warlord posted:
Why did the govt weld the selector switch for? If set for semi-auto, it will always fire semi, unless somebody has a key that will change it to full-auto.?
Note, Combat Diver has a M14
NM rifle. From the free online book M14 Rifle History and Development at
www.imageseek.com/m1aM14 M
A very few M14 rifles were permanently rendered semi-automatic. This was accomplished by welding the selector shaft lock, selector lock pin, selector shaft, sear release and the receiver. This prevented installation of the selector switch. Otherwise, the M14 M (Modified) rifle was a rack grade M14. This modification was officially announced in the Director of Civilian Marksmanship 1963 Rifle National Matches bulletin according to Stevens. The Army announced it in Army Regulation 920-25 dated 8 February 1965. “It was the intention of the U. S. Army to issue modified M14 rifles to shooting clubs and to sell them through the Director of Civilian Marksmanship (DCM) program . . .. Apparently, these rifles were never released." (4) The Gun Control Act was signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson on October 22, 1968 and it went into effect on December 16, 1968. This law, among other things, prevented distribution of the M14 rifle to the public. The M14 M rifle was identified by stamping the letter “M” after “M14” on the receiver heel. Springfield Armory (Springfield, MA) had converted 1009 rifles to M14 M by June 30, 1963.
M14 NM
A development program to turn the M14 into a competition match rifle was begun at Springfield Armory in 1959. Springfield Armory and TRW made such M14 rifles from scratch. They were designated M14 NM. Additionally, Springfield Armory and Rock Island Arsenal converted some M14 rifles to M14 NM models. M14 NM rifles received the same welding operation as the M14 M rifles.
A) M14 NM Production - 18,325 M14 NM rifles were produced from 1962 to 1967 with 6,500 of them produced in 1962 and 1963 by Springfield Armory. (5) Duff writes “an order for delivery of 3,000 M14 National Match rifles by August 1, 1962 was received by the Armory” and “Springfield reportedly delivered 3,550 new National Match rifles in 1963.” (6) This makes Duff’s accounting fifty more than Poyer for 1962 and 1963. 7200 M14 NM rifles were manufactured in 1962 and 1963 at Springfield Armory. (7) Additionally, the National Rifle Association reported 4,874 M14 NM rifles made by TRW. (8) However, TRW reported production of 7,609 M14 NM rifles. (9) Using the smallest numbers available, the minimum number produced was 18,325 (10). The maximum number produced would be 21,760 (7200 built for ’62 and ’63 + 7,609 built for ’64 + 6,951 rebuilt for ’65, ’66 and ’67).
B) M14 NM Distinctive Features - The receiver heels were stamped M14 NM. The NM stamping appears just to the right of M14 or on the flat surface next to the rear sight. The major differences between the M14 NM and the M14 were: 1) NM barrel is held to half the tolerances of the rack grade barrel and is not chrome plated 2) NM rifle receiver is glass bedded to the stock 3) specific parts are hand fitted and assembled 4) NM rear sight is adjustable in ½ MOA increments and 5) select fire parts are welded to prevent operation.
C) M14 NM Issue - M14 NM “rifles were made available at the 1963 National Rifle Matches for shooter orientation” and “became a regular issue item at the 1964 and 1965 Matches.” (11) The M14 type rifle was popular in competition shooting until the early 1990s. The M14 was used by the U. S. Marine Corps at Camp Perry as late as 1996. However, U. S. DCM shooting clubs such as the Alabama State Service Rifle Team still inventory M14 NM rifles at the time of this writing.
D) M14 NM as a Sniper Rifle - The first M14 rifles for sniping duty were used by the U. S. Army. In March, 1967 125 M14 NM rifles mounted with M84 2.2 X scopes were shipped to Viet Nam. There were M14 rifles equipped with M84 scopes in use in Viet Nam even after the XM21 with ART scope was fielded.
E) Civilian Ownership of the M14 NM - The court case, U. S. v. One U. S. (TRW) 7.62mm M-14 National Match Rifle, Serial No. 143711, 1980 WL 95647 (S. D. Ohio, May 20, 1980), is worthy of mention. Though this case applies only to this particular M14 NM rifle, it does establish that the M14 NM rifle as manufactured by TRW (Cleveland, OH) and Springfield Armory (Springfield, MA) is not capable of and is not designed for automatic fire. Robert Sauerman purchased the TRW M14 NM rifle serial number 143711 in 1973 or 1974. It was not registered as a NFA firearm. In order to set the question of the legal status to rest, Mr. Sauerman informed the BATF that he was in possession of the TRW M14 NM. This TRW M14 NM was confiscated from the owner, Robert Sauerman, by the BATF on September 27, 1977 at his gun shop near Dayton, Ohio. This TRW M14 NM was judged not to be a machine gun and ordered to be returned to Mr. Sauerman. The TRW M14 NM serial number 143711 was sold by Mr. Sauerman around 1986 or 1987 to the current owner. Later, Robert Sauerman met an untimely death when a drunk driver crossed lanes and hit him head on at a stoplight. The current owner of TRW M14 NM serial number 143711 also possesses the court case documents and a Springfield Armory M14 NM.