just wanted to make sure you knew

Imbrog says things in a "sarcastic" way. just to stir the crap.

Hmmmm.

Well thank you for the Heads-Up concerning Imbroglios posting habits...but I feel I must differ on your assertion of how&why.  Not trying to be a contrarian mind you but either my standards of proof are higher than many on this board or I have rose coloured contact lenses.  I am not singling anyone out but *many* jump the gun here upon the slightest "whiff" of evidence (which is a lot different than *proof*) supporting their ideas or assumptions.

Until I become a lifetime member of the Psychic Friends Network (tm) or I have irrefutable, solid proof of ones venomous sarcasm or inner desire to cause hate and discontent instead of merely offering an article from a third party to stimulate thought and constructive discourse I shall have to rule Imbroglio innocent of the charge of being a "Shit-Stirrer".  Not that my thoughts have any bearing on anyone else, that's just how I see it.

Please Re-read Imbroglios last "stirring" post, please note his complete lack of smilies or winks (denoting sarcasm?) within his opening statement.  Read the article...it really seemed more informative than bad or accusatory.  Maybe my skin is thicker than most.  I dunno, maybe others see things I cannot.

Thanks anyway for your thoughts!