Okay I have a question regarding two rigs posted within the last two pages of the pic thread.
pages 38 & 39 currently
It is about the AR's that have big scopes mounted back on the upper receivers. Krill-p's and the photo that 03USMC11 posted are prime examples of my question.
First, if their scopes are
anything like mine then I think there is
NO WAY the placement of the scopes allows enough eye relief for proper head placement and cheek weld. i.e. nose to charging handle.
If I'm wrong let me know why I'm mistaken or please explain why I see so many rifles with the scope mounted far back on just the upper receiver. Especially when they have a railed forend???
Why the hell spend the money on a railed fore end when you're not going to use it for an optic mounting platform? Is it a loss of zero issue? I don't understand all the rifles outfitted with railed forends when at most you'll mount a VFG or maybe a light. There are much cheaper ways to do both of those items than a railed forend.
Here is my BM Varminter. This is a project gun mostly because the scope has
no where near enough eye relief in the configuration pictured.
The gun shot fine with the adjustable carbine stock attached and I really did like how the adjustable stock allowed me to choke up on the gun and bring the wieght closer to my body but it has been taken off and replaced with a regular rifle stock.
I'd like to either get an ARMS # 38 super extended 14" swan sleeve and mount the scope on that or get a continuous railed foreend like a Troy and mount the scope further forward. I'd probably also look at getting a Bushmaster solid shorty stock to shorten the LOP.
What is you's guy's input?