by Michael J. Hurd  (August 21, 2004)

Summary: Bush is the handmaiden of the "morality" from which Hillary Rodham Clinton has never recoiled.  

[www.CapitalismMagazine.com]

Says Hillary Clinton: "Many of you are well enough off that ... the [Bush] tax cuts may have helped you ... We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

You've got to give it to Hillary. She does not hide from the philosophy of plunder that guides socialistic liberalism. Unlike her cohort John Kerry, she sees no need to apologize for nor in any way disguise the code of ethics that underlies her politics. The underlying code of ethics is essentially as follows: If you have more, you have an obligation to the common good to give it up -- for no other reason than you have more. The very act of owning implies an obligation to surrender that ownership.

It's plunder, plain and simple. It's dishonest plunder at that. By referring to "the common good" Hillary implies that everybody benefits from the transfer of loot from those who earn it to those who didn't earn it. As her large salary in the U.S. Senate will attest, most of that transfer goes to the government officials and bureaucracies who cash in on Hillary's immoral code of ethics.

The_Full_Story



I must respect, as the author stated,  Hillary's honesty - in that she doesn't hide her socialst agenda.  What IS scary is that, while doing this, enough people agree with Hillary's agenda to elect her to office.

A consequence of American polarization.

The non-response tells me that this is common knowledge or something to be avoided.

Quoted: Plus she wrote a really appalling senior thesis in the 60's for college where she said basically an overt revolution will never occur in America, so progressives need to assume positions of authority and change America from within.

That theory is absolutely viable.  And she deserves credit for her awarness of that.  I will note however, that her goals are anti-American in the most basic idealisms.  She IS a socialist (elite) and an adament anti-Constitutionalist.  Those thought processes would have gotten her hanged by our fore fathers.

Oh and if I were living back then with her, I would have volunteered to man the gallows.  

Quoted: After her comment at Barbara Boxer's fundraiser last month, shouldn't that be 'Socialist in Chief'?

Obviously the title is a barb in sarcasm.

Quoted: ...that will destroy this nation if she ever reaches her true goal of being POTUS. "

That is true.  She would do significant damage.  Though she would never attain that position.

Quoted: The problem with Hitlary is that many wwomen who are intelligent rational ladies would vote for her simply because she is a woman. The sad fact is I know many women like this, and it drives my wife nuts that her intelligent friends can't see the evil inherent in her pursuit of power. They merely see the things brought up against her as an attack by those mean old republicans against a woman. 96Ag

You are correct in that many women do believe she's merely a victim of bully tactics.  But I'll keep the faith and appoint those attributes to an insignificant minority compared to the rest of the U.S.

Obviously since she's been elected to office the "insignificants" are IMO concentrated to her area and those blind followers do not have enough impact to sway the populous.

Quoted: 2) Groupies - Like her because they would like to be her...

Women do actively seek other women to gain a strong voice in the political arena.  I just wish we had a woman like Thatcher or Rice to fill the void instead of Hillary the antichrist.