User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 12:13:07 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So how long until Police just start calling in an airstrike on suspected "drug homes" instead of risking lives. I mean drugs = terrorism..... so... drone strikes! That will happen after they raid a house where someone is prepared and kills a bunch of them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 12:13:52 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Bama is just trying to use a mistake in the article (used an informant rather than lied about using an informant) to detract from the story and the fact that the police murdered a man in his own home. Modus operandi. Attack the article when it makes TBL look bad. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
a narcotics team from Atlanta killed 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston during a drug raid on her home, then attempted to plant drugs in her basement to cover its mistake. The team had been relying on a tip from an informant and did no corroborating investigation. Why do authors lie about things like this? It just taints everything else they write. Ex-Atlanta officers get prison time for cover-up in deadly raid Link All three men pleaded guilty to federal charges of conspiracy to violate civil rights resulting in death. Smith and Junnier also pleaded guilty to state charges of voluntary manslaughter and making false statements, and Smith admitted to planting bags of marijuana in Johnston's home after her death. http://media.247sports.com/Uploads/Assets/153/63/1063153.gif Bama is just trying to use a mistake in the article (used an informant rather than lied about using an informant) to detract from the story and the fact that the police murdered a man in his own home. Modus operandi. Attack the article when it makes TBL look bad. No the truth is worse than what the author wrote. If you are going to publish something at least be truthful. This case should not even be mentioned in a "bad raid" article because that is not what it was. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 12:13:59 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Let me guess...no drugs found means the guy is white as snow and a model citizen? No, but it does mean that the police are 0-2 while investigating the citizen they killed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 12:14:20 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Let me guess...no drugs found means the guy is white as snow and a model citizen? I guess that people are guilty till proven innocent right comrade?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 12:16:18 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm sure he spanked his dog too hard or jaywalked or any other reason that should lead to him being carried out in a body bag. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Let me guess...no drugs found means the guy is white as snow and a model citizen? I'm sure he spanked his dog too hard or jaywalked or any other reason that should lead to him being carried out in a body bag. Perhaps he was one of those evil wrong-wood -stacking sunofabitches. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 12:16:58 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No the truth is worse than what the author wrote. If you are going to publish something at least be truthful. This case should not even be mentioned in a "bad raid" article because that is not what it was. So you're saying a raid based on false information (from the officers, not a CI) doesn't fit under the umbrella of "bad raid" You do understand how that sounds, don't you? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 12:18:32 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
We had a swat raid against a farm for not stacking firewood properly. I gotta read that story. I can't find the original article from the newspaper but here ya go Enjoy Don't mess with Texas. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 12:24:16 PM EDT
[#8]
I feel much safer.
Meanwhile, the real drug dealers who probably live just two doors down, where everyone knows they are, will continue to operate same same as always. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 12:26:17 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
a narcotics team from Atlanta killed 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston during a drug raid on her home, then attempted to plant drugs in her basement to cover its mistake. The team had been relying on a tip from an informant and did no corroborating investigation. Why do authors lie about things like this? It just taints everything else they write. Did you check to see who the author is? You'll only need one guess. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 12:26:54 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yep. The cops made the whole thing up. There was no informant. There was no investigation. They wanted a look in the house so they fabricated the whole case. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
a narcotics team from Atlanta killed 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston during a drug raid on her home, then attempted to plant drugs in her basement to cover its mistake. The team had been relying on a tip from an informant and did no corroborating investigation. Why do authors lie about things like this? It just taints everything else they write. Ex-Atlanta officers get prison time for cover-up in deadly raid Link All three men pleaded guilty to federal charges of conspiracy to violate civil rights resulting in death. Smith and Junnier also pleaded guilty to state charges of voluntary manslaughter and making false statements, and Smith admitted to planting bags of marijuana in Johnston's home after her death. Yep. The cops made the whole thing up. There was no informant. There was no investigation. They wanted a look in the house so they fabricated the whole case. Wow. Taking up for cops who admitted to planting evidence? I'm somewhat speechless. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 12:30:07 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wow. Taking up for cops who admitted to planting evidence? I'm somewhat speechless.
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
a narcotics team from Atlanta killed 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston during a drug raid on her home, then attempted to plant drugs in her basement to cover its mistake. The team had been relying on a tip from an informant and did no corroborating investigation. Why do authors lie about things like this? It just taints everything else they write. Ex-Atlanta officers get prison time for cover-up in deadly raid Link All three men pleaded guilty to federal charges of conspiracy to violate civil rights resulting in death. Smith and Junnier also pleaded guilty to state charges of voluntary manslaughter and making false statements, and Smith admitted to planting bags of marijuana in Johnston's home after her death. Yep. The cops made the whole thing up. There was no informant. There was no investigation. They wanted a look in the house so they fabricated the whole case. Wow. Taking up for cops who admitted to planting evidence? I'm somewhat speechless.
IIRC Bama said those dipshits should be executed. "Taking up for them" is not what he's doing. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 12:33:22 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: IIRC Bama said those dipshits should be executed. "Taking up for them" is not what he's doing. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: a narcotics team from Atlanta killed 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston during a drug raid on her home, then attempted to plant drugs in her basement to cover its mistake. The team had been relying on a tip from an informant and did no corroborating investigation. Why do authors lie about things like this? It just taints everything else they write. Ex-Atlanta officers get prison time for cover-up in deadly raid Link All three men pleaded guilty to federal charges of conspiracy to violate civil rights resulting in death. Smith and Junnier also pleaded guilty to state charges of voluntary manslaughter and making false statements, and Smith admitted to planting bags of marijuana in Johnston's home after her death. Yep. The cops made the whole thing up. There was no informant. There was no investigation. They wanted a look in the house so they fabricated the whole case. Wow. Taking up for cops who admitted to planting evidence? I'm somewhat speechless. IIRC Bama said those dipshits should be executed. "Taking up for them" is not what he's doing. This Bama was not taking up for the dirty cops, he was saying that the author of the article twisted the facts and made it look less severe than it actually was.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 12:34:23 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Don't mess with Texas. No kidding. Stack that cordwood proper citizen!  |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 12:52:09 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This Bama was not taking up for the dirty cops, he was saying that the author of the article twisted the facts and made it look less severe than it actually was. That wasn't clear. The implication I got was the story was untrue and it was a valid raid. That would be the normal interpretation of his remarks. His later clarification that it wasn't a bad raid is bullshit. Whether a CI lied or an officer lied, either way its a bad raid. I agree with Bama that the officers should have been given the death penalty. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:02:08 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Bama was not taking up for the dirty cops, he was saying that the author of the article twisted the facts and made it look less severe than it actually was. That wasn't clear. The implication I got was the story was untrue and it was a valid raid. That would be the normal interpretation of his remarks. His later clarification that it wasn't a bad raid is bullshit. Whether a CI lied or an officer lied, either way its a bad raid. I agree with Bama that the officers should have been given the death penalty. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
This That wasn't clear. The implication I got was the story was untrue and it was a valid raid. That would be the normal interpretation of his remarks. His later clarification that it wasn't a bad raid is bullshit. Whether a CI lied or an officer lied, either way its a bad raid. I agree with Bama that the officers should have been given the death penalty. I'll bet Mrs Johnston thought it was a bad raid......... |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:08:49 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Bama was not taking up for the dirty cops, he was saying that the author of the article twisted the facts and made it look less severe than it actually was. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: This Bama was not taking up for the dirty cops, he was saying that the author of the article twisted the facts and made it look less severe than it actually was. That wasn't clear. The implication I got was the story was untrue and it was a valid raid. That would be the normal interpretation of his remarks. His later clarification that it wasn't a bad raid is bullshit. Whether a CI lied or an officer lied, either way its a bad raid. I agree with Bama that the officers should have been given the death penalty. Entering a place based on information that proves to be bad intel, is a bad raid. Entering a place based on information that was made up by the cops that did the raid is far beyond a "bad raid" the cops involved should have gotten premeditated murder charges. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:12:29 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: This Bama was not taking up for the dirty cops, he was saying that the author of the article twisted the facts and made it look less severe than it actually was. That wasn't clear. The implication I got was the story was untrue and it was a valid raid. That would be the normal interpretation of his remarks. His later clarification that it wasn't a bad raid is bullshit. Whether a CI lied or an officer lied, either way its a bad raid. I agree with Bama that the officers should have been given the death penalty. Entering a place based on information that proves to be bad intel, is a bad raid. Entering a place based on information that was made up by the cops themselves is far beyond a "bad raid" agreed, which is why I'm hoping Bama will clarify what he meant. Saying it wasn't a bad raid because the officers made the evidence up seems to be a clintonesque evasion. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:20:03 PM EDT
[#18]
These stories always confuse the shit out of me, because I can never figure out if they are protecting, or serving.
Maybe both? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:28:53 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ex-Atlanta officers get prison time for cover-up in deadly raid Link All three men pleaded guilty to federal charges of conspiracy to violate civil rights resulting in death. Smith and Junnier also pleaded guilty to state charges of voluntary manslaughter and making false statements, and Smith admitted to planting bags of marijuana in Johnston's home after her death. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
a narcotics team from Atlanta killed 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston during a drug raid on her home, then attempted to plant drugs in her basement to cover its mistake. The team had been relying on a tip from an informant and did no corroborating investigation. Why do authors lie about things like this? It just taints everything else they write. Ex-Atlanta officers get prison time for cover-up in deadly raid Link All three men pleaded guilty to federal charges of conspiracy to violate civil rights resulting in death. Smith and Junnier also pleaded guilty to state charges of voluntary manslaughter and making false statements, and Smith admitted to planting bags of marijuana in Johnston's home after her death. I find it kind of odd they just happened to carry bags of drugs that day. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:30:34 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Don't mess with Texas. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
We had a swat raid against a farm for not stacking firewood properly. I gotta read that story. I can't find the original article from the newspaper but here ya go Enjoy Don't mess with Texas. It is a free state. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:30:46 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I find it kind of odd they just happened to carry bags of drugs that day. Isolated incident. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:34:56 PM EDT
[#22]
Can't you all see? The war on drugs is very successful. Successful at killing innocent people.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:37:35 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yep. The cops made the whole thing up. There was no informant. There was no investigation. They wanted a look in the house so they fabricated the whole case. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
a narcotics team from Atlanta killed 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston during a drug raid on her home, then attempted to plant drugs in her basement to cover its mistake. The team had been relying on a tip from an informant and did no corroborating investigation. Why do authors lie about things like this? It just taints everything else they write. Ex-Atlanta officers get prison time for cover-up in deadly raid Link All three men pleaded guilty to federal charges of conspiracy to violate civil rights resulting in death. Smith and Junnier also pleaded guilty to state charges of voluntary manslaughter and making false statements, and Smith admitted to planting bags of marijuana in Johnston's home after her death. Yep. The cops made the whole thing up. There was no informant. There was no investigation. They wanted a look in the house so they fabricated the whole case. What did the author lie about? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:38:02 PM EDT
[#24]
Just a few more bodies, guys, and we'll have won this war against those evil drugs.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:40:27 PM EDT
[#25]
1 ban, 3 locks, 8 pages.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:41:28 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
a narcotics team from Atlanta killed 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston during a drug raid on her home, then attempted to plant drugs in her basement to cover its mistake. The team had been relying on a tip from an informant and did no corroborating investigation. Why do authors lie about things like this? It just taints everything else they write. What part of the statement is false? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:43:02 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Anyone who hasn't become increasingly uncomfortable with no-knocks, the "war" on drugs, etc is completely out to lunch and apparently wants their ass-wiped by the almighty state from cradle to grave... I don't mind no-knocks, but they seem to be handing them out far too frequently. If there is good evidence that a serial killer was holed up somewhere or some people were planning on setting off some bombs/other act of terrorism, sure. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:43:38 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No-knock warrants are for evidence preservation, not police safety, as was pointed out in the OP. Since they didn't find any evidence, why the no-knock? I'm guessing the taxpayers are going to be soaked good on this one. I know if I was one, I'd be calling for the chief's nuts, along with the judge who signed this bullshit warrant. No-Knock entry is constitutionally permissible when the occupant already knows of the officers' presence and purpose, when knocking and announcing would increase the danger to police or the occupants, and when knocking and announcing could lead to destruction of evidence. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:44:10 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Bama was not taking up for the dirty cops, he was saying that the author of the article twisted the facts and made it look less severe than it actually was. The author linked to this article (quote below) that plainly stated the facts. The author quote IMO is out of context and is referring to what the cops claimed (the fact the police made up the informant story). "We now know that these were all lies. In fact, everything about the Kathryn Johnston murder was corrupt. The initial arrest of the ex-con came via trumped-up charges. The police then invented an informant for the search warrant, and lied about overseeing a drug buy from Johnston's home." |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:46:28 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No-Knock entry is constitutionally permissible when the occupant already knows of the officers' presence and purpose, when knocking and announcing would increase the danger to police or the occupants, and when knocking and announcing could lead to destruction of evidence. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
No-knock warrants are for evidence preservation, not police safety, as was pointed out in the OP. Since they didn't find any evidence, why the no-knock? I'm guessing the taxpayers are going to be soaked good on this one. I know if I was one, I'd be calling for the chief's nuts, along with the judge who signed this bullshit warrant. No-Knock entry is constitutionally permissible when the occupant already knows of the officers' presence and purpose, when knocking and announcing would increase the danger to police or the occupants, and when knocking and announcing could lead to destruction of evidence. Years from now drone strikes will be Constitutional for the same reasoning. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:48:40 PM EDT
[#31]
One of my favorite lines from Bladerunner:
"You know the score pal, if you ain't cop, your little people!" And no, VA does not have a Castle Law, it clearly states that you cannot use deadly force to protect property. Though, if you feel your life is in danger you can. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:51:18 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail... This and someone should go to prison for their negligence. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:53:58 PM EDT
[#33]
That would be a head shot or is this like the Bama case where the 5 cops beat an unconsious man into coma then got fired and convicted only to have it overturned and them get their jobs back... They should all be still in prison even if the guy was guilty the video was bad...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 1:54:12 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Let me guess...no drugs found means the guy is white as snow and a model citizen? No. He deserved to die though. No question. Do I really need to add this: /sarcasm. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 2:04:48 PM EDT
[#35]
Again, why can't this shit happen to family members of:
SEAL TEAM X USMC Force Recon ARMY SF DELTA FORCE USMC STA Platoon ... Just askin'. Anyone that knows me knows that I'm not against the County Mounty. I'm am dead set against the WOD and unlawfulness {even if it is the Law} by Johnny Law. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 2:07:42 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The author linked to this article (quote below) that plainly stated the facts. The author quote IMO is out of context and is referring to what the cops claimed (the fact the police made up the informant story). "We now know that these were all lies. In fact, everything about the Kathryn Johnston murder was corrupt. The initial arrest of the ex-con came via trumped-up charges. The police then invented an informant for the search warrant, and lied about overseeing a drug buy from Johnston's home." Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Bama was not taking up for the dirty cops, he was saying that the author of the article twisted the facts and made it look less severe than it actually was. The author linked to this article (quote below) that plainly stated the facts. The author quote IMO is out of context and is referring to what the cops claimed (the fact the police made up the informant story). "We now know that these were all lies. In fact, everything about the Kathryn Johnston murder was corrupt. The initial arrest of the ex-con came via trumped-up charges. The police then invented an informant for the search warrant, and lied about overseeing a drug buy from Johnston's home." The article in the OP that was from the WAPO is the one that had a misrepresentation of facts, that omitted that fact that the informant was made up. The CNN article you linked to that had the part of the story you put in bold, Bama was agreeing with you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 2:14:26 PM EDT
[#37]
Fire and Rope seem to be the answers to home invasions. Just sayin.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 2:14:41 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Let me guess...no drugs found means the guy is white as snow and a model citizen? Pathetic.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 2:30:28 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Let me guess...no drugs found means the guy is white as snow and a model citizen? It's a pretty good indication that the burglar the police were working with is a liar. I mean the first clue is that he's a meth addicted burglar who explained the drugs found with him by saying "it's not my car!" |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 2:37:23 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So you're saying a raid based on false information (from the officers, not a CI) doesn't fit under the umbrella of "bad raid" You do understand how that sounds, don't you? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
No the truth is worse than what the author wrote. If you are going to publish something at least be truthful. This case should not even be mentioned in a "bad raid" article because that is not what it was. So you're saying a raid based on false information (from the officers, not a CI) doesn't fit under the umbrella of "bad raid" You do understand how that sounds, don't you? It was something straight out of Training Day. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 2:38:42 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Anyone who hasn't become increasingly uncomfortable with no-knocks, the "war" on drugs, etc is completely out to lunch and apparently wants their ass-wiped by the almighty state from cradle to grave... Wow. That's post of the day material right there. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 2:39:41 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The article in the OP that was from the WAPO is the one that had a misrepresentation of facts, that omitted that fact that the informant was made up. The CNN article you linked to that had the part of the story you put in bold, Bama was agreeing with you. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Bama was not taking up for the dirty cops, he was saying that the author of the article twisted the facts and made it look less severe than it actually was. The author linked to this article (quote below) that plainly stated the facts. The author quote IMO is out of context and is referring to what the cops claimed (the fact the police made up the informant story). "We now know that these were all lies. In fact, everything about the Kathryn Johnston murder was corrupt. The initial arrest of the ex-con came via trumped-up charges. The police then invented an informant for the search warrant, and lied about overseeing a drug buy from Johnston's home." The article in the OP that was from the WAPO is the one that had a misrepresentation of facts, that omitted that fact that the informant was made up. The CNN article you linked to that had the part of the story you put in bold, Bama was agreeing with you. The problem is Bama provided a quote from the OP and then stated it was lies. Any reasonable person would assume this to mean everything he quoted was a lie. How the fook are we supposed to know what part of the quote he's referring to? Now it just sounds like Bama is back-peddling to cover up his mistake, which is typical for most cops posting here when they are proven wrong. Quoted:
"a narcotics team from Atlanta killed 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston during a drug raid on her home, then attempted to plant drugs in her basement to cover its mistake. The team had been relying on a tip from an informant and did no corroborating investigation". Why do authors lie about things like this? It just taints everything else they write. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 2:53:58 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The problem is Bama provided a quote from the OP and then stated it was lies. Any reasonable person would assume this to mean everything he quoted was a lie. How the fook are we supposed to know what part of the quote he's referring to? Now it just sounds like Bama is back-peddling to cover up his mistake, which is typical for most cops posting here when they are proven wrong. In all fairness, it is ridiculous how carefully cops have to parse their words here. But it's the reality of the situation. However, it was rather ambiguous. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 2:59:59 PM EDT
[#44]
How about the old fashion search warrant executed by patrol officers?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 3:15:55 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
In all fairness, it is ridiculous how carefully cops have to parse their words here. But it's the reality of the situation. However, it was rather ambiguous. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The problem is Bama provided a quote from the OP and then stated it was lies. Any reasonable person would assume this to mean everything he quoted was a lie. How the fook are we supposed to know what part of the quote he's referring to? Now it just sounds like Bama is back-peddling to cover up his mistake, which is typical for most cops posting here when they are proven wrong. In all fairness, it is ridiculous how carefully cops have to parse their words here. But it's the reality of the situation. However, it was rather ambiguous. Life is like that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 3:31:23 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Modus operandi. Attack the article when it makes TBL look bad. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
a narcotics team from Atlanta killed 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston during a drug raid on her home, then attempted to plant drugs in her basement to cover its mistake. The team had been relying on a tip from an informant and did no corroborating investigation. Why do authors lie about things like this? It just taints everything else they write. Ex-Atlanta officers get prison time for cover-up in deadly raid Link All three men pleaded guilty to federal charges of conspiracy to violate civil rights resulting in death. Smith and Junnier also pleaded guilty to state charges of voluntary manslaughter and making false statements, and Smith admitted to planting bags of marijuana in Johnston's home after her death. http://media.247sports.com/Uploads/Assets/153/63/1063153.gif Modus operandi. Attack the article when it makes TBL look bad. I don't recall ever a time where Bama has been a TBL kind of guy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 3:38:16 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
a narcotics team from Atlanta killed 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston during a drug raid on her home, then attempted to plant drugs in her basement to cover its mistake. The team had been relying on a tip from an informant and did no corroborating investigation. Why do authors lie about things like this? It just taints everything else they write. Perhaps they learned it from the police? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 3:41:03 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Let me guess...no drugs found means the guy is white as snow and a model citizen? What it means is a free man was murdered in his own home by the very organization that is supposed to protect him from being murdered in his own home. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 3:49:58 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Let me guess...no drugs found means the guy is white as snow and a model citizen? No, but it does means the police intel was flawed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2014 3:52:13 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Did you check to see who the author is? You'll only need one guess. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
a narcotics team from Atlanta killed 92-year-old Kathryn Johnston during a drug raid on her home, then attempted to plant drugs in her basement to cover its mistake. The team had been relying on a tip from an informant and did no corroborating investigation. Why do authors lie about things like this? It just taints everything else they write. Did you check to see who the author is? You'll only need one guess. Now it makes sense. Should have known. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
