Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 2/21/2020 5:19:58 PM EDT
The question is: what are they recruiting?

It looks like if you're a white heterosexual you start with a negative score.

Be the change, be the next generation.
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 5:52:08 PM EDT
[#1]
The CSP are trying to get ahead of the impending mass exodus they are forecasting for June 30th, 2022.

That would be the end of the current five year salary contract for all unionized state employees.  Anyone who retires before that day (and it is going to be LOT of state employees) will retain the yearly 2% COLA for life.  Those who don't will be under a new COLA plan that uses some very complicated algorithms to come to a COLA number for that year.  Could be higher than 2%, could be zero.  Everyone that can leave believes the latter is more likely so they're locking in the 2%

There are over 300 CSP troopers who are eligible. That's 35% or so of the whole department.  By recruiting now, they are hoping to get some classes through the academy to at least partially replace those leaving.  Even though they are authorized for I believe somewhere between 1100 to 1200 troopers, I don't think they've ever come close to that number.

The next big date is June 30th, 2027.  That is when the health insurance contract ends and needs to be renegotiated.  Either you retire and keep what you have, or you get the new version whatever that may be.  I can't imagine even the new one not being better than 90% of what's out there but you never know.
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 6:05:56 PM EDT
[#2]
Soon the requirements will be:

1.  If you want to be a captain you will have graduated 8th grade.

2.  If you want to be issued a gun you will have graduated 6th grade.

3.  If you want to carry your own gun you only have graduated 3rd grade.

4.  Facial tattoos may only cover 70% of your face, not including MS-13 tattoos.

5.  Homosexuality is desired.

6.  Trannies get extra credit.

Limiting criteria, but not completely.....

Greater than 600 lbs

Colorblind.

Blind

Deaf

Retarded

Wheelchair bound

More than 3 felony convictions totaling more than 20 years in prison.
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 7:24:45 PM EDT
[#3]
They sent an all Spanish ad to Puerto Rico to recruit people.

I think I triggered some guy on one of the Facebook gun pages for Connecticut when I commented on it
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 7:34:43 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They sent an all Spanish ad to Puerto Rico to recruit people.

I think I triggered some guy on one of the Facebook gun pages for Connecticut when I commented on it
View Quote
Whoa!  Spanish?  Really?  Yeah, because we don't need state gestapo that speaks English.  Jesus Connecticut is so fucked on many levels.
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 7:56:21 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Whoa!  Spanish?  Really?  Yeah, because we don't need state gestapo that speaks English.  Jesus Connecticut is so fucked on many levels.
View Quote
Now, were you pronouncing “Jesus” as JEE-zuss or HAY-zooss?
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 8:00:01 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Now, were you pronouncing “Jesus” as JEE-zuss or HAY-zooss?
View Quote
Samuel Jackson, Die Hard with a vengance, Zeus


Samuel Jackson, Die Hard with a vengance, Zeus
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 8:02:25 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The CSP are trying to get ahead of the impending mass exodus they are forecasting for June 30th, 2022.

That would be the end of the current five year salary contract for all unionized state employees.  Anyone who retires before that day (and it is going to be LOT of state employees) will retain the yearly 2% COLA for life.  Those who don't will be under a new COLA plan that uses some very complicated algorithms to come to a COLA number for that year.  Could be higher than 2%, could be zero.  Everyone that can leave believes the latter is more likely so they're locking in the 2%

There are over 300 CSP troopers who are eligible. That's 35% or so of the whole department.  By recruiting now, they are hoping to get some classes through the academy to at least partially replace those leaving.  Even though they are authorized for I believe somewhere between 1100 to 1200 troopers, I don't think they've ever come close to that number.

The next big date is June 30th, 2027.  That is when the health insurance contract ends and needs to be renegotiated.  Either you retire and keep what you have, or you get the new version whatever that may be.  I can't imagine even the new one not being better than 90% of what's out there but you never know.
View Quote
My heart is breaking.  New Coke?  Well if they don't like it there is always Pepsi.
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 9:38:15 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
My heart is breaking.  New Coke?  Well if they don't like it there is always Pepsi.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
The CSP are trying to get ahead of the impending mass exodus they are forecasting for June 30th, 2022.

That would be the end of the current five year salary contract for all unionized state employees.  Anyone who retires before that day (and it is going to be LOT of state employees) will retain the yearly 2% COLA for life.  Those who don't will be under a new COLA plan that uses some very complicated algorithms to come to a COLA number for that year.  Could be higher than 2%, could be zero.  Everyone that can leave believes the latter is more likely so they're locking in the 2%

There are over 300 CSP troopers who are eligible. That's 35% or so of the whole department.  By recruiting now, they are hoping to get some classes through the academy to at least partially replace those leaving.  Even though they are authorized for I believe somewhere between 1100 to 1200 troopers, I don't think they've ever come close to that number.

The next big date is June 30th, 2027.  That is when the health insurance contract ends and needs to be renegotiated.  Either you retire and keep what you have, or you get the new version whatever that may be.  I can't imagine even the new one not being better than 90% of what's out there but you never know.
My heart is breaking.  New Coke?  Well if they don't like it there is always Pepsi.
Didnt ask if it broke your heart.  G8 asked a question and I was able to answer it.  What you or anyone else thinks about it is irrelevant.

But most importantly,  do they even still make New Coke?
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 9:43:10 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Now, were you pronouncing “Jesus” as JEE-zuss or HAY-zooss?
View Quote
Didnt you promise everyone pictures on another thread?
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 10:03:38 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Didnt ask if it broke your heart.  G8 asked a question and I was able to answer it.  What you or anyone else thinks about it is irrelevant.

But most importantly,  do they even still make New Coke?
View Quote
Don't you dare say I never done did sumthin' for ya.

New Coke
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
New Coke
New Coke can.jpg
TypeCola
ManufacturerThe Coca-Cola Company
DistributorCoca-Cola Enterprises
Country of originU.S.
IntroducedApril 23, 1985
May 23, 2019 (limited re-release)
DiscontinuedJuly 10, 2002 (original run)
ColorCaramel
VariantsCoke II
New Coke was the unofficial name for the reformulation of Coca-Cola introduced in April 1985 by the Coca-Cola Company. In 1992, it was renamed Coke II.[1]
Click To View Spoiler

{edit to add spoiler and remove wall of text......COC7.....andrapos}
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 10:08:33 PM EDT
[#11]
New coke has no cocaine in it
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 10:09:21 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Don't you dare say I never done did sumthin' for ya.

New Coke
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
New Coke
New Coke can.jpg
TypeCola
ManufacturerThe Coca-Cola Company
DistributorCoca-Cola Enterprises
Country of originU.S.
IntroducedApril 23, 1985
May 23, 2019 (limited re-release)
DiscontinuedJuly 10, 2002 (original run)
ColorCaramel
VariantsCoke II
New Coke was the unofficial name for the reformulation of Coca-Cola introduced in April 1985 by the Coca-Cola Company. In 1992, it was renamed Coke II.[1]
Click To View Spoiler
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Don't you dare say I never done did sumthin' for ya.

New Coke
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
New Coke
New Coke can.jpg
TypeCola
ManufacturerThe Coca-Cola Company
DistributorCoca-Cola Enterprises
Country of originU.S.
IntroducedApril 23, 1985
May 23, 2019 (limited re-release)
DiscontinuedJuly 10, 2002 (original run)
ColorCaramel
VariantsCoke II
New Coke was the unofficial name for the reformulation of Coca-Cola introduced in April 1985 by the Coca-Cola Company. In 1992, it was renamed Coke II.[1]
Click To View Spoiler
Quoted:

Don't you dare say I never done did sumthin' for ya.

New Coke
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
New Coke
New Coke can.jpg
TypeCola
ManufacturerThe Coca-Cola Company
DistributorCoca-Cola Enterprises
Country of originU.S.
IntroducedApril 23, 1985
May 23, 2019 (limited re-release)
DiscontinuedJuly 10, 2002 (original run)
ColorCaramel
VariantsCoke II
New Coke was the unofficial name for the reformulation of Coca-Cola introduced in April 1985 by the Coca-Cola Company. In 1992, it was renamed Coke II.[1]

By 1985, Coca-Cola had been losing market share to diet soft drinks and non-cola beverages for many years. Blind taste tests indicated that consumers seemed to prefer the sweeter taste of rival Pepsi-Cola, and so the Coca-Cola recipe was reformulated. However, the American public's reaction to the change was negative, and "New Coke" was considered a major failure. The company reintroduced Coke's original formula within three months, rebranded "Coca-Cola Classic", resulting in a significant sales boost. This led to speculation New Coke formula had been a marketing ploy to stimulate sales of original Coca-Cola, which the company has denied.[2]

Coke II was discontinued in July 2002. It remains influential as a cautionary tale against tampering with a well-established and successful brand. In May 2019, it was announced that the 1985 formulation (bearing the name "New Coke") would be reintroduced to promote the third season of the Netflix series Stranger Things which takes place in 1985.[3]

Contents
1Background
1.1"Project Kansas"
2Launch
2.1Initial success
2.2Backlash
2.3Response by Pepsi
2.4Company dissatisfaction
2.5Reversal
3Aftermath and legacy
3.1After Coca-Cola Classic
3.2Coke II
3.3Commercial legacy
3.4Conspiracy theories
3.5Taste test problems
4See also
5References
6Further reading
7External links
Background
After World War II, Coca-Cola held 60% of the market share. By 1983, it had declined to under 24%, largely because of competition from Pepsi-Cola. Pepsi had begun to outsell Coke in supermarkets; Coke maintained its edge only through soda vending machines and fountain sales in fast food restaurants, concessions, and sports venues where Coca-Cola had purchased "pouring rights".[2]

Market analysts believed baby boomers were more likely to purchase diet drinks as they aged and remained health- and weight-conscious. Growth in the full-calorie segment would have to come from younger drinkers, who at that time favored Pepsi by even more overwhelming margins.[4] Meanwhile, the overall market for colas steadily declined in the early 1980s, as consumers increasingly purchased diet and non-cola soft drinks, many of which were sold by Coca-Cola themselves. This trend further eroded Coca-Cola's market share.[5][6] When Roberto Goizueta became Coca-Cola CEO in 1980, he told employees there would be no "sacred cows" in how the company did business, including how it formulated its drinks.[7]

"Project Kansas"

One of Coca-Cola's advertisements to promote the flavor change in Coke
Coca-Cola's senior executives commissioned a secret project headed by marketing vice president Sergio Zyman and Coca-Cola USA president Brian Dyson to create a new flavor for Coke. This research, called "Project Kansas", took its name from a photo of Kansas journalist William Allen White drinking a Coke; the image had been used extensively in Coca-Cola advertising and hung on several executives' walls.:114

The sweeter cola overwhelmingly beat both regular Coke and Pepsi in taste tests, surveys, and focus groups. Asked if they would buy and drink the product if it were Coca-Cola, most testers said they would, although it would take some getting used to. About 10–12% of testers felt angry and alienated at the thought, and said they might stop drinking Coke altogether. Their presence in focus groups tended to negatively skew results as they exerted indirect peer pressure on other participants.[9]:355

The surveys, which were given more significance by standard marketing procedures of the era, were less negative than the taste tests and were key in convincing management to change the formula in 1985, to coincide with the drink's centenary. But the focus groups had provided a clue as to how the change would play out in a public context, a data point the company downplayed but which proved important later.[10]

Management rejected an idea to make and sell the new flavor as a separate variety of Coca-Cola. The company's bottlers were already complaining about absorbing other recent additions into the product line since 1982, after the introduction of Diet Coke; Cherry Coke was launched nationally nearly concurrently with New Coke during 1985. Many of them had sued over the company's syrup pricing policies. A new variety of Coke in competition with the main variety could also have cannibalized Coke's sales and increased the proportion of Pepsi drinkers relative to Coke drinkers.

Early in his career with Coca-Cola, Goizueta had been in charge of the company's Bahamian subsidiary. In that capacity, he had improved sales by tweaking the drink's flavor slightly, so he was receptive to the idea that changes to the taste of Coke could lead to increased profits. He believed it would be "New Coke or no Coke",:106 and that the change must take place openly. He insisted that the containers carry the "New!" label, which gave the drink its popular name.[9]:358

Goizueta also made a visit to his mentor and predecessor as the company's chief executive, the ailing Robert W. Woodruff, who had built Coke into an international brand following World War II. He claimed he had secured Woodruff's blessing for the reformulation, but even many of Goizueta's closest friends within the company doubt that Woodruff understood Goizueta's intentions.[9]:356:115

Launch
“To hear some tell it, April 23, 1985, was a day that will live in marketing infamy ... spawning consumer angst the likes of which no business has ever seen.”
— The Coca-Cola Company, on the New Coke announcement[6]
New Coke was introduced on April 23, 1985. Production of the original formulation ended later that week. In many areas, New Coke was initially introduced in "old" Coke packaging; bottlers used up remaining cans, cartons and labels before new packaging was widely available. Old cans containing New Coke were identified by their gold colored tops, while glass and plastic bottles had red caps instead of silver and white, respectively. Bright yellow stickers indicating the change were placed on the cartons of can multi-packs.

The press conference at New York City's Lincoln Center to introduce the new formula did not go well. Reporters had already been fed questions by Pepsi,[11] which was worried that New Coke would erase its gains. Goizueta, Coca-Cola's CEO, described the new flavor as "bolder", "rounder", and "more harmonious",[9]:352 and defended the change by saying that the drink's secret formula was not sacrosanct and inviolable. As far back as 1935, Coca-Cola sought kosher certification from Atlanta rabbi Tobias Geffen, and made two changes to the formula so the drink could be considered kosher (as well as halal and vegetarian).[12] Goizueta also refused to admit that taste tests had led the change, calling it "one of the easiest decisions we've ever made.":117 A reporter asked whether Diet Coke would also be reformulated "assuming [New Coke] is a success," to which Goizueta curtly replied, "No. And I didn't assume that this is a success. This is a success."[9]:352

The emphasis on the sweeter taste of the new flavor also ran contrary to previous Coke advertising, in which spokesman Bill Cosby had touted Coke's less-sweet taste as a reason to prefer it over Pepsi.[11]:136 Nevertheless, the company's stock went up on the announcement, and market research showed 80% of the American public was aware of the change within days.:119[13]

Initial success
Coca-Cola introduced the new formula with marketing pushes in New York, where workers renovating the Statue of Liberty for its 1986 centenary were given cans,[13] and Washington, D.C., where thousands of cans were given away in Lafayette Park. As soon as New Coke was introduced, the new formula was available at McDonald's and other drink fountains in the United States. Sales figures from those cities, and other areas where it had been introduced, showed a reaction that went as the market research had predicted. In fact, Coke's sales were up 8% over the same period as the year before.[7]

Most Coke drinkers resumed buying the new Coke at much the same level as they had the old one. Surveys indicated that the majority of regular Coke drinkers liked the new flavoring.[11]:153 Three quarters of the respondents said they would buy New Coke again.[7] The big test, however, remained in the Southeast, where Coke was first bottled and tasted.

Backlash
Despite New Coke's acceptance with a large number of Coca-Cola drinkers, many more resented the change in formula and were not shy about making that known—just as had happened in the focus groups. Many of these drinkers were Southerners, some of whom considered Coca-Cola a fundamental part of their regional identity. They viewed the company's decision to change the formula through the prism of the Civil War, as another surrender to the "Yankees".[11]:149–151

Company headquarters in Atlanta began receiving letters and telephone calls expressing anger or deep disappointment. The company received over 40,000 calls and letters,:119 including one letter, delivered to Goizueta, that was addressed to "Chief Dodo, The Coca-Cola Company". Another letter asked for his autograph, as the signature of "one of the dumbest executives in American business history" would likely become valuable in the future. The company hotline, 1-800-GET-COKE, received over 1,500 calls a day compared to around 400 before the change.[6] A psychiatrist whom Coke had hired to listen in on calls told executives that some people sounded as if they were discussing the death of a family member.[11]:163

They were, nonetheless, joined by some voices from outside the region. Chicago Tribune columnist Bob Greene wrote some widely reprinted pieces ridiculing the new flavor and damning Coke's executives for having changed it. Comedians and talk show hosts, including Johnny Carson and David Letterman, made regular jokes mocking the switch. Ads for New Coke were booed heavily when they appeared on the scoreboard at the Houston Astrodome.[13] Even Fidel Castro, a longtime Coca-Cola drinker, contributed to the backlash, calling New Coke a sign of American capitalist decadence.[9]:362 Goizueta's father expressed similar misgivings to his son, who later recalled that it was the only time his father had agreed with Castro, whose rule he had fled Cuba to avoid.:118

Gay Mullins, a Seattle retiree looking to start a public relations firm with $120,000 of borrowed money, formed the organization Old Cola Drinkers of America on May 28 to lobby Coca-Cola to either reintroduce the old formula or sell it to someone else. His organization eventually received over 60,000 phone calls. He also filed a class action lawsuit against the company (which was quickly dismissed by a judge who said he preferred the taste of Pepsi[14]), while nevertheless expressing interest in securing The Coca-Cola Company as a client of his new firm should it reintroduce the old formula.[11]:160 In two informal blind taste tests, Mullins either failed to distinguish New Coke from old or expressed a preference for New Coke.[11]:162

Despite ongoing resistance in the South, New Coke continued to do well in the rest of the country.[11]:149–151 But executives were uncertain of how international markets would react. Executives met with international Coke bottlers in Monaco; to their surprise, the bottlers were not interested in selling New Coke.[15] Zyman also heard doubts and skepticism from his relatives in Mexico, where New Coke was scheduled to be introduced later that summer, when he went there on vacation.

Goizueta stated that Coca-Cola employees who liked New Coke felt unable to speak up due to peer pressure, as had happened in the focus groups. Donald Keough, the Coca-Cola president and chief operating officer, reported overhearing someone say at his country club that they liked New Coke, but they would be "damned if I'll let Coca-Cola know that."[11]:154

Response by Pepsi
Pepsi-Cola took advantage of the situation, running ads in which a first-time Pepsi drinker exclaimed, "Now I know why Coke did it!"[11]:148–9 Even amidst consumer anger and several Pepsi ads mocking Coca-Cola's debacle, Pepsi actually gained very few long-term converts over Coke's switch, despite a 14% sales increase over the same month the previous year, the largest sales growth in the company's history.[7] Coca-Cola's director of corporate communications, Carlton Curtis, realized over time that consumers were more upset about the withdrawal of the old formula than the taste of the new one.[11]:175

Roger Enrico, then director of Pepsi's North American operations, declared a company-wide holiday and took out a full-page ad in The New York Times proclaiming that Pepsi had won the long-running "Cola Wars".:115 [9]:359 Since Coke officials were preoccupied over the weekend with preparations for the announcement, their Pepsi counterparts had time to cultivate skepticism among reporters, sounding themes that would later come into play in the public discourse over the changed drink.[11]:125 After the announcement on April 23, PepsiCo gave its employees the day off saying, "By today's action, Coke has admitted that it's not the real thing."

Company dissatisfaction
Some Coca-Cola executives had quietly been arguing for a reintroduction of the old formula as early as May.[11]:157 By mid June, when soft drink sales usually start to rise, the numbers showed that new Coke was leveling among consumers. Executives feared social peer pressure was now affecting their bottom line. Some consumers even began trying to obtain "old" Coke from overseas, where the new formula had not yet been introduced, as domestic stocks of the old drink were exhausted.[11]:158 Over the course of the month, Coca-Cola's chemists also quietly reduced the acidity level of the new formula, hoping to assuage complaints about the flavor and allow its sweetness to be better perceived (advertisements pointing to this change were prepared, but never used).[9]:364

In addition to the noisier public protests, boycotts, and bottles being emptied into the streets of several cities, the company had more serious reasons to be concerned. Its bottlers, and not just the ones still suing the company over syrup pricing policies, were expressing concern. While they had given Goizueta a standing ovation when he announced the change at an April 22 bottlers' meeting at Atlanta's Woodruff Arts Center, glad the company had finally taken some initiative in the face of Pepsi's advances,[13] they were less enthusiastic about the taste.[9]:364 :106,116 Most of them saw great difficulty having to promote and sell a drink that had long been marketed as "The Real Thing", constant and unchanging, now that it had been changed.

The 20 bottlers still suing Coca-Cola made much of the change in their legal arguments. Coca-Cola had argued in its defense when the suit was originally filed that the formula's uniqueness and difference from Diet Coke justified different pricing policies from the latter – but if the new formula was simply an HFCS-sweetened Diet Coke, Coca-Cola could not argue the formula was unique. Bottlers, particularly in the South, were also tired of facing personal opprobrium over the change. Many reported that some acquaintances and even friends and relatives had ostracized them, or had expressed displeasure in other emotionally hurtful ways. On June 23, several of the bottlers took these complaints to Coca-Cola executives in a private meeting.:121 With the company now fearing boycotts not only from its consumers but its bottlers, talks about reintroducing the old formula moved from "if" to "when".

Finally, the Coca-Cola board decided that enough was enough, and plans were set in motion to bring back the old Coke. Company president Donald Keough revealed years later, in the documentary The People vs. Coke (2002), that they realized this was the only right thing to do when they visited a small restaurant in Monaco and the owner proudly said they served "the real thing, it's a real Coke," offering them a chilled 6 and 1/2 oz. glass bottle of original Coca-Cola.[15]

Reversal
On the afternoon of July 11, 1985, Coca-Cola executives announced the return of the original formula, 79 days after New Coke's introduction. ABC News' Peter Jennings interrupted General Hospital with a special bulletin to share the news with viewers. On the floor of the U.S. Senate, David Pryor called the reintroduction "a meaningful moment in U.S. history".[9] The company hotline received 31,600 calls in the two days after the announcement.[6]

The new product continued to be marketed and sold as Coke (until 1992, when it was renamed Coke II) while the original formula was named Coca-Cola Classic, and for a short time it was referred to by the public as Old Coke. Some who tasted the reintroduced formula were not convinced that the first batches really were the same formula that had supposedly been retired that spring. This was true for a few regions, because Coca-Cola Classic differed from the original formula in that all bottlers who hadn't already done so were using high fructose corn syrup instead of cane sugar to sweeten the drink, though most had by this time.[11]:183

"There is a twist to this story which will please every humanist and will probably keep Harvard professors puzzled for years," said Keough at a press conference. "The simple fact is that all the time and money and skill poured into consumer research on the new Coca-Cola could not measure or reveal the deep and abiding emotional attachment to original Coca-Cola felt by so many people."

Gay Mullins, founder of the organization Old Cola Drinkers of America (which had lobbied Coca-Cola to either reintroduce the old formula or sell it to someone else), was given the first case of Coca-Cola Classic.[13]

Aftermath and legacy
By the end of 1985, Coca-Cola Classic was substantially outselling both New Coke and Pepsi. Six months after the rollout, Coke's sales had increased at more than twice the rate of Pepsi's.[16]

New Coke's sales dwindled to a three percent share of the market, although it was selling quite well in Los Angeles and some other key markets.[16] Later research, however, suggested that it was not the return of Coca-Cola Classic, but instead the nearly unnoticed introduction of Cherry Coke, which appeared almost simultaneously with New Coke, that can be credited with the company's success in 1985.[11]:187

The Coca-Cola Company spent a considerable amount of time trying to figure out where it had made a mistake, ultimately concluding that it had underestimated the public reaction of the portion of the customer base that would be alienated by the switch. This would not emerge for several years afterward, however, and in the meantime the public simply concluded that the company had, as Keough suggested, failed to consider the public's attachment to the idea of what Coke's old formula represented. While that has become conventional wisdom in the ensuing years, some analyses have suggested otherwise.

This populist version of the story served Coke's interests, however, as the episode did more to position and define Coca-Cola as a brand embodying values distinct from Pepsi. Allowing itself to be portrayed as a somewhat clueless large corporation forced to withdraw from a big change by overwhelming public pressure flattered customers, as Keough put it, "We love any retreat which has us rushing toward our best customers with the product they love the most."[9]:360 Bottles and cans continued to bear the "Coca-Cola Classic" title until January 2009, when the company announced it would stop printing the word "Classic" on the labels of 16-US-fluid-ounce (470 ml) bottles sold in parts of the southeastern United States.[17] The change is part of a larger strategy to rejuvenate the product's image.[17]

The fiasco led Bill Cosby to end his long time advertising for Coca-Cola. Cosby claimed that his commercials praising the superiority of the new formula had hurt his credibility. No one at Coca-Cola was fired or otherwise held responsible for what is still widely perceived as a misstep, for the simple reason that it ultimately wasn't. When Goizueta died in 1997, the company's share price was well above what it was when he had taken over 16 years earlier and its position as market leader even more firmly established. At the time, Roger Enrico, then head of Pepsi's American operations, likened New Coke to the Edsel.[18][19] Later, when he became PepsiCo's CEO, he modified his assessment of the situation, saying that had people been fired or demoted over New Coke, it would have sent a message that risk-taking was strongly discouraged at the company.[20]

In the late 1990s, Zyman summed up the New Coke experience thus:

Yes, it infuriated the public, cost us a ton of money and lasted for only 77 days before we reintroduced Coca-Cola Classic. Still, New Coke was a success because it revitalized the brand and reattached the public to Coke.[21]

New Coke continued to do what it had originally been designed to do: win taste tests. In 1987, The Wall Street Journal surveyed 100 randomly selected cola drinkers, the majority of whom indicated a preference for Pepsi, with Classic Coke accounting for the remainder save two New Coke loyalists. When this group was given a chance to try all three in a blind test, New Coke slightly edged out Pepsi, but many drinkers reacted angrily to finding they had chosen a brand other than their favorite.[22]

Goizueta claimed that he never once regretted the decision to change Coca-Cola. He even threw a tenth anniversary party for New Coke in 1995 and continued to drink it until his death in 1997.[13]

After Coca-Cola Classic
"Catch the wave" redirects here. For the wrestling tournament, see Catch the Wave.
In the short run, the reintroduction of original Coca-Cola saved Coke's sales figures and brought it back in the good graces of many customers and bottlers. Phone calls and letters to the company were as joyful and thankful as they had been angry and depressed. "You would have thought we'd cured cancer", said one executive.[11]:181

But confusion reigned at the company's marketing department, which had to design a plan to market two Coca-Colas where such plans were inconceivable just a few months before. Coca-Cola Classic did not need much help, with a "Red, White and You" campaign showcasing the American virtues many of those who had clamored for its reintroduction had pointedly reminded the company that it embodied. But the company was at a loss to sell what was now just "Coke". Obviously, "The Best Just Got Better" could no longer be used. Marketers fumbled for a strategy for the rest of the year.[9]:366 Matters were not helped when McDonald's announced shortly after the reintroduction of Coca-Cola Classic, that it was immediately switching from New Coke back to original Coca-Cola at all of its restaurants.[9]:369

Max Headroom print ad from the "Catch the wave" campaign
At the beginning of 1986, however, Coke's marketing team found a strategy by returning to one of their original motives for changing the formula: the youth market that preferred Pepsi. Max Headroom, the purportedly computer-generated media personality played by Matt Frewer, was chosen to replace Cosby as the spokesman for Coke's new "Catch the wave" campaign. With his slicked-back hair and sunglasses, he was already known to much of the U.S. youth audience through appearances on MTV and Cinemax. The campaign was launched with a television commercial produced by McCann Erickson New York, with Max saying in his trademark stutter, "C-c-c-catch the wave!" and referring to his fellow "Cokeologists".[23] In a riposte to Pepsi's televisual teasings, one showed Headroom asking a Pepsi can he was "interviewing" how it felt about more drinkers preferring Coke to it and then cut to the condensation forming on, and running down, the can. "S-s-s-s-sweating?", he asked.

The campaign was a huge success, and surveys likewise showed that more than three-quarters of the target market were aware of the ads within two days. Coke's consumer hotline received more calls about Max than any previous spokesperson, some even asking if he had a girlfriend.[24] The ads and campaign continued through 1987, and were chosen as best of 1986 by Video Storyboard of New York.[24]

Coke II

A can of Coke II
In 1985, New Coke was sold only in the United States, United States territories, and Canada while the original formula continued to be sold in the rest of the world. New Coke was eventually returned to the company's product portfolio; it was test-marketed in certain U.S. cities under the name Coke II in 1990,[1] which was taken national in late 1992, despite the company's original intention not to create a second brand. Filmmaker Miranda July is said to have suggested the name of Coke II while working as a tastemaker for an ad agency.[25]

The Coca-Cola Company did practically nothing to promote or otherwise distinguish it. In a market already offering several choices of drinks calling themselves "Coke" in some fashion or another, the public saw little reason to embrace a product they had firmly rejected seven years earlier, and within about a year, Coke II was largely off the American shelves again. By 1998, it could only be found in a few scattered markets in the northwest, midwest and some overseas territories. In July 2002, Coca-Cola announced that Coke II would be discontinued entirely.[26]

On August 16, 2002, The Coca-Cola Company announced a change of the label of Coke Classic in which the word "Classic" was no longer so prominent, leading to speculation that it would eventually be removed and the last traces of New Coke eliminated.[26] In 2009, Coca-Cola permanently removed "Classic" from its North American packaging.[27] Currently, as of 2017, packages of original Coca-Cola have since been branded with an "Original Taste" banner above the label, as part of the brand's worldwide "One Brand" marketing campaign, first introduced in 2016.[28]

Commercial legacy
"For a product so widely despised," noted AdWeek blogger Tim Nudd in 2006, "New Coke (a.k.a. Coke II) still gets an admirable amount of ink." He noted Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking (2005) by Malcolm Gladwell, and Why Most Things Fail: Evolution, Extinction and Economics (2005) by Paul Ormerod, that dealt with it at some length, as well as two recent mentions in Forbes and Sports Illustrated.[29]

Within Coca-Cola, the role the company's bottlers had played in forcing its hand led executives to create a new subsidiary, Coca-Cola Enterprises, which bought out several of the larger bottlers and placed distribution and marketing efforts more tightly under Coca-Cola's control.[citation needed]

On May 21, 2019, the Coca-Cola Company announced that New Coke would be relaunched for a "(very) limited promotional run" to promote the third season of the web series Stranger Things, as part of a partnership deal with Netflix. About 500,000 cans of New Coke were produced for the promotion.[30]

Conspiracy theories
The Coca-Cola Company's apparently sudden reversal on New Coke led to conspiracy theories, including:

The company intentionally changed the formula, hoping consumers would be upset with the company, and demand the original formula to return, which in turn would cause sales to spike.[2] Keough answered this speculation by saying "We're not that dumb, and we're not that smart."[2][15]
The putative switch was planned all along to cover the change from sugar-sweetened Coke to much less expensive high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), a theory that was supposedly given credence by the apparently different taste of Coke Classic when it first hit the market (the U.S. sugar trade association took out a full-page ad lambasting Coke for using HFCS in all bottling of the old formula when it was reintroduced).[11] In fact, Coca-Cola began allowing bottlers to remove up to half of the product's cane sugar as early as 1980, five years before the introduction of New Coke. By the time the new formula was introduced, most bottlers had already sweetened Coca-Cola entirely with HFCS.[2]
It provided cover for the final removal of all coca derivatives from the product to placate the Drug Enforcement Administration, which was trying to eradicate the plant worldwide to combat an increase in cocaine trafficking and consumption. While Coke's executives were indeed relieved the new formula contained no coca and concerned about the long-term future of the Peruvian government-owned coca fields that supplied it in the face of increasing DEA pressure to end cultivation of the crop, according to author Mark Pendergrast there was no direct pressure from the DEA on Coca-Cola to do so.[9] This theory was endorsed in a Time article, as well as by historian Bartow Elmore, who claims the reformulation was made in response to the escalating War on Drugs by the Reagan Administration.[31]
Taste test problems
In his book Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking (2005), Malcolm Gladwell relates his conversations with market researchers in the food industry who put most of the blame for the failure of New Coke on the flawed nature of taste tests. They claim most are subject to systematic biases. Tests such as the Pepsi Challenge were "sip tests", meaning that drinkers were given small samples (less than a can or bottle's worth) to try. Gladwell contends that what people say they like in these tests may not reflect what they actually buy to drink at home over several days.[32] Carol Dollard, who once worked in product development for Pepsi, told Gladwell: "I've seen many times where the sip test will give you one result and the home-use test will give you the exact opposite."[32]:159 For example, although many consumers react positively to the sweeter taste of Pepsi in small volumes, it may become unattractively sweet when drunk in quantity. A more comprehensive testing regimen could possibly have revealed this, Gladwell's sources believe.[32]

Gladwell reports that other market researchers have criticized Coke for not realizing that much of its success as a brand came from what they call sensation transference, a phenomenon first described by marketer Louis Cheskin in the late 1940s: tasters unconsciously add their reactions to the drink's packaging into their assessment of the taste.[33] For example, one of the researchers told Gladwell that his firm's research found 7-Up drinkers believed a sample from a bottle with a more yellow label was more "lemony", although the flavor was identical.[32]:163 In Coke's case, it is alleged that buyers, subject to sensation transference, were also "tasting" the red color of the container and distinctive Coca-Cola script. It was therefore, in their opinion, a mistake to focus solely on the product and its taste. "The mistake Coke made," said Darrel Rhea, an executive with the firm Cheskin founded, "was in attributing their loss in share entirely to the product." He points to Pepsi's work in establishing a youth-oriented brand identity from the 1960s as having more bearing on its success.[34]

Coke considered but rejected gradually changing the drink's flavor incrementally, without announcing they were doing so. Executives feared the public would notice and exaggerate slight differences in taste. In 1998, Joel Dubow, a professor of food marketing at St. Joseph's University, tested this "flavor balance hypothesis" and argued that it was not true. He and fellow researcher Nancy Childs tested mixtures of Coca-Cola Classic and Coke II and found that the gradual changes of taste were not noticed by a significant number of tasters. Coke, he said, would have succeeded had it chosen this strategy.[35]

See also
icon1980s portal
Drink portal
Coca-Cola C2
Crystal Pepsi
Dasani (United Kingdom)
List of defunct consumer brands
MagiCan
OK Soda
References
Jamieson, Sean (April 5, 1990). "Coke II makes its Spokane debut". Spokesman-Review. (Spokane, Washington). p. A8.
Mikkelson, Barbara (March 13, 2007). "Knew Coke / New Coke Origin". Snopes.com. Retrieved March 16, 2010.
New Coke is coming back and it's all because of Netflix's hit show "Stranger Things" CBS News, May 21, 2019
Koten, John; Kilman, Scott (July 12, 1985). "Coca-Cola Faces Tough Marketing Task in Attempting to Sell Old and New Coke". The Wall Street Journal.
Stevenson, Richard W. (August 20, 1985). "New Coke vs. Classic: The Verdict Is Still Out". The New York Times. NYTimes Co. Retrieved April 8, 2017.
"The Real Story of New Coke". Coke Lore. The Coca-Cola Company. Retrieved October 10, 2011.
Demott, John S. (June 24, 1985). "All Afizz Over the New Coke". Time. Retrieved April 8, 2017.
Hays, Constance L. (2005). The Real Thing: Truth and Power at the Coca-Cola Company (Random House Trade pbk. ed.). New York: Random House. ISBN 978-0-8129-7364-8.
Pendergrast, Mark (2004). For God, Country and Coca-Cola : The Definitive History of the Great American Soft Drink and the Company that Makes It (2. ed., rev. and expanded, [Nachdr.] ed.). New York: Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-05468-8.
Schindler, Robert M. (1992). "The Real Lesson of New Coke: The Value of Focus Groups for Predicting the Effects of Social Influence". Marketing Research. 4 (4): 22 [p. 27]. ISSN 1040-8460.
Oliver, Thomas (1987). The Real Coke, The Real Story (Repr ed.). New York: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0140104080.
Horowitz, Roger (January 8, 2013) "The Real Thing: How Coke Became Kosher", Science History Institute. Retrieved July 4, 2019
Matthews, Blair (Spring 2005). "Coca Cola's Big Mistake: New Coke 20 Years Later ..." Soda Pop Dreams. Archived from the original on December 2009. Retrieved June 16, 2006.
"Coke Flavor-Suit Rejected". UPI. June 21, 1985.
Barry, Daniel (2002). The People vs Coke. BBC Documentary.
"Topics; Cars and Cola Jokes". The New York Times. October 23, 1985. Retrieved July 17, 2019.
McKay, Betsy (January 30, 2009). "Coke to Omit 'Classic'". The Wall Street Journal.
TIME; July 22, 1985; 48
"Roger Enrico, the president of Pepsi-Cola U.S.A., was quick to proclaim the 10-week-old new Coke "the Edsel of the 80's" "IDEAS & TRENDS - Coca-Cola Swallows Its Words". The New York Times. July 14, 1985.
EnErico, Roger & Kornbluth, Jesse (1988). The Other Guy Blinked: How Pepsi Won the Cola Wars. New York, NY: Bantam Books. p. 240. ISBN 978-0-553-26632-0.
Bigford, Andrew. "Last Run: Sergio Zyman". SKI Magazine. Retrieved June 14, 2006.
Smith, Gary (October 15, 2006) [1998]. Introduction to Statistical Reasoning. McGraw Hill. pp. 186–87.
"Max & N-N-New Coke". The Max Headroom Chronicles. 2005. Retrieved December 14, 2006.
"Highlights in the History of Coca-Cola Television Advertising". Library of Congress. Retrieved June 22, 2006.
Onstad, Katrina (July 14, 2011). "Miranda July, The Make-Believer". The New York Times.
John H. McConnell; How to Design, Implement and Interpret an Employee Survey, AMACOM Division of the American Management Association, ISBN 0-8144-0709-9, 2003, 3.
Clifford, Stephen (January 31, 2009). "Coca-Cola Deleting 'Classic' From Coke Label". The New York Times. Retrieved October 3, 2011.
"Coca-Cola Reveals New "One-Brand" Packaging". The Coca-Cola Company. Archived from the original on April 22, 2016. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
Nudd, Tim (February 24, 2006). "Where are the last few cans of New Coke?". AdWeek. Retrieved June 26, 2006.
"New Coke and Netflix Take Viewers Back to 1985 for Stranger Things Season 3 in First-of-its-Kind Partnership". The Coca-Cola Company. Retrieved May 21, 2019.
"New Coke History America". TIME.
Gladwell, Malcolm (2005). Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking (1. ed.). New YorK (etc.): Back Bay. ISBN 978-0-316-17232-5.
Cheskin, Louis & Ward, L.B. (September 1948). "Indirect Approach to Market Reactions". Harvard Business Review.
Gordon, Ian; Frank, Thomas (December 1999). "The Conquest of Cool: Business Culture, Counterculture, and the Rise of Hip Consumerism". The Journal of American History. 86 (3): 1396. doi:10.2307/2568708. JSTOR 2568708.
Dubow, Joel S; Childs, Nancy M (November 1998). "New Coke, Mixture Perception, and the Flavor Balance Hypothesis". Journal of Business Research. 43 (3): 147–155. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(97)00220-8.
Further reading
Civille, Gail Vance & Lyon, Brenda G. (1996). Aroma and Flavor Lexicon for Sensory Evaluation. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
Hine, Thomas (1997). The Total Package: The Secret History and Hidden Meanings of Boxes, Bottles, Cans, and Other Persuasive Containers. Back Bay Books. ISBN 978-0-316-36546-8.
Imram, Nazlin (1999). "The role of visual cues in customer perception and acceptance of a food product". Nutrition & Food Science. 99 (5): 224–230. doi:10.1108/00346659910277650.
Leven, S. and Levine, D. (1996). "Multiattribute Decision Making in Context: A Dynamic Neural Network Methodology". Cognitive Science. 20 (2): 271–299. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2002_4.
Meilgaard, Morten; Civille, Gail Vance; Carr, B. Thomas (1999). Sensory Evaluation Techniques (Third ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Wilson, Timothy & Schooler, Jonathan (1999). "Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 60 (2): 181–192. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.181.
External links
Bastedo, Michael & Davis, Angela. "God, What a Blunder: The New Coke Story". lycos.co.uk. Archived from the original on May 15, 2006. With a good talk on the problems of their research methodologies (focus groups v. surveys).
"Coke Lore (Knew Coke) — Snopes' take on New Coke". Snopes.
"Coke Lore: New Coke". Coca-Cola.
"New Coke - a market research disaster?". St John's College Blog. 2012.
"QuickTime news clip on New Coke introduction". KTLA. Los Angeles: CNN. Archived from the original on February 28, 2008.
vte
You're whall of text offends me

{edit to add spoiler and remove wall of text......COC7.....andrapos}
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 10:26:56 PM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
You're whall of text offends me
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Don't you dare say I never done did sumthin' for ya.

New Coke
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
New Coke
New Coke can.jpg
TypeCola
ManufacturerThe Coca-Cola Company
DistributorCoca-Cola Enterprises
Country of originU.S.
IntroducedApril 23, 1985
May 23, 2019 (limited re-release)
DiscontinuedJuly 10, 2002 (original run)
ColorCaramel
VariantsCoke II
New Coke was the unofficial name for the reformulation of Coca-Cola introduced in April 1985 by the Coca-Cola Company. In 1992, it was renamed Coke II.[1]

By 1985, Coca-Cola had been losing market share to diet soft drinks and non-cola beverages for many years. Blind taste tests indicated that consumers seemed to prefer the sweeter taste of rival Pepsi-Cola, and so the Coca-Cola recipe was reformulated. However, the American public's reaction to the change was negative, and "New Coke" was considered a major failure. The company reintroduced Coke's original formula within three months, rebranded "Coca-Cola Classic", resulting in a significant sales boost. This led to speculation New Coke formula had been a marketing ploy to stimulate sales of original Coca-Cola, which the company has denied.[2]

Coke II was discontinued in July 2002. It remains influential as a cautionary tale against tampering with a well-established and successful brand. In May 2019, it was announced that the 1985 formulation (bearing the name "New Coke") would be reintroduced to promote the third season of the Netflix series Stranger Things which takes place in 1985.[3]

Contents
1Background
1.1"Project Kansas"
2Launch
2.1Initial success
2.2Backlash
2.3Response by Pepsi
2.4Company dissatisfaction
2.5Reversal
3Aftermath and legacy
3.1After Coca-Cola Classic
3.2Coke II
3.3Commercial legacy
3.4Conspiracy theories
3.5Taste test problems
4See also
5References
6Further reading
7External links
Background
After World War II, Coca-Cola held 60% of the market share. By 1983, it had declined to under 24%, largely because of competition from Pepsi-Cola. Pepsi had begun to outsell Coke in supermarkets; Coke maintained its edge only through soda vending machines and fountain sales in fast food restaurants, concessions, and sports venues where Coca-Cola had purchased "pouring rights".[2]

Market analysts believed baby boomers were more likely to purchase diet drinks as they aged and remained health- and weight-conscious. Growth in the full-calorie segment would have to come from younger drinkers, who at that time favored Pepsi by even more overwhelming margins.[4] Meanwhile, the overall market for colas steadily declined in the early 1980s, as consumers increasingly purchased diet and non-cola soft drinks, many of which were sold by Coca-Cola themselves. This trend further eroded Coca-Cola's market share.[5][6] When Roberto Goizueta became Coca-Cola CEO in 1980, he told employees there would be no "sacred cows" in how the company did business, including how it formulated its drinks.[7]

"Project Kansas"

One of Coca-Cola's advertisements to promote the flavor change in Coke
Coca-Cola's senior executives commissioned a secret project headed by marketing vice president Sergio Zyman and Coca-Cola USA president Brian Dyson to create a new flavor for Coke. This research, called "Project Kansas", took its name from a photo of Kansas journalist William Allen White drinking a Coke; the image had been used extensively in Coca-Cola advertising and hung on several executives' walls.:114

The sweeter cola overwhelmingly beat both regular Coke and Pepsi in taste tests, surveys, and focus groups. Asked if they would buy and drink the product if it were Coca-Cola, most testers said they would, although it would take some getting used to. About 10–12% of testers felt angry and alienated at the thought, and said they might stop drinking Coke altogether. Their presence in focus groups tended to negatively skew results as they exerted indirect peer pressure on other participants.[9]:355

The surveys, which were given more significance by standard marketing procedures of the era, were less negative than the taste tests and were key in convincing management to change the formula in 1985, to coincide with the drink's centenary. But the focus groups had provided a clue as to how the change would play out in a public context, a data point the company downplayed but which proved important later.[10]

Management rejected an idea to make and sell the new flavor as a separate variety of Coca-Cola. The company's bottlers were already complaining about absorbing other recent additions into the product line since 1982, after the introduction of Diet Coke; Cherry Coke was launched nationally nearly concurrently with New Coke during 1985. Many of them had sued over the company's syrup pricing policies. A new variety of Coke in competition with the main variety could also have cannibalized Coke's sales and increased the proportion of Pepsi drinkers relative to Coke drinkers.

Early in his career with Coca-Cola, Goizueta had been in charge of the company's Bahamian subsidiary. In that capacity, he had improved sales by tweaking the drink's flavor slightly, so he was receptive to the idea that changes to the taste of Coke could lead to increased profits. He believed it would be "New Coke or no Coke",:106 and that the change must take place openly. He insisted that the containers carry the "New!" label, which gave the drink its popular name.[9]:358

Goizueta also made a visit to his mentor and predecessor as the company's chief executive, the ailing Robert W. Woodruff, who had built Coke into an international brand following World War II. He claimed he had secured Woodruff's blessing for the reformulation, but even many of Goizueta's closest friends within the company doubt that Woodruff understood Goizueta's intentions.[9]:356:115

Launch
“To hear some tell it, April 23, 1985, was a day that will live in marketing infamy ... spawning consumer angst the likes of which no business has ever seen.”
— The Coca-Cola Company, on the New Coke announcement[6]
New Coke was introduced on April 23, 1985. Production of the original formulation ended later that week. In many areas, New Coke was initially introduced in "old" Coke packaging; bottlers used up remaining cans, cartons and labels before new packaging was widely available. Old cans containing New Coke were identified by their gold colored tops, while glass and plastic bottles had red caps instead of silver and white, respectively. Bright yellow stickers indicating the change were placed on the cartons of can multi-packs.

The press conference at New York City's Lincoln Center to introduce the new formula did not go well. Reporters had already been fed questions by Pepsi,[11] which was worried that New Coke would erase its gains. Goizueta, Coca-Cola's CEO, described the new flavor as "bolder", "rounder", and "more harmonious",[9]:352 and defended the change by saying that the drink's secret formula was not sacrosanct and inviolable. As far back as 1935, Coca-Cola sought kosher certification from Atlanta rabbi Tobias Geffen, and made two changes to the formula so the drink could be considered kosher (as well as halal and vegetarian).[12] Goizueta also refused to admit that taste tests had led the change, calling it "one of the easiest decisions we've ever made.":117 A reporter asked whether Diet Coke would also be reformulated "assuming [New Coke] is a success," to which Goizueta curtly replied, "No. And I didn't assume that this is a success. This is a success."[9]:352

The emphasis on the sweeter taste of the new flavor also ran contrary to previous Coke advertising, in which spokesman Bill Cosby had touted Coke's less-sweet taste as a reason to prefer it over Pepsi.[11]:136 Nevertheless, the company's stock went up on the announcement, and market research showed 80% of the American public was aware of the change within days.:119[13]

Initial success
Coca-Cola introduced the new formula with marketing pushes in New York, where workers renovating the Statue of Liberty for its 1986 centenary were given cans,[13] and Washington, D.C., where thousands of cans were given away in Lafayette Park. As soon as New Coke was introduced, the new formula was available at McDonald's and other drink fountains in the United States. Sales figures from those cities, and other areas where it had been introduced, showed a reaction that went as the market research had predicted. In fact, Coke's sales were up 8% over the same period as the year before.[7]

Most Coke drinkers resumed buying the new Coke at much the same level as they had the old one. Surveys indicated that the majority of regular Coke drinkers liked the new flavoring.[11]:153 Three quarters of the respondents said they would buy New Coke again.[7] The big test, however, remained in the Southeast, where Coke was first bottled and tasted.

Backlash
Despite New Coke's acceptance with a large number of Coca-Cola drinkers, many more resented the change in formula and were not shy about making that known—just as had happened in the focus groups. Many of these drinkers were Southerners, some of whom considered Coca-Cola a fundamental part of their regional identity. They viewed the company's decision to change the formula through the prism of the Civil War, as another surrender to the "Yankees".[11]:149–151

Company headquarters in Atlanta began receiving letters and telephone calls expressing anger or deep disappointment. The company received over 40,000 calls and letters,:119 including one letter, delivered to Goizueta, that was addressed to "Chief Dodo, The Coca-Cola Company". Another letter asked for his autograph, as the signature of "one of the dumbest executives in American business history" would likely become valuable in the future. The company hotline, 1-800-GET-COKE, received over 1,500 calls a day compared to around 400 before the change.[6] A psychiatrist whom Coke had hired to listen in on calls told executives that some people sounded as if they were discussing the death of a family member.[11]:163

They were, nonetheless, joined by some voices from outside the region. Chicago Tribune columnist Bob Greene wrote some widely reprinted pieces ridiculing the new flavor and damning Coke's executives for having changed it. Comedians and talk show hosts, including Johnny Carson and David Letterman, made regular jokes mocking the switch. Ads for New Coke were booed heavily when they appeared on the scoreboard at the Houston Astrodome.[13] Even Fidel Castro, a longtime Coca-Cola drinker, contributed to the backlash, calling New Coke a sign of American capitalist decadence.[9]:362 Goizueta's father expressed similar misgivings to his son, who later recalled that it was the only time his father had agreed with Castro, whose rule he had fled Cuba to avoid.:118

Gay Mullins, a Seattle retiree looking to start a public relations firm with $120,000 of borrowed money, formed the organization Old Cola Drinkers of America on May 28 to lobby Coca-Cola to either reintroduce the old formula or sell it to someone else. His organization eventually received over 60,000 phone calls. He also filed a class action lawsuit against the company (which was quickly dismissed by a judge who said he preferred the taste of Pepsi[14]), while nevertheless expressing interest in securing The Coca-Cola Company as a client of his new firm should it reintroduce the old formula.[11]:160 In two informal blind taste tests, Mullins either failed to distinguish New Coke from old or expressed a preference for New Coke.[11]:162

Despite ongoing resistance in the South, New Coke continued to do well in the rest of the country.[11]:149–151 But executives were uncertain of how international markets would react. Executives met with international Coke bottlers in Monaco; to their surprise, the bottlers were not interested in selling New Coke.[15] Zyman also heard doubts and skepticism from his relatives in Mexico, where New Coke was scheduled to be introduced later that summer, when he went there on vacation.

Goizueta stated that Coca-Cola employees who liked New Coke felt unable to speak up due to peer pressure, as had happened in the focus groups. Donald Keough, the Coca-Cola president and chief operating officer, reported overhearing someone say at his country club that they liked New Coke, but they would be "damned if I'll let Coca-Cola know that."[11]:154

Response by Pepsi
Pepsi-Cola took advantage of the situation, running ads in which a first-time Pepsi drinker exclaimed, "Now I know why Coke did it!"[11]:148–9 Even amidst consumer anger and several Pepsi ads mocking Coca-Cola's debacle, Pepsi actually gained very few long-term converts over Coke's switch, despite a 14% sales increase over the same month the previous year, the largest sales growth in the company's history.[7] Coca-Cola's director of corporate communications, Carlton Curtis, realized over time that consumers were more upset about the withdrawal of the old formula than the taste of the new one.[11]:175

Roger Enrico, then director of Pepsi's North American operations, declared a company-wide holiday and took out a full-page ad in The New York Times proclaiming that Pepsi had won the long-running "Cola Wars".:115 [9]:359 Since Coke officials were preoccupied over the weekend with preparations for the announcement, their Pepsi counterparts had time to cultivate skepticism among reporters, sounding themes that would later come into play in the public discourse over the changed drink.[11]:125 After the announcement on April 23, PepsiCo gave its employees the day off saying, "By today's action, Coke has admitted that it's not the real thing."

Company dissatisfaction
Some Coca-Cola executives had quietly been arguing for a reintroduction of the old formula as early as May.[11]:157 By mid June, when soft drink sales usually start to rise, the numbers showed that new Coke was leveling among consumers. Executives feared social peer pressure was now affecting their bottom line. Some consumers even began trying to obtain "old" Coke from overseas, where the new formula had not yet been introduced, as domestic stocks of the old drink were exhausted.[11]:158 Over the course of the month, Coca-Cola's chemists also quietly reduced the acidity level of the new formula, hoping to assuage complaints about the flavor and allow its sweetness to be better perceived (advertisements pointing to this change were prepared, but never used).[9]:364

In addition to the noisier public protests, boycotts, and bottles being emptied into the streets of several cities, the company had more serious reasons to be concerned. Its bottlers, and not just the ones still suing the company over syrup pricing policies, were expressing concern. While they had given Goizueta a standing ovation when he announced the change at an April 22 bottlers' meeting at Atlanta's Woodruff Arts Center, glad the company had finally taken some initiative in the face of Pepsi's advances,[13] they were less enthusiastic about the taste.[9]:364 :106,116 Most of them saw great difficulty having to promote and sell a drink that had long been marketed as "The Real Thing", constant and unchanging, now that it had been changed.

The 20 bottlers still suing Coca-Cola made much of the change in their legal arguments. Coca-Cola had argued in its defense when the suit was originally filed that the formula's uniqueness and difference from Diet Coke justified different pricing policies from the latter – but if the new formula was simply an HFCS-sweetened Diet Coke, Coca-Cola could not argue the formula was unique. Bottlers, particularly in the South, were also tired of facing personal opprobrium over the change. Many reported that some acquaintances and even friends and relatives had ostracized them, or had expressed displeasure in other emotionally hurtful ways. On June 23, several of the bottlers took these complaints to Coca-Cola executives in a private meeting.:121 With the company now fearing boycotts not only from its consumers but its bottlers, talks about reintroducing the old formula moved from "if" to "when".

Finally, the Coca-Cola board decided that enough was enough, and plans were set in motion to bring back the old Coke. Company president Donald Keough revealed years later, in the documentary The People vs. Coke (2002), that they realized this was the only right thing to do when they visited a small restaurant in Monaco and the owner proudly said they served "the real thing, it's a real Coke," offering them a chilled 6 and 1/2 oz. glass bottle of original Coca-Cola.[15]

Reversal
On the afternoon of July 11, 1985, Coca-Cola executives announced the return of the original formula, 79 days after New Coke's introduction. ABC News' Peter Jennings interrupted General Hospital with a special bulletin to share the news with viewers. On the floor of the U.S. Senate, David Pryor called the reintroduction "a meaningful moment in U.S. history".[9] The company hotline received 31,600 calls in the two days after the announcement.[6]

The new product continued to be marketed and sold as Coke (until 1992, when it was renamed Coke II) while the original formula was named Coca-Cola Classic, and for a short time it was referred to by the public as Old Coke. Some who tasted the reintroduced formula were not convinced that the first batches really were the same formula that had supposedly been retired that spring. This was true for a few regions, because Coca-Cola Classic differed from the original formula in that all bottlers who hadn't already done so were using high fructose corn syrup instead of cane sugar to sweeten the drink, though most had by this time.[11]:183

"There is a twist to this story which will please every humanist and will probably keep Harvard professors puzzled for years," said Keough at a press conference. "The simple fact is that all the time and money and skill poured into consumer research on the new Coca-Cola could not measure or reveal the deep and abiding emotional attachment to original Coca-Cola felt by so many people."

Gay Mullins, founder of the organization Old Cola Drinkers of America (which had lobbied Coca-Cola to either reintroduce the old formula or sell it to someone else), was given the first case of Coca-Cola Classic.[13]

Aftermath and legacy
By the end of 1985, Coca-Cola Classic was substantially outselling both New Coke and Pepsi. Six months after the rollout, Coke's sales had increased at more than twice the rate of Pepsi's.[16]

New Coke's sales dwindled to a three percent share of the market, although it was selling quite well in Los Angeles and some other key markets.[16] Later research, however, suggested that it was not the return of Coca-Cola Classic, but instead the nearly unnoticed introduction of Cherry Coke, which appeared almost simultaneously with New Coke, that can be credited with the company's success in 1985.[11]:187

The Coca-Cola Company spent a considerable amount of time trying to figure out where it had made a mistake, ultimately concluding that it had underestimated the public reaction of the portion of the customer base that would be alienated by the switch. This would not emerge for several years afterward, however, and in the meantime the public simply concluded that the company had, as Keough suggested, failed to consider the public's attachment to the idea of what Coke's old formula represented. While that has become conventional wisdom in the ensuing years, some analyses have suggested otherwise.

This populist version of the story served Coke's interests, however, as the episode did more to position and define Coca-Cola as a brand embodying values distinct from Pepsi. Allowing itself to be portrayed as a somewhat clueless large corporation forced to withdraw from a big change by overwhelming public pressure flattered customers, as Keough put it, "We love any retreat which has us rushing toward our best customers with the product they love the most."[9]:360 Bottles and cans continued to bear the "Coca-Cola Classic" title until January 2009, when the company announced it would stop printing the word "Classic" on the labels of 16-US-fluid-ounce (470 ml) bottles sold in parts of the southeastern United States.[17] The change is part of a larger strategy to rejuvenate the product's image.[17]

The fiasco led Bill Cosby to end his long time advertising for Coca-Cola. Cosby claimed that his commercials praising the superiority of the new formula had hurt his credibility. No one at Coca-Cola was fired or otherwise held responsible for what is still widely perceived as a misstep, for the simple reason that it ultimately wasn't. When Goizueta died in 1997, the company's share price was well above what it was when he had taken over 16 years earlier and its position as market leader even more firmly established. At the time, Roger Enrico, then head of Pepsi's American operations, likened New Coke to the Edsel.[18][19] Later, when he became PepsiCo's CEO, he modified his assessment of the situation, saying that had people been fired or demoted over New Coke, it would have sent a message that risk-taking was strongly discouraged at the company.[20]

In the late 1990s, Zyman summed up the New Coke experience thus:

Yes, it infuriated the public, cost us a ton of money and lasted for only 77 days before we reintroduced Coca-Cola Classic. Still, New Coke was a success because it revitalized the brand and reattached the public to Coke.[21]

New Coke continued to do what it had originally been designed to do: win taste tests. In 1987, The Wall Street Journal surveyed 100 randomly selected cola drinkers, the majority of whom indicated a preference for Pepsi, with Classic Coke accounting for the remainder save two New Coke loyalists. When this group was given a chance to try all three in a blind test, New Coke slightly edged out Pepsi, but many drinkers reacted angrily to finding they had chosen a brand other than their favorite.[22]

Goizueta claimed that he never once regretted the decision to change Coca-Cola. He even threw a tenth anniversary party for New Coke in 1995 and continued to drink it until his death in 1997.[13]

After Coca-Cola Classic
"Catch the wave" redirects here. For the wrestling tournament, see Catch the Wave.
In the short run, the reintroduction of original Coca-Cola saved Coke's sales figures and brought it back in the good graces of many customers and bottlers. Phone calls and letters to the company were as joyful and thankful as they had been angry and depressed. "You would have thought we'd cured cancer", said one executive.[11]:181

But confusion reigned at the company's marketing department, which had to design a plan to market two Coca-Colas where such plans were inconceivable just a few months before. Coca-Cola Classic did not need much help, with a "Red, White and You" campaign showcasing the American virtues many of those who had clamored for its reintroduction had pointedly reminded the company that it embodied. But the company was at a loss to sell what was now just "Coke". Obviously, "The Best Just Got Better" could no longer be used. Marketers fumbled for a strategy for the rest of the year.[9]:366 Matters were not helped when McDonald's announced shortly after the reintroduction of Coca-Cola Classic, that it was immediately switching from New Coke back to original Coca-Cola at all of its restaurants.[9]:369

Max Headroom print ad from the "Catch the wave" campaign
At the beginning of 1986, however, Coke's marketing team found a strategy by returning to one of their original motives for changing the formula: the youth market that preferred Pepsi. Max Headroom, the purportedly computer-generated media personality played by Matt Frewer, was chosen to replace Cosby as the spokesman for Coke's new "Catch the wave" campaign. With his slicked-back hair and sunglasses, he was already known to much of the U.S. youth audience through appearances on MTV and Cinemax. The campaign was launched with a television commercial produced by McCann Erickson New York, with Max saying in his trademark stutter, "C-c-c-catch the wave!" and referring to his fellow "Cokeologists".[23] In a riposte to Pepsi's televisual teasings, one showed Headroom asking a Pepsi can he was "interviewing" how it felt about more drinkers preferring Coke to it and then cut to the condensation forming on, and running down, the can. "S-s-s-s-sweating?", he asked.

The campaign was a huge success, and surveys likewise showed that more than three-quarters of the target market were aware of the ads within two days. Coke's consumer hotline received more calls about Max than any previous spokesperson, some even asking if he had a girlfriend.[24] The ads and campaign continued through 1987, and were chosen as best of 1986 by Video Storyboard of New York.[24]

Coke II

A can of Coke II
In 1985, New Coke was sold only in the United States, United States territories, and Canada while the original formula continued to be sold in the rest of the world. New Coke was eventually returned to the company's product portfolio; it was test-marketed in certain U.S. cities under the name Coke II in 1990,[1] which was taken national in late 1992, despite the company's original intention not to create a second brand. Filmmaker Miranda July is said to have suggested the name of Coke II while working as a tastemaker for an ad agency.[25]

The Coca-Cola Company did practically nothing to promote or otherwise distinguish it. In a market already offering several choices of drinks calling themselves "Coke" in some fashion or another, the public saw little reason to embrace a product they had firmly rejected seven years earlier, and within about a year, Coke II was largely off the American shelves again. By 1998, it could only be found in a few scattered markets in the northwest, midwest and some overseas territories. In July 2002, Coca-Cola announced that Coke II would be discontinued entirely.[26]

On August 16, 2002, The Coca-Cola Company announced a change of the label of Coke Classic in which the word "Classic" was no longer so prominent, leading to speculation that it would eventually be removed and the last traces of New Coke eliminated.[26] In 2009, Coca-Cola permanently removed "Classic" from its North American packaging.[27] Currently, as of 2017, packages of original Coca-Cola have since been branded with an "Original Taste" banner above the label, as part of the brand's worldwide "One Brand" marketing campaign, first introduced in 2016.[28]

Commercial legacy
"For a product so widely despised," noted AdWeek blogger Tim Nudd in 2006, "New Coke (a.k.a. Coke II) still gets an admirable amount of ink." He noted Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking (2005) by Malcolm Gladwell, and Why Most Things Fail: Evolution, Extinction and Economics (2005) by Paul Ormerod, that dealt with it at some length, as well as two recent mentions in Forbes and Sports Illustrated.[29]

Within Coca-Cola, the role the company's bottlers had played in forcing its hand led executives to create a new subsidiary, Coca-Cola Enterprises, which bought out several of the larger bottlers and placed distribution and marketing efforts more tightly under Coca-Cola's control.[citation needed]

On May 21, 2019, the Coca-Cola Company announced that New Coke would be relaunched for a "(very) limited promotional run" to promote the third season of the web series Stranger Things, as part of a partnership deal with Netflix. About 500,000 cans of New Coke were produced for the promotion.[30]

Conspiracy theories
The Coca-Cola Company's apparently sudden reversal on New Coke led to conspiracy theories, including:

The company intentionally changed the formula, hoping consumers would be upset with the company, and demand the original formula to return, which in turn would cause sales to spike.[2] Keough answered this speculation by saying "We're not that dumb, and we're not that smart."[2][15]
The putative switch was planned all along to cover the change from sugar-sweetened Coke to much less expensive high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), a theory that was supposedly given credence by the apparently different taste of Coke Classic when it first hit the market (the U.S. sugar trade association took out a full-page ad lambasting Coke for using HFCS in all bottling of the old formula when it was reintroduced).[11] In fact, Coca-Cola began allowing bottlers to remove up to half of the product's cane sugar as early as 1980, five years before the introduction of New Coke. By the time the new formula was introduced, most bottlers had already sweetened Coca-Cola entirely with HFCS.[2]
It provided cover for the final removal of all coca derivatives from the product to placate the Drug Enforcement Administration, which was trying to eradicate the plant worldwide to combat an increase in cocaine trafficking and consumption. While Coke's executives were indeed relieved the new formula contained no coca and concerned about the long-term future of the Peruvian government-owned coca fields that supplied it in the face of increasing DEA pressure to end cultivation of the crop, according to author Mark Pendergrast there was no direct pressure from the DEA on Coca-Cola to do so.[9] This theory was endorsed in a Time article, as well as by historian Bartow Elmore, who claims the reformulation was made in response to the escalating War on Drugs by the Reagan Administration.[31]
Taste test problems
In his book Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking (2005), Malcolm Gladwell relates his conversations with market researchers in the food industry who put most of the blame for the failure of New Coke on the flawed nature of taste tests. They claim most are subject to systematic biases. Tests such as the Pepsi Challenge were "sip tests", meaning that drinkers were given small samples (less than a can or bottle's worth) to try. Gladwell contends that what people say they like in these tests may not reflect what they actually buy to drink at home over several days.[32] Carol Dollard, who once worked in product development for Pepsi, told Gladwell: "I've seen many times where the sip test will give you one result and the home-use test will give you the exact opposite."[32]:159 For example, although many consumers react positively to the sweeter taste of Pepsi in small volumes, it may become unattractively sweet when drunk in quantity. A more comprehensive testing regimen could possibly have revealed this, Gladwell's sources believe.[32]

Gladwell reports that other market researchers have criticized Coke for not realizing that much of its success as a brand came from what they call sensation transference, a phenomenon first described by marketer Louis Cheskin in the late 1940s: tasters unconsciously add their reactions to the drink's packaging into their assessment of the taste.[33] For example, one of the researchers told Gladwell that his firm's research found 7-Up drinkers believed a sample from a bottle with a more yellow label was more "lemony", although the flavor was identical.[32]:163 In Coke's case, it is alleged that buyers, subject to sensation transference, were also "tasting" the red color of the container and distinctive Coca-Cola script. It was therefore, in their opinion, a mistake to focus solely on the product and its taste. "The mistake Coke made," said Darrel Rhea, an executive with the firm Cheskin founded, "was in attributing their loss in share entirely to the product." He points to Pepsi's work in establishing a youth-oriented brand identity from the 1960s as having more bearing on its success.[34]

Coke considered but rejected gradually changing the drink's flavor incrementally, without announcing they were doing so. Executives feared the public would notice and exaggerate slight differences in taste. In 1998, Joel Dubow, a professor of food marketing at St. Joseph's University, tested this "flavor balance hypothesis" and argued that it was not true. He and fellow researcher Nancy Childs tested mixtures of Coca-Cola Classic and Coke II and found that the gradual changes of taste were not noticed by a significant number of tasters. Coke, he said, would have succeeded had it chosen this strategy.[35]

See also
icon1980s portal
Drink portal
Coca-Cola C2
Crystal Pepsi
Dasani (United Kingdom)
List of defunct consumer brands
MagiCan
OK Soda
References
Jamieson, Sean (April 5, 1990). "Coke II makes its Spokane debut". Spokesman-Review. (Spokane, Washington). p. A8.
Mikkelson, Barbara (March 13, 2007). "Knew Coke / New Coke Origin". Snopes.com. Retrieved March 16, 2010.
New Coke is coming back and it's all because of Netflix's hit show "Stranger Things" CBS News, May 21, 2019
Koten, John; Kilman, Scott (July 12, 1985). "Coca-Cola Faces Tough Marketing Task in Attempting to Sell Old and New Coke". The Wall Street Journal.
Stevenson, Richard W. (August 20, 1985). "New Coke vs. Classic: The Verdict Is Still Out". The New York Times. NYTimes Co. Retrieved April 8, 2017.
"The Real Story of New Coke". Coke Lore. The Coca-Cola Company. Retrieved October 10, 2011.
Demott, John S. (June 24, 1985). "All Afizz Over the New Coke". Time. Retrieved April 8, 2017.
Hays, Constance L. (2005). The Real Thing: Truth and Power at the Coca-Cola Company (Random House Trade pbk. ed.). New York: Random House. ISBN 978-0-8129-7364-8.
Pendergrast, Mark (2004). For God, Country and Coca-Cola : The Definitive History of the Great American Soft Drink and the Company that Makes It (2. ed., rev. and expanded, [Nachdr.] ed.). New York: Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-05468-8.
Schindler, Robert M. (1992). "The Real Lesson of New Coke: The Value of Focus Groups for Predicting the Effects of Social Influence". Marketing Research. 4 (4): 22 [p. 27]. ISSN 1040-8460.
Oliver, Thomas (1987). The Real Coke, The Real Story (Repr ed.). New York: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0140104080.
Horowitz, Roger (January 8, 2013) "The Real Thing: How Coke Became Kosher", Science History Institute. Retrieved July 4, 2019
Matthews, Blair (Spring 2005). "Coca Cola's Big Mistake: New Coke 20 Years Later ..." Soda Pop Dreams. Archived from the original on December 2009. Retrieved June 16, 2006.
"Coke Flavor-Suit Rejected". UPI. June 21, 1985.
Barry, Daniel (2002). The People vs Coke. BBC Documentary.
"Topics; Cars and Cola Jokes". The New York Times. October 23, 1985. Retrieved July 17, 2019.
McKay, Betsy (January 30, 2009). "Coke to Omit 'Classic'". The Wall Street Journal.
TIME; July 22, 1985; 48
"Roger Enrico, the president of Pepsi-Cola U.S.A., was quick to proclaim the 10-week-old new Coke "the Edsel of the 80's" "IDEAS & TRENDS - Coca-Cola Swallows Its Words". The New York Times. July 14, 1985.
EnErico, Roger & Kornbluth, Jesse (1988). The Other Guy Blinked: How Pepsi Won the Cola Wars. New York, NY: Bantam Books. p. 240. ISBN 978-0-553-26632-0.
Bigford, Andrew. "Last Run: Sergio Zyman". SKI Magazine. Retrieved June 14, 2006.
Smith, Gary (October 15, 2006) [1998]. Introduction to Statistical Reasoning. McGraw Hill. pp. 186–87.
"Max & N-N-New Coke". The Max Headroom Chronicles. 2005. Retrieved December 14, 2006.
"Highlights in the History of Coca-Cola Television Advertising". Library of Congress. Retrieved June 22, 2006.
Onstad, Katrina (July 14, 2011). "Miranda July, The Make-Believer". The New York Times.
John H. McConnell; How to Design, Implement and Interpret an Employee Survey, AMACOM Division of the American Management Association, ISBN 0-8144-0709-9, 2003, 3.
Clifford, Stephen (January 31, 2009). "Coca-Cola Deleting 'Classic' From Coke Label". The New York Times. Retrieved October 3, 2011.
"Coca-Cola Reveals New "One-Brand" Packaging". The Coca-Cola Company. Archived from the original on April 22, 2016. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
Nudd, Tim (February 24, 2006). "Where are the last few cans of New Coke?". AdWeek. Retrieved June 26, 2006.
"New Coke and Netflix Take Viewers Back to 1985 for Stranger Things Season 3 in First-of-its-Kind Partnership". The Coca-Cola Company. Retrieved May 21, 2019.
"New Coke History America". TIME.
Gladwell, Malcolm (2005). Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking (1. ed.). New YorK (etc.): Back Bay. ISBN 978-0-316-17232-5.
Cheskin, Louis & Ward, L.B. (September 1948). "Indirect Approach to Market Reactions". Harvard Business Review.
Gordon, Ian; Frank, Thomas (December 1999). "The Conquest of Cool: Business Culture, Counterculture, and the Rise of Hip Consumerism". The Journal of American History. 86 (3): 1396. doi:10.2307/2568708. JSTOR 2568708.
Dubow, Joel S; Childs, Nancy M (November 1998). "New Coke, Mixture Perception, and the Flavor Balance Hypothesis". Journal of Business Research. 43 (3): 147–155. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(97)00220-8.
Further reading
Civille, Gail Vance & Lyon, Brenda G. (1996). Aroma and Flavor Lexicon for Sensory Evaluation. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
Hine, Thomas (1997). The Total Package: The Secret History and Hidden Meanings of Boxes, Bottles, Cans, and Other Persuasive Containers. Back Bay Books. ISBN 978-0-316-36546-8.
Imram, Nazlin (1999). "The role of visual cues in customer perception and acceptance of a food product". Nutrition & Food Science. 99 (5): 224–230. doi:10.1108/00346659910277650.
Leven, S. and Levine, D. (1996). "Multiattribute Decision Making in Context: A Dynamic Neural Network Methodology". Cognitive Science. 20 (2): 271–299. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2002_4.
Meilgaard, Morten; Civille, Gail Vance; Carr, B. Thomas (1999). Sensory Evaluation Techniques (Third ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Wilson, Timothy & Schooler, Jonathan (1999). "Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 60 (2): 181–192. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.181.
External links
Bastedo, Michael & Davis, Angela. "God, What a Blunder: The New Coke Story". lycos.co.uk. Archived from the original on May 15, 2006. With a good talk on the problems of their research methodologies (focus groups v. surveys).
"Coke Lore (Knew Coke) — Snopes' take on New Coke". Snopes.
"Coke Lore: New Coke". Coca-Cola.
"New Coke - a market research disaster?". St John's College Blog. 2012.
"QuickTime news clip on New Coke introduction". KTLA. Los Angeles: CNN. Archived from the original on February 28, 2008.
vte
Quoted:

Don't you dare say I never done did sumthin' for ya.

New Coke
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
New Coke
New Coke can.jpg
TypeCola
ManufacturerThe Coca-Cola Company
DistributorCoca-Cola Enterprises
Country of originU.S.
IntroducedApril 23, 1985
May 23, 2019 (limited re-release)
DiscontinuedJuly 10, 2002 (original run)
ColorCaramel
VariantsCoke II
New Coke was the unofficial name for the reformulation of Coca-Cola introduced in April 1985 by the Coca-Cola Company. In 1992, it was renamed Coke II.[1]

By 1985, Coca-Cola had been losing market share to diet soft drinks and non-cola beverages for many years. Blind taste tests indicated that consumers seemed to prefer the sweeter taste of rival Pepsi-Cola, and so the Coca-Cola recipe was reformulated. However, the American public's reaction to the change was negative, and "New Coke" was considered a major failure. The company reintroduced Coke's original formula within three months, rebranded "Coca-Cola Classic", resulting in a significant sales boost. This led to speculation New Coke formula had been a marketing ploy to stimulate sales of original Coca-Cola, which the company has denied.[2]

Coke II was discontinued in July 2002. It remains influential as a cautionary tale against tampering with a well-established and successful brand. In May 2019, it was announced that the 1985 formulation (bearing the name "New Coke") would be reintroduced to promote the third season of the Netflix series Stranger Things which takes place in 1985.[3]

Contents
1Background
1.1"Project Kansas"
2Launch
2.1Initial success
2.2Backlash
2.3Response by Pepsi
2.4Company dissatisfaction
2.5Reversal
3Aftermath and legacy
3.1After Coca-Cola Classic
3.2Coke II
3.3Commercial legacy
3.4Conspiracy theories
3.5Taste test problems
4See also
5References
6Further reading
7External links
Background
After World War II, Coca-Cola held 60% of the market share. By 1983, it had declined to under 24%, largely because of competition from Pepsi-Cola. Pepsi had begun to outsell Coke in supermarkets; Coke maintained its edge only through soda vending machines and fountain sales in fast food restaurants, concessions, and sports venues where Coca-Cola had purchased "pouring rights".[2]

Market analysts believed baby boomers were more likely to purchase diet drinks as they aged and remained health- and weight-conscious. Growth in the full-calorie segment would have to come from younger drinkers, who at that time favored Pepsi by even more overwhelming margins.[4] Meanwhile, the overall market for colas steadily declined in the early 1980s, as consumers increasingly purchased diet and non-cola soft drinks, many of which were sold by Coca-Cola themselves. This trend further eroded Coca-Cola's market share.[5][6] When Roberto Goizueta became Coca-Cola CEO in 1980, he told employees there would be no "sacred cows" in how the company did business, including how it formulated its drinks.[7]

"Project Kansas"

One of Coca-Cola's advertisements to promote the flavor change in Coke
Coca-Cola's senior executives commissioned a secret project headed by marketing vice president Sergio Zyman and Coca-Cola USA president Brian Dyson to create a new flavor for Coke. This research, called "Project Kansas", took its name from a photo of Kansas journalist William Allen White drinking a Coke; the image had been used extensively in Coca-Cola advertising and hung on several executives' walls.:114

The sweeter cola overwhelmingly beat both regular Coke and Pepsi in taste tests, surveys, and focus groups. Asked if they would buy and drink the product if it were Coca-Cola, most testers said they would, although it would take some getting used to. About 10–12% of testers felt angry and alienated at the thought, and said they might stop drinking Coke altogether. Their presence in focus groups tended to negatively skew results as they exerted indirect peer pressure on other participants.[9]:355

The surveys, which were given more significance by standard marketing procedures of the era, were less negative than the taste tests and were key in convincing management to change the formula in 1985, to coincide with the drink's centenary. But the focus groups had provided a clue as to how the change would play out in a public context, a data point the company downplayed but which proved important later.[10]

Management rejected an idea to make and sell the new flavor as a separate variety of Coca-Cola. The company's bottlers were already complaining about absorbing other recent additions into the product line since 1982, after the introduction of Diet Coke; Cherry Coke was launched nationally nearly concurrently with New Coke during 1985. Many of them had sued over the company's syrup pricing policies. A new variety of Coke in competition with the main variety could also have cannibalized Coke's sales and increased the proportion of Pepsi drinkers relative to Coke drinkers.

Early in his career with Coca-Cola, Goizueta had been in charge of the company's Bahamian subsidiary. In that capacity, he had improved sales by tweaking the drink's flavor slightly, so he was receptive to the idea that changes to the taste of Coke could lead to increased profits. He believed it would be "New Coke or no Coke",:106 and that the change must take place openly. He insisted that the containers carry the "New!" label, which gave the drink its popular name.[9]:358

Goizueta also made a visit to his mentor and predecessor as the company's chief executive, the ailing Robert W. Woodruff, who had built Coke into an international brand following World War II. He claimed he had secured Woodruff's blessing for the reformulation, but even many of Goizueta's closest friends within the company doubt that Woodruff understood Goizueta's intentions.[9]:356:115

Launch
“To hear some tell it, April 23, 1985, was a day that will live in marketing infamy ... spawning consumer angst the likes of which no business has ever seen.”
— The Coca-Cola Company, on the New Coke announcement[6]
New Coke was introduced on April 23, 1985. Production of the original formulation ended later that week. In many areas, New Coke was initially introduced in "old" Coke packaging; bottlers used up remaining cans, cartons and labels before new packaging was widely available. Old cans containing New Coke were identified by their gold colored tops, while glass and plastic bottles had red caps instead of silver and white, respectively. Bright yellow stickers indicating the change were placed on the cartons of can multi-packs.

The press conference at New York City's Lincoln Center to introduce the new formula did not go well. Reporters had already been fed questions by Pepsi,[11] which was worried that New Coke would erase its gains. Goizueta, Coca-Cola's CEO, described the new flavor as "bolder", "rounder", and "more harmonious",[9]:352 and defended the change by saying that the drink's secret formula was not sacrosanct and inviolable. As far back as 1935, Coca-Cola sought kosher certification from Atlanta rabbi Tobias Geffen, and made two changes to the formula so the drink could be considered kosher (as well as halal and vegetarian).[12] Goizueta also refused to admit that taste tests had led the change, calling it "one of the easiest decisions we've ever made.":117 A reporter asked whether Diet Coke would also be reformulated "assuming [New Coke] is a success," to which Goizueta curtly replied, "No. And I didn't assume that this is a success. This is a success."[9]:352

The emphasis on the sweeter taste of the new flavor also ran contrary to previous Coke advertising, in which spokesman Bill Cosby had touted Coke's less-sweet taste as a reason to prefer it over Pepsi.[11]:136 Nevertheless, the company's stock went up on the announcement, and market research showed 80% of the American public was aware of the change within days.:119[13]

Initial success
Coca-Cola introduced the new formula with marketing pushes in New York, where workers renovating the Statue of Liberty for its 1986 centenary were given cans,[13] and Washington, D.C., where thousands of cans were given away in Lafayette Park. As soon as New Coke was introduced, the new formula was available at McDonald's and other drink fountains in the United States. Sales figures from those cities, and other areas where it had been introduced, showed a reaction that went as the market research had predicted. In fact, Coke's sales were up 8% over the same period as the year before.[7]

Most Coke drinkers resumed buying the new Coke at much the same level as they had the old one. Surveys indicated that the majority of regular Coke drinkers liked the new flavoring.[11]:153 Three quarters of the respondents said they would buy New Coke again.[7] The big test, however, remained in the Southeast, where Coke was first bottled and tasted.

Backlash
Despite New Coke's acceptance with a large number of Coca-Cola drinkers, many more resented the change in formula and were not shy about making that known—just as had happened in the focus groups. Many of these drinkers were Southerners, some of whom considered Coca-Cola a fundamental part of their regional identity. They viewed the company's decision to change the formula through the prism of the Civil War, as another surrender to the "Yankees".[11]:149–151

Company headquarters in Atlanta began receiving letters and telephone calls expressing anger or deep disappointment. The company received over 40,000 calls and letters,:119 including one letter, delivered to Goizueta, that was addressed to "Chief Dodo, The Coca-Cola Company". Another letter asked for his autograph, as the signature of "one of the dumbest executives in American business history" would likely become valuable in the future. The company hotline, 1-800-GET-COKE, received over 1,500 calls a day compared to around 400 before the change.[6] A psychiatrist whom Coke had hired to listen in on calls told executives that some people sounded as if they were discussing the death of a family member.[11]:163

They were, nonetheless, joined by some voices from outside the region. Chicago Tribune columnist Bob Greene wrote some widely reprinted pieces ridiculing the new flavor and damning Coke's executives for having changed it. Comedians and talk show hosts, including Johnny Carson and David Letterman, made regular jokes mocking the switch. Ads for New Coke were booed heavily when they appeared on the scoreboard at the Houston Astrodome.[13] Even Fidel Castro, a longtime Coca-Cola drinker, contributed to the backlash, calling New Coke a sign of American capitalist decadence.[9]:362 Goizueta's father expressed similar misgivings to his son, who later recalled that it was the only time his father had agreed with Castro, whose rule he had fled Cuba to avoid.:118

Gay Mullins, a Seattle retiree looking to start a public relations firm with $120,000 of borrowed money, formed the organization Old Cola Drinkers of America on May 28 to lobby Coca-Cola to either reintroduce the old formula or sell it to someone else. His organization eventually received over 60,000 phone calls. He also filed a class action lawsuit against the company (which was quickly dismissed by a judge who said he preferred the taste of Pepsi[14]), while nevertheless expressing interest in securing The Coca-Cola Company as a client of his new firm should it reintroduce the old formula.[11]:160 In two informal blind taste tests, Mullins either failed to distinguish New Coke from old or expressed a preference for New Coke.[11]:162

Despite ongoing resistance in the South, New Coke continued to do well in the rest of the country.[11]:149–151 But executives were uncertain of how international markets would react. Executives met with international Coke bottlers in Monaco; to their surprise, the bottlers were not interested in selling New Coke.[15] Zyman also heard doubts and skepticism from his relatives in Mexico, where New Coke was scheduled to be introduced later that summer, when he went there on vacation.

Goizueta stated that Coca-Cola employees who liked New Coke felt unable to speak up due to peer pressure, as had happened in the focus groups. Donald Keough, the Coca-Cola president and chief operating officer, reported overhearing someone say at his country club that they liked New Coke, but they would be "damned if I'll let Coca-Cola know that."[11]:154

Response by Pepsi
Pepsi-Cola took advantage of the situation, running ads in which a first-time Pepsi drinker exclaimed, "Now I know why Coke did it!"[11]:148–9 Even amidst consumer anger and several Pepsi ads mocking Coca-Cola's debacle, Pepsi actually gained very few long-term converts over Coke's switch, despite a 14% sales increase over the same month the previous year, the largest sales growth in the company's history.[7] Coca-Cola's director of corporate communications, Carlton Curtis, realized over time that consumers were more upset about the withdrawal of the old formula than the taste of the new one.[11]:175

Roger Enrico, then director of Pepsi's North American operations, declared a company-wide holiday and took out a full-page ad in The New York Times proclaiming that Pepsi had won the long-running "Cola Wars".:115 [9]:359 Since Coke officials were preoccupied over the weekend with preparations for the announcement, their Pepsi counterparts had time to cultivate skepticism among reporters, sounding themes that would later come into play in the public discourse over the changed drink.[11]:125 After the announcement on April 23, PepsiCo gave its employees the day off saying, "By today's action, Coke has admitted that it's not the real thing."

Company dissatisfaction
Some Coca-Cola executives had quietly been arguing for a reintroduction of the old formula as early as May.[11]:157 By mid June, when soft drink sales usually start to rise, the numbers showed that new Coke was leveling among consumers. Executives feared social peer pressure was now affecting their bottom line. Some consumers even began trying to obtain "old" Coke from overseas, where the new formula had not yet been introduced, as domestic stocks of the old drink were exhausted.[11]:158 Over the course of the month, Coca-Cola's chemists also quietly reduced the acidity level of the new formula, hoping to assuage complaints about the flavor and allow its sweetness to be better perceived (advertisements pointing to this change were prepared, but never used).[9]:364

In addition to the noisier public protests, boycotts, and bottles being emptied into the streets of several cities, the company had more serious reasons to be concerned. Its bottlers, and not just the ones still suing the company over syrup pricing policies, were expressing concern. While they had given Goizueta a standing ovation when he announced the change at an April 22 bottlers' meeting at Atlanta's Woodruff Arts Center, glad the company had finally taken some initiative in the face of Pepsi's advances,[13] they were less enthusiastic about the taste.[9]:364 :106,116 Most of them saw great difficulty having to promote and sell a drink that had long been marketed as "The Real Thing", constant and unchanging, now that it had been changed.

The 20 bottlers still suing Coca-Cola made much of the change in their legal arguments. Coca-Cola had argued in its defense when the suit was originally filed that the formula's uniqueness and difference from Diet Coke justified different pricing policies from the latter – but if the new formula was simply an HFCS-sweetened Diet Coke, Coca-Cola could not argue the formula was unique. Bottlers, particularly in the South, were also tired of facing personal opprobrium over the change. Many reported that some acquaintances and even friends and relatives had ostracized them, or had expressed displeasure in other emotionally hurtful ways. On June 23, several of the bottlers took these complaints to Coca-Cola executives in a private meeting.:121 With the company now fearing boycotts not only from its consumers but its bottlers, talks about reintroducing the old formula moved from "if" to "when".

Finally, the Coca-Cola board decided that enough was enough, and plans were set in motion to bring back the old Coke. Company president Donald Keough revealed years later, in the documentary The People vs. Coke (2002), that they realized this was the only right thing to do when they visited a small restaurant in Monaco and the owner proudly said they served "the real thing, it's a real Coke," offering them a chilled 6 and 1/2 oz. glass bottle of original Coca-Cola.[15]

Reversal
On the afternoon of July 11, 1985, Coca-Cola executives announced the return of the original formula, 79 days after New Coke's introduction. ABC News' Peter Jennings interrupted General Hospital with a special bulletin to share the news with viewers. On the floor of the U.S. Senate, David Pryor called the reintroduction "a meaningful moment in U.S. history".[9] The company hotline received 31,600 calls in the two days after the announcement.[6]

The new product continued to be marketed and sold as Coke (until 1992, when it was renamed Coke II) while the original formula was named Coca-Cola Classic, and for a short time it was referred to by the public as Old Coke. Some who tasted the reintroduced formula were not convinced that the first batches really were the same formula that had supposedly been retired that spring. This was true for a few regions, because Coca-Cola Classic differed from the original formula in that all bottlers who hadn't already done so were using high fructose corn syrup instead of cane sugar to sweeten the drink, though most had by this time.[11]:183

"There is a twist to this story which will please every humanist and will probably keep Harvard professors puzzled for years," said Keough at a press conference. "The simple fact is that all the time and money and skill poured into consumer research on the new Coca-Cola could not measure or reveal the deep and abiding emotional attachment to original Coca-Cola felt by so many people."

Gay Mullins, founder of the organization Old Cola Drinkers of America (which had lobbied Coca-Cola to either reintroduce the old formula or sell it to someone else), was given the first case of Coca-Cola Classic.[13]

Aftermath and legacy
By the end of 1985, Coca-Cola Classic was substantially outselling both New Coke and Pepsi. Six months after the rollout, Coke's sales had increased at more than twice the rate of Pepsi's.[16]

New Coke's sales dwindled to a three percent share of the market, although it was selling quite well in Los Angeles and some other key markets.[16] Later research, however, suggested that it was not the return of Coca-Cola Classic, but instead the nearly unnoticed introduction of Cherry Coke, which appeared almost simultaneously with New Coke, that can be credited with the company's success in 1985.[11]:187

The Coca-Cola Company spent a considerable amount of time trying to figure out where it had made a mistake, ultimately concluding that it had underestimated the public reaction of the portion of the customer base that would be alienated by the switch. This would not emerge for several years afterward, however, and in the meantime the public simply concluded that the company had, as Keough suggested, failed to consider the public's attachment to the idea of what Coke's old formula represented. While that has become conventional wisdom in the ensuing years, some analyses have suggested otherwise.

This populist version of the story served Coke's interests, however, as the episode did more to position and define Coca-Cola as a brand embodying values distinct from Pepsi. Allowing itself to be portrayed as a somewhat clueless large corporation forced to withdraw from a big change by overwhelming public pressure flattered customers, as Keough put it, "We love any retreat which has us rushing toward our best customers with the product they love the most."[9]:360 Bottles and cans continued to bear the "Coca-Cola Classic" title until January 2009, when the company announced it would stop printing the word "Classic" on the labels of 16-US-fluid-ounce (470 ml) bottles sold in parts of the southeastern United States.[17] The change is part of a larger strategy to rejuvenate the product's image.[17]

The fiasco led Bill Cosby to end his long time advertising for Coca-Cola. Cosby claimed that his commercials praising the superiority of the new formula had hurt his credibility. No one at Coca-Cola was fired or otherwise held responsible for what is still widely perceived as a misstep, for the simple reason that it ultimately wasn't. When Goizueta died in 1997, the company's share price was well above what it was when he had taken over 16 years earlier and its position as market leader even more firmly established. At the time, Roger Enrico, then head of Pepsi's American operations, likened New Coke to the Edsel.[18][19] Later, when he became PepsiCo's CEO, he modified his assessment of the situation, saying that had people been fired or demoted over New Coke, it would have sent a message that risk-taking was strongly discouraged at the company.[20]

In the late 1990s, Zyman summed up the New Coke experience thus:

Yes, it infuriated the public, cost us a ton of money and lasted for only 77 days before we reintroduced Coca-Cola Classic. Still, New Coke was a success because it revitalized the brand and reattached the public to Coke.[21]

New Coke continued to do what it had originally been designed to do: win taste tests. In 1987, The Wall Street Journal surveyed 100 randomly selected cola drinkers, the majority of whom indicated a preference for Pepsi, with Classic Coke accounting for the remainder save two New Coke loyalists. When this group was given a chance to try all three in a blind test, New Coke slightly edged out Pepsi, but many drinkers reacted angrily to finding they had chosen a brand other than their favorite.[22]

Goizueta claimed that he never once regretted the decision to change Coca-Cola. He even threw a tenth anniversary party for New Coke in 1995 and continued to drink it until his death in 1997.[13]

After Coca-Cola Classic
"Catch the wave" redirects here. For the wrestling tournament, see Catch the Wave.
In the short run, the reintroduction of original Coca-Cola saved Coke's sales figures and brought it back in the good graces of many customers and bottlers. Phone calls and letters to the company were as joyful and thankful as they had been angry and depressed. "You would have thought we'd cured cancer", said one executive.[11]:181

But confusion reigned at the company's marketing department, which had to design a plan to market two Coca-Colas where such plans were inconceivable just a few months before. Coca-Cola Classic did not need much help, with a "Red, White and You" campaign showcasing the American virtues many of those who had clamored for its reintroduction had pointedly reminded the company that it embodied. But the company was at a loss to sell what was now just "Coke". Obviously, "The Best Just Got Better" could no longer be used. Marketers fumbled for a strategy for the rest of the year.[9]:366 Matters were not helped when McDonald's announced shortly after the reintroduction of Coca-Cola Classic, that it was immediately switching from New Coke back to original Coca-Cola at all of its restaurants.[9]:369

Max Headroom print ad from the "Catch the wave" campaign
At the beginning of 1986, however, Coke's marketing team found a strategy by returning to one of their original motives for changing the formula: the youth market that preferred Pepsi. Max Headroom, the purportedly computer-generated media personality played by Matt Frewer, was chosen to replace Cosby as the spokesman for Coke's new "Catch the wave" campaign. With his slicked-back hair and sunglasses, he was already known to much of the U.S. youth audience through appearances on MTV and Cinemax. The campaign was launched with a television commercial produced by McCann Erickson New York, with Max saying in his trademark stutter, "C-c-c-catch the wave!" and referring to his fellow "Cokeologists".[23] In a riposte to Pepsi's televisual teasings, one showed Headroom asking a Pepsi can he was "interviewing" how it felt about more drinkers preferring Coke to it and then cut to the condensation forming on, and running down, the can. "S-s-s-s-sweating?", he asked.

The campaign was a huge success, and surveys likewise showed that more than three-quarters of the target market were aware of the ads within two days. Coke's consumer hotline received more calls about Max than any previous spokesperson, some even asking if he had a girlfriend.[24] The ads and campaign continued through 1987, and were chosen as best of 1986 by Video Storyboard of New York.[24]

Coke II

A can of Coke II
In 1985, New Coke was sold only in the United States, United States territories, and Canada while the original formula continued to be sold in the rest of the world. New Coke was eventually returned to the company's product portfolio; it was test-marketed in certain U.S. cities under the name Coke II in 1990,[1] which was taken national in late 1992, despite the company's original intention not to create a second brand. Filmmaker Miranda July is said to have suggested the name of Coke II while working as a tastemaker for an ad agency.[25]

The Coca-Cola Company did practically nothing to promote or otherwise distinguish it. In a market already offering several choices of drinks calling themselves "Coke" in some fashion or another, the public saw little reason to embrace a product they had firmly rejected seven years earlier, and within about a year, Coke II was largely off the American shelves again. By 1998, it could only be found in a few scattered markets in the northwest, midwest and some overseas territories. In July 2002, Coca-Cola announced that Coke II would be discontinued entirely.[26]

On August 16, 2002, The Coca-Cola Company announced a change of the label of Coke Classic in which the word "Classic" was no longer so prominent, leading to speculation that it would eventually be removed and the last traces of New Coke eliminated.[26] In 2009, Coca-Cola permanently removed "Classic" from its North American packaging.[27] Currently, as of 2017, packages of original Coca-Cola have since been branded with an "Original Taste" banner above the label, as part of the brand's worldwide "One Brand" marketing campaign, first introduced in 2016.[28]

Commercial legacy
"For a product so widely despised," noted AdWeek blogger Tim Nudd in 2006, "New Coke (a.k.a. Coke II) still gets an admirable amount of ink." He noted Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking (2005) by Malcolm Gladwell, and Why Most Things Fail: Evolution, Extinction and Economics (2005) by Paul Ormerod, that dealt with it at some length, as well as two recent mentions in Forbes and Sports Illustrated.[29]

Within Coca-Cola, the role the company's bottlers had played in forcing its hand led executives to create a new subsidiary, Coca-Cola Enterprises, which bought out several of the larger bottlers and placed distribution and marketing efforts more tightly under Coca-Cola's control.[citation needed]

On May 21, 2019, the Coca-Cola Company announced that New Coke would be relaunched for a "(very) limited promotional run" to promote the third season of the web series Stranger Things, as part of a partnership deal with Netflix. About 500,000 cans of New Coke were produced for the promotion.[30]

Conspiracy theories
The Coca-Cola Company's apparently sudden reversal on New Coke led to conspiracy theories, including:

The company intentionally changed the formula, hoping consumers would be upset with the company, and demand the original formula to return, which in turn would cause sales to spike.[2] Keough answered this speculation by saying "We're not that dumb, and we're not that smart."[2][15]
The putative switch was planned all along to cover the change from sugar-sweetened Coke to much less expensive high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), a theory that was supposedly given credence by the apparently different taste of Coke Classic when it first hit the market (the U.S. sugar trade association took out a full-page ad lambasting Coke for using HFCS in all bottling of the old formula when it was reintroduced).[11] In fact, Coca-Cola began allowing bottlers to remove up to half of the product's cane sugar as early as 1980, five years before the introduction of New Coke. By the time the new formula was introduced, most bottlers had already sweetened Coca-Cola entirely with HFCS.[2]
It provided cover for the final removal of all coca derivatives from the product to placate the Drug Enforcement Administration, which was trying to eradicate the plant worldwide to combat an increase in cocaine trafficking and consumption. While Coke's executives were indeed relieved the new formula contained no coca and concerned about the long-term future of the Peruvian government-owned coca fields that supplied it in the face of increasing DEA pressure to end cultivation of the crop, according to author Mark Pendergrast there was no direct pressure from the DEA on Coca-Cola to do so.[9] This theory was endorsed in a Time article, as well as by historian Bartow Elmore, who claims the reformulation was made in response to the escalating War on Drugs by the Reagan Administration.[31]
Taste test problems
In his book Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking (2005), Malcolm Gladwell relates his conversations with market researchers in the food industry who put most of the blame for the failure of New Coke on the flawed nature of taste tests. They claim most are subject to systematic biases. Tests such as the Pepsi Challenge were "sip tests", meaning that drinkers were given small samples (less than a can or bottle's worth) to try. Gladwell contends that what people say they like in these tests may not reflect what they actually buy to drink at home over several days.[32] Carol Dollard, who once worked in product development for Pepsi, told Gladwell: "I've seen many times where the sip test will give you one result and the home-use test will give you the exact opposite."[32]:159 For example, although many consumers react positively to the sweeter taste of Pepsi in small volumes, it may become unattractively sweet when drunk in quantity. A more comprehensive testing regimen could possibly have revealed this, Gladwell's sources believe.[32]

Gladwell reports that other market researchers have criticized Coke for not realizing that much of its success as a brand came from what they call sensation transference, a phenomenon first described by marketer Louis Cheskin in the late 1940s: tasters unconsciously add their reactions to the drink's packaging into their assessment of the taste.[33] For example, one of the researchers told Gladwell that his firm's research found 7-Up drinkers believed a sample from a bottle with a more yellow label was more "lemony", although the flavor was identical.[32]:163 In Coke's case, it is alleged that buyers, subject to sensation transference, were also "tasting" the red color of the container and distinctive Coca-Cola script. It was therefore, in their opinion, a mistake to focus solely on the product and its taste. "The mistake Coke made," said Darrel Rhea, an executive with the firm Cheskin founded, "was in attributing their loss in share entirely to the product." He points to Pepsi's work in establishing a youth-oriented brand identity from the 1960s as having more bearing on its success.[34]

Coke considered but rejected gradually changing the drink's flavor incrementally, without announcing they were doing so. Executives feared the public would notice and exaggerate slight differences in taste. In 1998, Joel Dubow, a professor of food marketing at St. Joseph's University, tested this "flavor balance hypothesis" and argued that it was not true. He and fellow researcher Nancy Childs tested mixtures of Coca-Cola Classic and Coke II and found that the gradual changes of taste were not noticed by a significant number of tasters. Coke, he said, would have succeeded had it chosen this strategy.[35]

See also
icon1980s portal
Drink portal
Coca-Cola C2
Crystal Pepsi
Dasani (United Kingdom)
List of defunct consumer brands
MagiCan
OK Soda
References
Jamieson, Sean (April 5, 1990). "Coke II makes its Spokane debut". Spokesman-Review. (Spokane, Washington). p. A8.
Mikkelson, Barbara (March 13, 2007). "Knew Coke / New Coke Origin". Snopes.com. Retrieved March 16, 2010.
New Coke is coming back and it's all because of Netflix's hit show "Stranger Things" CBS News, May 21, 2019
Koten, John; Kilman, Scott (July 12, 1985). "Coca-Cola Faces Tough Marketing Task in Attempting to Sell Old and New Coke". The Wall Street Journal.
Stevenson, Richard W. (August 20, 1985). "New Coke vs. Classic: The Verdict Is Still Out". The New York Times. NYTimes Co. Retrieved April 8, 2017.
"The Real Story of New Coke". Coke Lore. The Coca-Cola Company. Retrieved October 10, 2011.
Demott, John S. (June 24, 1985). "All Afizz Over the New Coke". Time. Retrieved April 8, 2017.
Hays, Constance L. (2005). The Real Thing: Truth and Power at the Coca-Cola Company (Random House Trade pbk. ed.). New York: Random House. ISBN 978-0-8129-7364-8.
Pendergrast, Mark (2004). For God, Country and Coca-Cola : The Definitive History of the Great American Soft Drink and the Company that Makes It (2. ed., rev. and expanded, [Nachdr.] ed.). New York: Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-05468-8.
Schindler, Robert M. (1992). "The Real Lesson of New Coke: The Value of Focus Groups for Predicting the Effects of Social Influence". Marketing Research. 4 (4): 22 [p. 27]. ISSN 1040-8460.
Oliver, Thomas (1987). The Real Coke, The Real Story (Repr ed.). New York: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0140104080.
Horowitz, Roger (January 8, 2013) "The Real Thing: How Coke Became Kosher", Science History Institute. Retrieved July 4, 2019
Matthews, Blair (Spring 2005). "Coca Cola's Big Mistake: New Coke 20 Years Later ..." Soda Pop Dreams. Archived from the original on December 2009. Retrieved June 16, 2006.
"Coke Flavor-Suit Rejected". UPI. June 21, 1985.
Barry, Daniel (2002). The People vs Coke. BBC Documentary.
"Topics; Cars and Cola Jokes". The New York Times. October 23, 1985. Retrieved July 17, 2019.
McKay, Betsy (January 30, 2009). "Coke to Omit 'Classic'". The Wall Street Journal.
TIME; July 22, 1985; 48
"Roger Enrico, the president of Pepsi-Cola U.S.A., was quick to proclaim the 10-week-old new Coke "the Edsel of the 80's" "IDEAS & TRENDS - Coca-Cola Swallows Its Words". The New York Times. July 14, 1985.
EnErico, Roger & Kornbluth, Jesse (1988). The Other Guy Blinked: How Pepsi Won the Cola Wars. New York, NY: Bantam Books. p. 240. ISBN 978-0-553-26632-0.
Bigford, Andrew. "Last Run: Sergio Zyman". SKI Magazine. Retrieved June 14, 2006.
Smith, Gary (October 15, 2006) [1998]. Introduction to Statistical Reasoning. McGraw Hill. pp. 186–87.
"Max & N-N-New Coke". The Max Headroom Chronicles. 2005. Retrieved December 14, 2006.
"Highlights in the History of Coca-Cola Television Advertising". Library of Congress. Retrieved June 22, 2006.
Onstad, Katrina (July 14, 2011). "Miranda July, The Make-Believer". The New York Times.
John H. McConnell; How to Design, Implement and Interpret an Employee Survey, AMACOM Division of the American Management Association, ISBN 0-8144-0709-9, 2003, 3.
Clifford, Stephen (January 31, 2009). "Coca-Cola Deleting 'Classic' From Coke Label". The New York Times. Retrieved October 3, 2011.
"Coca-Cola Reveals New "One-Brand" Packaging". The Coca-Cola Company. Archived from the original on April 22, 2016. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
Nudd, Tim (February 24, 2006). "Where are the last few cans of New Coke?". AdWeek. Retrieved June 26, 2006.
"New Coke and Netflix Take Viewers Back to 1985 for Stranger Things Season 3 in First-of-its-Kind Partnership". The Coca-Cola Company. Retrieved May 21, 2019.
"New Coke History America". TIME.
Gladwell, Malcolm (2005). Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking (1. ed.). New YorK (etc.): Back Bay. ISBN 978-0-316-17232-5.
Cheskin, Louis & Ward, L.B. (September 1948). "Indirect Approach to Market Reactions". Harvard Business Review.
Gordon, Ian; Frank, Thomas (December 1999). "The Conquest of Cool: Business Culture, Counterculture, and the Rise of Hip Consumerism". The Journal of American History. 86 (3): 1396. doi:10.2307/2568708. JSTOR 2568708.
Dubow, Joel S; Childs, Nancy M (November 1998). "New Coke, Mixture Perception, and the Flavor Balance Hypothesis". Journal of Business Research. 43 (3): 147–155. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(97)00220-8.
Further reading
Civille, Gail Vance & Lyon, Brenda G. (1996). Aroma and Flavor Lexicon for Sensory Evaluation. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
Hine, Thomas (1997). The Total Package: The Secret History and Hidden Meanings of Boxes, Bottles, Cans, and Other Persuasive Containers. Back Bay Books. ISBN 978-0-316-36546-8.
Imram, Nazlin (1999). "The role of visual cues in customer perception and acceptance of a food product". Nutrition & Food Science. 99 (5): 224–230. doi:10.1108/00346659910277650.
Leven, S. and Levine, D. (1996). "Multiattribute Decision Making in Context: A Dynamic Neural Network Methodology". Cognitive Science. 20 (2): 271–299. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2002_4.
Meilgaard, Morten; Civille, Gail Vance; Carr, B. Thomas (1999). Sensory Evaluation Techniques (Third ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Wilson, Timothy & Schooler, Jonathan (1999). "Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 60 (2): 181–192. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.181.
External links
Bastedo, Michael & Davis, Angela. "God, What a Blunder: The New Coke Story". lycos.co.uk. Archived from the original on May 15, 2006. With a good talk on the problems of their research methodologies (focus groups v. surveys).
"Coke Lore (Knew Coke) — Snopes' take on New Coke". Snopes.
"Coke Lore: New Coke". Coca-Cola.
"New Coke - a market research disaster?". St John's College Blog. 2012.
"QuickTime news clip on New Coke introduction". KTLA. Los Angeles: CNN. Archived from the original on February 28, 2008.
vte
You're whall of text offends me
sweet WOT
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 10:42:24 PM EDT
[#14]
Biggest wot I have seen in some time, CT forum is delivering lately.
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 11:28:57 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Didnt you promise everyone pictures on another thread?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Now, were you pronouncing “Jesus” as JEE-zuss or HAY-zooss?
Didnt you promise everyone pictures on another thread?
Inbound!
Link Posted: 2/21/2020 11:39:56 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Biggest wot I have seen in some time, CT forum is delivering lately.
View Quote
Now we need to get two people wagging their credentials and yelling at each other for it to be a true party.
Link Posted: 2/22/2020 9:35:31 AM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Now we need to get two people wagging their credentials and yelling at each other for it to be a true party.
View Quote
Steveo, Masked, and M4 all got the ban hammer it seems. Who is gonna take up the slack?
Link Posted: 2/22/2020 10:07:22 AM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Didnt ask if it broke your heart.  G8 asked a question and I was able to answer it.  What you or anyone else thinks about it is irrelevant.

But most importantly,  do they even still make New Coke?
View Quote
I will regulate my thoughts and opinions to the locked box of Tyranny.  

Although I’m glad I could help bring the topic of New Coke to light.
Link Posted: 2/22/2020 10:30:49 AM EDT
[#19]
Anyway back to my original post thought.  It is disgusting to me that CSP is recruiting for "social justice", "wokeness", perverts, etc.  Just plain disgusting!
Link Posted: 2/22/2020 10:44:33 AM EDT
[#20]
It would be nice if they would recruit people that have the same mentality as most of the Sheriffs in VA.

We know that isn’t ever going to happen though.
Link Posted: 2/22/2020 11:32:35 AM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It would be nice if they would recruit people that have the same mentality as most of the Sheriffs in VA.

We know that isn’t ever going to happen though.
View Quote
These will be young recruits- a lack of experienced and balanced leadership isn’t going to help.
Link Posted: 2/22/2020 11:47:02 AM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

These will be young recruits- a lack of experienced and balanced leadership isn’t going to help.
View Quote
Truth right here.
Link Posted: 2/22/2020 11:52:12 AM EDT
[#23]
Having an experienced sgt show up can really help to de escalate a situation. He can help to reign in the stupidity on both fronts
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top