From the
The League of Women Voters of GeorgiaA non partisan site
To provide the Supreme Court jurisdiction to answer questions of law from federal courts.
(House Resolution No. 68)
SHALL THE CONSTITUTION BE AMENDED SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT THE SUPREME COURT SHALL HAVE JURISDICTION TO ANSW ER QUESTIONS OF LAW FROM ANY STATE APPELLATE COURT OR FEDERAL DISTRICT OR
APPELLATE COURT? Article VI, Section VI of the Constitution is amended by striking Paragraph IV and inserting in lieu thereof a new Paragraph IV to read as follows:
“Paragraph IV. Jurisdiction over questions of law from state appellate or federal district or appellate courts. The Supreme Court shall have jurisdiction to answer any question of law from any state appellate or federal district or appellate court.”
Explanation: Under the current constitution the Supreme Court of Georgia has jurisdiction to answer questions of law certified by the Court of Appeals of Georgia. By statute and court rule, the Supreme Court can also answer questions of law certified by any federal appellate court but not from federal district court. The federal courts are required to apply Georgia law to certain cases and issues. These issues arise at the trial level, which is district court in the federal system. The State Bar of Georgia saw a need to allow the federal trial courts to ask questions of the Georgia Supreme Court prior to or during a trial that involve interpretation of Georgia law. Currently, the questions can only be asked by federal appellate courts, which means after trial.
Pro: This amendment would allow federal courts to get a definitive interpretation of
Georgia law prior to or during trial, rather than waiting until after trial. Waiting until after trial might mean that the federal trial judge interpreted the law incorrectly. That would require a new trial. This provision is intended to save time and money by making a definitive answer available when it can do the most good.
Con: The current constitutional provision gives the Supreme Court jurisdiction only over questions certified by the Georgia Court of Appeals. Questions from the federal appellate courts are permitted by statute. It would appear that this issue could be handled by amending the statute rather than the Constitution.
IMO it's a yes vote. The Bald Monk
http://wayofthebaldmonk.net/2.jpgSemper Gumby!