Hey guys. My "Apocolipse Now" gun is a Bushmaster VMatch Carbine (16"). It's actually such a highbred abortion I won't even go into it, but BM did it for me and it works like the Third I.D. on the Republican Guard.
So I took it out into the desert looking for al-Queda boys setting up on our glide apporach to sight in the back up iron sights. Unfortunately, there weren't any (Terrorists) so I used paper targets. I believe that at this particular point in time that weapon shoots better than I can shoot it. But at any rate, it's more that accurate enough for any combat I'VE ever been around. And reliable.
So, take the gun home and clean it? O.K. And reassemble everything and load it and store it. Then I'm contemplating ('cause I know Santa's not flying with Hammas in the air) the play between the upper and the lower receivers. It's tiny, but we HAVE to have something to worry about now, don't we?
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong here, but who cares? The gun is loaded. The round is in the chamber. The barrel is part of the upper receiver group. Who cares what the lower part of the receiver is doing? It's job is to hold the magazine full of ammo and let the hammer fall on the firing pin (upper receiver assembly) while the gun goes bang.
You could use the lower receiver, or you could use a ball peen hammer, but the accuracy factor has already been set in that all of the ballistic dynamics, until the bullet leaves the barrel, are occurring in the upper receiver. I don't see that tollerance (upper/lower receiver) as critical, or even relevant, to the weapon's accuracy.
Of course, I could be wrong?
What do you guys think?-