User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/2/2005 9:04:57 PM EDT
[#1]
The sights the rifle comes with. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/2/2005 9:07:26 PM EDT
[#2]
+1. I also like the Aimpoint but seem to be more profitient w/ iron sites. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 8/2/2005 9:07:59 PM EDT
[#3]
The same optic setup I use for any range... an EOT.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/2/2005 9:08:52 PM EDT
[#4]
+87 |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 8/2/2005 9:10:45 PM EDT
[#5]
If I use my irons while wearing glasses and a BDU cap, does that count as a combat optic?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/2/2005 9:47:33 PM EDT
[#6]
dr sounds like optics to me but what power are they??
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/2/2005 11:07:11 PM EDT
[#7]
ACOG
Aimpoint EOTech |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 12:03:15 AM EDT
[#8]
Aimpoint M2 co-witnessed with LMT fixed BUIS.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 2:58:52 AM EDT
[#9]
yep. ACOG! which - by the way- are becoming much more readily available I read that Trijicon substantially expanded their manufacturing capacity over the past couple of years, and they are now pumping them out. In fact, they are now aggressively advertising civilian sales, which hopefully will result in the Holy Grail of AR optics......................... The Inexpensive ACOG |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 3:51:26 AM EDT
[#10]
Eotech
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 3:54:32 AM EDT
[#11]
1st: ACOG
2nd: EoTech 3rd: Aimpoint |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 4:29:14 AM EDT
[#12]
First, post in the proper forum - Optics, Mounts, and Sights Second, you need to actually have a poll.  Oh, and third, Aimpoint than ACOG.  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 6:19:48 AM EDT
[#13]
aimpoint
iron sites everything else |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 6:24:23 AM EDT
[#14]
Aimpoint or Leupold CQT.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 6:25:29 AM EDT
[#15]
I love my Leupold MK4 CQ/T
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 6:28:25 AM EDT
[#16]
+1 |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 6:40:19 AM EDT
[#17]
Out to 100 yards? Iron sights (I know you said they don't count).
Second choice out to 100 yards would be a battle proven red dot (Aimpoint of EOTech), preferably co-witnessed. I've got a MatchDot on a .22 upper, but haven't needed or wanted a red dot on my .223 uppers badly enough to justify the price of an Aimpoint and mount or an EOTech. That said. IF I put an optic on one of my ARs, it will probably be an ACOG (TA11 or TA31) for performance beyond 100 yards. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 6:41:24 AM EDT
[#18]
why does this optic get such a bad rap in the reviews? Seems Leupold should make a good one, based on everything I have ever used of theirs. Have never tried one though. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 6:41:27 AM EDT
[#19]
I'll tell you when you put up your poll
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 6:44:45 AM EDT
[#20]
The heading says poll...Where's the poll?????????????????????????????
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 6:45:25 AM EDT
[#21]
+1 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 6:59:29 AM EDT
[#22]
+2 also why is this in the discussion forum and not in the optics forums? 
|
||
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 7:01:52 AM EDT
[#23]
DR, I can't say that i've read the op. pieces you're speaking of, so I'm not sure what it is they're griping about. My 1st assumption would have to be the CQT's relative size; my second assumption would be based on the subjective gripes concerning it's "circle-dot" reticle (not what they prefer). Compared to an aimpoint, it is rather large (maybe 1.3 aimpoints in length). Otherwise, the optics are crystal clear, the illuminated reticle shows no sign of "flaring" even at high power, it uses AA batteries, is waterproof, built like a tank, and (my favorite)has the capability to go from a true 1X to 3X with a twist of the ocular housing. I own an aimpoint and can recommend it, but I'm growing weary of red dots. Between the two, I'll take the CQT...hands down, but, again, this is my opinion. ETA: There's nothing else like it. Op. ed. writers have nothing to compare it to? Who knows? I've learned to take their biased opinions with a grain of salt when it comes to subjective dislikes. |
|||
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 7:03:22 AM EDT
[#24]
+1 
|
|||
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 9:02:00 AM EDT
[#25]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 9:03:31 AM EDT
[#26]
I don't see a poll. IBTP.
My choice is Aimpoint co-witnessed with irons. Colt_SBR |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/3/2005 9:40:11 AM EDT
[#27]
EO Tech for the imaginary poll.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
