User Panel
Lets see we have SHARP online training
SHARP face to face training What's next SHARP hand to hand training 12 more years and I'am out of DOD thank god Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Quoted:
Since reading is not a requirement here in GD, this from the linked article, "Fanning’s nomination is the latest in a series of actions taken by the administration to advance the rights of gays and lesbians throughout the federal government. The Obama administration has overhauled internal policies to provide benefits to same-sex partners, appointed gay men and lesbians to the executive branch and the federal bench and ended the 18-year ban on gays serving openly in the military." So reading between the lines.... being gay was requirement one and everything else was secondary. On the plus side, the Army will have some fabulous uniforms coming in the next year. View Quote * according to the Washington Post. * and anyone else with a brain. |
|
Quoted:
Since reading is not a requirement here in GD, this from the linked article, "Fanning’s nomination is the latest in a series of actions taken by the administration to advance the rights of gays and lesbians throughout the federal government. The Obama administration has overhauled internal policies to provide benefits to same-sex partners, appointed gay men and lesbians to the executive branch and the federal bench and ended the 18-year ban on gays serving openly in the military." So reading between the lines.... being gay was requirement one and everything else was secondary. On the plus side, the Army will have some fabulous uniforms coming in the next year. View Quote Skinny jean bdu's ftw! |
|
|
Quoted:
Damn right. Its no ones business what I or anyone does behind closed doors with whom.If they can do the job, why the hell shouldn't they be allowed to. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
All I ask is they be best qualified. If they can do the job well, they get the job. I don't care about what they do off-duty. Damn right. Its no ones business what I or anyone does behind closed doors with whom.If they can do the job, why the hell shouldn't they be allowed to. There is the rub, though. How do we know he wasn't picked solely for his sexuality? |
|
Quoted:
In other news the Marines are asking for a waiver to keep women out of combat arms. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Marines win all interservice arguments from here on out by default. Thanks Obama! I thought that was the case after army boot camp went coed But in seriousness In other news the Marines are asking for a waiver to keep women out of combat arms. I just want to go live in a cave sometime |
|
Quoted:
Same. Somehow I believe this is a stupid political stunt (obviously) but if he really is the most qualified then I have no issue. But...somehow I doubt it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
All I ask is they be best qualified. If they can do the job well, they get the job. I don't care about what they do off-duty. Same. Somehow I believe this is a stupid political stunt (obviously) but if he really is the most qualified then I have no issue. But...somehow I doubt it. |
|
Quoted:
Damn right. Its no ones business what I or anyone does behind closed doors with whom.If they can do the job, why the hell shouldn't they be allowed to. View Quote What job was he hired to do? It seems he was hired to transform the army further towards the progressive agenda. Oh, and for a position like that, where there would be ample motive for blackmail, we do have a concern about what goes on behind closed doors. |
|
This prez does have a track record: He nominated a wise latina to the supreme court. He nominated a lesbian as SOS. He put SJW's in charge of the IRS and BATFE. I'm sure that all of his appointments are just as qualified.
Edit: I almost forgot about the two highly qualified nominations for Attorney General, they are both fucking ideal aren't they? |
|
Quoted:
There is the rub, though. How do we know he wasn't picked solely for his sexuality? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
All I ask is they be best qualified. If they can do the job well, they get the job. I don't care about what they do off-duty. Damn right. Its no ones business what I or anyone does behind closed doors with whom.If they can do the job, why the hell shouldn't they be allowed to. There is the rub, though. How do we know he wasn't picked solely for his sexuality? You can rest assured that guy was picked solely because he sucks dick. Name one POS he has appointed that isn't a complete failure |
|
Quoted:
Since reading is not a requirement here in GD, this from the linked article, "Fanning’s nomination is the latest in a series of actions taken by the administration to advance the rights of gays and lesbians throughout the federal government. The Obama administration has overhauled internal policies to provide benefits to same-sex partners, appointed gay men and lesbians to the executive branch and the federal bench and ended the 18-year ban on gays serving openly in the military." So reading between the lines.... being gay was requirement one and everything else was secondary. On the plus side, the Army will have some fabulous uniforms coming in the next year. View Quote Eh, didn't need to read it to know the answer. But the real deal IMO is that pusing the progressive agenda was the core requirement. Being gay just means he has a personal stake in the agenda that someone else might not. |
|
While he gives a speech do you sneeze "faggot" or cough "homo"?
|
|
Quoted:
This prez does have a track record: He nominated a wise latina to the supreme court. He nominated a lesbian as SOS. He put SJW's in charge of the IRS and BATFE. I'm sure that all of his appointments are just as qualified. View Quote He put a lesbian in the supremes, too. Hilllery is probably bi. |
|
Further destruction of moral,
Why in Gods name is it necessary for the world to know this persons sexual orientation anyway? Would it not be offensive to announce that they were straight?....WTF! |
|
Quoted:
Further destruction of moral, Why in Gods name is it necessary for the world to know this persons sexual orientation anyway? Would it not be offensive to announce that they were straight?....WTF! View Quote Nonsense. It should be a requirement that at the start of each press conference all attendees must announce their sexual orientation as well as any fetishes. |
|
I guess we know how all of those retroactive Honorable Discharges are going to turn out
|
|
|
Quoted:
Nonsense. It should be a requirement that at the start of each press conference all attendees must announce their sexual orientation as well as any fetishes. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Further destruction of moral, Why in Gods name is it necessary for the world to know this persons sexual orientation anyway? Would it not be offensive to announce that they were straight?....WTF! Nonsense. It should be a requirement that at the start of each press conference all attendees must announce their sexual orientation as well as any fetishes. yeah, I suppose your right. we could then just cut right to the chase...I am feelin a little freakish. |
|
Quoted:
Nonsense. It should be a requirement that at the start of each press conference all attendees must announce their sexual orientation as well as any fetishes. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Further destruction of moral, Why in Gods name is it necessary for the world to know this persons sexual orientation anyway? Would it not be offensive to announce that they were straight?....WTF! Nonsense. It should be a requirement that at the start of each press conference all attendees must announce their sexual orientation as well as any fetishes. Edit: Also, any religious affiliation, or lack thereof, and approximately where on the political spectrum their sympathies lie. Because that's what is most important. |
|
From the article: "Defense Secretary Ashton Carter tapped Fanning last year"
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Quoted:
don't laugh Marines are getting a tranny View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Marines win all interservice arguments from here on out by default. Thanks Obama! don't laugh Marines are getting a tranny Ha ha, WM's just look like trannies. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Quoted:
Obama just has to make a social statement with every move he makes. God, will he ever leave? View Quote 489 days and 5 hours left.....I hope the country can bear it. http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=263&iso=20170120T00&msg=Time%20left%20until%20Obama%20leaves%20office%22 |
|
|
I would love to be a reporter in DC. At the press conference, I would direct all my questions towards the sexuality of the parties calling the conference just to point out how ridiculous this is.
"Are you in a committed monogamous homosexual relationship,or do you play the field? How many partners would you say you have had in the last year? Do you include any props or role-playing into your sexual encounters? What kind? Could you elaborate on how exactly you use them? Do you require these props in order to get excited?" |
|
Quoted:
Eh, didn't need to read it to know the answer. But the real deal IMO is that pusing the progressive agenda was the core requirement. Being gay just means he has a personal stake in the agenda that someone else might not. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Since reading is not a requirement here in GD, this from the linked article, "Fanning’s nomination is the latest in a series of actions taken by the administration to advance the rights of gays and lesbians throughout the federal government. The Obama administration has overhauled internal policies to provide benefits to same-sex partners, appointed gay men and lesbians to the executive branch and the federal bench and ended the 18-year ban on gays serving openly in the military." So reading between the lines.... being gay was requirement one and everything else was secondary. On the plus side, the Army will have some fabulous uniforms coming in the next year. Eh, didn't need to read it to know the answer. But the real deal IMO is that pusing the progressive agenda was the core requirement. Being gay just means he has a personal stake in the agenda that someone else might not. It goes beyond pushing an agenda; it’s another of Obama’s firsts which he views as part of his amazing legacy. Advancing ideology is secondary to burnishing his image; he’s always been a fucking legend in his own mind. |
|
I keep saying,
"He sits down on his bed every night and things about how he's screwed the country up and just laughs his ass off."' That's his job, he's doing it, and enjoying it. |
|
|
Quoted:
I would love to be a reporter in DC. At the press conference, I would direct all my questions towards the sexuality of the parties calling the conference just to point out how ridiculous this is. "Are you in a committed monogamous homosexual relationship,or do you play the field? How many partners would you say you have had in the last year? Do you include any props or role-playing into your sexual encounters? What kind? Could you elaborate on how exactly you use them? Do you require these props in order to get excited?" View Quote These are fair questions for the nominee since he has nothing to be ashamed of, right? |
|
|
Quoted:
All I ask is they be best qualified. If they can do the job well, they get the job. I don't care about what they do off-duty. View Quote That's the problem. Obama doesn't give a shit about qualified, in fact, the less qualified, the better for him. All he cares about is community organizing and shoving shit down peoples throats. |
|
Quoted:
That's the problem. Obama doesn't give a shit about qualified, in fact, the less qualified, the better for him. All he cares about is community organizing and shoving shit down peoples throats. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
All I ask is they be best qualified. If they can do the job well, they get the job. I don't care about what they do off-duty. That's the problem. Obama doesn't give a shit about qualified, in fact, the less qualified, the better for him. All he cares about is community organizing and shoving shit down peoples throats. If the guy's sexuality was of no import, then why was it mentioned? |
|
Gives an entirely new meaning for "To the rear, March !!"
Social PC with a country, it's inhabitants and future at stake by a man that has never held a real job has a sketchy past and never done anything but read a speech off a teleprompter. Everything he touches turns to dog crap. This will not be any different. |
|
Quoted:
Who cares if he is gay? Is he the most qualified and best individual for the job? That's all I care about. View Quote That depends on if "Proper Butsex Techniques" "Flavored Anal Lube rankings" "Fabulous Uniform Reworks" Count. Man our enemies have to be laughing their asses off. Of what our country has become! Holy shit an I glad I got out years ago! |
|
|
Quoted:
Think about it... does he have a history of appointing the best qualified????? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
All I ask is they be best qualified. If they can do the job well, they get the job. I don't care about what they do off-duty. Think about it... does he have a history of appointing the best qualified????? If hating America is a qualification, he's been rolling with the fucking A Team. It will take decades to unfuck this country from the Black Jesus. |
|
|
|
|
Is he qualified (prior service and Pentagon admin/leadership experience) for the position? or is it just appointing someone to make a political statement with blatant disregard for our national security?
|
|
Quoted:
These are fair questions for the nominee since he has nothing to be ashamed of, right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I would love to be a reporter in DC. At the press conference, I would direct all my questions towards the sexuality of the parties calling the conference just to point out how ridiculous this is. "Are you in a committed monogamous homosexual relationship,or do you play the field? How many partners would you say you have had in the last year? Do you include any props or role-playing into your sexual encounters? What kind? Could you elaborate on how exactly you use them? Do you require these props in order to get excited?" These are fair questions for the nominee since he has nothing to be ashamed of, right? Would it be appropriate for someone who introduces/is known to have a wife? |
|
|
Quoted:
Is he qualified (prior service and Pentagon admin/leadership experience) for the position? or is it just appointing someone to make a political statement with blatant disregard for our national security? View Quote It seems the appointment is a part of the fundamental trasnformation. |
|
Gays make up 1% of the population yet make up a large percentage of Obama's Cabinet and Supreme Court picks. That's not an accident, but a political agenda.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.