Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
New Chinese NV Forum (Page 1 of 2)
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Posted: 4/15/2024 11:50:26 PM EDT
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 11:27:27 AM EDT
[#1]
So we now have 7 subforums for what is already a very niche product. The further divided all of this is the slower the forums are going to be.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 11:36:15 AM EDT
[#2]
A Chinese NV subforum now where even common brands like Holosun are included?

Is the same being done for optics?

My suspicion remains... a certain group with a financial stake in selling expensive MIC units wants competition fenced out.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 11:57:13 AM EDT
[#3]
Laaaaaaaaaaame
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 12:02:05 PM EDT
[#4]
You're evening putting Holosun threads in there? They're carrying the entirety of the civilian laser market on their back right now.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 12:14:19 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By HitTheForwardAssist:
You're evening putting Holosun threads in there? They're carrying the entirety of the civilian laser market on their back right now.
View Quote


Holosun isn't a site sponsor
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 12:51:25 PM EDT
[#6]
As much as I do not like to see Americans buying NV and Thermal from China the reality it is the world we live in.
With that said it is utterly absurd that IRAY products would be removed from the main NV discussion forum.

Knock offs NV helmet mounts and lasers should be separated but not real product.

The main NV forum has been dying for a while and this nonsense just puts anther nail in its coffin.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 3:06:45 PM EDT
[Last Edit: chosos] [#7]
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 3:46:04 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By chosos:

I want to come at this from a curious standpoint because we certainly don't want China's low-light capabilities to ever exceed our own.
View Quote


I read that as "we dont want civilian low light capabilities to ever exceed/match those of the government."

Weird, I always thought of Arfcom as being pro-2A.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 4:06:24 PM EDT
[#9]
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 4:19:56 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By chosos:
I have some additional questions that I sent back to administration - because I'm not really sure how to moderate some of this for ya'll.



I was primarily asking because I sort of feel like the intent is to fight IP infringement. However, if that is the case, I had questions about all of the other clone mounts (nv & weapon), weapon parts, etc.

I have read that that Nocturn, BAE, and L3 are currently lobbying the House Armed Services Committee (Honorable Mike Rogers, R, AL) trying to ban or place 100% tax tariffs on any Chinese NV and Thermal items via the ANVM https://www.nightvisionassociation.org/newsletters/q4-2023/

Detrimental Effects of Chinese Night Vision Equipment Manufacturer’s Involvement in U.S. Commercial Market Require Immediate Corrective Action
https://www.nightvisionassociation.org/sites/default/assets/Files/China_Night_Vision_Problem_Final.pdf

I am probably going to reach out to the ANVM and inquire about membership details, as well. It looks like the membership chair/VP is the former President at ASU until he retired. I want to come at this from a curious standpoint because we certainly don't want China's low-light capabilities to ever exceed our own.
View Quote


How is curtailing or segregating the discussion of actual Chinese made NV/Thermal units on AR15.com going to stop the advancement of Chinese made units or stop IP theft?  
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 4:33:08 PM EDT
[Last Edit: mickdonaldson] [#11]
The "iP tHeFt" flag is just smoke - please explain how an internet forum is legally required to combat *discussion* about SOTAC L4G24 or Somogear NGAL clones? Damn, I just had a question about my Bering Optics Super-Yoter C...guess it's off to the Chinese forum...
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 4:38:33 PM EDT
[#12]
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 6:55:57 PM EDT
[#13]
This seems like it will be a great way to make the "Chinese" NV forum the most popular one, and the other "legit" subforum views drop off.

It seems like the intent was to bury knockoff vendors and products in an unpopular subforum.

But by banishing major providers like Holosun, iRay, Behring (iRay cores), Pulsar (Lithuania with some China), etc. who all do large percentages of U.S. retail sales... Then that's the subforum where people will start visiting in order to read about common-use products and – unintended consequence – these folks will wind up getting MORE exposure to both airsoft knockoffs and low-priced/not bad options.

Link Posted: 4/16/2024 9:01:22 PM EDT
[#14]
IDK. All these sub forums are kinda getting out of hand.
Link Posted: 4/16/2024 10:37:14 PM EDT
[Last Edit: hydrostatic_cling] [#15]
So is it categorized by assumption or can there be some stringent review of supposed "American" items that are Chinese or Chinese in components, or just partially Chinese? To create this delineation yet still falsely lump thermal and night vision together seems petty. And how about countries other than China which are demonstrably allied with China? Such as any member nation of BRICS.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 6:53:41 AM EDT
[#16]
Read through TNVC's whining about IP theft (which is a laughable smokescreen, as mentioned above) in the Somogear threads and the decision will make much more sense. It goes on for pages. They have  been pushing for this for a very long time. Just look at their inventory and compare against what is now shoved to the subforum. Maybe they should spend more time protecting their customer's card data against fraud and less time worrying about IRAYs.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 7:43:20 AM EDT
[#17]
Perhaps instead of a "China Made" subforum a "Chinese Clone" subforum would be more appropriate?

Can you imagine if they did this in the main "Optics, Mounts, and Sights" subforum of AR15? If they had a "China Made Optics, Mounts, and Sights" forum... with Holosun, Sig, Primary Arms, Vortex, Swampfox, etc. China made products all relegated to another forum?

I would be all about faked clone Leupolds, Aimpoints, etc. being in a subforum as I would fake/airsoft LAMs, etc.

With this China made NV subforum are we going to get posts removed from the main forum if someone asks for a product reccomendation and a China made product is mentioned along with a US made one? Where would you post a comparison of, or discussion of, an iRay Hybrid 75mm 4x vs N-Vision HALO XRF 3.5x? Will any mention of or comparison to China made gear get a post banished to the China subforum?

When we go to war with China over Taiwan, will made in Taiwan products get to come back to the main forum?
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 8:09:04 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Marksman14] [#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Horrible_Aim:
A Chinese NV subforum now where even common brands like Holosun are included?

Is the same being done for optics?

My suspicion remains... a certain group with a financial stake in selling expensive MIC units wants competition fenced out.
View Quote


Same group I assume you're referring to didn't like a comment I made about their video, whined to staff supposedly, and I got a warning for it.

So yeah, they have some influence.  And its why I spend a significantly less amount of time here, and despite having probably approaching 20k worth of stuff from the "mystery reporter", I shop elsewhere now.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 8:53:32 AM EDT
[#19]
I don't actually care because I'm almost never on this site, and when I am it's near exclusively the NV forum but this is dumb enough that I feel compelled to say my piece.

Why aren't AGM thermal discussions moved to the Chinese forum? they use Iray cores.

Why aren't Bering Optics discussions in the Chinese forum? also Iray cores

Is the concern IP theft, or not supporting china or forbidding discussion of anything that TNVC and Night Goggles don't sell?

Chinese NNVT image intensifier tubes are based on Photonis XD4/XR5 tubes that China purchased the licensing to fair and square in the early 2000s. That's not IP theft (Photonis sold to Bel Optronic in India too)

What IP theft did Holosun do? if there is any, they're an American company (Huanic is the Chinese manufacturer for Holosun) and Steiner or L3 can put on their big boy pants and sue them if they have a case. The military industrial complex certainly doesn't need this silly little forum defending them.

Laserspeed products are all original designs, not only that but they take feedback from customers and make revisions based on them. Which mod was it that suggested we go to L3 and propose a group buy if we were unhappy with their products? What specifically is the problem with these devices?

You guys know that every other night vision forum on the internet is constantly making fun of you guys for doing stupid shit like this, right?

Link Posted: 4/17/2024 9:18:59 AM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Horrible_Aim:
Read through TNVC's whining about IP theft (which is a laughable smokescreen, as mentioned above) in the Somogear threads and the decision will make much more sense. It goes on for pages. They have  been pushing for this for a very long time. Just look at their inventory and compare against what is now shoved to the subforum. Maybe they should spend more time protecting their customer's card data against fraud and less time worrying about IRAYs.
View Quote

Link Posted: 4/17/2024 9:43:07 AM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AKoch31:
So we now have 7 subforums for what is already a very niche product. The further divided all of this is the slower the forums are going to be.
View Quote

Come come now... let's let the people that paid absolute top dollar for their NV products feel special in their safe space.

And then we can all discuss products that are 98% as functional for 33% of the price without any of the condescension.

Win-win.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 9:44:49 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Millennial] [#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Horrible_Aim:
A Chinese NV subforum now where even common brands like Holosun are included?

Is the same being done for optics?

My suspicion remains... a certain group with a financial stake in selling expensive MIC units wants competition fenced out.
View Quote

Dude, you really think the NV-bros can handle the Holosun Ping Ping NV memes?  They already have to tolerate Ping Ping red dot memes in the optics forum.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 9:56:23 AM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Akenthusiast:

Chinese NNVT image intensifier tubes are based on Photonis XD4/XR5 tubes that China purchased the licensing to fair and square in the early 2000s. That's not IP theft (Photonis sold to Bel Optronic in India too)

View Quote


That is some really good info - thanks.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 11:31:18 AM EDT
[#24]
What about Yoter and Super Yoter (ie: Bering Optics) thermals that are popular with certain site vendors... do they get stuffed into the Chinese NV memoryhole too?  They use iRay cores, no?
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 11:42:41 AM EDT
[Last Edit: dan1477] [#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AKoch31:
So we now have 7 subforums for what is already a very niche product. The further divided all of this is the slower the forums are going to be.
View Quote


oh boy i love checking 10+ different places for new posts. i feel the same way about the equipment exchange. this forum is getting more and more ridiculous. i know arfcom has sponsors they want to make happy and thats probably the reason why they want it separated out but still.

for every new subforum they add, they should be required to delete one.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 11:58:59 AM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By dan1477:


oh boy i love checking 10+ different places for new posts. i feel the same way about the equipment exchange. this forum is getting more and more ridiculous. i know arfcom has sponsors they want to make happy and thats probably the reason why they want it separated out but still.

for every new subforum they add, they should be required to delete one.
View Quote


Looks like I'll just check one NV sub forum now. And it won't be this one.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 12:07:47 PM EDT
[#27]
JFC

So TNVC finally got their way I see.

It’s a shame that we can’t talk about NV products in thier entirety and have to further segregate discussion to protect egos.

Someone should replace the Brownell’s did this meme with TNVC did this.

Great way to bring a community together, keep up the good work. (Sarcasm)


Link Posted: 4/17/2024 12:14:18 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TheStillestHour:

https://i.imgur.com/R13sKFZ.jpeg
View Quote


So. Much. This.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 12:19:18 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By dan1477:


oh boy i love checking 10+ different places for new posts. i feel the same way about the equipment exchange. this forum is getting more and more ridiculous. i know arfcom has sponsors they want to make happy and thats probably the reason why they want it separated out but still.

for every new subforum they add, they should be required to delete one.
View Quote


I am right there with you. Even better, they should delete 2 for every 1 new subforum. Forums/Subforums are much like wasteful government agencies/programs, where they apparently have a natural tendency to bloat out over time, with absolutely no connection to serving the people whose advantage they are ostensibly created for.

Like, I'm a huge fan of PSA, but having their stuff across like 3 new dedicated forums does nothing but make it a hassle to read about them, and is nonsensical when their products fit fine in the various forums already dedicated to those types of products.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 1:06:26 PM EDT
[#30]
AGM, Bering Optics, Burris all use Chinese Raytron thermal cores, made in China.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 1:21:17 PM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By deadbeef:
AGM, Bering Optics, Burris all use Chinese Raytron thermal cores, made in China.
View Quote



Great point, if TNVC is going to push this, go all the way and get all those threads moved to the new forum.

Anyone want to take a guess which forum will have the traffic then? It’ll be crickets in the other forum.

Link Posted: 4/17/2024 1:30:22 PM EDT
[#32]
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 1:37:29 PM EDT
[#33]
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 2:35:10 PM EDT
[#34]
I want all products discussed on arfcom to be segregated into country of origin subforums. Then break that down into subforums based on components of those products also based on country of origin.

Link Posted: 4/17/2024 2:43:34 PM EDT
[Last Edit: PistoleroJesse] [#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By RottenPumpkin:
I want all products discussed on arfcom to be segregated into country of origin subforums. Then break that down into subforums based on components of those products also based on country of origin.

View Quote

I think this has merit. So instead of a forum for ar15s or AKs, we have just a schematic blowup of the parts. You click on a trigger pin if you want to discuss trigger pins. Rear takedown pin detent spring forum would always be very popular.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 5:51:32 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By RottenPumpkin:
I want all products discussed on arfcom to be segregated into country of origin subforums. Then break that down into subforums based on components of those products also based on country of origin.
View Quote


This, totally.

Man, I was looking for a red dot sight, but I forgot to check the "Swedish Optics" subforum to find out if Aimpoint had anything new coming out. Sweden was, like, super socialist between 1970-90, so some of their older optics might be in the "Communist Optics" subforum. I guess I'll check there too.
Eh, maybe I should just play it safe and get a good ol' American red dot from that Oregon company, Crimson Trace - owned by S&W, a good ol' American company that used to be owned by that anti-gun Tomkins PLC British company before coming back home and then outsourcing their optics to... uhh... China.
Hmm. IT'S ALL SO TRICKY!

Link Posted: 4/17/2024 7:09:00 PM EDT
[#37]
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 7:10:52 PM EDT
[#38]
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 7:14:01 PM EDT
[#39]
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 7:44:03 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Stylz:
There is a possibility that it will be more popular. Not all products that have some association with a Chinese part need to be moved. The intent is to move discussion of products that are wholly owned by a Chinese entity to the new sub forum.
View Quote


Let’s get all the Chinese products, US office or not, moved to the new forum if this is going to be done. If it’s IS, SG, AGM, Sig, Bering Optics, Burris, Holosun, Amazon, or any other that comes along in the market move it and that includes the current threads.

If it’s worth doing, it’s worth doing right.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 8:00:52 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Stylz:
There is a possibility that it will be more popular. Not all products that have some association with a Chinese part need to be moved. The intent is to move discussion of products that are wholly owned by a Chinese entity to the new sub forum.
View Quote

Iray has a lot in the US. So then why is the iray rh25 thread dumped with somogear garbage?
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 8:01:07 PM EDT
[Last Edit: chosos] [#42]
[Deleted]
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 8:19:02 PM EDT
[#43]
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 8:23:26 PM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TNVC:


Sigh, I see our great name is getting dragged into the mud again. We are not MODS nor Sr. Staff, Admin or whomever nor make any decisions around here. Enough is enough.

OUT
View Quote



Interesting. Tell site staff/ mods to leave the NV sub forum alone. Publicly, in this forum, perhaps now. That should put a stop to all the screeching…am I right?
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 8:59:54 PM EDT
[Last Edit: shenendoah_rifleman] [#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Stylz:
A site that has been dedicated to civilian firearms discussion for 25+ years is not pro-2A?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Stylz:
Originally Posted By shenendoah_rifleman:


I read that as "we dont want civilian low light capabilities to ever exceed/match those of the government."

Weird, I always thought of Arfcom as being pro-2A.
A site that has been dedicated to civilian firearms discussion for 25+ years is not pro-2A?


Arfcom should be a place that fosters support for the 2A, i.e., supports American civilians having the same sort of gear the US Government has, or at least as close as we can get. That is what it means to "keep arms" with the possibility of being able to "bear arms" in a meaningful sense.

NV/thermal capability is right on the leading edge of the best gear/weaponry that civilians have access too. Thus, its pretty cut and dry that if you support the proliferation of such tools into civilian hands you are pro-2A. If you are against civilians owning such tools you are anti-2A.

Now you have a sudden and universally unpopular change to this forum, that by all appearances is an attempt to sideline the proliferation of knowledge about these tools and their potential use by US civilians. In that thread you have a mod of this forum whose first post about said topic is talking about how he is going to write a letter to support the banning of affordable/useful NV/thermal device sales to civilians.

So, yes, I am calling out that action and that attitude as being anti-2A. It is particularly suspicious that the mod (a representative of Arfcom), would feel the need to talk about his anti-2A political crusade in a thread that wasn't overtly about politics. This suggests to anyone reading it that the creation of the Chinese optics subforum and the banning of these tools in civilian hands is linked. Or at least that the representatives of Arfcom would like one to somehow lead to the other.

If you want to talk about guns in an anti-2A space then please kindly screw off to r/liberalgunowners and leave Arfcom to the Patriots. I don't care how many posts you have.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 9:33:27 PM EDT
[#46]
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 10:09:43 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By chosos:
If that is referring to my post, you completely misread it or missed my intent. I was posting that whitepaper to share that this type of push is rolling a lot wider than many of you think

You should read that whitepaper and familiarize yourself with it. I was going to write them to obtain more details so I can be better informed.
View Quote


Thank you for the response. I read the two links.

I apologize if I misread what you were saying.
The only sentence that seemed to show your beliefs is the last one, "because we certainly don't want China's low-light capabilities to ever exceed our own." I read that as you were taking action towards that end. The fear played up in the whitepaper is that US civilians are funding the PLA through NV purchases, so it sounded like your opinion is in harmony with the author of that paper. That paper suggests putting a 100% tariff on all Chinese NV related products as a "good first step" towards completely eliminating their import, justified by the possibility that these sales might help equip the PLA.

It is clear to me this is just an excuse from a bunch of massive corporations who (understandably) don't want to lose market share. If the PLA wants to develop NV tech they don't need the couple million at best these little companies might be able to put back into R&D. They have hundreds of billions (literally) through direct and indirect taxes funded by Americans that buy everything else that China sells.

The point they make about Chinese companies being subsidized is reasonable, but it wouldn't justify a 100% tariff. Would they support a 100% tariff on every other "high technology" export from China which is subsidized in just the same way and also competes with US companies? I highly doubt it.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 10:17:59 PM EDT
[#48]
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 10:31:58 PM EDT
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TNVC_Augee:


I have done that more than once, and clearly it hasn't worked.

But what the hell, I'll do it again.

I, Augee Kim, COO of TNVC disagreed with and still disagree with the creation of a Chinese Night Vision forum for exactly the reason being demonstrated here: despite our having nothing to do with it, we still get blamed.

I also disagreed with the airsoft forum for similar reasons, which is the last time this happened, and I think I made it unequivocally and publicly clear then.

You can verify with @GoatBoy or @Stylz that I told them that all this was going to do was to piss people off and we'd end up being blamed.

They had and have their reasons and in the end our opinion was noted, considered, however the final decision was made without us and over our heads.

Yes, we are a main site sponsor and proud to be, and it speaks to the long term personal relationships that we have formed from years of being a part of, participating in, contributing to, and trying to grow the night vision enthusiast market that have allowed us to have the pleasure of remaining a main site sponsor. I guarantee you, if it was a bidding war for cash? We would lose.

There's also a hundred companies out there that would love a shot at one of the four spots at the top of the forum on the largest firearms-related discussion site on the entire internet--just look how many forums there are in the Industry section--every one of those companies pays to be there (anyone remember the KAC dust-up a while back?), many occupied by companies with a whole lot larger marketing and sponsorship budgets than TNVC.

Ultimate Night Vision is also a site sponsor here.

Beyond that, I've always generally agreed that there are too many sub-forums, not just in the night vision sub-section here, and it was always frustrating even when I was participating much more extensively all across ARFCOM, before I worked for TNVC. There are 20 separate sub-forums in the AR15 tab alone. And if you're asking about advice for what upper to buy for your next AR build, do you post it "AR Discussions"? "Build it Yourself"? "Rifles, Uppers, Lowers, Barrels, and more"? What if it's a 300BLK? "AR Variants"? What if you're using a modern Noveske billet upper with A2 sights? Where does that go? "A2 Builds"?

My point is not to dump on Site Staff or the forum, but pointing out that continually fracturing subdivisions of forums isn't exactly uncommon or unusual on ARFCOM going back, at this point, literal decades.

The AK forum literally has nine subdivisions for countries of origin, plus a manufacturer, and several others under the "Variants" sub-section. There is a literal "Turkish Pistols" sub-forum under Handguns. I don't know what predicated the decisions to spin all of those different things off into their own forums, but I can tell ya, TNVC didn't have anything to do with those either.



Eh, I get it.

It's the nature of the beast. Either we take our ball and go home and disappear from the forums like many companies have and just keep signing the checks, or we do our best to stick around and continue to contribute positively even while some folks do their best to kick us in the nuts whenever something happens they don't like, whether or not we're involved, because we're here, and sometimes you can even get a rise out of one of our employees, nevermind that we all started as civilian enthusiasts too, regardless of what our professional backgrounds may have been. Hell, I think I've done EE deals with at least half the people commenting in this thread before I started working for TNVC, at least the ones that were here prior to 2017.

But yeah, MIC Merchant 4 Lyfe, I guess.



~Augee
View Quote


Very well stated and is unambiguous as to your position.
Link Posted: 4/17/2024 11:01:36 PM EDT
[Last Edit: noodles_down] [#50]
I am CEO at Nocturn Ind. I want to respond to this and create clarity before speculation ensues. We are NOT lobbying anyone and we have not lobbied anyone. We are simply members of the American Night Vision Manufacturers Association and took part in discussions about these topics. I personally was mentioned for bringing up an issue about the chinese circumventing export laws. A white paper was written by the association president and the tariff was proposed by him or some other member. Its intent was to level out the govt. subsidized prices to something more comparable to the US. I do not believe an outright ban was proposed. 45 member companies voted yes to approve the paper. I was given the opportunity to read it ahead of time and I made suggestions that attempted to protect ethical business practices and companies doing business properly. I raised the concern that a 100% tariff would be detrimental to many US companies who use chinese manufacturers for many of their products. Our only interest and goal is to protect IP for its rightful owners. We have made this stance very clear in any and all discussions we have had. We do however support the banning of importing from companies who produce counterfeit product. The problem with this is speculation and speaking without fully understanding or asking questions first. I do not appreciate our company being accussed of lobbying or proposing this tariff. If anyone wants answers from someone involved I am happy to provide them if you ask me. Please be patient however, running a business and taking care of customers takes precident. We have no problem with chinese imported products, we do however have a problem with companies stealing or copying other companies hard work and investments and selling them for a much cheaper price. Some chinese companies make superb products and listen to their customers feedback, I support this. I do not care where a company is from, as long as they practice ethical business.
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
New Chinese NV Forum (Page 1 of 2)
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top