Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 4:20:05 PM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

  Rich coming from the drum circle that spawned socialist scum Sanders.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Where is the CT detachment defending CT gun laws as "not that bad" in the thread earlier this week? Whatever you do don't post the pic of CT gun owners lining up to register - that pic should have a trigger warning on it.

  Rich coming from the drum circle that spawned socialist scum Sanders.


One word - Burlington.

A few bad apples doesn't negate the freedoms we enjoy nor excuse the Malloy and company apologists.
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 4:20:25 PM EDT
[#2]
I hope I have a CT cop trying to ride on my airplane while carrying.

It may not go the way way he thinks it will.

TC
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 4:22:19 PM EDT
[#3]
These things won't change until the people put the right politicians in power. It's easy to blame the cops but the problem and solution is well above them.
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 4:23:28 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
More Northeast Reconstituted European Values
View Quote


FIFY
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 4:25:12 PM EDT
[#5]
We don't apologize for Malloy, the big gimmedat cities vote him in.
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 4:28:27 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
These things won't change until the people put the right politicians in power. It's easy to blame the cops but the problem and solution is well above them.
View Quote

It's very easy to blame the cops for having a press conference calling on politicians to erode both the second and fourth amendments.

It's impressive that even with police officers actively campaigning for this that you believe it's not their fault.
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 4:48:12 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

It's very easy to blame the cops for having a press conference calling on politicians to erode both the second and fourth amendments.

It's impressive that even with police officers actively campaigning for this that you believe it's not their fault.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
These things won't change until the people put the right politicians in power. It's easy to blame the cops but the problem and solution is well above them.

It's very easy to blame the cops for having a press conference calling on politicians to erode both the second and fourth amendments.

It's impressive that even with police officers actively campaigning for this that you believe it's not their fault.


It's 3 counties and their administrators (politicians). I don't agree with their wants and hope they don't get their wish. However, Those same 3 counties are suffering from high crime rates as is reported in the article (see heat map below). We sometimes like to attach nefarious motives to people's actions but in their minds at least they think this will help them with gun crime. I don't agree. I like to take in the whole picture, not a popular activity of some who like to visit these kinds of threads.

I consider the political climate in that area of the country and why they may be pushing for this. Again, we can blame the cops but that will accomplish nothing until the politics change. I really would like to see the police there stand up and say this isn't right but I just don't think the people in that area have the same political outlook as I do. Not everyone, unfortunately, sees the 2A as a hill to commit employment suicide on.

No, not every cop is going to stand with the 2A as we here understand it but there are plenty who will. Fix the politics first.



Link Posted: 4/27/2016 4:50:50 PM EDT
[#8]
"The Constitution State"
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 5:02:26 PM EDT
[#9]
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 5:04:46 PM EDT
[#10]


Has been that for some time now as far as I can tell.
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 5:11:29 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Has been that for some time now as far as I can tell.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Has been that for some time now as far as I can tell.

Hey used to say you only needed to carry it you didn't have to show it. Then they changed it to reasonable suspicion. Now they would want it no suspicion needed
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 5:25:27 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It's 3 counties and their administrators (politicians). I don't agree with their wants and hope they don't get their wish. However, Those same 3 counties are suffering from high crime rates as is reported in the article (see heat map below). We sometimes like to attach nefarious motives to people's actions but in their minds at least they think this will help them with gun crime. I don't agree. I like to take in the whole picture, not a popular activity of some who like to visit these kinds of threads.

I consider the political climate in that area of the country and why they may be pushing for this. Again, we can blame the cops but that will accomplish nothing until the politics change. I really would like to see the police there stand up and say this isn't right but I just don't think the people in that area have the same political outlook as I do. Not everyone, unfortunately, sees the 2A as a hill to commit employment suicide on.

No, not every cop is going to stand with the 2A as we here understand it but there are plenty who will. Fix the politics first.

http://i742.photobucket.com/albums/xx68/blue_shield1/CrimeHeatMap_zpsp40g5zvd.jpg

http://i742.photobucket.com/albums/xx68/blue_shield1/racemap_zpsd0viap4c.jpg
View Quote


Are they sworn police officers with arrest powers?  If yes, then they are police officers.

I'm interested if you have any charts that show a correlation between open carry and crimes in that area.
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 5:27:42 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Hey used to say you only needed to carry it you didn't have to show it. Then they changed it to reasonable suspicion. Now they would want it no suspicion needed
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Has been that for some time now as far as I can tell.

Hey used to say you only needed to carry it you didn't have to show it. Then they changed it to reasonable suspicion. Now they would want it no suspicion needed

I'm no constitutional scholar, but I'm pretty sure that you can't just make a law that allows detention of people without RAS or PC.
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 5:47:39 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
As a Police Officer I believe in Constitutional Carry open or concealed. Firearms are apart of my life style always have been always will be. People in general freak out when they see someone carrying. A lot of it has to do with the media and politicians saying guns are bad. Those type of people are idiots. Guns are a tool will save a life and feed a family. How a individual uses the weapon is what makes it bad or good.
View Quote


Nice and succinct- well said.

Now all we need is every other cop in the country (present and future) to agree to this.
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 5:48:21 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I'm no constitutional scholar, but I'm pretty sure that you can't just make a law that allows detention of people without RAS or PC.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:


Has been that for some time now as far as I can tell.

Hey used to say you only needed to carry it you didn't have to show it. Then they changed it to reasonable suspicion. Now they would want it no suspicion needed

I'm no constitutional scholar, but I'm pretty sure that you can't just make a law that allows detention of people without RAS or PC.


Yes but they don't care. they want to remove the part in brackets

AN ACT CONCERNING THE PRESENTATION OF A CARRY PERMIT.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:  
Section 1. Subsection (b) of section 29-35 of the 2016 supplement to
1 the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu
2 thereof (Effective July 1, 2016):
3(b) The holder of a permit issued pursuant to section 29-28 shall
4 carry such permit upon one's person while carrying such pistol or
5 revolver. Such holder shall present his or her permit upon the request
6 of a law enforcement officer [who has reasonable suspicion of a crime]
7 for purposes of verification of the validity of the permit or
8 identification of the holder, provided such law enforcement officer has
9 reason to believe such holder is carrying a pistol or revolver.
[that is 10 observed by such law enforcement officer.]  11
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:  
Section 1 July 1, 2016 29-35(b)
   
Raised Bill No.  5408    
LCO No. 1910     2 of 2  
Statement of Purpose:   To require the holder of a permit for the carrying of any pistol or revolver to present such permit upon request of a law enforcement officer.  
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets. Proposed additions are indicated by und
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 5:55:37 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I'm no constitutional scholar, but I'm pretty sure that you can't just make a law that allows detention of people without RAS or PC.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:


Has been that for some time now as far as I can tell.

Hey used to say you only needed to carry it you didn't have to show it. Then they changed it to reasonable suspicion. Now they would want it no suspicion needed

I'm no constitutional scholar, but I'm pretty sure that you can't just make a law that allows detention of people without RAS or PC.


Heres a better one
they want to take your guns if you have a temp restraining order BEFORE the hearing. so if someone wants to fuck with you they just have to make a false statement and they will take your guns without a hearing.
Link Posted: 4/27/2016 5:56:37 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I'm no constitutional scholar, but I'm pretty sure that you can't just make a law that allows detention of people without RAS or PC.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:


Has been that for some time now as far as I can tell.

Hey used to say you only needed to carry it you didn't have to show it. Then they changed it to reasonable suspicion. Now they would want it no suspicion needed

I'm no constitutional scholar, but I'm pretty sure that you can't just make a law that allows detention of people without RAS or PC.


Connecticut is a real pioneer in these areas.
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top