Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 4/12/2024 10:14:23 AM EDT
As the title says. I'm browsing for a 30 cal can that will eventually be used on a 300blk 8" - 9" barrel (subs and supers) and have narrowed it down to these two.  For those who have experience with both, would you recommend one over the other?  The Polo is cheaper, but doesn't include a mount (aside from the direct thread) so I would probably go Griffin Plan A if I went with the Polo. The Razor is more, but comes ready to go out of the box. Both are reported to have fantastic warranties and manufacturer support, so they both have that going for them.

Thoughts?
Link Posted: 4/12/2024 1:36:45 PM EDT
[#1]
Originally Posted By NC_Parrothead:
The Polo is cheaper, but doesn't include a mount (aside from the direct thread) so I would probably go Griffin Plan A if I went with the Polo. The Razor is more, but comes ready to go out of the box.
View Quote
Personally I see that a a plus in the Polonium column.  You can use whatever mount is best for your needs. It's Hub threaded so all your cans can use the same mount.

Rugged forces you into their own proprietary mount whether it's best for you or not. Whether you have cans from other manufacturers or not.

A non Hub can has to be exceptionally good and have an exceptionally good price for me to even consider buying it.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top