Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Posted: 11/8/2002 9:02:10 AM EDT
Would possession of a collapsible stock justify intent if I didn't own a pre-ban rifle?  I hope to get one after the beginning of the year but lately have seen some deals on collapsible stocks and flashhiders and such
Link Posted: 11/8/2002 10:49:20 AM EDT
[#1]
No it does not.  Just like possesion of a 14.5" barrel without an extended FH is not intent to make a SBR.  It can be used for lawful purposes if properly modified.  The only hard fast rules are NOT EVEN ONE full auto part in a semi AR and you cant have ALL the parts for a full auto and you cant drill the hole in the reciever for the auto sear trip.

You can have a single full auto part though.  I just sent a full auto carrier to Kurt to have it milled to semi specs.  I also have a 14.5" barrel on the way.  
Link Posted: 11/8/2002 11:09:03 AM EDT
[#2]
That's what I was hoping.  There is a guy in town here who is about to be sentenced for having an AR-15, an M-16 tri burst kit, and a how-to manual.  Hadn't done it, but I guess the intent was there.  Just wanted to make sure the other things didn't fall into the same category.
Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top