User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:32:05 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why do you care if someone else wants to possess things you don't like? Do you think we should ban alcohol because people abuse it? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
As a father I'm torn between the legalization of MJ, and the true dangers that exist when it is legalized. I know it is a great drug for many health issues, that dangerous drugs are often prescribed for. But, legalization in its current form is abusive, and does nothing to regulate the drug in a manner which avoids such abuses by those that simply want to avoid the legal consequences of possession. These two states I believe are simply trying to protect their borders from a massive infusion of legalized, illegally obtained marijuana. I've seen how easy it is to get the drug in Colorado, and the increase of school age kids smoking it, because it's easier to obtain now via illegal methods; ie stealing a little of their parents legal weed, legal buyers selling it, etc... I'm truly torn, I love cutting the head off of the cartels (which legalization won't do). I'm for legitimate use for those with health afflictions. I just hate the massive abuses by xbox commando's, thugs, hippies, and the like. I just hate that it's easier for kids to get, which has been proven in California, Washington, and Colorado. Grammar Nazi's be damned, I didn't spell or grammar check it for mistakes. Why do you care if someone else wants to possess things you don't like? Do you think we should ban alcohol because people abuse it? Our herpy derpy "blue law" supporters do just that. They love the fed gov having broad powers as long it is being used to beat down people they don't like. Then they turn around and throw a tissy fit about how it is "unconstitutional" when the same powers are used against them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:33:17 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So successful country on earth has legal drugs. Fuck Marijuana and libertarians Yes, well fuck your rights too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:33:42 PM EDT
[#3]
Fuck big government Republicans who oppose states rights.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:33:48 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: KHP officers actually focus on trying to get personal stashes? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Ha Ha I hope Kansas joins in too! Me too. More egg on everyone's face that way. Hell no, our state troopers are having to much fun busting drivers in possession or high crossing the border. KHP officers actually focus on trying to get personal stashes? Hell yes they do. There is a "weed" bus that makes trips(or use to) to CO weekly for recreational excursions of course. I bet you dollars to doughnuts that KHP set up at the boarder just waiting on them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:34:46 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Oh look, LIBertarian tears!  Says the person where anyone can walk in with back pain and get a weed script and have no mags over 10 rounds. Shit at least according to our law the state has to prove that you possesed the magazines after 14/01/1013. Of which 2/3 of Sheriff's said they won't ask or investigate. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:34:55 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You know what? I don't like Big Red. I think I'll petition the Federal government to make the State of Oklahoma outlaw it. That and RC Cola. Because that's what Federalism is all about! Making sure the Federal government makes all laws uniform and identical throughout the land. Fuck a bunch of RC, you can have all that heathen faggotry. You simply cannot serve ribs without Big Red. I'm pretty sure it's illegal. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:37:39 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Fuck a bunch of RC, you can have all that heathen faggotry. You simply cannot serve ribs without Big Red. I'm pretty sure it's illegal. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
You know what? I don't like Big Red. I think I'll petition the Federal government to make the State of Oklahoma outlaw it. That and RC Cola. Because that's what Federalism is all about! Making sure the Federal government makes all laws uniform and identical throughout the land. Fuck a bunch of RC, you can have all that heathen faggotry. You simply cannot serve ribs without Big Red. I'm pretty sure it's illegal. Our forefathers did not fight an oppressive central government thousands of miles away just so they could pass their own laws willy nilly! Big Red should be illegal throughout the land. It isn't good for you. And therefore it should be illegal everywhere. That's what freedom is all about. Forcing people to live free by outlawing all the bad choices. And if they don't live free, we'll jail and fine the fuck out of them. That's the American way. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:37:56 PM EDT
[#8]
If a state passed a law allowing full auto weapons or silencers, do you think the feds would let that one stand?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:40:08 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If a state passed a law allowing full auto weapons or silencers, do you think the feds would let that one stand? Holy fucking dogshit, did everyone sleep through fucking civcs class? Jesus tapdancing hamster god. That isn't how this works. That isn't how any of this works. FUCK. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:41:20 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Our forefathers did not fight an oppressive central government thousands of miles away just so they could pass their own laws willy nilly! Big Red should be illegal throughout the land. It isn't good for you. And therefore it should be illegal everywhere. That's what freedom is all about. Forcing people to live free by outlawing all the bad choices. And if they don't live free, we'll jail and fine the fuck out of them. That's the American way. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You know what? I don't like Big Red. I think I'll petition the Federal government to make the State of Oklahoma outlaw it. That and RC Cola. Because that's what Federalism is all about! Making sure the Federal government makes all laws uniform and identical throughout the land. Fuck a bunch of RC, you can have all that heathen faggotry. You simply cannot serve ribs without Big Red. I'm pretty sure it's illegal. Our forefathers did not fight an oppressive central government thousands of miles away just so they could pass their own laws willy nilly! Big Red should be illegal throughout the land. It isn't good for you. And therefore it should be illegal everywhere. That's what freedom is all about. Forcing people to live free by outlawing all the bad choices. And if they don't live free, we'll jail and fine the fuck out of them. That's the American way. Just because you don't like Big Red, doesn't mean you should force your stupid beliefs down our throats. Besides, all the old studies concerning the health effects of big red were skewed by scare tactics and monetary influence from "Brown Cola". You need to relax. I know it's scary, but that's how freedom works. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:41:48 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If a state passed a law allowing full auto weapons or silencers, do you think the feds would let that one stand? Do you think any Republicans here would cheer California if they demanded the Feds do something about their neighbor's lax gun laws?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:43:59 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just because you don't like Big Red, doesn't mean you should force your stupid beliefs down our throats. Besides, all the old studies concerning the health effects of big red were skewed by scare tactics and monetary influence from "Brown Cola". You need to relax. I know it's scary, but that's how freedom works. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You know what? I don't like Big Red. I think I'll petition the Federal government to make the State of Oklahoma outlaw it. That and RC Cola. Because that's what Federalism is all about! Making sure the Federal government makes all laws uniform and identical throughout the land. Fuck a bunch of RC, you can have all that heathen faggotry. You simply cannot serve ribs without Big Red. I'm pretty sure it's illegal. Our forefathers did not fight an oppressive central government thousands of miles away just so they could pass their own laws willy nilly! Big Red should be illegal throughout the land. It isn't good for you. And therefore it should be illegal everywhere. That's what freedom is all about. Forcing people to live free by outlawing all the bad choices. And if they don't live free, we'll jail and fine the fuck out of them. That's the American way. Just because you don't like Big Red, doesn't mean you should force your stupid beliefs down our throats. Besides, all the old studies concerning the health effects of big red were skewed by scare tactics and monetary influence from "Brown Cola". You need to relax. I know it's scary, but that's how freedom works. I would relax but no one has yet passed a law saying I can. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:45:50 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
As a father I'm torn between the legalization of MJ, and the true dangers that exist when it is legalized. I know it is a great drug for many health issues, that dangerous drugs are often prescribed for. But, legalization in its current form is abusive, and does nothing to regulate the drug in a manner which avoids such abuses by those that simply want to avoid the legal consequences of possession. These two states I believe are simply trying to protect their borders from a massive infusion of legalized, illegally obtained marijuana. I've seen how easy it is to get the drug in Colorado, and the increase of school age kids smoking it, because it's easier to obtain now via illegal methods; ie stealing a little of their parents legal weed, legal buyers selling it, etc... I'm truly torn, I love cutting the head off of the cartels (which legalization won't do). I'm for legitimate use for those with health afflictions. I just hate the massive abuses by xbox commando's, thugs, hippies, and the like. I just hate that it's easier for kids to get, which has been proven in California, Washington, and Colorado. Grammar Nazi's be damned, I didn't spell or grammar check it for mistakes. 
I *live* in Colorado. It's not that easy to buy it legally if you're underage (>21 years old, possession limits, IDs required to be scanned, etc., so almost impossible for kids to buy it legally), and it's no easier to purchase now illegally than it was before. That is to say, it was incredibly easy to get illegally. But hey, don't worry about all that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:48:14 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The sob stories from all the western NE sheriffs have been hilarious guess they can dry their tears with new MRAPs or something Haven't heard anything out of my county. It's not like anyone west of Grand Island has any pull in Lincoln. Unicameral setup sucks. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:49:27 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Hmmm, another way to look at is if they lose then states rights wins. Thank You, I was thinking the same way. Roy |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:50:08 PM EDT
[#16]
It absolutely amazes me that a lot of the people on here think it would be perfectly fine to throw someone in prison for smoking a joint in the privacy of their own home, but get outraged when someone wants to throw them in prison for having "assault rifles" and "high capacity magazines". I don't think most people in this country (including here) understand freedom anymore.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:51:09 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I would relax but no one has yet passed a law saying I can. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You know what? I don't like Big Red. I think I'll petition the Federal government to make the State of Oklahoma outlaw it. That and RC Cola. Because that's what Federalism is all about! Making sure the Federal government makes all laws uniform and identical throughout the land. Fuck a bunch of RC, you can have all that heathen faggotry. You simply cannot serve ribs without Big Red. I'm pretty sure it's illegal. Our forefathers did not fight an oppressive central government thousands of miles away just so they could pass their own laws willy nilly! Big Red should be illegal throughout the land. It isn't good for you. And therefore it should be illegal everywhere. That's what freedom is all about. Forcing people to live free by outlawing all the bad choices. And if they don't live free, we'll jail and fine the fuck out of them. That's the American way. Just because you don't like Big Red, doesn't mean you should force your stupid beliefs down our throats. Besides, all the old studies concerning the health effects of big red were skewed by scare tactics and monetary influence from "Brown Cola". You need to relax. I know it's scary, but that's how freedom works. I would relax but no one has yet passed a law saying I can. Laws are more like guidelines, really. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:51:24 PM EDT
[#18]
That is stupid. I WANT the dopers to leave OK.
But seriously. Let other states do their own stuff as long as it doesn't fuck with us.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:52:56 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It absolutely amazes me that a lot of the people on here think it would be perfectly fine to throw someone in prison for smoking a joint in the privacy of their own home, but get outraged when someone wants to throw them in prison for having "assault rifles" and "high capacity magazines". I don't think most people in this country (including here) understand freedom anymore. 99% of the population neither understands nor desires the 'freedom' that Arfcoms Libertarians want in their Utopia. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:53:01 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That is stupid. I WANT the dopers to leave OK. I'll drink a tall beer to that, let me hop in my truck first.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:53:44 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 99% of the population neither understands nor desires the 'freedom' that Arfcoms Libertarians want in their Utopia. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: It absolutely amazes me that a lot of the people on here think it would be perfectly fine to throw someone in prison for smoking a joint in the privacy of their own home, but get outraged when someone wants to throw them in prison for having "assault rifles" and "high capacity magazines". I don't think most people in this country (including here) understand freedom anymore. 99% of the population neither understands nor desires the 'freedom' that Arfcoms Libertarians want in their Utopia. It's even sadder that just being left the fuck alone if I'm not hurting anyone is considered a crazy Utopia.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:55:45 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Fuck big government Republicans who oppose states rights. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 8:56:36 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
As a father I'm torn between the legalization of MJ, and the true dangers that exist when it is legalized. I know it is a great drug for many health issues, that dangerous drugs are often prescribed for. But, legalization in its current form is abusive, and does nothing to regulate the drug in a manner which avoids such abuses by those that simply want to avoid the legal consequences of possession. These two states I believe are simply trying to protect their borders from a massive infusion of legalized, illegally obtained marijuana. I've seen how easy it is to get the drug in Colorado, and the increase of school age kids smoking it, because it's easier to obtain now via illegal methods; ie stealing a little of their parents legal weed, legal buyers selling it, etc... I'm truly torn, I love cutting the head off of the cartels (which legalization won't do). I'm for legitimate use for those with health afflictions. I just hate the massive abuses by xbox commando's, thugs, hippies, and the like. I just hate that it's easier for kids to get, which has been proven in California, Washington, and Colorado. Grammar Nazi's be damned, I didn't spell or grammar check it for mistakes. EXACT same argument is used by gun banners. Just sayin. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:01:12 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's even sadder that just being left the fuck alone if I'm not hurting anyone is considered a crazy Utopia. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
It absolutely amazes me that a lot of the people on here think it would be perfectly fine to throw someone in prison for smoking a joint in the privacy of their own home, but get outraged when someone wants to throw them in prison for having "assault rifles" and "high capacity magazines". I don't think most people in this country (including here) understand freedom anymore. 99% of the population neither understands nor desires the 'freedom' that Arfcoms Libertarians want in their Utopia. It's even sadder that just being left the fuck alone if I'm not hurting anyone is considered a crazy Utopia. I use the term Utopia because I don't think it(Pure Libertarianism) is an attainable goal. When the vast majority neither understand nor want it, it is a pipe dream. When I was a young man I was a member of the Libertarian Party and voted many for every L candidate I could. Now, I am more realistic about who I vote for, still some L's, some R's and even the occasional D. I've come to understand that the Libertarian platform has the same issues as pure socialism, it will only work in a vacuum with the adherents of the ideal being an overwhelming majority. On this issue (MJ) I think the Republican party is on the losing end; I believe we'll see it legal in a decade on the federal level. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:02:37 PM EDT
[#25]
Florida voted majority to allow medical marijuana by 58%. It need 60% for approval.
The Sheriffs all came out like it was the end of the world. Reminds me when Florida passed CCW back in 1987. All the newspapers and some Sheriffs and Chief of Police said it would end with Wild West Shootouts and blood would run in the streets. Said every traffic argument would end in needless loss of life. I see this weed argument just as false. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:05:01 PM EDT
[#26]
Cartel pot is still cheaper than legal pot, anyone that thinks the cartels have suffered from legal pot are stoned.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:05:58 PM EDT
[#27]
I guess Colorado should keep its pot in Colorado.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:10:01 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Cartel pot is still cheaper than legal pot, anyone that thinks the cartels have suffered from legal pot are stoned. Pot needs to be taken completely off the controlled substances list...and then see what the cartels do with it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:10:17 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I guess Colorado should keep its pot in Colorado. I still think money will open up other states sooner than voter initiatives. It did it with state lottery's. Remember Georgia saying it would never allow lottery sales. Well there was traffic jams at the Florida state line for Georgia residents buying tickets in Florida. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:10:43 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Do you think any Republicans here would cheer California if they demanded the Feds do something about their neighbor's lax gun laws? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: If a state passed a law allowing full auto weapons or silencers, do you think the feds would let that one stand? Do you think any Republicans here would cheer California if they demanded the Feds do something about their neighbor's lax gun laws? Everyone here cheers a state like Arizona when they sue the federal government to make them enforce immigration law, don't see anyone calling the Republicans there hypocrites for using the federal court system for that. Actually looking at the issue of marijuana legalization, the Republicans have been strongly anti-drug for 4 or more decades that I can remember, if anything they are being very consistent on the issue, so I don't see the hypocrisy there. Have those states been advocating for the federal government to NOT enforce other federal laws? That would be hypocritical. No purist will ever be satisfied anyway, I laugh at hypocrisy everyday myself, senior citizens bitching about social security one moment and cashing their check the next. I'm a federal employee, it's always entertaining to listen to the diehard Republicans at work bitch about the size of the government and deficit while they're sitting on their ass all day collecting a check and usually multiple government pensions. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:13:36 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I view the Feds not enforcing drug laws the same as not enforcing immigration laws. If we allow the federal government to cherry pick what laws the want to ignore or enforce then the laws and the Constitution will become worthless. Congress needs to change the law, the Administration shouldn't be telling law enforcement to selectively ignore established law as a work around. Wouldn't it be hypocritical for one to be against Obama's actions on immigration yet support his actions on marijuana? It's the same tactic, if he has the power to ignore one law they can ignore any of them. I'm pro-legalization but I also support these states trying to make the Feds do the job they are obligated and funded to do. Well said, that is why this lawsuit is a good idea. It will force the fed govs hand and make the US Supreme court make a ruling. This will set precedent for many other state rights issues. States have been controlled many times by US Supreme Court rulings where they have made laws less strict and the federal government has made rulings to the states that those laws are unconstitutional. The current administration choosing which laws they will and won't enforce is anarchy. I look forward to the ruling on this one. I would think the Supreme Court would have to rule that the states that have legalized Marijuana is unconstitutional since it is illegal federally. If the Supreme Court rules the states marijuana legalization as constitutional, then hold on it is going to be wide open for many, many other things. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:13:58 PM EDT
[#32]
Quoted:
Oh, you Republican hypocrite fuckwads. That big, out of control Federal Government is a bad thing, until you can swing it like a weapon when another state does something you don't like, within their own borders. It's rare I truly side with the liberals, but right here is some weapons-grade bullshit from the conservatives. Has either of these states ever proposed a "fuck you" over Federal gun grabbing? Me thinks they probably have on that, or some other issue. 
http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/apexchange/2014/12/18/us--marijuana-lawsuit.html LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — Nebraska and Oklahoma are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to declare Colorado's legalization of marijuana unconstitutional.Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning announced Thursday that the states are seeking a court order to prevent Colorado from enforcing a measure that was approved by voters in 2012. Bruning says Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt is also a party to the lawsuit.
The complaint alleges that Colorado's Amendment 64 runs afoul of federal law. I have to agree with you. It is not Nebraska nor Oklahoma's business how Colorado does its internal laws and its not Colorado's problem if they can't handle their own citizens. Anyone who thinks the commerce clause applies is a moron. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:17:57 PM EDT
[#33]
LOL. NE and OK are the two houses in the HOA that are pissed that CO painted their house pink.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:18:05 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Hmmm, another way to look at is if they lose then states rights wins. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:18:50 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I view the Feds not enforcing drug laws the same as not enforcing immigration laws. If we allow the federal government to cherry pick what laws the want to ignore or enforce then the laws and the Constitution will become worthless. Congress needs to change the law, the Administration shouldn't be telling law enforcement to selectively ignore established law as a work around. Wouldn't it be hypocritical for one to be against Obama's actions on immigration yet support his actions on marijuana? It's the same tactic, if he has the power to ignore one law they can ignore any of them. I'm pro-legalization but I also support these states trying to make the Feds do the job they are obligated and funded to do. Apples and kumquats. The federal government is Constitutionally obligated to manage borders and immigration as per the law. They have no business telling citizens of individual states what they may or may not consume. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:19:11 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ha Ha I hope Kansas joins in too! If Kansas joined, that would the height of hypocrisy. They couldn't make a more retarded move. Pass the Firearms Freedom Act declaring federal firearms laws null and void for any firearms manufactured in the state, including most NFA items, and make it a felony for any LEO to enforce a federal law regarding firearms. Then sue a neighboring state for nullifying a federal law. Brilliant! |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:21:44 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Poor comparison, the neighboring states' gun laws are perfectly legal under federal law. ... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If a state passed a law allowing full auto weapons or silencers, do you think the feds would let that one stand? Do you think any Republicans here would cheer California if they demanded the Feds do something about their neighbor's lax gun laws? Poor comparison, the neighboring states' gun laws are perfectly legal under federal law. ... For crying out loud. That isn't how it works. The Federal government outlawing something does not mean that any State has to have laws that match. And no one passes laws to "allow" things. Everything is already allowed by default. Things only BECOME illegal when laws are passed against them. Am feel like I'm teaching swahili to martians.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:24:31 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I have to agree with you. It is not Nebraska nor Oklahoma's business how Colorado does its internal laws and its not Colorado's problem if they can't handle their own citizens. Anyone who thinks the commerce clause applies is a moron. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Oh, you Republican hypocrite fuckwads. That big, out of control Federal Government is a bad thing, until you can swing it like a weapon when another state does something you don't like, within their own borders. It's rare I truly side with the liberals, but right here is some weapons-grade bullshit from the conservatives. Has either of these states ever proposed a "fuck you" over Federal gun grabbing? Me thinks they probably have on that, or some other issue. http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/apexchange/2014/12/18/us--marijuana-lawsuit.html LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — Nebraska and Oklahoma are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to declare Colorado's legalization of marijuana unconstitutional.Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning announced Thursday that the states are seeking a court order to prevent Colorado from enforcing a measure that was approved by voters in 2012. Bruning says Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt is also a party to the lawsuit. The complaint alleges that Colorado's Amendment 64 runs afoul of federal law. I have to agree with you. It is not Nebraska nor Oklahoma's business how Colorado does its internal laws and its not Colorado's problem if they can't handle their own citizens. Anyone who thinks the commerce clause applies is a moron. So Nebraska/Oklahoma is supposed to turn a blind eye and not enforce their own laws? Why should Nebraska and Oklahoma have to bear the expense of going after illegal drugs coming across the Colorado border? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:25:25 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I guess Colorado should keep its pot in Colorado. They busted someone on the interstate here in Florida a few weeks back, had 8 or so ounces of pot legally purchased in Colorado, still in the individually labeled vials and pill bottles it was sold from the dispensary in. Felony possession and intent to distribute/trafficking. I'm sure the court will consider the fact it is crossing state lines when they rule on the constitutionality of it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:28:58 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So Nebraska/Oklahoma is supposed to turn a blind eye and not enforce their own laws? Why should Nebraska and Oklahoma have to bear the expense of going after illegal drugs coming across the Colorado border? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh, you Republican hypocrite fuckwads. That big, out of control Federal Government is a bad thing, until you can swing it like a weapon when another state does something you don't like, within their own borders. It's rare I truly side with the liberals, but right here is some weapons-grade bullshit from the conservatives. Has either of these states ever proposed a "fuck you" over Federal gun grabbing? Me thinks they probably have on that, or some other issue.
http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/apexchange/2014/12/18/us--marijuana-lawsuit.html LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — Nebraska and Oklahoma are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to declare Colorado's legalization of marijuana unconstitutional.Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning announced Thursday that the states are seeking a court order to prevent Colorado from enforcing a measure that was approved by voters in 2012. Bruning says Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt is also a party to the lawsuit.
The complaint alleges that Colorado's Amendment 64 runs afoul of federal law. I have to agree with you. It is not Nebraska nor Oklahoma's business how Colorado does its internal laws and its not Colorado's problem if they can't handle their own citizens. Anyone who thinks the commerce clause applies is a moron. So Nebraska/Oklahoma is supposed to turn a blind eye and not enforce their own laws? Why should Nebraska and Oklahoma have to bear the expense of going after illegal drugs coming across the Colorado border? Just like Virgina is not responsible for New York's gun laws, Colorado is not responsible for Nebraska's drug laws. You sound exactly like Bloomburg and Mayors Against Guns. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:30:10 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just like Virgina is not responsible for New York's gun laws, Colorado is not responsible for Nebraska's drug laws. You sound exactly like Bloomburg and Mayors Against Guns. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have to agree with you. It is not Nebraska nor Oklahoma's business how Colorado does its internal laws and its not Colorado's problem if they can't handle their own citizens. Anyone who thinks the commerce clause applies is a moron. So Nebraska/Oklahoma is supposed to turn a blind eye and not enforce their own laws? Why should Nebraska and Oklahoma have to bear the expense of going after illegal drugs coming across the Colorado border? Just like Virgina is not responsible for New York's gun laws, Colorado is not responsible for Nebraska's drug laws. You sound exactly like Bloomburg and Mayors Against Guns. I gotta agree, the lawsuit has zero merit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:30:31 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So successful country on earth has legal drugs. Fuck Marijuana and libertarians Your post and avatar are pretty ironic. Don't tread on me, but fuck states making there own laws based on the will of the people. Federal Government get over here and tell my neighboring state they can't do that. Arrest those people! |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:31:26 PM EDT
[#43]
Maybe California should sue Arizona to force us to adopt their gun laws.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:35:42 PM EDT
[#44]
I am a Christianity and believe the whole word. That being said I live in Oregon where it was just legalized and I support it. Free will was given to us and who are we to tell another man what he can or cannot do. Kids will smoke anyway. I was high every day in highschool.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:37:06 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Maybe California should sue Arizona to force us to adopt their gun laws. No!No! Arizona's liberal gun laws make trouble for California cops trying to keep 30 round mags out of the state so the Federal government must make Arizona comply with California gun laws! And then New Mexico because New Mexico is next to Arizona and they can just pass through AZ to get to CA, and then Texas and so forth. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:38:03 PM EDT
[#46]
I haven't read any of this thead but as an A&P with an IA I have to do a piss test . So the man with his finger on the button or the members of congress have to do the same? No WTF is wrong with this and what are we going to do about it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:41:57 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So Nebraska/Oklahoma is supposed to turn a blind eye and not enforce their own laws? Why should Nebraska and Oklahoma have to bear the expense of going after illegal drugs coming across the Colorado border? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Oh, you Republican hypocrite fuckwads. That big, out of control Federal Government is a bad thing, until you can swing it like a weapon when another state does something you don't like, within their own borders. It's rare I truly side with the liberals, but right here is some weapons-grade bullshit from the conservatives. Has either of these states ever proposed a "fuck you" over Federal gun grabbing? Me thinks they probably have on that, or some other issue.
http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/apexchange/2014/12/18/us--marijuana-lawsuit.html LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — Nebraska and Oklahoma are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to declare Colorado's legalization of marijuana unconstitutional.Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning announced Thursday that the states are seeking a court order to prevent Colorado from enforcing a measure that was approved by voters in 2012. Bruning says Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt is also a party to the lawsuit.
The complaint alleges that Colorado's Amendment 64 runs afoul of federal law. I have to agree with you. It is not Nebraska nor Oklahoma's business how Colorado does its internal laws and its not Colorado's problem if they can't handle their own citizens. Anyone who thinks the commerce clause applies is a moron. So Nebraska/Oklahoma is supposed to turn a blind eye and not enforce their own laws? Why should Nebraska and Oklahoma have to bear the expense of going after illegal drugs coming across the Colorado border? The level and cost of enforcement is entirely NE and OK's choice CO has no say or impact in the budgets or activities of NE/OK LE I have zero sympathy for idiots that attempt to illegally traverse either state however I also have zero sympathy for idiots that think CO plates are RS /PC Fishing costs money if you want to go fishing there is some cost involved |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:42:23 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So Nebraska/OklahomaNew York is supposed to turn a blind eye and not enforce their own laws? Why should Nebraska and OklahomaNew York have to bear the expense of going after illegal drugsguns coming across the Colorado border from Southern States? FIFY...You sound exactly like Mr. Bloomberg and King Andy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:45:26 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I gotta agree, the lawsuit has zero merit. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I have to agree with you. It is not Nebraska nor Oklahoma's business how Colorado does its internal laws and its not Colorado's problem if they can't handle their own citizens. Anyone who thinks the commerce clause applies is a moron. So Nebraska/Oklahoma is supposed to turn a blind eye and not enforce their own laws? Why should Nebraska and Oklahoma have to bear the expense of going after illegal drugs coming across the Colorado border? Just like Virgina is not responsible for New York's gun laws, Colorado is not responsible for Nebraska's drug laws. You sound exactly like Bloomburg and Mayors Against Guns. I gotta agree, the lawsuit has zero merit. It most definitely has merit. See my previous post if you need it explained to you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/18/2014 9:46:42 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pot needs to be taken completely off the controlled substances list...and then see what the cartels do with it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Cartel pot is still cheaper than legal pot, anyone that thinks the cartels have suffered from legal pot are stoned. Pot needs to be taken completely off the controlled substances list...and then see what the cartels do with it. As long as it's not punitively taxed, I'd love to see a cartel try to compete with Philip-Morris. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
