Quoted: Correct me if I'm wrong, but is the point of the EC to prevent one or a few states from exerting undue influence over the rest of the country, despite their populations?
For example, If California had almost all the people in the country, and the other states had 100K each, (and the numbers were the same as now), would the purpose of the EC be to prevent California from overwhelming the other states?
Seems like a reasonable restriction to me....
|
It's to prevent a few CITIES from dominating the vote...
Remember
THE PRESIDENT IS SUPPOSED TO REPRESENT THE NATION AS A WHOLE, NOT THE INDIVIDUAL PEOPLEThe purpose of the Electoral College was to complete the trifecta of elected government:
1) President : Represents the NATION
2) Senate : Represents the STATES
3) House of Reps : Represents the PEOPLE
Now, we screwed up #2 with direct election of senators.
Fortunately #1 is still in place
The Electoral College is SUPPOSED to be winner-take-all, it's the only way it works... If you du Colorado's REALLY STUPID IDEA and make it proportional by state, then you allow major metro areas to dominate elections - you basically defeat the purpose of having the EC, period...