Insight on the News - Fair Comment
Issue: 01/07/02

It's 1984 in Massachusetts – And Big Brother Is Gay
By John Haskins

Mary Clossey's children see no American flags at school to remind them that it is their safety that young men are risking their lives to defend. Rather, her daughter and other pupils are filed into an auditorium to hear a speaker liken the U.S. military to terrorists.
For years the Newton, Mass., public schools have blithely violated a Massachusetts law that the flag be on display in every classroom. On the other hand, there are many flags on display if you count rainbow flags that symbolize a gay-friendly environment.

When Clossey enrolled her son in Newton North High School's reading program little did she know that the teacher had bragged in the Boston Globe (July 8, 2001) of quietly introducing homosexual and transsexual subjects into his classes. The teacher, Michael Kozuch, handed out The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky with instructions to write an essay on it. What literary "treats" did Kozuch consider mandatory for other people's children? Sex between a boy and a dog, man-boy sex, anal sex between boys, male masturbation and female masturbation with a hot dog. By chance Clossey opened the book her son brought home. But what came after that shock was worse: She encountered public officials who saw protective parents as obstacles.

Clossey called her mayor. He never called back. Calling school officials, she says she encountered "arrogant disrespect for parents." So she filed a criminal complaint against the teacher for corrupting a minor. Even Boston's hard-line pro-homosexuality newspapers and TV stations couldn't sit on this. But the complaint went nowhere. It emerged that Kozuch was not acting alone. The book was on a reading list given to every student. Urged by other furious parents, Clossey went to the local prosecutor. But the receptionist had been warned to expect her, according to Clossey. She waited and waited, but was not allowed to speak to her district attorney.

After parents discovered the book, Newton North High School educators removed it from class discussion but refused to remove it from the reading list. Alert parents already knew the high-school language department, on one pretext or another, had showed Ma Vie en Rose, an R-rated film about a "homosexual" child. Pupils learned how "Ludo enjoys being a girl. Borrowing mommy's red high heels, her lipstick, her earrings … yummy!" Trouble is, 7-year-old Ludo is a boy, even if he is pretty in pink.

Freshmen learn about masturbation and sodomy in a required course that uses street language, as if proper vocabulary would ruin the educational experience. A large mural in a corridor depicts two girls holding hands, reading something called "Romea and Juliet."

Is Newton a rogue town? In nearby Brookline a transsexual told first-graders how his penis was cut off and he became a woman. With no sense of irony, the Globe called it "sex-change counseling." Parents, never notified, had to comfort their terrified children.

Ashland children were instructed to play homosexuals in a skit. As reported in the Middlesex News on April 1, 1994, one boy's line was: "It's natural to be attracted to the same sex." Girls were told to hold hands and pretend they were lesbians.

Part II -

As reported widely in Massachusetts in 1992, at a required assembly in Chelmsford, an instructor used four-letter words describing the joys of anal and oral sex. The children then licked condoms.

Framingham pupils found themselves answering this Orwellian questionnaire: "1. What do you think caused your heterosexuality? 2. When did you first decide you were heterosexual? 3. Is it possible heterosexuality is a phase you will grow out of? 4. Is it possible you are heterosexual because you fear the same sex? 5. If you have never slept with anyone of the same sex, how do you know you wouldn't prefer it? Is it possible you merely need a good gay experience? 6. To whom have you disclosed your heterosexuality? How did they react? 7. Why are heterosexuals so blatant, always making a spectacle of their heterosexuality? Why can't they just be who they are and not flaunt their sexuality by kissing in public, wearing wedding rings, etc.?"

In Lexington, a parent discovered that her 13-year-old could borrow a book telling how gay men at the opera can socialize with "the backs of their trousers discreetly parted so they could experience a little extra pleasure while viewing the spectacle on stage." Her school purchased it with health funds.

A prominent psychiatrist says the sex-ed curricula at these schools can lower children "to the level of animals" and inflict lasting harm. "Massachusetts schools' systematic promotion of homosexuality and promiscuity fosters sexual confusion and experimentation," says Nathaniel S. Lehrman, former clinical director of the Kingsboro Psychiatric Center in New York. "They dilute and trivialize [the capacity for] faithful sexual passion which should [later] be the cement of these children's marriages. Unstable youngsters may become particularly vulnerable to homosexuals who actively recruit them."

Some teachers all over North America quietly are mainstreaming homosexual behavior to children as young as 5 years old. As widely reported, on "Gay Days" classes are cancelled and students led to compulsory activities where homosexuals explain their "lifestyles." The mind-control techniques are straight from Soviet schools.

Officials often confront parents who express anger, telling each parent, "You're the only one who complained." The implied message: "It would be unconstitutional to teach Judeo-Christian morality. So we're obliged to teach its polar opposite."

Samuel Blumenfeld, a much-published author on education, says many school superintendents implicitly assert "that children (are) owned by the state." Compelling evidence from Massachusetts:


Silver Lake's freshman health text says: "Testing your ability to function sexually and give pleasure to another person may be less threatening in the early teens with people of your own sex." And, "You may come to the conclusion that growing up means rejecting the values of your parents." Pupils were ordered to keep the book at school and never take it home.

Part III -

Needham High School violated the parents'-rights law by concealing from parents a schoolwide assembly in which a girl described her first lesbian kiss and rhapsodized about lesbianism. Teachers continued the discussion in homeroom. They also broke the law by failing to tell pupils of their right not to attend. Later, the gay club's faculty adviser announced, in poor English, that parents' decisions to remove their children next year would not be honored, as the "assembly (taught no) moral or religious beliefs."

After a "Homophobia Week" of mandatory assemblies in Beverly, a 14-year-old told her father he was a "homophobe." She had learned that homosexuals have a right to marry and adopt children. Parents were not notified. A boy wrote to a local paper: "I felt disturbed and nauseated. I witnessed biased testimonies by gays and the public mocking of a priest in our auditorium."

A Beverly parent removed a child after discovering the content of a four-day "sexual-harassment" program that replaced algebra. The teacher encouraged the pupil to come back, saying, "Your parents don't have to know."

In Manomet, a health instructor passed out material that an eighth-grader said violated his parents' beliefs. "If you have any trouble with your parents, tell me and I'll handle them," the instructor replied.

A Newton principal refused to remove children from the condom-distribution program, telling their parents, "It's too important."
Local media cover such stories reluctantly, with headlines such as "Local Mother Angered by Sex Ed." They treat not the provocation, but the reaction, as newsworthy. Imagine this back-page headline informing the public of Watergate: "Partisan Democrats Criticize White House."

In the July 8, 2001 Globe article headlined "More schools tackling gay issues," Kozuch discussed his efforts to use schools to shape children's views of homosexuality under the radar screen of parents. "It's low key," he said. "The point is that we want to treat (bisexual, homosexual and transsexual) issues in a way that's matter of course."

Giving gay pornography to other people's children didn't used to be called "treating issues," say critics. And who told schools to "tackle" anal sex?

"Where the radical homosexual movement is gaining control of curricula the citizenry must stop schools' systematic sabotage of children's moral development," says Lehrman, former chairman of the Task Force on Religion and Mental Health of the New York Federation of Jewish Philanthropies

See what happens when you take Christ out of Christmas? Whoops, that's another thread altogether!

But not quite! When I was young we would be preparing for a Christmas play right about now!

Now it's Tom and Joe play 'hide the pickle'!

Folks when are you ever gonna learn that 'nature abhors a vacuum'? If you teach your children not to believe in anything, they will most assuredly one day believe in everything!

I'll bet you don't find these sorts of lessons in private Christian, Jewish, or Moslem schools!

So it appears that if you have no faith, your children's minds will be like small petri dishes that some gayroid teacher will be instilling some noxious mixtures into!

Let's just hope that that's all he instills in your children!

Can you say 'NAMBLA replaced the Boy Scouts in American public schools in the early years of the 21st Century'?

Eric The(ButYou'reWaySmarterThanIAm,Right?)Hun[>]:)]

Some militant homosexuals increasingly feel "called' into teaching the way other people are called to be missionaries. "Tolerance" programs claiming to support gay children (gay children?) provide cover for introducing obscene material and guiding troubled pupils toward homosexuality.

The self-righteous comments of some educators suggest they see innocence as a thing to crush. A child not knowing about sodomy, they feel, is a thing to be corrected. Every child has a right and a need to know what homosexuals do to each other's bodies — and be told it is equivalent to Mommy and Daddy's marriage. "Leave no child behind."

Blumenfeld wrote of the 19th-century establishment of Massachusetts' universal state education that fierce resistance by parents and voters was overcome only by a solemn oath by the state to confine itself to academic matters. The right of parents to guide the moral training of their children was guaranteed. But that was back when children belonged to their parents.

Clossey got a letter from the district attorney informing her that Massachusetts schools, libraries and museums are immune from laws against exposing children to pornography.

It's time to make it a federal felony to crush the innocence of children, with punishments trebled for "educators."

John Haskins is executive director of the Parents' Rights Coalition (www.parentsrightscoalition.org). E-mail him at [email protected].
________________________________________________
sgtar15
Member


Hannah_Reitsch, I know this is happening, but I frequently quiz my kids about this matter, and in rural Utah at least, this is not the case.
_______________________________________

Jarhead_22
Member

Assachusetts: ugh.

I spent ten years in Catholic schools and no one ever tried to explain how anal sex works. Any hypothetical Jarhead offspring are headed the same direction.

________________________________________
Jarhead_22
Member


Hannah, what's the source of this article, and what does your signature line mean in English?

________________________________________


In my opinion, we have reached the point in the United States where only "armed conflict" brings us together and even armed conflict is only a temporary respite.

Only "we" can destroy the United States of America.
And we are.
________________________________________________
Hannah_Reitsch
Jarhead, credit is given at the end of the article to the source.
And my sig line means "To each his own".

________________________________________
Avalon01
Member

Well, so far we haven't been introducing the "gay agenda" into our curriculum.
____________________________________________
Jarhead_22
Member




So it's from the Parent's Rights Coalition's website?
________________________________________


ErickM
The republic is lost, be aware that realistic thinkers are the minority now, learn to be amused and laugh about watching everything turn to shit and fall all around you and you'll be happier.
_____________________________________________
Sorry folks, I posted this all wrong should have made it replies instead of new topics.
Tried to put your responses here.
Thanks to Fight4YourRights for trying to fix it :)

Ahhh, another milepost on the road to destruction[IMG]http://www.theunholytrinity.org/cracks_smileys/contrib/aahmed/sad.gif[/IMG]

Don't ask me to display a flag on my ride.  This sort of thing is just one of many examples of why not.[IMG]http://www.theunholytrinity.org/cracks_smileys/contrib/aahmed/sad.gif[/IMG]

Doomed

We cannot let 'them' win, so why lower your flag NOW?

Don't you know that the American Flag will be one of the first items to go in the United States of MulticulturalAmerica?

Why surrender the flag so soon?[>]:)]

Did you read the first few paragraphs of this article? These people want you to lower your flag!


Not that I put one up in the last couple of months, but I'm certainly not lowering the one I have had flying on my house all along over some pusillanimous pillow biters in F'ing Assachusetts!

Fight [b]FOR[/b] something, don't lower your colors and retreat in the face of these soulless moral relativists.

Sodem and Gamora returned.

WTF?!  I would be pulling my kids out of school asap if they were getting told things like this.  I don't even have kids and I am pissed off at these spineless, all out assaults on our morals.  This does look like brainwashing.

Is there anything we can do, that don't live in those states?

I was homeschooled for 8 years, private school for two years, and public school for three years. In retrospect, public school was a waste of time.

Well, becoming a bit more intolerant of "sexual diversity" would be a good start.
Protest "queer rights" whenever they rear their ugly heads. Let folks know if you find public homosexual behavior revolting. And don't be afraid of those who will call you a "nazi" for it.
State your opposition to the gay lobby clearly, and without fear, because this is the kind of crap it leads to. Their agenda is far more than "protecting their civil rights." Their recruiters are after our children.
Support the Boy Scouts, and the Salvation Army for having the courage to oppose this well funded assault on our nation's decency.

[b][size=6][center]ANSWER = [i][u]HOMESCHOOL[/u][/b][/i][/size=6][/center]