Quoted:
Quoted: I think it’s apples and oranges. I believe the Boston figure refers only to money realized by the City of Boston (i.e., the Boston City Treasury). The NYC figure is some statistical extrapolation of dubious accuracy and “creative accounting.”
NYC is also more expensive than Boston. The figure for NYC needs to be put in “Boston adjusted dollars,” or some such. (In Boston, this means “It’s mine unless I let you keep it.”)
|
|
Comments: No, I suck at parties. I'm a lawyer, whadya want?
Also, I should have made it clearer in paragraph 1 that (apparently) the NYC statistic refers to all monies spent in pursuit of the convention in the NY area. That is, it includes extra money spent for security, for direct convention expenses, for car rentals by attending delegates, and for the bagel with cream cheese purchased by the greengrocer delegate from Indiana. The extreme difference is (apparently) due to the total addition to the NYC economy due to the convention.
The Boston statistic refers to direct and indirect taxes that made the City of Boston (alone) richer. That is, I think that is why the difference is so large and Leno was conparing "apples and oranges."
So, I'm not perfect.