User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:06:16 PM EDT
[#1]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:07:01 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It is crazy that we are 50 million guns short. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
He was on the Fox morning show about 20 minutes ago saying that right now we are stuck with the 2nd amendment and the 14th amendment so we should have a discussion about further amendments to the constitution to repeal the 2nd amendment and "do something that makes sense." He said something to the effect of "I think it's crazy that in a country of 350 million people that we have over 300 million guns."  It is crazy that we are 50 million guns short. I'm doing my best to make up for the shortage. 
Damn being poor, not having a 6k sq. ft. house, and no super model wife. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:09:02 PM EDT
[#3]
And why is he on FOX?
Isn't FOX newz a uber-rightwing propaganda outlet? Or are they changing their tune in order to support Jeb? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:10:13 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Let's give them a sporting chance. It'll be fun. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
You want every liberal and progressive to have a gun? History has shown that doesn't work out very well for the rest of us. Let's give them a sporting chance. It'll be fun. No it won't. They will still be trying to drive home, open a gun safe to get the gun out, remove trigger locks, unlock ammo cabinet, load mags, and try to remember how to charge the weapon by the time things are over. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:16:50 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It is crazy that we are 50 million guns short. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:17:02 PM EDT
[#6]
The 2nd was supposed to limit the govt's ability to infringe on that God given natural right.
It has nothing to do with whether or not people have and carry guns. I don't think he understands what will happen if the 2nd is repealed. I don't think it will be all unicorn farts and rainbow parades. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:18:44 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
And why is he on FOX? Isn't FOX newz a uber-rightwing propaganda outlet? Or are they changing their tune in order to support Jeb? They've pretty much always been shills for big government Republicans. Guys like Stossel, Cavuto, and Napolitano were always the exception. And now have pretty much all moved over to the business channel. Which is funny, because the other networks are similar. Who is that Italian guy who reports from the trading floor for MSNBC? I love it when he goes on a tirade. Honestly, as far as cable news goes, the only thing I can stand to watch is the business news. From any of them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:19:18 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The 2nd was supposed to limit the govt's ability to infringe on that God given natural right. It has nothing to do with whether or not people have and carry guns. I don't think he understands what will happen if the 2nd is repealed. I don't think it will be all unicorn farts and rainbow parades. It's the only thing pretecting the 1st |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:20:54 PM EDT
[#9]
Fuck him, and anyone that gives him air time!!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:21:17 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
MSC182 on ARFCOM says Geraldo can choke on a dick. Ditto and I'm sure he has plenty of times. FGR, FHRC, FBHO. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:21:43 PM EDT
[#11]
Big govt republicans are just as bad as big govt dems.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:26:28 PM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:
He was on the Fox morning show about 20 minutes ago saying that right now we are stuck with the 2nd amendment and the 14th amendment so we should have a discussion about further amendments to the constitution to repeal the 2nd amendment and "do something that makes sense." He said something to the effect of "I think it's crazy that in a country of 350 million people that we have over 300 million guns." BUT BUT BUT THATS NOT WHAT THE SECOND AMENDMENT MEANS...WHY SHOULD IT NEED REPEALED? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:27:53 PM EDT
[#13]
Geraldo still thinks that he's relevant in the world?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:29:43 PM EDT
[#14]
Geraldo is a racist dirtbag. Fuck him with a pinecone.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:33:05 PM EDT
[#15]
I've said it before, and I will say it again-Fuck Geraldo.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:33:40 PM EDT
[#16]
But a while ago, he admitted to carrying a gun while in A'stan.
"Knowledge of Rivera’s wartime gun-totting came via his own admission a week before the AP story ran. It happened on Fox News, where Rivera said, "If they’re going to get us, it’s going to be in a gun fight.” An anchor followed up on the question by asking Rivera if he was carrying a gun and he responded by "nodding yes.” More here http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/03/01/geraldo-rivera-guns-for-me-but-not-for-thee/ |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:37:44 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
But a while ago, he admitted to carrying a gun while in A'stan. "Knowledge of Rivera’s wartime gun-totting came via his own admission a week before the AP story ran. It happened on Fox News, where Rivera said, "If they’re going to get us, it’s going to be in a gun fight.” An anchor followed up on the question by asking Rivera if he was carrying a gun and he responded by "nodding yes.” More here http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/03/01/geraldo-rivera-guns-for-me-but-not-for-thee/ liberal morans are known for being hypocrites. It's a requirement of the personality disorder |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:39:20 PM EDT
[#18]
Can we repeal his citizenship?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:43:15 PM EDT
[#19]
Meh....he is jumping on the current bandwagon and saying stuff to rile the masses, generate heat and get people to tune in to see the outrage.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 12:43:53 PM EDT
[#20]
I hope he gets a little to close to the next hurricane he's covering.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 1:53:16 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
And why is he on FOX? Isn't FOX newz a uber-rightwing propaganda outlet? Or are they changing their tune in order to support Jeb? Nope. Never has been. Just a bit more to the right than the others. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 2:02:19 PM EDT
[#22]
The 2nd Amendment merely notifies the state that the citizen has the right to keep and bear arms. Even if repealed, it does not remove that right, because were were endowed by our Creator with that right, and that right existed before the government of the US did. There is literally no constitutional method that can take away that right. Any method used to deny, whether it be through the guise of a constitutional repeal, or an outright tyrannical confiscation attempt, is illegal, and will have no effect on those of us who believe that the right is inherent in man, and that the right is enumerated for the benefit of keeping the government from overreaching it's bounds. Those rights are not given by government, and it is our duty as patriots to fight back against any that see fit to usurp our God given rights.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 2:05:11 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The 2nd Amendment merely notifies the state that the citizen has the right to keep and bear arms. Even if repealed, it does not remove that right, because were were endowed by our Creator with that right, and that right existed before the government of the US did. There is literally no constitutional method that can take away that right. Any method used to deny, whether it be through the guise of a constitutional repeal, or an outright tyrannical confiscation attempt, is illegal, and will have no effect on those of us who believe that the right is inherent in man, and that the right is enumerated for the benefit of keeping the government from overreaching it's bounds. Those rights are not given by government, and it is our duty as patriots to fight back against any that see fit to usurp our God given rights. Close. The people could amend the constitution to grant the Federal government the authority to regulate the possession of firearms. But you are right in that the absence of the second Amendment would not grant the Federal government that authority. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 2:07:01 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
300 million is wishful thinking for gun grabbers who thought 270 million was accurate in the early 90s. Yeah, I would say a million a year is on the conservative side. Just a bit. http://i.imgur.com/X44cZSk.jpg It's beautiful. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 2:21:19 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Close. The people could amend the constitution to grant the Federal government the authority to regulate the possession of firearms. But you are right in that the absence of the second Amendment would not grant the Federal government that authority. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The 2nd Amendment merely notifies the state that the citizen has the right to keep and bear arms. Even if repealed, it does not remove that right, because were were endowed by our Creator with that right, and that right existed before the government of the US did. There is literally no constitutional method that can take away that right. Any method used to deny, whether it be through the guise of a constitutional repeal, or an outright tyrannical confiscation attempt, is illegal, and will have no effect on those of us who believe that the right is inherent in man, and that the right is enumerated for the benefit of keeping the government from overreaching it's bounds. Those rights are not given by government, and it is our duty as patriots to fight back against any that see fit to usurp our God given rights. Close. The people could amend the constitution to grant the Federal government the authority to regulate the possession of firearms. But you are right in that the absence of the second Amendment would not grant the Federal government that authority. Even if amended , they have no right. The government did not grant us that right. A higher authority granted it to us. Therefore, government cannot take away that right. It must answer to the power that granted it to us. Unless the Higher Power that granted us that right decides to change His will and law since time began, we will always have that right. Any attempt by anyone other than our Creator is null, void, and illegal, and I will treat it as such, and so will any other patriot. The government has no power to regulate or confiscate unless you give it that power over you. That is an individual decision. If that time were to come, there may be only 10% that would openly fight that unjust and illegal deed, but what that 10% could do, would change the face of the nation forever, just as in 1776. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 2:26:09 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It's beautiful. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: 300 million is wishful thinking for gun grabbers who thought 270 million was accurate in the early 90s. Yeah, I would say a million a year is on the conservative side. Just a bit. http://i.imgur.com/X44cZSk.jpg It's beautiful. The numbers are, but NICS is a cancer that should die. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 2:26:45 PM EDT
[#27]
I remember seeing Geraldo on Fox, when he was in Afghanistan right after 9/11, bragging on how he had a gun and would shoot OBL himself. Fox pays these guys to stir the pot; though, what they have to say is so ridiculously stupid that I have to wonder if Fox isn't desperate for some reason. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 2:26:58 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Even if amended , they have no right. The government did not grant us that right. A higher authority granted it to us. Therefore, government cannot take away that right. It must answer to the power that granted it to us. Unless the Higher Power that granted us that right decides to change His will and law since time began, we will always have that right. Any attempt by anyone other than our Creator is null, void, and illegal, and I will treat it as such, and so will any other patriot. The government has no power to regulate or confiscate unless you give it that power over you. That is an individual decision. If that time were to come, there may be only 10% that would openly fight that unjust and illegal deed, but what that 10% could do, would change the face of the nation forever, just as in 1776. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The 2nd Amendment merely notifies the state that the citizen has the right to keep and bear arms. Even if repealed, it does not remove that right, because were were endowed by our Creator with that right, and that right existed before the government of the US did. There is literally no constitutional method that can take away that right. Any method used to deny, whether it be through the guise of a constitutional repeal, or an outright tyrannical confiscation attempt, is illegal, and will have no effect on those of us who believe that the right is inherent in man, and that the right is enumerated for the benefit of keeping the government from overreaching it's bounds. Those rights are not given by government, and it is our duty as patriots to fight back against any that see fit to usurp our God given rights. Close. The people could amend the constitution to grant the Federal government the authority to regulate the possession of firearms. But you are right in that the absence of the second Amendment would not grant the Federal government that authority. Even if amended , they have no right. The government did not grant us that right. A higher authority granted it to us. Therefore, government cannot take away that right. It must answer to the power that granted it to us. Unless the Higher Power that granted us that right decides to change His will and law since time began, we will always have that right. Any attempt by anyone other than our Creator is null, void, and illegal, and I will treat it as such, and so will any other patriot. The government has no power to regulate or confiscate unless you give it that power over you. That is an individual decision. If that time were to come, there may be only 10% that would openly fight that unjust and illegal deed, but what that 10% could do, would change the face of the nation forever, just as in 1776. The whole point of government is surrendering authority. Every power the government has, enumerated in the constitution, represents a voluntary surrender of authority. Are you telling me that a constitutional amendment to grant the government the authority to do something wouldn't be constitutional? This is as dumb as the people claiming a constitutional amendment repealing the 14th amendment wouldn't be constitutional. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 2:29:58 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why would anyone pay any attention to anything that Geraldo Fox News says? FIFY |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 2:30:02 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Fuck him, and all the Fox sellouts. Yep, time to dump FOX. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 2:30:20 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It is crazy that we are 50 million guns short. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: He was on the Fox morning show about 20 minutes ago saying that right now we are stuck with the 2nd amendment and the 14th amendment so we should have a discussion about further amendments to the constitution to repeal the 2nd amendment and "do something that makes sense." He said something to the effect of "I think it's crazy that in a country of 350 million people that we have over 300 million guns." It is crazy that we are 50 million guns short. Should be 700 million, two is one one is none |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 2:30:38 PM EDT
[#32]
Quoted:
He was on the Fox morning show about 20 minutes ago saying that right now we are stuck with the 2nd amendment and the 14th amendment so we should have a discussion about further amendments to the constitution to repeal the 2nd amendment and "do something that makes sense." He said something to the effect of "I think it's crazy that in a country of 350 million people that we have over 300 million guns." I agree with this statement. We should have at least 350 million guns!! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 2:42:21 PM EDT
[#33]
I will occasionally watch 'The Five' on FOX, but if he is one of the guest I immediately change the channel.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 2:52:05 PM EDT
[#34]
Remember this when you support Fox by watching their shows.
They are worse than CNN and MSNBC in the fact that they create a false persona hiding their true liberal selves. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 3:05:20 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It is crazy that we are 50 million guns short. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
He was on the Fox morning show about 20 minutes ago saying that right now we are stuck with the 2nd amendment and the 14th amendment so we should have a discussion about further amendments to the constitution to repeal the 2nd amendment and "do something that makes sense." He said something to the effect of "I think it's crazy that in a country of 350 million people that we have over 300 million guns." It is crazy that we are 50 million guns short. Yeah about that. I lost my internet for a month so stopped bidding on gunbroker. Sorry |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 4:12:27 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I saw the segment. You're right about his point but he is anti gun to the core. He would love to see the 2nd Amendment repealed. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
He wasn't serious. He was playing the liberals Devils advocate. He was saying the liberals have as much a chance of repealing the 2nd Amendment as the Conservatives do of repealing the 14th Amendment. I saw the segment. You're right about his point but he is anti gun to the core. He would love to see the 2nd Amendment repealed. NY lib like Donald Trump. They'll settle for marginalizing Heller/ McDonald, Citizens United and Canadian-Aus-Euro-socialist gun control. 
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/280754630047199232 
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/627841345789558788 
"That is not the job of the United States Senate to vilify private citizens." ~Ted Cruz
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 4:24:04 PM EDT
[#37]
Jerry Rivers is a clown
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 4:28:16 PM EDT
[#38]
#repealGeraldo
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 4:30:52 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Go fuck yourself Geraldo. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 4:38:29 PM EDT
[#40]
Ok if we do the 6th too and then dig mass graves and systematically exterminate liberals(gas,guns,det cord, however). Fetch the voting records, anyone with 2 obama votes can get on the train.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 5:32:34 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The whole point of government is surrendering authority. Every power the government has, enumerated in the constitution, represents a voluntary surrender of authority. Are you telling me that a constitutional amendment to grant the government the authority to do something wouldn't be constitutional? This is as dumb as the people claiming a constitutional amendment repealing the 14th amendment wouldn't be constitutional. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The 2nd Amendment merely notifies the state that the citizen has the right to keep and bear arms. Even if repealed, it does not remove that right, because were were endowed by our Creator with that right, and that right existed before the government of the US did. There is literally no constitutional method that can take away that right. Any method used to deny, whether it be through the guise of a constitutional repeal, or an outright tyrannical confiscation attempt, is illegal, and will have no effect on those of us who believe that the right is inherent in man, and that the right is enumerated for the benefit of keeping the government from overreaching it's bounds. Those rights are not given by government, and it is our duty as patriots to fight back against any that see fit to usurp our God given rights. Close. The people could amend the constitution to grant the Federal government the authority to regulate the possession of firearms. But you are right in that the absence of the second Amendment would not grant the Federal government that authority. Even if amended , they have no right. The government did not grant us that right. A higher authority granted it to us. Therefore, government cannot take away that right. It must answer to the power that granted it to us. Unless the Higher Power that granted us that right decides to change His will and law since time began, we will always have that right. Any attempt by anyone other than our Creator is null, void, and illegal, and I will treat it as such, and so will any other patriot. The government has no power to regulate or confiscate unless you give it that power over you. That is an individual decision. If that time were to come, there may be only 10% that would openly fight that unjust and illegal deed, but what that 10% could do, would change the face of the nation forever, just as in 1776. The whole point of government is surrendering authority. Every power the government has, enumerated in the constitution, represents a voluntary surrender of authority. Are you telling me that a constitutional amendment to grant the government the authority to do something wouldn't be constitutional? This is as dumb as the people claiming a constitutional amendment repealing the 14th amendment wouldn't be constitutional. that is exactly what I'm telling you. The Bill of Rights is not a list of powers that the government has. That is where you make your mistake. The Bill of Rights is a list of powers that the people have, that the people were given by their Creator, that the people had before the government existed. It is a list of powers of the people, that the government cannot touch, and have no power to touch, because they are not the authors of those powers. The Creator was the author, and only the Creator can change them or eliminate them. The whole premise of listing those things, and stating that they were given by God, and not the government, was so that no government in the future could modify of deny them in the way that the British government they had just fought a war with did. They wrote them in such a way that no man, in any position of power, could ever touch them. In their day, when something was granted and given by God, no human had the power to take it away. The very definition of inalienable speaks to it. "Inalienable" Unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor: There is no modifier by which an inalienable right may be taken or given. It simply cannot be, by anyone, government or other. They put those rights out of reach for a reason. They weren't stupid men. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 6:18:13 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
that is exactly what I'm telling you. The Bill of Rights is not a list of powers that the government has. That is where you make your mistake. The Bill of Rights is a list of powers that the people have, that the people were given by their Creator, that the people had before the government existed. It is a list of powers of the people, that the government cannot touch, and have no power to touch, because they are not the authors of those powers. The Creator was the author, and only the Creator can change them or eliminate them. The whole premise of listing those things, and stating that they were given by God, and not the government, was so that no government in the future could modify of deny them in the way that the British government they had just fought a war with did. They wrote them in such a way that no man, in any position of power, could ever touch them. In their day, when something was granted and given by God, no human had the power to take it away. The very definition of inalienable speaks to it. "Inalienable" Unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor: There is no modifier by which an inalienable right may be taken or given. It simply cannot be, by anyone, government or other. They put those rights out of reach for a reason. They weren't stupid men. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The 2nd Amendment merely notifies the state that the citizen has the right to keep and bear arms. Even if repealed, it does not remove that right, because were were endowed by our Creator with that right, and that right existed before the government of the US did. There is literally no constitutional method that can take away that right. Any method used to deny, whether it be through the guise of a constitutional repeal, or an outright tyrannical confiscation attempt, is illegal, and will have no effect on those of us who believe that the right is inherent in man, and that the right is enumerated for the benefit of keeping the government from overreaching it's bounds. Those rights are not given by government, and it is our duty as patriots to fight back against any that see fit to usurp our God given rights. Close. The people could amend the constitution to grant the Federal government the authority to regulate the possession of firearms. But you are right in that the absence of the second Amendment would not grant the Federal government that authority. Even if amended , they have no right. The government did not grant us that right. A higher authority granted it to us. Therefore, government cannot take away that right. It must answer to the power that granted it to us. Unless the Higher Power that granted us that right decides to change His will and law since time began, we will always have that right. Any attempt by anyone other than our Creator is null, void, and illegal, and I will treat it as such, and so will any other patriot. The government has no power to regulate or confiscate unless you give it that power over you. That is an individual decision. If that time were to come, there may be only 10% that would openly fight that unjust and illegal deed, but what that 10% could do, would change the face of the nation forever, just as in 1776. The whole point of government is surrendering authority. Every power the government has, enumerated in the constitution, represents a voluntary surrender of authority. Are you telling me that a constitutional amendment to grant the government the authority to do something wouldn't be constitutional? This is as dumb as the people claiming a constitutional amendment repealing the 14th amendment wouldn't be constitutional. that is exactly what I'm telling you. The Bill of Rights is not a list of powers that the government has. That is where you make your mistake. The Bill of Rights is a list of powers that the people have, that the people were given by their Creator, that the people had before the government existed. It is a list of powers of the people, that the government cannot touch, and have no power to touch, because they are not the authors of those powers. The Creator was the author, and only the Creator can change them or eliminate them. The whole premise of listing those things, and stating that they were given by God, and not the government, was so that no government in the future could modify of deny them in the way that the British government they had just fought a war with did. They wrote them in such a way that no man, in any position of power, could ever touch them. In their day, when something was granted and given by God, no human had the power to take it away. The very definition of inalienable speaks to it. "Inalienable" Unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor: There is no modifier by which an inalienable right may be taken or given. It simply cannot be, by anyone, government or other. They put those rights out of reach for a reason. They weren't stupid men. You're preaching up a good storm, but it's mostly going to the choir. Most of what you've said there is true. The bill of rights aren't a list of powers of the government. I have never said otherwise. The government doesn't have the authority to act where it hasn't been granted such authority. That is true. I have never said otherwise. That's why the founders actually had lengthy, published debates about whether a "bill of rights" should even be added to the document. Why include amendments to forbid the government from doing things that everyone already understood it had no authorization to do in the first place? That doesn't mean they intended to forbid the people from authorizing the government to do things. That goes against the purpose of even having a written constitution. What other powers/rights/authority may the people not transfer to government? Is there a list? Or is it just understood? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 6:19:02 PM EDT
[#43]
More proof we need media reform.
It's obvious these media whores are being controlled, all being in lock step with the same narrative, same talking points. 7 men/network owners should not have a monopoly on controlling 95% of our "news" media and networks. Time to break them and sell them into smaller less controlled networks. Worked with Standard Oil and Ma Bell....time for some "diversity" in media ownership. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 6:21:40 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You want every liberal and progressive to have a gun? History has shown that doesn't work out very well for the rest of us. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
He was on the Fox morning show about 20 minutes ago saying that right now we are stuck with the 2nd amendment and the 14th amendment so we should have a discussion about further amendments to the constitution to repeal the 2nd amendment and "do something that makes sense." He said something to the effect of "I think it's crazy that in a country of 350 million people that we have over 300 million guns." It is crazy that we are 50 million guns short. You want every liberal and progressive to have a gun? History has shown that doesn't work out very well for the rest of us. You wouldn't shoot an unarmed man, would you?. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 6:23:10 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It is crazy that we are 50 million guns short. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
He was on the Fox morning show about 20 minutes ago saying that right now we are stuck with the 2nd amendment and the 14th amendment so we should have a discussion about further amendments to the constitution to repeal the 2nd amendment and "do something that makes sense." He said something to the effect of "I think it's crazy that in a country of 350 million people that we have over 300 million guns." It is crazy that we are 50 million guns short. first thing I thought 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 6:23:20 PM EDT
[#46]
I'm willing to go to war over that one Jerry....
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 6:25:37 PM EDT
[#47]
Just as clueless now as he was then.
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 6:28:44 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
But I think we can all agree, you need at least one backup. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
He was on the Fox morning show about 20 minutes ago saying that right now we are stuck with the 2nd amendment and the 14th amendment so we should have a discussion about further amendments to the constitution to repeal the 2nd amendment and "do something that makes sense." He said something to the effect of "I think it's crazy that in a country of 350 million people that we have over 300 million guns." It is crazy that we are 50 million guns short. But I think we can all agree, you need at least one backup. looks to me we are about 600 million short of where we should be. One is none, two is one.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 6:30:36 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The antigunners coming out in favor of repealing the 2nd Amendment is actually great news for the pro-gun side! 1. It "drops the mask," so to speak, and reveals their true intentions. This is better for us than the standard "I support the 2nd Amendment, but...." 2. It wastes their time and resources on an impossible quest. Amending the constitution is difficult anyway, and amending it to repeal the 2nd simply isn't going to happen. (Unless there's a constitutional convention -- or "convention of states" -- and then all bets are off.) and people wonder why we are against that convention that some here keep calling for... |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/28/2015 6:30:36 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Where is a skinhead with a chair when you need him. Yep. Bust that nose again.
|
|
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
