Quoted: Considering that some of the missing explosives are the type used in detonation a nuke, I would say yes.
|
They use that "nuke detonation" for the shock factor. I'm sure it could be used for nukes. So could other explosives. As far as I know, which is pretty far, trinitroglycerol, or nitroglycerin, is the most brisant explosive there is. Dynamite has the same power, so if it is indeed the most powerful explosive, it's more powerful than the stuff in the building.
The stuff stolen is just a military explosive. It's not special. It's not like it's some kind of super-explosive.
Besides, saying that the explosive is dangerous because you can use it for nukes is like saying that you can make life because scientists have created amino acids.
EDITED TO SAY: I'm NOT saying that IF the explosives have been taken for use by the enemy, it isn't a big deal. I'm just saying that the media is acting like this specific explosive is much worse than some other kind.