Which would you prefer to fight?

I can see a lot of advantages to combating Libs...figure once they are gone the country will be a nicer place.

You can't fault zombies for wanting to eat your brains...after all, it is their nature. However, based on that logic can you fault the Libs for being such pussies? It is certainly in their nature.

Best of both worlds would be to fight the libs and then fight them again when they become zombies - that way you can blast em twice

Blasting them twice!!
Double your pleasure, double your fun!!

deleted by poster

Quoted: Which would you prefer to fight?

Neither. But zombies at least have an excuse for their behavior.

Quoted: Quoted: Which would you prefer to fight? Neither. But zombies at least have an excuse for their behavior.

...and they have better personal hygene habits than most liberals.

Zombies, because Liberals would be harder to kill. As you know, with Zombies you can shoot them in the shoot them in the brain, killing them, again. But since liberals have no brain, and they are already bleeding from their hearts, they would be much much harder to kill.

Quoted: Zombies, because Liberals would be harder to kill. As you know, with Zombies you can shoot them in the shoot them in the brain, killing them, again. But since liberals have no brain, and they are already bleeding from their hearts, they would be much much harder to kill.

The corollary to this is that liberals, by lacking brains, are in no danger from zombies. Zombies, as you know, eat brains.

Knowing they are the zombies' only prey, conservatives arm themselves. Liberals have no such need. But liberals hate guns, because guns protect their arch-enemies (conservatives) from the zombies. And as Shaggy noted, liberals attempt to resmble zombies in personal hygiene habits and appearance. This is done to make conservatives waste ammunition.

Now you know why conservatives own guns and fear zombies, while liberals hate guns and smell like zombies.