Quote History Quoted:
What distances, generally, are you shooting? The 35mm has a native 2.5x magnification
Shooting probably won't be further than 100-200yards.
Better options? For clarity and durability...not really. The REAP ?IIR is lighter and possibly better for scanning as well.
I honestly will mostly use it for finding wildlife/ wolves/ elk/ deer in the mountains. I have found it to be more effective than a spotting scope for glassing for wildlife bowhunting. I do live in Texas so definitely will be using it for Pigs and coyotes the other half of the time. I assume the Reap IR would be better for that, but I don't know if by much.
Do you want to record? I don't really care about the ability to record. I guess I can add a DVR down the road.
I greatly appreciate all of your input. I have played around with an MKIII, and was blown away, but never the REAP IR or MKii so I have nothing to compare.
View Quote
So we’ve made good ground in this thread. To summarize (Tmm has all of them, I have the REAP and have also used the mk2):
MK2 - comes in 19mm and 35mm. Least expensive. Single QD Larue mount and excellent as a scope.
MK3 - comes in 35mm and 60mm. Middle or highest cost depending on the mm choice. Double QD Larue mount. Extra reticles from the MK2 and ability to store them as a set zero for different rifles. Also rangefinder which I don’t find much value in. 3 vs 2 battery option
REAP-IR- basically the 35mm MK3 in a smaller package. My personal favorite.
Also, a little insider info, go with a SN number above 35000 (REAP) for the updated rev1 core which fixes a few bugs and gives it a slightly different color hue. You’ll know not just by the printed SN number but also the firmware flashing once turned on at the top left as 4.xx vs original core 2.xx. Call around for better prices on each. Website prices are all msrp. New can be negotiated, and some vendors discount more than others. You should be able to find each for 600-1000 less than websites state.
If mostly 150y-200y+ I’d actually want a 60mm MK3. 35mm is a fantastic close to medium middle ground.
If I wanted to video or upgrade firmware remotely, I’d consider the less expensive XP50 Pulsar