RDP
Your post seems somewhat discombobulated, but let me try to explain further.
Yes, virtually everything can be analyzed in terms of cost vs. benefit; what is the acquired benefit and detrimental cost (being economic, inconvenience, reliability, etc).
While you like a smooth trigger & break, would you consider a red optic (micro aimpoint for example) and a magwell to be essential for your carry gun? I would hazard a guess that most would not as the inconvenience (cost) in carrying such a firearm would not be worth the advantage gained (benefit).
Admittedly, I have no combat experience so all I know of from trained professionals is second hand. I know of one that carries a 1911 with 1.5 trigger with no holster while others carry your out of the box Sig. Each has made their own decision.
For me, I see little advantage in using a 3.5 connector as my splits aren't much different and my accuracy does not suffer much from my other Glocks. I notice the main difference in weak hand shooting, something I am trying to practice a lot this year.
To answer your question, I don't think a light trigger offers much advantage. I am sure that most individuals have such a rush of adrenaline, that they fall to the base level of their training where a light trigger wouldn't make much difference. Again, this is a guess as I don't have combat experience and can't at all profess intelligence in this area.
Finally, please don't misread my theory into some anti-glock, 15 pound trigger mess. I succinctly said "To some it is, to some it isn't". Would you be in better shape with a NYPD trigger in a civil suit. I might guess so, but again I don't practice in this area of the law. I wouldn't guess that you would be in a worse mess.
I do know that the more variables at play in any litigation, the more money you will spend. A trigger job (or whatever it might be) adds variables which would substantially raise the cost of any civil defense (whether it is at trial or pretrial). This is the "cost" associated with the benefit of a trigger job. As I have said previously, to some it is worth it, to some it isn't.
While some individuals won't agree with me, I find it foolish to not be aware of issues(i.e. trigger jobs) that might come to fruition at the legal defense. At the bare minimum, these issues need to be considered in deciding whether or not said gun modifications are worth it.