Posted: 9/23/2014 10:26:55 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote History Quoted:
No, it is, as you said, speculation. M-W defines speculate as "to take to be true on the basis of insufficient evidence." That's how people refer to "making up shit" in polite society. In your case, it's not a matter of "insufficient evidence", it's "no evidence". Or, more accurately, "in the face of the evidence to the contrary". The victim's mother said that Davis had physically abused Arrendale in the past. Davis's ex-wife said they were having a conflict over custody. Your insistence that she was murdered because she was cheating says more about you than it does about her.
As to your personal experience figuring into your assessment of the odds, I doubt that you've murdered enough women for cheating on you to constitute a statistically valid sample of the female population. Now, prejudice, that I might believe. So instead of all this limp dick tap dancing and weaseling you've done in this thread, why not just come out and say that you believe that any white woman in an intimate relationship with a black man is trash, and most likely a lying, cheating whore in the bargain. Hell, go all out and call her a mud shark, not like Arrendale's going to show up here to defend herself. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
And what odds would those be? And if, as you say, infidelity doesn't enter into the moral calculus of her demise, why speculate about it?
Every murderer has his or her own reasons for committing the crime.
My bet is that his reason for murdering her is that she cheated on him.
He is still guilty of murder. Her death is not her fault.
I see. So you decided you'd make up shit about a dead woman just for the hell of it, with neither purpose nor basis? By the way, I'm still waiting for you to tell me about "the odds".
I didn't make up anything. It's my personal bet, and mine alone. The odds are based on nothing more than personal experience, perception and prejudice.
No, it is, as you said, speculation. M-W defines speculate as "to take to be true on the basis of insufficient evidence." That's how people refer to "making up shit" in polite society. In your case, it's not a matter of "insufficient evidence", it's "no evidence". Or, more accurately, "in the face of the evidence to the contrary". The victim's mother said that Davis had physically abused Arrendale in the past. Davis's ex-wife said they were having a conflict over custody. Your insistence that she was murdered because she was cheating says more about you than it does about her.
As to your personal experience figuring into your assessment of the odds, I doubt that you've murdered enough women for cheating on you to constitute a statistically valid sample of the female population. Now, prejudice, that I might believe. So instead of all this limp dick tap dancing and weaseling you've done in this thread, why not just come out and say that you believe that any white woman in an intimate relationship with a black man is trash, and most likely a lying, cheating whore in the bargain. Hell, go all out and call her a mud shark, not like Arrendale's going to show up here to defend herself.
Brava, madam.
|
|