is still the king of logistics
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 4:10:34 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I have friends in the Hungarian intelligence community and they are telling me that they do not think NATO will honor article 5.

Hungary has such a token military force thanks to the cut backs by Socialist.


A communist runs Finland and they are refusing new weapons....

you know...in the name of peace and solidarity and brotherhood.
View Quote




We saw how useful NATO was after 9/11 and they voluntarily invoked Article 5.

US: We need  NATO troops to join in combat ground combat in Afghanistan.

NATO: You were serious about that?
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 6:33:20 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:




We saw how useful NATO was after 9/11 and they voluntarily invoked Article 5.

US: We need  NATO troops to join in combat ground combat in Afghanistan.

NATO: You were serious about that?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have friends in the Hungarian intelligence community and they are telling me that they do not think NATO will honor article 5.

Hungary has such a token military force thanks to the cut backs by Socialist.


A communist runs Finland and they are refusing new weapons....

you know...in the name of peace and solidarity and brotherhood.




We saw how useful NATO was after 9/11 and they voluntarily invoked Article 5.

US: We need  NATO troops to join in combat ground combat in Afghanistan.

NATO: You were serious about that?



Utterly untrue.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 7:50:21 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
With a quick wiki, only 120k active troops, 80 modern combat aircraft, and no modern attack helos.

Not to mention, the capital is only about 125km from the border.

I hope they have a ton of SAMs, MANPADS, and ATGM's.
View Quote


They do. And also a shitlload of Leopards thry are modernizing.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 8:02:30 PM EDT
[#19]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They could do it just wouldn't be very successful. US is still the king of logistics
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:





Some of you have WAYYYY too much faith in the Russian Military...

No, they just don't understand that the latest reorganization and disposition of the Russian Army largely takes the conventional brigades off the table as intervention options, other than in Russia itself or on the immediate periphery, which Poland is not part of. And its not like they're gonna invade with just a few airborne regiments and naval infantry battalions.



There is simply no logistics mechanism in the current Russian army to support sending the bulk of the Leningrad and Moscow military districts 800+ miles to Poland. The days of the Soviet offensive machine are dead and gone.






They could do it just wouldn't be very successful. US is still the king of logistics
No doubt, but we are the peasants of Executive leadership. . .



 
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 8:07:48 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
A chain is only as strong as it's weakest link.

Unfortunately the U.S. is the weakest link in the NATO chain at the moment, and NATO looks to the U.S. for leadership.

Poland would be on their own, I'm ashamed to say, but I think they could defeat the Russians if they fight purely defensive war.

Another of OBAMA's fundamental "transformations".
View Quote



Western Europe isn't going to war for Polan or Eesti.

The US? Yeah.

Spain, Belgium, Germany? Nope.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 9:37:13 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Utterly untrue.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have friends in the Hungarian intelligence community and they are telling me that they do not think NATO will honor article 5.

Hungary has such a token military force thanks to the cut backs by Socialist.


A communist runs Finland and they are refusing new weapons....

you know...in the name of peace and solidarity and brotherhood.




We saw how useful NATO was after 9/11 and they voluntarily invoked Article 5.

US: We need  NATO troops to join in combat ground combat in Afghanistan.

NATO: You were serious about that?



Utterly untrue.


The anti NATO stuff that permeates the American Right is fascinating to come across, and it's all over this thread. I wouldn't at all be surprised if some of the messaging didn't originate elsewhere.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 9:38:20 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


As stupid as the declaration of "peace in our day" was, the reality is that Britain was not really in any position that early to do much of anything vis a vis Germany.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Georgia and Ukraine aren't NATO allies. We'd provide much more aid to Poland facing a full-fledged Russian invasion than we ever will with Ukraine fighting "separatists". If Poland gets invaded, I suspect we'd have some B-2's headed that direction within a day or two.


Historically, Poland has been hung out to dry by its other European allies - what twice? three times in the 20th century?  And Obama in the White House?  I know which way I'd be betting if I were Poland.


WTF could have France and England have done in 1939 to stop the Germans? THey declared WAR on the Nazis over Poland. I would not call that letting them hang out to dry. 1945 otoh...
They should of gone to war far before that. The Germans repeatedly violated the treaty of Versailles in the 30s instead of smashing them early on they picked appeasement.  


As stupid as the declaration of "peace in our day" was, the reality is that Britain was not really in any position that early to do much of anything vis a vis Germany.


France could have in '39, save for inept leadership.  The Germans had orders to retreat at the first counter attack by France when they invaded. (I think I remember that right)


Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 9:47:32 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


The anti NATO stuff that permeates the American Right is fascinating to come across, and it's all over this thread. I wouldn't at all be surprised if some of the messaging didn't originate elsewhere.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have friends in the Hungarian intelligence community and they are telling me that they do not think NATO will honor article 5.

Hungary has such a token military force thanks to the cut backs by Socialist.


A communist runs Finland and they are refusing new weapons....

you know...in the name of peace and solidarity and brotherhood.




We saw how useful NATO was after 9/11 and they voluntarily invoked Article 5.

US: We need  NATO troops to join in combat ground combat in Afghanistan.

NATO: You were serious about that?



Utterly untrue.


The anti NATO stuff that permeates the American Right is fascinating to come across, and it's all over this thread. I wouldn't at all be surprised if some of the messaging didn't originate elsewhere.

Nyet, comrade. Is pravda. Completely true.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 9:57:22 PM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


The anti NATO stuff that permeates the American Right is fascinating to come across, and it's all over this thread. I wouldn't at all be surprised if some of the messaging didn't originate elsewhere.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have friends in the Hungarian intelligence community and they are telling me that they do not think NATO will honor article 5.

Hungary has such a token military force thanks to the cut backs by Socialist.


A communist runs Finland and they are refusing new weapons....

you know...in the name of peace and solidarity and brotherhood.




We saw how useful NATO was after 9/11 and they voluntarily invoked Article 5.

US: We need  NATO troops to join in combat ground combat in Afghanistan.

NATO: You were serious about that?



Utterly untrue.


The anti NATO stuff that permeates the American Right is fascinating to come across, and it's all over this thread. I wouldn't at all be surprised if some of the messaging didn't originate elsewhere.

The American Right seems to hate NATO as much as our Left does.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 9:59:53 PM EDT
[#25]
Russia gets fucked.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 10:10:03 PM EDT
[#26]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:





The American Right seems to hate NATO as much as our Left does.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:


Quoted:


Quoted:

I have friends in the Hungarian intelligence community and they are telling me that they do not think NATO will honor article 5.



Hungary has such a token military force thanks to the cut backs by Socialist.





A communist runs Finland and they are refusing new weapons....



you know...in the name of peace and solidarity and brotherhood.


We saw how useful NATO was after 9/11 and they voluntarily invoked Article 5.



US: We need  NATO troops to join in combat ground combat in Afghanistan.



NATO: You were serious about that?






Utterly untrue.




The anti NATO stuff that permeates the American Right is fascinating to come across, and it's all over this thread. I wouldn't at all be surprised if some of the messaging didn't originate elsewhere.



The American Right seems to hate NATO as much as our Left does.




 






Probably because NATO is viewed as European military welfare supported by the 53% of adults in the US who are actually Taxpayers.




It was sustainable in the 1950's when half of the world's economy was the USA, not anymore.




I don't have a giant hard on for NATO, other than it's subsidizing most of the participants who don't have to pay a pro rata share for their own defense.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 10:12:16 PM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The American Right seems to hate NATO as much as our Left does.
View Quote


Oh, our far Left does too, but the mainstream Left keeps those guys more effectively quiet, while the mainstream Right has lost its way, replaced by what you see here every day.

Clinton took the banner of the neoliberal Washington consensus in the '90s, and somehow we decided the only alternative was to derp hard and derp often.  Thus even when we elected a classic Social Democrat - or worse - it was apparently too late to get back in the game, the cat was out of the bag.  Now, it's all about just pulling out of the game entirely, lest one be a "statist." The closest thing the EU seems to have is those Euroskeptic crowd.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 10:12:55 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Probably because NATO is viewed as European military welfare supported by the 53% of adults in the US who are actually Taxpayers.


It was sustainable in the 1950's when half of the world's economy was the USA, not anymore.


I don't have a giant hard on for NATO, other than it's subsidizing most of the participants who don't have to pay a pro rata share for their own defense.
View Quote

Our Left mostly sees it as a tool of American imperialism.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 10:16:03 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Oh, our far Left does too, but the mainstream Left keeps those guys more effectively quiet, while the mainstream Right has lost its way, replaced by what you see here every day.

Clinton took the banner of the neoliberal Washington consensus in the '90s, and somehow we decided the only alternative was to derp hard and derp often.  Thus even when we elected a classic Social Democrat - or worse - it was apparently too late to get back in the game, the cat was out of the bag.  Now, it's all about just pulling out of the game entirely, lest one be a "statist." The closest thing the EU seems to have is those Euroskeptic crowd.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The American Right seems to hate NATO as much as our Left does.


Oh, our far Left does too, but the mainstream Left keeps those guys more effectively quiet, while the mainstream Right has lost its way, replaced by what you see here every day.

Clinton took the banner of the neoliberal Washington consensus in the '90s, and somehow we decided the only alternative was to derp hard and derp often.  Thus even when we elected a classic Social Democrat - or worse - it was apparently too late to get back in the game, the cat was out of the bag.  Now, it's all about just pulling out of the game entirely, lest one be a "statist." The closest thing the EU seems to have is those Euroskeptic crowd.

Yup. Most of the Euroskeptic parties are Populist in nature. They live off of fear mongering and easy answers.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 10:25:32 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Western Europe isn't going to war for Polan or Eesti.

The US? Yeah.

Spain, Belgium, Germany? Nope.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
A chain is only as strong as it's weakest link.

Unfortunately the U.S. is the weakest link in the NATO chain at the moment, and NATO looks to the U.S. for leadership.

Poland would be on their own, I'm ashamed to say, but I think they could defeat the Russians if they fight purely defensive war.

Another of OBAMA's fundamental "transformations".



Western Europe isn't going to war for Polan or Eesti.

The US? Yeah.

Spain, Belgium, Germany? Nope.



NATO used to be the Protect Germany Club.

I feel bad for the newcomers to NATO like the teensy Baltic states, Romania, etc. They are the ones who would theoretically need protection, and they sure as hell aren't going to get meaningful POMCUS sites, or  a new British Army of the Vistula, ReForLatvia sites, etc.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 10:26:49 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They might now win but the Poles would give them one hell of a bloodbath before they went down.
View Quote

Link Posted: 2/28/2015 10:32:32 PM EDT
[#32]
Yeah non nuclear, Poland could hold out.  What would be left of her in 6 weeks of Russian tactics(Shelling the the hell outa every thing) would be what both sides need to think about before hand.  Russia will use Arty and Rockets but the Poles will turn their own country into a giant Stalingrad battle.  It would be a fucking mess
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 10:37:54 PM EDT
[#33]
I do not think there would be many Polish soldiers alive at the end of the six weeks.

I also believe there would be scores more dead Russians, because the Polaks would fight to the last breath. They're goddamn tired of being exterminated, and would go down fighting rather than waiting to be executed.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 10:51:39 PM EDT
[#34]
Poland should never have been allowed into NATO. Why the hell should we want to go to war with Russia over Poland?
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:07:43 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Our Left mostly sees it as a tool of American imperialism.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Probably because NATO is viewed as European military welfare supported by the 53% of adults in the US who are actually Taxpayers.


It was sustainable in the 1950's when half of the world's economy was the USA, not anymore.


I don't have a giant hard on for NATO, other than it's subsidizing most of the participants who don't have to pay a pro rata share for their own defense.

Our Left mostly sees it as a tool of American imperialism.

It's should be.

Whole world would be better off if it were.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:24:19 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


A lot of ARF has had a love affair with the Russian and Israeli militaries since before I joined.

"They don't fuck around"

lol
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Some of you have WAYYYY too much faith in the Russian Military, and WAAYYYYYY too little faith in NATO / US forces.


The military of NATO member states in Western Europe could not only hold back Russia, but destroy them. I have faith in that.


This isn't the fucking 70s and 80s people - Russia puts on a good picture today, but can't project, supply, support, or otherwise sustain any real conventional attack further than ~100km from it's own borders.


A lot of ARF has had a love affair with the Russian and Israeli militaries since before I joined.

"They don't fuck around"

lol


Amatuers worry about tactics, professionals worry about logistics.

Despite all the chest thumping Russia does their track record for effectively launching military operations outside their own borders leaves something to be desired. Even back during the Soviet  war in Afghanistan they had a lot of issues that shouldn't have existed for a modern military. Seriously they just figured out in 2014 regular access to showers and laundry facilities really improved the health of their soldiers.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:37:55 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Six weeks with no assistance?  Hell no.  There might be some localized hold outs but the Polish military would be demolished.
View Quote


Eh. I wouldn't bet on it. Poland owns more leapord II's then the Germans do.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:39:45 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Our Left mostly sees it as a tool of American imperialism.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Probably because NATO is viewed as European military welfare supported by the 53% of adults in the US who are actually Taxpayers.


It was sustainable in the 1950's when half of the world's economy was the USA, not anymore.


I don't have a giant hard on for NATO, other than it's subsidizing most of the participants who don't have to pay a pro rata share for their own defense.

Our Left mostly sees it as a tool of American imperialism.

Now that's pretty funny.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:43:23 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
[span style='text-decoration: line-through;']Poland should never have been allowed into NATO. Why the hell should we want to go to war with Russia over Poland?

Herpa derp, derpa derp derp.
View Quote

FIFY

Got news for you...there is a thing called a global economy and the US has foreign interests in that economy.  Specifically a secure Europe which is a very large trading partner with the US.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:48:05 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Poland should never have been allowed into NATO. Why the hell should we want to go to war with Russia over Poland?
View Quote


Because Poland has been a strong partner in the WOT.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:49:33 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
And ironically enough, once the war reached a fever pitch the Germans not only employed far more cavalry than the Poles ever did, but used horses for supply and transport on a massive scale. They didn't use cavalry on the Western Front but my great-uncles knew the Germans were in a world of trouble when they saw how many horses they were using in Normandy while their units were completely motorized.
View Quote


Only the US and UK didn't use lots of horse transport in WWII, and their armies were only about the size of the mechanized portion of the German army.  The Germans used some  horse cavalry on the eastern front, where there was a lot of ground to cover, and very few roads.  Mechanized warfare was new and everyone was still learning how to do it.

By the way, the US still had two horse cavalry divisions in 1940.  Troops were mounted on captured horses and mules during the campaigns in Sicily and Italy.  The Coast Guard used thousands of horses for mounted patrols of US beaches.  Mules were an important part of the supply chain in several theaters.  All in all, the US military used more than 50,000 horses and mules in WWII.
Link Posted: 2/28/2015 11:52:07 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


WTF could have France and England have done in 1939 to stop the Germans? THey declared WAR on the Nazis over Poland. I would not call that letting them hang out to dry. 1945 otoh...
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Georgia and Ukraine aren't NATO allies. We'd provide much more aid to Poland facing a full-fledged Russian invasion than we ever will with Ukraine fighting "separatists". If Poland gets invaded, I suspect we'd have some B-2's headed that direction within a day or two.


Historically, Poland has been hung out to dry by its other European allies - what twice? three times in the 20th century?  And Obama in the White House?  I know which way I'd be betting if I were Poland.


WTF could have France and England have done in 1939 to stop the Germans? THey declared WAR on the Nazis over Poland. I would not call that letting them hang out to dry. 1945 otoh...


France could have stopped WWII and deposed Hitler in 1936 when he re-militarized the Rhineland.  France could have told them get out or we will make you.  German officer corps at this point was very aware of their inferiority to the French Army.  Hitler then could have been "deposed" by military coup with the full support of the French.

Why didn't the British and French declare war on the Soviets when they invaded Poland?
Link Posted: 3/1/2015 12:07:47 AM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Some of you have WAYYYY too much faith in the Russian Military, and WAAYYYYYY too little faith in NATO / US forces.


The military of NATO member states in Western Europe could not only hold back Russia, but destroy them. I have faith in that.


This isn't the fucking 70s and 80s people - Russia puts on a good picture today, but can't project, supply, support, or otherwise sustain any real conventional attack further than ~100km from it's own borders.
View Quote


Perhaps the Russian threat (however real) against Poland and the Baltic states is just what Western Europe needs to actually start taking their own defense seriously and quit looking for America to save them.  Those days are rapidly fading.  The question are we past the denial and into the acceptance phase.

NATO = America.  

I don't see "NATO" currently intervening over the Baltic nations or Poland.

The interesting thing will be to see the response from Poland's neighbor to the West.  

We know of France's response to the Soviets coming west of the Rhine.  I wonder it the Germans would do the same to Russians coming west of the Vistula.
Link Posted: 3/1/2015 12:25:32 AM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


A lot of ARF has had a love affair with the Russian and Israeli militaries since before I joined.

"They don't fuck around"

lol
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Some of you have WAYYYY too much faith in the Russian Military, and WAAYYYYYY too little faith in NATO / US forces.


The military of NATO member states in Western Europe could not only hold back Russia, but destroy them. I have faith in that.


This isn't the fucking 70s and 80s people - Russia puts on a good picture today, but can't project, supply, support, or otherwise sustain any real conventional attack further than ~100km from it's own borders.


A lot of ARF has had a love affair with the Russian and Israeli militaries since before I joined.

"They don't fuck around"

lol


Israel could put up a good fight, and do regularly.
Link Posted: 3/1/2015 12:33:36 AM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:




We saw how useful NATO was after 9/11 and they voluntarily invoked Article 5.

US: We need  NATO troops to join in combat ground combat in Afghanistan.

NATO: You were serious about that?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have friends in the Hungarian intelligence community and they are telling me that they do not think NATO will honor article 5.

Hungary has such a token military force thanks to the cut backs by Socialist.


A communist runs Finland and they are refusing new weapons....

you know...in the name of peace and solidarity and brotherhood.




We saw how useful NATO was after 9/11 and they voluntarily invoked Article 5.

US: We need  NATO troops to join in combat ground combat in Afghanistan.

NATO: You were serious about that?


Poland had the 2nd highest loss of life in the Middle East.
Link Posted: 3/1/2015 12:36:42 AM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Poland should never have been allowed into NATO. Why the hell should we want to go to war with Russia over Poland?
View Quote


Your ignorance. It's showing.
Link Posted: 3/1/2015 12:38:36 AM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Poland had the 2nd highest loss of life in the Middle East.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have friends in the Hungarian intelligence community and they are telling me that they do not think NATO will honor article 5.

Hungary has such a token military force thanks to the cut backs by Socialist.


A communist runs Finland and they are refusing new weapons....

you know...in the name of peace and solidarity and brotherhood.




We saw how useful NATO was after 9/11 and they voluntarily invoked Article 5.

US: We need  NATO troops to join in combat ground combat in Afghanistan.

NATO: You were serious about that?


Poland had the 2nd highest loss of life in the Middle East.


My impression is that Poland has been a faithful ally to the USA.
Link Posted: 3/1/2015 2:46:35 AM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Because Poland has been a strong partner in the WOT.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Poland should never have been allowed into NATO. Why the hell should we want to go to war with Russia over Poland?


Because Poland has been a strong partner in the WOT.

And they hate Russians.

Nice avatar.
Link Posted: 3/1/2015 3:02:04 AM EDT
[#49]
The real question is how long until someone pops a nuke?
Link Posted: 3/1/2015 3:14:50 AM EDT
[#50]
Russia has artillery...very good artillery and lots of it along with the willingness to use it without worries about ROEs.

Unless NATO is ready for full scale mechanized warfare, Russia would walk all over Poland with Poland taking huge casualties and inflicting similar on the Russians...but the Russians are willing to take casualties.

The Polish are good people and have been strong in the GWOT.  We should stand with them if something goes sideways.
Page / 4
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top