Need 9th Circuit Court of Appeals AOW case info

General » Legal Section

Site Notices

TNVC Partners With Envision Technology - MARS Rangefinder Family, MARS-Lc!

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Need 9th Circuit Court of Appeals AOW case info

Posted: 9/21/2005 5:35:53 AM EDT

I need the case in which the 9th Circuit ruled adding a VFG to an existing pistol did not constitue an AOW.

Thanks

Posted: 9/21/2005 5:47:37 AM EDT

[#1]

Got plans for that new AR pistol, nationwide?

Posted: 9/21/2005 12:00:53 PM EDT

[#2]

???

Posted: 9/21/2005 3:11:45 PM EDT

[#3]

Eh, I just saw your post about your new AR pistol and thought maybe you were looking for a way to attach one. I'd want to, if it were legal.

There was a post on subguns that referred to the U.S. vs. Fix, but I couldn't find anything else on it.

Posted: 9/22/2005 8:11:54 PM EDT

[#4]

I'm not familiar with a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision/opinion on this.

There is US v Davis but thats a district court ruling.

Even after being modified with grips, the pistols are
still "pistols" as defined above and not "any other weapon" as
defined by 26 U.S.C. section 5845(e).

Posted: 9/23/2005 3:14:52 PM EDT

[#5]

Quoted:
I'm not familiar with a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision/opinion on this.

There is US v Davis but thats a district court ruling.

Even after being modified with grips, the pistols are
still "pistols" as defined above and not "any other weapon" as
defined by 26 U.S.C. section 5845(e).

Ok, thanks Phil.

I found the US v Fix ruling in an old thread I had archived on my machine, the Davis ruling will help pad my letter to BATFE.

ETA: Uh... which US v Davis???

Google spits out a bunch of drug related cases, nothing I can find yet in relation to this matter. Any idea on which court or perhaps a year for the ruling?

Thanks

Posted: 9/26/2005 4:32:46 PM EDT

[#6]

Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm not familiar with a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision/opinion on this.

There is US v Davis but thats a district court ruling.

Even after being modified with grips, the pistols are
still "pistols" as defined above and not "any other weapon" as
defined by 26 U.S.C. section 5845(e).

Ok, thanks Phil.

I found the US v Fix ruling in an old thread I had archived on my machine, the Davis ruling will help pad my letter to BATFE.

ETA: Uh... which US v Davis???

Google spits out a bunch of drug related cases, nothing I can find yet in relation to this matter. Any idea on which court or perhaps a year for the ruling?

Thanks

Sorry about that.

One link of several that will get it for you.
www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/usr/wbardwel/public/nfalist/us_v_davis2.txt

Cite as U.S. v. Davis, Cr. No. 8:93-106, Report of Magistrate,
(D.S.C. June 21, 1993), and Order of Dismissal, September 24, 1993.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

ANDERSON DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CRIMINAL NO. 8:93-106
VS. REPORT OF MAGISTRATE

GORDON DAVIS, SANDRA DAVIS,
TAMMY SMITH, AND JERRY SMITH

Posted: 9/28/2005 11:54:01 AM EDT

[#7]

Quoted:

Sorry about that.

One link of several that will get it for you.
www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/usr/wbardwel/public/nfalist/us_v_davis2.txt

Awesome, thanks Phil!

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Need 9th Circuit Court of Appeals AOW case info

General » Legal Section

Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.

Warning

Confirm Action

About AR15.COM

Stay Connected

Newsletter

Contact Us