Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 2/9/2006 2:52:53 PM EDT
Would love some pictures of that,Im thinking of doing it
Link Posted: 2/9/2006 3:07:49 PM EDT
[#1]
not a DD its a larue w/14.5 inch barrel


here is a 12.0 DD w/ 16 inch barrel
Link Posted: 2/9/2006 4:00:49 PM EDT
[#2]
Here's one of many Dissy picture threads. There's a few in there running DD rails. Click >HERE<.
Link Posted: 2/9/2006 4:07:06 PM EDT
[#3]
Here is mine.  Its a 16 inch barrel with the midlenth rail that is extended to 12 inches on the right and left side and the bottom.

Link Posted: 2/9/2006 4:46:09 PM EDT
[#4]
Man that makes that 14.5 look so much longer,Thats what I have ,Im thinking of free floating it with no fsb so there is no shadow in my TA01NSN,And it will look good,keep them coming
Link Posted: 2/9/2006 4:58:09 PM EDT
[#5]
FYI - I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure DD does not make a 13.2 rail. Unless DD is coming out with one at SHOT then LaRue is your only choice for a 13.2

I personally think a 12.0 is plenty long enough on a 14.5 or 16 but that's just my opinion.
Link Posted: 2/9/2006 5:24:13 PM EDT
[#6]
.
Link Posted: 2/9/2006 5:56:23 PM EDT
[#7]


DD doesn't make a 13.2", or not yet at any rate
Link Posted: 2/9/2006 6:00:49 PM EDT
[#8]
Duffy 16" OR 14.5? Looks good
 K9DPD What is the over all length of your hand guards?
  THANKS GUYS!
Link Posted: 2/9/2006 7:36:10 PM EDT
[#9]
It's a light weight 14.5" from CMMG, I got tired of lugging a 10lb. rifle around
Link Posted: 2/9/2006 7:42:42 PM EDT
[#10]


12.0 over a 16" using a PRI gas block
Link Posted: 2/9/2006 7:57:39 PM EDT
[#11]
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 4:50:52 AM EDT
[#12]
16" mid length with LaRue 13.2

Link Posted: 2/10/2006 4:56:24 AM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:
Im thinking of doing it

Dare I ask why you're thinking of doing it?
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 5:54:16 AM EDT
[#14]
I had considered doing this with a PRI unit.  Don't ask why.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 6:09:56 AM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:
I had considered doing this with a PRI unit.  Don't ask why.



Why?
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 6:32:01 AM EDT
[#16]
<>
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 6:54:53 AM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
I had considered doing this with a PRI unit.  Don't ask why.

It's a perfectly legitimate question. Far too often people ask for answers without saying why they want to do something. This can sometimes lead to people giving the wrong answers to the question, they end up doing something for the wrong reason or don't know why they're doing it.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 6:57:20 AM EDT
[#18]
I'll tell you why I did it, I hate touching hot barrels, I like the generous length upon which to grab the handguard like a standard rifle, and I want the option of using a bipod.  Plus, it allows the front sight to sit a little farther up towards the muzzle.

Link Posted: 2/10/2006 7:33:28 AM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:
I'll tell you why I did it, I hate touching hot barrels, I like the generous length upon which to grab the handguard like a standard rifle, and I want the option of using a bipod.  Plus, it allows the front sight to sit a little farther up towards the muzzle.

I agree with all of those reasons. The only disadvantge is the added weight and, in some cases, unused "rail estate".
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 8:13:49 AM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I'll tell you why I did it, I hate touching hot barrels, I like the generous length upon which to grab the handguard like a standard rifle, and I want the option of using a bipod.  Plus, it allows the front sight to sit a little farther up towards the muzzle.

I agree with all of those reasons. The only disadvantge is the added weight and, in some cases, unused "rail estate".



On that note, I weighed that AR (pictured) last night.  As pictured it's 8 pounds w/o the magazine.  Not too shabby really.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 8:14:51 AM EDT
[#21]
I just don't feel like typing long replies ;)

- the basic reason is I want the free float joys but dont' want all the rail positions (or covers, rail ladders etc). The PRI fits the bill in terms of what I want to do and how I want to use it.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 1:12:46 PM EDT
[#22]

Quoted:
Duffy 16" OR 14.5? Looks good
 K9DPD What is the over all length of your hand guards?
  THANKS GUYS!



13.2 on the top one and 12.0 on the bottom
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 1:36:06 PM EDT
[#23]
Looks like I will be useing the 12.0 .I think I will sell the 14.5 M4 barrel and get a 16" light weight,I have never seen a 14.5 pencil barrel
Whats a good gas block that will clear?
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 1:48:09 PM EDT
[#24]

Quoted:
Looks like I will be useing the 12.0 .I think I will sell the 14.5 M4 barrel and get a 16" light weight,I have never seen a 14.5 pencil barrel
Whats a good gas block that will clear?



If I am not mistaken CMMG does offer 14.5 inch chromelined 1/7 twist barrels.  They can perm attach  a Phantom or Vortex if you do not want to go the SBR route.
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 2:11:02 PM EDT
[#25]
14.5 light weights,I will have to get ahold of them.
 Why im doing it.Well I wanted to get rid of my fsb,so the shadow of it wouldnt be in my TAO1NSN,so I started looking at low pro gas blocks,then I seen where some people cut the tower off,and left the gas block,but somewhere I read that some of the really low profile gas blocks were used for fitting inside a rifle length ff tube on carbines,and after seeing the pictures,I have to say they look really nice
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 2:23:53 PM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:
This has always been my favorite configuration, but then I started thinking about, the extra leverage on the barel nut, which is attached to the upper receiver.  I know I can flex a 12.0 rail, which will move the barrel, but the bolt in the receiver will not be moving with the barrel. That cant be good. Maybe I'm just thinking too much?




Well... if you are, you are at least thinking correctly. The handguards that attach to the barrel nut are known to present a problem with flexing the alignment of the bolt and barrel, this causes the load on the bolt (when fired) to be largely taken up by only a few of the lugs, resulting in binding or even breaking.

This is one of the reasons that so many people are interested in solid upper receivers and handguard mountings that transfer the load to something other than the barrel nut...
Link Posted: 2/10/2006 2:41:22 PM EDT
[#27]
No,I dont want to hear it............
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top