Quoted:
I'm waiting for the cyborgs myself
View Quote
Already here. There are people out there with pump-augmented hearts, artificial valves in their hearts, artificial lenses in their eyes, artificial joints, synthetic replacement bones, etc. They are, by definition, cyborg - part human, part machine.
People augmented with microprocessors are coming up - electronic stimulation of the sight centers of the brain to restore rudimentary "vision" to the blind, electronic "spinal bypass" circuitry to enable the paraplegic to use their limbs, etc.
The question is this: Is an embryo a human being? To the religious, there isn't even a question. To the pragmatic, it [i]can[/i] be, but the question is [i]when[/i]. As heilo put it, how many funerals are there for miscarriages?
I'm sorry, but a clump of cells in a petri-dish is not a human being. If (when) they somehow manage to bring an embryo (cloned or not) to full term outside a human womb, then that [i]will[/i] be a human being with all the rights that you or I (may still) have.
The question is, what do we do about the intermediate period? When do we draw the line and say that it is a being with rights? Right now, legally, it is until birth. Too loose. The fanatically anti-abortion oriented say "at conception". Too tight. Who gets to play Goldielocks and determine what's "just right"?