User Panel
Quoted:
So they basically told you to pay special attention to pre-2013 correspondence. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
DOJ keeps asking to create search terms for them. Oh, and they are trying to limit the search to 2013 and after. Lol. No. More likely that 2013 and up is in a searchable database already hence the search term request. They are trying to limit what he could find by making him limit it. It's easy to get the right answer provided you know what the questions should be. 42 |
|
The DOJ hires liberal lawyers . There was an article in the last couple of years about how the DOJ hires . The DOJ hires with an agenda .
|
|
|
I guess they are going to do nothing and wait for the lawsuit. Then do more nothing.
|
|
Quoted:
What was their generic answer View Quote http://www.sdslaw.us/single-post/2016/10/10/ATF-answers-complaint-in-NFATCA-FOIA-case here. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I heard that NFATCA has an open meeting to the public the Thursday before the knob creek shoot in October. If anyone can attend it would be interesting to hear what they have to say. Any idea where the meeting is? https://imgur.com/VwHdpyB Is anyone planning on going to this open meeting? Would be interesting to here if they bring this up. |
|
Quoted:
Is anyone planning on going to this open meeting? Would be interesting to here if they bring this up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I heard that NFATCA has an open meeting to the public the Thursday before the knob creek shoot in October. If anyone can attend it would be interesting to hear what they have to say. Any idea where the meeting is? https://imgur.com/VwHdpyB Is anyone planning on going to this open meeting? Would be interesting to here if they bring this up. Im going to try and be there in time for the meeting. |
|
Nolo, off your website:
They've proposed 5 (yes, FIVE) dates for production. Can there really be that many records? View Quote I'm no lawyer, not up on FOIA and generally terminally stupid--why is five days such a surprise? I guess I don't understand the context of the word "production" here. |
|
Quoted: Nolo, off your website: I'm no lawyer, not up on FOIA and generally terminally stupid--why is five days such a surprise? I guess I don't understand the context of the word "production" here. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Nolo, off your website: They've proposed 5 (yes, FIVE) dates for production. Can there really be that many records? I'm no lawyer, not up on FOIA and generally terminally stupid--why is five days such a surprise? I guess I don't understand the context of the word "production" here. They are saying that it will be so onerous or so much work to make the information requested available that they need 5 different days to do it. "Production" as in "produce the requested information." Which seems ridiculous. |
|
Quoted:
They are saying that it will be so onerous or so much work to make the information requested available that they need 5 different days to do it. "Production" as in "produce the requested information." Which seems ridiculous. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Nolo, off your website: They've proposed 5 (yes, FIVE) dates for production. Can there really be that many records? I'm no lawyer, not up on FOIA and generally terminally stupid--why is five days such a surprise? I guess I don't understand the context of the word "production" here. They are saying that it will be so onerous or so much work to make the information requested available that they need 5 different days to do it. "Production" as in "produce the requested information." Which seems ridiculous. Must be a lot of stuff. Can't wait to get it. |
|
Quoted:
Must be a lot of stuff. Can't wait to get it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Nolo, off your website: They've proposed 5 (yes, FIVE) dates for production. Can there really be that many records? I'm no lawyer, not up on FOIA and generally terminally stupid--why is five days such a surprise? I guess I don't understand the context of the word "production" here. They are saying that it will be so onerous or so much work to make the information requested available that they need 5 different days to do it. "Production" as in "produce the requested information." Which seems ridiculous. Must be a lot of stuff. Can't wait to get it. I'm waiting to see how much is either redacted or missing to protect a CI. |
|
Quoted:
I'm waiting to see how much is either redacted or missing to protect a CI. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Nolo, off your website: They've proposed 5 (yes, FIVE) dates for production. Can there really be that many records? I'm no lawyer, not up on FOIA and generally terminally stupid--why is five days such a surprise? I guess I don't understand the context of the word "production" here. They are saying that it will be so onerous or so much work to make the information requested available that they need 5 different days to do it. "Production" as in "produce the requested information." Which seems ridiculous. Must be a lot of stuff. Can't wait to get it. I'm waiting to see how much is either redacted or missing to protect a CI. Only one way to find out!!!! |
|
|
Quoted:
They are saying that it will be so onerous or so much work to make the information requested available that they need 5 different days to do it. "Production" as in "produce the requested information." Which seems ridiculous. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Nolo, off your website: They've proposed 5 (yes, FIVE) dates for production. Can there really be that many records? I'm no lawyer, not up on FOIA and generally terminally stupid--why is five days such a surprise? I guess I don't understand the context of the word "production" here. They are saying that it will be so onerous or so much work to make the information requested available that they need 5 different days to do it. "Production" as in "produce the requested information." Which seems ridiculous. So, produce as in "hand box of files to FOIA requester"? When my kids were two, they came up with better lines than that. |
|
Quoted:
I'm waiting to see how much is either redacted or missing to protect a CI. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Nolo, off your website: They've proposed 5 (yes, FIVE) dates for production. Can there really be that many records? I'm no lawyer, not up on FOIA and generally terminally stupid--why is five days such a surprise? I guess I don't understand the context of the word "production" here. They are saying that it will be so onerous or so much work to make the information requested available that they need 5 different days to do it. "Production" as in "produce the requested information." Which seems ridiculous. Must be a lot of stuff. Can't wait to get it. I'm waiting to see how much is either redacted or missing to protect a CI. Not even a CI. DOS vetted FOIA requests with the Clinton Foundation. http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/11/wikileaks-state-dept-coordinated-email-release-with-clinton-campaign/ I'll wager ATF will vet these with the shitbags at NFATCA and there will be collusion to obscure the truth. |
|
Court ordered the following production schedule:
? Friday, November 18, 2016 – first production deadline; ? Monday, December 19, 2016 – second production deadline; ? Wednesday, January 18, 2017 – third production deadline; ? Friday, February 17, 2017 – fourth production deadline; and ? Monday, March 20, 2017 – fifth and final production deadline |
|
|
Quoted:
Court ordered the following production schedule: ? Friday, November 18, 2016 – first production deadline; ? Monday, December 19, 2016 – second production deadline; ? Wednesday, January 18, 2017 – third production deadline; ? Friday, February 17, 2017 – fourth production deadline; and ? Monday, March 20, 2017 – fifth and final production deadline View Quote Does this mean they should provide 20% of the material at the five dates or that they get to blow you off 4 times then do a major dump of redacted material on you and say that's it? |
|
Quoted:
Does this mean they should provide 20% of the material at the five dates or that they get to blow you off 4 times then do a major dump of redacted material on you and say that's it? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Court ordered the following production schedule: ? Friday, November 18, 2016 – first production deadline; ? Monday, December 19, 2016 – second production deadline; ? Wednesday, January 18, 2017 – third production deadline; ? Friday, February 17, 2017 – fourth production deadline; and ? Monday, March 20, 2017 – fifth and final production deadline Does this mean they should provide 20% of the material at the five dates or that they get to blow you off 4 times then do a major dump of redacted material on you and say that's it? Up to them really. No set number of docs per drop. |
|
|
Quoted:
ATF is blowing it off until after the election, then stretching out the timeframe in which they must release the documents requested under the FOIA with a final disposition date over year after the documents were initially requested. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
so,in laymans terms? ATF is blowing it off until after the election, then stretching out the timeframe in which they must release the documents requested under the FOIA with a final disposition date over year after the documents were initially requested. Although, it may be because: 1. they're going to print out the whole slew, to ensure it's non-searchable. 2. there's so many documents, it will literally take that long. 3. they're busy trying to ensure that they'll get charged with whatever wrongdoing they're guilty of by the current administration, and get a midnight pardon. |
|
Were they looking for this?
|
|
Quoted:
Although, it may be because: 1. they're going to print out the whole slew, to ensure it's non-searchable. 2. there's so many documents, it will literally take that long. 3. they're busy trying to ensure that they'll get charged with whatever wrongdoing they're guilty of by the current administration, and get a midnight pardon. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
so,in laymans terms? ATF is blowing it off until after the election, then stretching out the timeframe in which they must release the documents requested under the FOIA with a final disposition date over year after the documents were initially requested. Although, it may be because: 1. they're going to print out the whole slew, to ensure it's non-searchable. 2. there's so many documents, it will literally take that long. 3. they're busy trying to ensure that they'll get charged with whatever wrongdoing they're guilty of by the current administration, and get a midnight pardon. Meh. I have high speed scanners and can ocr whatever they send. |
|
Quoted:
Although, it may be because: 1. they're going to print out the whole slew, to ensure it's non-searchable. 2. there's so many documents, it will literally take that long. 3. they're busy trying to ensure that they'll get charged with whatever wrongdoing they're guilty of by the current administration, and get a midnight pardon. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
so,in laymans terms? ATF is blowing it off until after the election, then stretching out the timeframe in which they must release the documents requested under the FOIA with a final disposition date over year after the documents were initially requested. Although, it may be because: 1. they're going to print out the whole slew, to ensure it's non-searchable. 2. there's so many documents, it will literally take that long. 3. they're busy trying to ensure that they'll get charged with whatever wrongdoing they're guilty of by the current administration, and get a midnight pardon. Taking the effort to bust out that blue and white mimeograph machine and make a few generations of copies takes time. |
|
http://www.sdslaw.us/single-post/2016/10/28/Today-we-filed-a-Response-and-Cross-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-in-an-OIG-FOIA-dealing-with-NFA-issues
Different case, but still has some nfatca flavorings. This is for the NFRTR audit work papers. Nfatca is referenced in them. |
|
This is an anti archive bump. I will get some docs either tomorrow or a few days after
|
|
|
|
|
No filing and no docs yet. They usually mail them hard copy, so I'll probably have something by next week. And then monthly for a bit.
|
|
Dear Nolo C., We're sorry for the delay, but due to unforeseen circumstances, we will be out of the office until 1/2/2017 We totally missed the fact that there were 3 federal holidays so close together, and so many had vacation time with family already planned. By being late JUST ONE DAY! it has totally messed with that damn schedule that judge pinned us to. As soon as we can get back in the office , reminisce about the good times, and get everything back in motion again, we expect to have this ready for you February 2017, at the latest. Your friends, The BATFE. P.S. barring any further complications. |
|
hold on boys and girls. the documents are here. OCRing the docs now..
|
|
|
|
|
when they declare pages exempt because they are "non-responsive", what does that mean?
They have exempted lots of pages. |
|
Why is The NFATCA asking the ATF to redact information in their response letters? or did I read that wrong?
"Since there are no regulations concerning this issue I am asking, on behalf of the NF A TC A, for a response from the Bureau on what the status is on ownership of any type of 40mm round and what the specific status is on pocessing tracer ammunition. I will be publishing this information for our membership through our web site. If at all possible you can redact the information in your response to the .......... letter and let us know how to proceed. A TF has published a lot of opinion letters on both issues but the NF A TCA has nothing to go on that could be shared with the rest of the industry. This entire letter debacle with ........makes me very angry. This tells me that letters of opinion are being sent to certain personnel and that industry has no access to that data. In short, I need your help." |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.