Quoted:
Quoted: I'm still P.O'd at NRA on how they let that ban happen. I remember writing them after the House version was passed and before it went to Senate conference committee asking them to oppose it. The response from ILA was " we are prepared to fight for machine guns AFTER (McClure-Volkmer is passed). In other words, they had poured a bunch of money into getting the FOPA passed and had to have something to show for it. I remember seeing an article in my American Rifleman after Reagan signed it crowing about "Our huge victory" .What a crock! Remember, this was accepted by a Republican senate and signed by a Republican president. P.S. Still waiting for the big fight on machine guns that NRA promised. |
Do we really have to go over it again? FOPA gave us a lot more pros than cons:
*Ammunition without needing to submit to dealer record keeping *No need for an FFL to deal in ammunition *Importatation of military surplus firearms *Ability to not get screwed for transporting your legal gun through non-friendly states when engaged in interstate travel (when you follow FOPA rules)
While trading machine guns isn't a good thing, the benefits seem to be worth it. |
Remember what section you are posting in here (General Class III).
Moreover, NRA claimed a "compromise" was needed. Really? Compromise?
-what did we get in exchange for the 1994 AWB or the Brady law?
-what did we get for the 1989 import ban?
-what did they give back to us civilian gun owners in exchange for tightening NICS in 2007?
Answer: NOTHING. Why? - because advocates of gun control don't negociate and they don't compromise. It does NOT work that way in real life.
NRA lied to us about "compromise" being the cause in FOPA 86.
Most of the NRA's BOD didn't give a rats ass about Title II guns and they STILL don't. Fact is, most of them think we gun owners (as a group) are better off without civilian NFA firearm possession because it makes their message of us just wanting hunting & skeet shooting guns more easy to sell to more Americans (seeing the $$$ here?). Some of the NRA's BOD are even against civilian ownership of the AR-15 rifle (like Joaquin Jackson - who you are paying to fly to the NRA convention next month - yeahm he's still on the board). We AR-15 owners are just a thorn in the side of the old farts at the skeet club & out in Ratton.
Please don't defend the NRA on this section of afrcom; I don't think many fans of Title II guns are going to chime in about how much the NRA is doing to defend civilian Title II ownership.