User Panel
Posted: 11/3/2009 6:17:34 PM EDT
Oscar-winning Hollywood movie producer Barrie Osborne (The Matrix, Lord of the Rings) is poised to spend $150-million to film a biopic of Mohammed.
Says Osborne, "The film will educate people about the true meaning of Islam." Somehow I doubt that... Like the previous big budget film about the illiterate slave owner and war lord who founded the Muslim religion, the as-yet-untitled film won't show Mohammed's face. http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-722-Conservative-Politics-Examiner~y2009m11d2-New-Hollywood-movie-about-Mohammed-promises-truth-courts-controversy |
|
I predict this will do shitty in the states, and gross a billion dollars around the world
|
|
Barrie Osborne - born New York City, alumnus of Carleton College (Minnesota), lives in Wellington, New Zealand ... Osborne has recently got the backing of Al Noor Holdings, a Qatar media company for the production of a $200 million feature film about the Prophet Mohammed.
|
|
Quoted:
I predict this will do shitty in the states, and gross a billion dollars around the world Tsk, tsk. It will not gross but about $30 million. All those hadjis ripping DVD's and selling them for a buck will not make this guy much money. |
|
|
How will they promote the movie and the lead "Mohammed" actor, when they aren't supposed to show "His " image? They're fucked!!!! Have to chop off own heads,,...
|
|
Even if he makes a blatantly Islamic film that portrays Mohammed as the literal prophet and messenger of God and makes every effort to toe the line on the Koran, it will piss off more Muslims than it makes happy. People will die as a result of this film.
|
|
$100 of Black Cats in 7 opening locations will sink this movie. Sell short.
|
|
Is it going to have the part where he married the 9y/o girl and has sex with her? Islam and NAMBLA,,,,,,,pretty similar in some respects.
|
|
Will it have the special scene where he rapes 9 year old girls?
|
|
Quoted:
Even if he makes a blatantly Islamic film that portrays Mohammed as the literal prophet and messenger of God and makes every effort to toe the line on the Koran, it will piss off more Muslims than it makes happy. People will die as a result of this film. That's what I was thinking too. They will be putting a bounty on him. If they make it, I hope it tanks. |
|
Quoted:
Even if he makes a blatantly Islamic film that portrays Mohammed as the literal prophet and messenger of God and makes every effort to toe the line on the Koran, it will piss off more Muslims than it makes happy. People will die as a result of this film. +1 |
|
Quoted:
How will they promote the movie and the lead "Mohammed" actor, when they aren't supposed to show "His " image? They're fucked!!!! Have to chop off own heads,,... That's the best part...they say in the write up that you will never see Mohammed...NEVER SEE MOHAMMED!! It will be the MOTHER OF ALL SUCK MOVIES....and possibly get everyone working on it a dose of real world reality as they get executed one by one for "offending the prophet" with the low gross. HAA HAA |
|
Quoted:
Oscar-winning Hollywood movie producer Barrie Osborne (The Matrix, Lord of the Rings) is poised to spend $150-million to film a biopic of Mohammed. Says Osborne, "The film will educate people about the true meaning of Islam." Somehow I doubt that... Like the previous big budget film about the illiterate slave owner and war lord who founded the Muslim religion, the as-yet-untitled film won't show Mohammed's face. http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-722-Conservative-Politics-Examiner~y2009m11d2-New-Hollywood-movie-about-Mohammed-promises-truth-courts-controversy Will they have the whole movie "accidentally" blocking Muhamed's face like they did with Austin Powers' wiener? That would be pretty funny, actually! As for hollyweird, I think that they are simply being their anti-American selves. They support whatever enemy we are fighting, whether it is the VietCong, Castro or Islam. If Facism ever rises again (wait, too late!) they'd somehow glorify that too. |
|
I heard Roman Polanski was going to be the director. He's personally handling casting for the role of Aisha.
|
|
In 1976, Hollyweird made a film about Muhammud called "the message".
Basically it was the same thing, no "face" or "voice" of Muhammud. it was sooo stupid filmed like that. and of course they totally exclude his marriage to Aisha. And of course when shown in the USA........THERE WAS A SIEGE AND DEATHS. I can't wait till this hits European theaters. I have a feeling this film might not get made. You can actually watch the old movie about Muhammud on youtube nowadays. The Message 1976 From WIKI: Response
On March 9, 1977, a group led by Hamaas Abdul Khaalis, seized several buildings and took 134 hostages in Washington, D.C.[2] The takeover led to the fatal shootings of a journalist and a police officer, and the non-fatal shooting of Marion Barry , who would become mayor of Washington, D.C. two years later. One of their demands was to prevent the release of the film. One of the hostage-takers specifically said, according to an on-site reporter, that "he wanted a guarantee from the whole world it will never be shown or they would execute some of the hostages".[3] OH SNAP! It lead to the shooting of Marion Barry??? Oh please liberal hollywood!!! MAKE MORE FILMS LIKE THIS!!!! |
|
Won't Islam put a Jihad on them for portraying Mohammed's face???
edit....should have read whole original post...duh. |
|
Quoted:
Will it have the special scene where he rapes 9 year old girls? |
|
I thought it is against Islamic law to have a "picture" drawn or printed of the face of Mohammed, wouldn't making a movie about him and showing his face (even if an actor) breaks that "law"?
|
|
what's that screaming.......? oh. it's just mohammed, burning in hell. fuck that illiterate, thieving, child and goat molesting pirate of the desert. let us circumambulate!
|
|
Quoted:
Will it have any clitorectomies performed in it? It has got nothing to do with dentistry. Wait, what??? |
|
This is hilarious, because to make a film about Mohammad is considered very very very very offensive to Muslims. The irony is delicious.
|
|
Quoted:
This is hilarious, because to make a film about Mohammad is considered very very very very offensive to Muslims. The irony is delicious. yup, director and all actors are dead men lulz!! |
|
In on 1
IBTL And fuck Hollywood, Mohammad, and especially fuck Obama. |
|
Unless they portray Muhammed as a raging asshole, a pedophile, rapist, and murderer, it won't be historically accurate.
Even if it portrays him as the most awesome dude to ever walk the earth, it will still piss off muslims because you can't depict Muhammed for some asinine reason. So either way, muslims are going to go nuts over it (like they do about everything else) and everybody else is going to pan it because it's a piece of shit and a waste of film. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Oscar-winning Hollywood movie producer Barrie Osborne (The Matrix, Lord of the Rings) is poised to spend $150-million to film a biopic of Mohammed. Says Osborne, "The film will educate people about the true meaning of Islam." Somehow I doubt that... Like the previous big budget film about the illiterate slave owner and war lord who founded the Muslim religion, the as-yet-untitled film won't show Mohammed's face. http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-722-Conservative-Politics-Examiner~y2009m11d2-New-Hollywood-movie-about-Mohammed-promises-truth-courts-controversy Will they have the whole movie "accidentally" blocking Muhamed's face like they did with Austin Powers' wiener? That would be pretty funny, actually! As for hollyweird, I think that they are simply being their anti-American selves. They support whatever enemy we are fighting, whether it is the VietCong, Castro or Islam. If Facism ever rises again (wait, too late!) they'd somehow glorify that too. So either they're going to cover Muhammed's face like Wilson from Home Improvement, or... maybe it'll be shot from a first-person perspective? |
|
Oh, IBTL because of everyone not sucking up to muslims in this thread and speaking truthfully about Muhammed.
|
|
A movie about a homosexual pedo murderer. I'm suprised Michael Moore isn't directing this for free.
|
|
Quoted: Unless they portray Muhammed as a raging asshole, a pedophile, rapist, and murderer, it won't be historically accurate. Even if it portrays him as the most awesome dude to ever walk the earth, it will still piss off muslims because you can't depict Muhammed for some asinine reason. So either way, muslims are going to go nuts over it (like they do about everything else) and everybody else is going to pan it because it's a piece of shit and a waste of film. /thread |
|
For the record, I don't know any educated Shia that don't think you can depict images of Mohammad. His image is pretty common in Iran.
|
|
|
Quoted:
For the record, I don't know any educated Shia that don't think you can depict images of Mohammad. His image is pretty common in Iran. Very true… Shia have no problem with depictions of the Prophet. |
|
Twenty Internets to the first guy that photoshops a production shot of "Mohammed" with a Porky Pig head!
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
For the record, I don't know any educated Shia that don't think you can depict images of Mohammad. His image is pretty common in Iran. Very true… Shia have no problem with depictions of the Prophet. During the "cartoon-outrage" there were many examples of images in Iran that supposedly was of muhammed. I think they were said to in reality be images of imam Ali, wich was his cousin and son-in-law. I have no sources though. You'll have to google it yourself If I remember correctly the sunnis claim Ali was just one of the rightful caliphs (after some assasinations), but the shias claim he was the direct successor or something. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
For the record, I don't know any educated Shia that don't think you can depict images of Mohammad. His image is pretty common in Iran. Very true… Shia have no problem with depictions of the Prophet. During the "cartoon-outrage" there were many examples of images in Iran that supposedly was of muhammed. I think they were said to in reality be images of imam Ali, wich was his cousin and son-in-law. I have no sources though. You'll have to google it yourself If I remember correctly the sunnis claim Ali was just one of the rightful caliphs (after some assasinations), but the shias claim he was the direct successor or something. Lots of pictures of Prophet Mohammed in Islamic art |
|
Quoted:
Oscar-winning Hollywood movie producer Barrie Osborne (The Matrix, Lord of the Rings) is poised to spend $150-million to film a biopic of Mohammed. Says Osborne, "The film will educate people about the true meaning of Islam." Somehow I doubt that... Like the previous big budget film about the illiterate slave owner and war lord who founded the Muslim religion, the as-yet-untitled film won't show Mohammed's face. http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-722-Conservative-Politics-Examiner~y2009m11d2-New-Hollywood-movie-about-Mohammed-promises-truth-courts-controversy So, will they show the part about his 9 year old wife? Or how about all of the people he savagely murdered? Mohammed was a pedophile and a mass murderer. |
|
Could you picture what would hapen if the movie potrayed his life as history and the Gurans and hadiths potray it and not some fluffed up propoganda.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
For the record, I don't know any educated Shia that don't think you can depict images of Mohammad. His image is pretty common in Iran. Very true… Shia have no problem with depictions of the Prophet. During the "cartoon-outrage" there were many examples of images in Iran that supposedly was of muhammed. I think they were said to in reality be images of imam Ali, wich was his cousin and son-in-law. I have no sources though. You'll have to google it yourself If I remember correctly the sunnis claim Ali was just one of the rightful caliphs (after some assasinations), but the shias claim he was the direct successor or something. Lots of pictures of Prophet Mohammed in Islamic art Very well then, the "cartoon-outrage" makes even more sense now! |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.