well, i tried to be neutral and see what people though about somthing i heard, but didn't get much as far as an interpretation, so here it goes again, except this is the full context and everything...
the question is, did kerry get a dishonorable discharge.
listen to the following and let me know what you think.
The following is an interview conducted in Nov 1971, on the TV program Viewpoints, at the TV studios of WRC-TV, Washington, DC. Go to the url
kerry 1971 interviewclick on the blue box which says: A November 6, 1971 interview with John Kerry on protesting the war in Vietnam. (10 min.)
A real media file will play, when it plays listen closely to the section that starts around 2 minutes 50 secs.
Key conversation is Debbie: Was there every any question about you being dishonourably discharged? Kerry: oh no, no, that has never been questioned.
The last question was awkwardly phrased, as some people can say that it could be intrepreted as either 1) a dishonorable discharged had occurred, and D: was asking if there had been any questions about it, or 2) had there been raised any questions about a dishonorable discharge occurring
is this something, or do i need to go back to school and relearn english?
How does this apply – see the article written by writer Thomas Lipscomb in the NY Sun - subcriber link - the link is now protected, they (the paper ) protected it for subscribers, i will look for a copy somewhere. i will post a summary in another post below of this article
My impression of this is that she knew a dishon dc (dishonorble(y) discharge) had occurred, and was asking if anyone had said anything about it. If it had not occurred, wouldn't the question be "was there ever a question about the possiblity you might be dishon dc'ed?". also, kerry seems surprised, then, almost smuggly replies that there had never been any question about the dishon dc, as he brushes off the question.
edited to hot link site, unhot linked subscriber site, edited title