You can see MORE with the T1.
Your FOV (or more correctly, your perceived FOV) is HUGE compared to an M-series with the much larger housing. The housing on the T1 almost disappear, the reason people claim that Eotech's have a better FOV is because of the thin edge along the 3 top side. Well the T1 has an even better perceived FOV than the Eotech's.
And before someone jumps and say there's no such thing as FOV on a red-dot, I will note that this answer relates to the "perceived" FOV when your eyes take initial focus to the target and superimposing the dot onto it. During this split second and when you bring the sights up to your eyes the housing does create a tunnel vision effect that creates a perceived FOV. The T1 TINY, TINY, did I mention TINY? housing and it's short length puts it ahead even of the Eotech in this department. It is counter intuitive to think that a smaller tube will give better FOV, but it does since the FOV is only a perceived one and not a real one. Perception in this case is effected by the width of the housing along with the length of the housing.
The dot is as easy to find on a T-1 as my old M2 that it replaced. The Burris, like all the other sights of it's sight suffers greatly from the non circular glass surface, non sealed pathways of the beam. The T-1 suffers from none of those problem so it is as easy to use as an m2. And as my statements above will attest to you, it's EASIER, FASTER, SMALLER, LIGHTER, THINNER, SHORTER, BETTER.
So yeah, I like mine a little bit.