06-27-2022 - jovan pulitzer paper analysis p 68

04-04-2022 raffensperger issued 4 subpoenas for information after ignoring truethevote for a year.... problem is, there was a person that was lead counsel for abram's group that would get the name of the whistleblower, if ttv complies... p65

04-04-2022 charles kirk talks to dinesh d'sousza about the truethevote info - says he saw the evidence and saw harvesters visiting abram's offices between ballot drops... nightly - page 62

03-01-2022 Dispite speaker vos attempts to derail the investigation into wisconsin election fraud by gableman, gableman presented an interim report in a hearing today, reccommending the election be decertified

not a good summary of what happened in the hearing has been found yet, but a link to the report is on page 60


02-11-2022 Feds want to supress both full and redacted reports that  dominion machines have vulnerabilities and are hackable, because they don't want others to know what the vulnerabilities are p59 or https://apnews.com/article/technology-georgia-atlanta-voting-elections-d4543623099fea5bf3633d0913532c11

01/28/2022 PA state court ruled that the no excuse mail in voter law was unconstitutional. article P58, likely to be put on hold while appealed to PA supreme court by the governor

01/12/22 raffensperger to be interviews on john fredericks show, links p57

01/04/22 - raffensperger openning investigation into reports of ballot harvesting and collussion, reports made by truethevote from back in august - page 57

dec - various reports of investigations going on page 57


12/08 - wisconsin state hearing on voter rolls, too many discrepencies such as over 120,000 ACTIVE voters who have been registered to vote for more than 100 years, etc. too many to  to list, thanks to DaGoose for finding video see p55

11/19 update 12/2   kemp has his own office do investigation into claims available (as not all information that is suppose to be available has been provided) fulton county data doesn't match their reported numbers from prior audits....

kemp's office finds the fulton county information and numbers can't be vaildated, as they don't match and fulton county and calls for state investigation page 55

11/09 - voter ga has determined all in person ballot images are missing in fulton county, and 74 counties are also missing ballot images and more p54

10/13 - georgia judge amero throws out garland favorito request to examine absentee ballots for lack of injury and had no standing, after hearing from georgia investigators no evidence of fraud exist p53


10/07 - house oversight hearing sham - maricopa admits they deleted data from machines before turning them over to senate audit team. they claim they 'archived' the data, and did not turn over the 'archived' data because it was not directly requested - p52

9/23 - texas sos announces request for forensic audit of 4 counties - dallas, harris, tarrant, and collin for the 2929 election - page 46

9/22 - Maricopa county supervisor chucri resigns after recordings of him doubting authenticity of election leaked and posted at the gateway pundit. other recordings to follow - page 46

9/17 maricopa county had a late, special hearing on the charges they violated arizona law and were under threat of losing millions in funding as a result, as well as possible misdemeanor charges and prison time.

it appears they caved to the arizona senate subpeona, and will be providing access to routers, logs, and other material they had been refusing to provide.

see page 44

title was AZ audit - maricopa county tells senate f* you- AZ Audit Hearing Fri Sept 24 1pm

9/16 senator rogers announces hearing for az audit results  Fri Sept 24 1pm

9/08 - liz harris put out a report today on findings of a volunteer arizona canvas, more on page 40

9/03 - truethevote to release video soon of ballot harvesting - stories page 40

8/30 - colorado sos blocks any audit, dekalb county chain of custody problems page 40

8/21 mastriano had tried to start a pennsylvania audit, it has been blocked by corman, with corman saying it's problems with mastriano and mastriano is no longer doing one

see page 38 for posts


aeroworksxp clips from lindell event
https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/AZ-audit-maricopa-county-tells-senate-f-you-az-audit-draft-being-prepared/5-2475195/?page=32#i94234212


data analysis by seek2 regarding arizona voting patterns
https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/AZ-audit-maricopa-county-tells-senate-f-you-az-audit-draft-being-prepared/5-2475195/?page=28#i94198695
https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/AZ-audit-maricopa-county-tells-senate-f-you-fulton-co-ga-election-chief-resigns/5-2475195/?page=36#i94274101
https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/AZ-audit-maricopa-county-tells-senate-f-you-fulton-co-ga-election-chief-resigns/5-2475195/?r=-1&page=37&anc=94323664#i94307712

8-17 az audit draft being prepared, to be presented to az senate for review before release
https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/AZ-audit-maricopa-county-tells-senate-f-you-fulton-co-ga-election-chief-resigns/5-2475195/?r=-1&page=37&anc=94323664#i94338799

8-15 Georgia Fulton County Elections Chief Ralph Jones Resigns  He Ran the Late Night Ballot Dump Operation in Atlanta
https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/AZ-audit-maricopa-county-tells-senate-f-you-8-2-borrelli-files-AG-complaint-Wisc-issues-subpoenas/5-2475195/?page=37#i94298990



------------------------

maricopa refuses to provide material despite az senate subpoena


https://ktar.com/story/4605193/maricopa-county-defiantly-responds-to-arizona-senates-audit-subpoena/

the arizona senate is currently out of session, and doesn't have the votes to hold maricopa in contempt because there have been 2 gop, including ugenti-rita who is running to be the next secretary of state in charge of elections, that refuse to investigate the election or support legislation to improve election integrity

so what is next?

there is suppose to be a canvas of suspicious voters on the voting rolls that have voted in the last election beginning soon.

the canvas is suppose to look at voters with problems such as 10's to 100's of voters registered to addresses that are businesses, single family homes, vacant lots, etc. and try to invalidate the maricopa votes


edit title was arizona audit - maricopa county tells az senate f* you, not going to give you anything 8/2/21

Update - borrelli files complaint with AG to have maricopa investigated for violating subpoena, which could result in maricopa losing 10% of it's share of tax revenue for a year


https://www.azmirror.com/blog/borrelli-wants-ag-to-take-action-against-supervisors-over-subpoena-defiance/
more details in article

edit - title was AZ audit - maricopa county tells senate f* you on anything 8/2/21-UPD borrelli files AG complaint


8-6-21
it's tgp, but from oann, so....



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/wisconsin-rep-janel-brandtjen-issues-subpoenas-audit-2-counties/

thanks DaGoose for posting the breitbart article...

I saw the tgp one, but your's has more info....

meanwhile, also tgp, as I didn't see any other news story on it yet


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/breaking-update-maricopa-county-republican-committee-votes-unanimously-reject-fraudulent-2020-election-results/


and I thought I saw this was already posted somewhere on arfcom, but don't remember where


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/breaking-langlade-county-wisconsin-joins-texas-maricopa-county-arizona-unanimously-reject-results-2020-election/


edit - btw, Trump is at las vegas tonight and anchorage saturday doing rallies. rsbn link in thread

https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/Trump-speaking-at-rally-in-support-laxalt-lombardo-7-08-2022-also-alaska-rally-7-09-2022/5-2567633/

Hogwash. Numerous constitutional scholars have indicated that Pence didn't do what he could have. Further, the Texas case being punted by SCOTUS was part and parcel of the election being stolen in plain view. We had an overthrow of the duly elected government.

No, we can't. Until processes and procedures are in place to prevent a recurrence, then our republic is still at risk. Further, until prosecutions occur against those who engaged in deliberate fraud, then we continue to remain a nation without the rule of law.

So, in short, Wisconsin's electors were invalid. And, they're not the only state that is true for.

Well, those “constitutional scholars” are wrong.

just a note, that christina bobb, oann host, also Trump attorney, is co-hosting the Trump rally in anchorage on rsbn...

she's been talking about the wisconsin supreme court ruling, and brings up that several other states have the same problem with drop boxes that weren't authorized by the state legislature, and implications that the wisconsin ruling could have on their use...

not directly 2020 election related, but.... (posted in separate thread in gd and reposting here)


a gateway pundit story, but with backed up reference...

basically, 'unknown errors' have resulted in supposedly 63k ballots with sent out to voters, with incorrect addresses, municiple and other races.

election officials have been reluctant to address or admit issues existed, even though early voting has started.

supposedly, the solution (so far) is that voters will be voting for federal and state offices in the original ballot, and they will be sent a second ballot with municiple races, so they have to turn in both to have voted in all the races

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/breaking-incorrect-ballots-sent-63000-arizona-voters-weeks-officials-ignored-concerns-63000-supplemental-ballots-printed/

more in article

and the backup refernce
https://www.pinalcountyaz.gov/Vote/Pages/BallotIssues.aspx



there were some articles in wisconsin saying the wisconsin election committee hasn't made any comments on the wisconsin supreme court ruling against drop boxes yet, but no real content

other than that, haven't seen anything else

there was comments on the john fredericks show this morning, that seemed to indicate the georgia election material may be preserved after the 22 month deadline to preserve it, because there is an attempt to appeal one of the lawsuits going on, but if the suit is denied, the material will likely be destroyed asap





edit - and the election ballot problem thread quickly died in gd, because, I guess, no one cares

Lots of people care, they have accepted the fact that NOTHING will happen.  Its like Q bullshit, two moar weeks and all that, then crickets.  Then the next batch of 64 kabillion fraudulent ballots come to light and NOTHING happens

What are your credentials that would make someone believe your word over Constitutional scholars/

Also, what parts do you know that are wrong, and what information do you have to refute it

Obama was a Constitutional scholar.

He got nothing.

And he and the dems know the power the vp has, which is why they're trying to pass new laws about it.

No, they're using that red herring as cover for sneaking in a far more dangerous change which apparently was overlooked by more than just cm.

Why so secretive? We're all friends here.

Raising the threshold for challenges to electoral votes by a significant margin.

Data Supporting the Reported Results of the 2020 Election Does NOT Reconcile with Data in Voting Machine Files – Something Is Very Wrong

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/huge-data-supporting-final-results-2020-election-not-reconcile-voting-machine-files-something-wrong/

After the 2020 Election steal, we knew things were very wrong.  Now as experts dig into the 2020 Election results, the final results don’t seem to reconcile with anything.

We learned in 2020 that American elections are a mess.  Now here we are a year and a half later and we are uncovering more evidence that the final results in 2020 never should have been certified.

We reported within days of the election and since then that the final numbers made no sense.  This was highlighted in our work surrounding the Drop and Roll.

The Edison data used in the above video has since been dug into much deeper.  Draza Smith and Jeff O’Donnell are two data experts who began looking at this data.  They made numerous observations after doing so as noted in the article below.  Some key points are:

Edison data with state totals are provided to mainstream media outlets like the New York Times showing reportedly up-to-date results of  the election for each state
There is a separate stream of Edison data based on county reporting that goes to the state
The state data supplied to the media and the county data supplied to the state don’t mirror each other and don’t agree until very late in the process – results should be the same for all reporting at all times
In the 2020 Election all results for all states went to zero and then when the numbers were reported again the state and county data nearly matched
Before the ‘Edison zero’ moment, there are differences between the Edison state and county data
State data was always below the county data (except with DC)
After the ‘Edison zero’ the state and county data are very close
Ultimately both the state and county data come to an agreement
The state data appears almost completely fictional to paint a story to the public
The county data may be fictional as well to some extent but appear not as off as state data.
Some county data obtained does correlate with Edison county data and some doesn’t with state reporting more likely related to an algorithm or pre-determined value
Battleground states actually had more refined reporting down to the precinct level rather than county level as in other states
The ratio of Trump to Biden votes appears preset for each state before the election
But when Texas and then Florida went to Trump voting had to stop while they rearranged the remainder of the swing state votes
The Edison zero moment occurred after Florida was called for Trump
All states show this pattern
There may be some type of controller that manages the votes – a device similar to ones used in multiple industries
Jeff O’Donnell “I have probably done a fairly deep dive on 12 different states and I have found unacceptable, unacceptable things in all 12.  Even in my worst nightmares previous to this election, I never dreamed that anything like this on such a massive scale could happen.  We need answers to so many questions.”
Draza Smith shared: “Everything we’ve put together with the idea of how things happened here, played out exactly the same way in the California recall election.  Why did all those people…go in and vote and be told, oh you can’t vote, you’ve already cast a vote…So the things that we’re seeing happening are falling into line that it’s the same, it’s the same, it’s the same.  We need to start demanding the answers as to why the same, the same, the same.”
We need an audit of our time stamps.  We need to get a better idea of how a ballot goes from the voter, to the tabulator, to the state and Edison and eventually to the New York Times.

Based on personal experience, having performed hundreds of audits around the world, when performing an audit of any data set, you want to make sure your data is complete.  You can do this by reconciling your data to reported results.  

The county results reported in the Edison data don’t agree with the state results.  They should.  So another data set to compare these results to was needed.  This is where ‘Cast Vote Records’ come in.

“Cast Vote Records” are inventories of votes recorded in the voting system.  These records can be downloaded onto a spreadsheet and they show all votes for each ballot counted in the election through the election system.  Each row represents each ballot tabulated in the election and which tabulator it was cast on, what image number it was given, what type of vote it was, ballot type or precinct, and what all the votes were for the races on that ballot.

Below is an example of a Cast Vote Record report provided by Erin Clements from the New Mexico audit.  Each row in the spreadsheet represents a ballot with the votes for each ballot:



Unfortunately, and perhaps by design, the Cast Vote Records do not include time stamps for when the ballots were cast or tabulated.  The Cast Vote records in the order they are provided from the voting system do not agree with the Edison data.

Numerous states were reviewed and none of the Cast Vote Records for any state agreed with the results for the state reported through Edison.

Erin Clements shared that the order of the votes in the Cast Vote Record is impossible to achieve in most counties. Votes are clearly being shuffled and possibly made up altogether.  Small, red counties don’t necessarily show shuffling, but ballot stuffing in absentee ballots for some races usually pops out.

It is also impossible to tie the order of the votes in the CVR to the election night reporting we saw on TV. It may be because TV reporting is almost completely made up? Draza Smith and Jeff ODonnell have shown that the election night reporting appears to be based solely on the number of ballots that are reported at any given time with ratios of votes reported using an algorithm to manipulate the public’s perception of how the election is going.

To understand this, it’s helpful to look at Rhode Island’s data because it’s the only state that processes its entire election on one computer, so all the ballots are stored in one Cast Vote Record. These graphs are from Draza Smith.  The first graph represents what was reported on TV with a huge jump in Biden votes after Florida was called for President Trump.



The Cast Vote Records show a different picture.  These charts should agree.



According to the Edison data charts President Trump was in the lead all night, then there was a massive injection of Biden votes after Florida was called for Trump – just like we saw in MI, PA, GA, etc.

When taking the records as stored in the state’s Election Management System (EMS) you’ll notice that the Biden votes that were injected at the end of counting on TV are now spread out so it doesn’t look like there was a massive Biden ballot dump.

If elections were honestly counted, reported, and recorded, then the two plots would have the same shape. But they don’t. In Rhode Island, it looks like the Dominion software shuffled the last-minute stuffed votes into the record to spread them out and make them look natural. So if anyone checks the Cast Vote Record later, it won’t look like obvious ballot stuffing.

This was found to be the same in multiple states and in all the records reviewed.  None of the Cast Vote Records agreed with the Edison data.

At this point – in the 2020 Election the Edison data that was used to report the status of the election results across the country, can’t be reconciled to anything.

And not a fuckin thing will happen to any of them and dominion machines will still be in use next election.  Voting ni longer matters

Good stuff. Thanks.

@DaGoose

every ballot should get stamped with: date and timestamp of when it was read into the machine, the id of the machine, the id of the person entering it. It should be IMPOSSIBLE to feed a ballot more than once. If there is an issue with the ballot, the operator CANNOT fix it, period. it goes into an adjudication container with a summary of the issue(s). If the number of ballots with issues is sufficient to change the outcome, then, and only then can they be reviewed by a bi-partisan group. A photograph of each adjudicated ballot is maintained. Any and all corrections are recorded and timestamped with the id's and signatures on everybody that signs off on them.

Additionly, upon receipt of a mail-in ballot, the envelope and the ballot itself gets tagged with an id number that can be used in an audit to match ballots with the person that sent them in, should questions arise or an audit needs to verify the ballot is legitimate. If a mail in ballot cannot be associated with a envelope, the person responsible for them will be punished legally - perhaps 1K per ballot where this happens.

A FEDERAL JUDGE WILL HEAR EVIDENCE AGAINST THE USE OF ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES IN ARIZONA

https://www.rsbnetwork.com/news/a-federal-judge-will-hear-evidence-against-the-use-of-electronic-voting-machines-in-arizona/


A federal judge will hear evidence against the use of electronic voting machines in Arizona’s upcoming midterm elections on Thursday, July 21.

Ordered early Monday morning, Judge John J. Tuchi granted the hearing in response to a request for a preliminary injunction against the use of electronic voting machines and subsequent motions to dismiss filed by defendants Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs and the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.

The original injunction was filed by plaintiffs Kari Lake, a candidate for Arizona’s gubernatorial race, and Arizona state Rep. Mark Finchem, who is running for secretary of state.

On July 21, a federal judge will hear the request from @KariLake and @RealMarkFinchem for a preliminary injunction to block the use of electronic machines in elections. Sets up to three hours for the hearing.

— Mary Jo Pitzl (@maryjpitzl) July 14, 2022
“As there is substantial overlap in the motions, the Court will entertain consolidated presentations from the parties,” the judge ordered. “Plaintiffs will have no more than two hours to present all argument and, as pertains to their application for injunctive relief, evidence. Defendants shall have no more than three hours collectively to present their argument and evidence.”

In the complaint, Lake and Finchem argued that they have “a constitutional and statutory right to have their ballots, and all ballots cast together with theirs, counted accurately and transparently, so that only legal votes determine the winners of each office contested in the Midterm Election.”

Electronic voting machines, the plaintiffs contended, are not “reliably secure” and do not meet the legally required standards to ensure a secure election.

“The use of untested and unverified electronic voting machines violates the rights of Plaintiffs and their fellow voters and office seekers, and it undermines public confidence in the validity of election results,” the complaint reads. “Just as the government cannot insist on ‘trust me,’ so too, private companies that perform governmental functions, such as vote counting, cannot be trusted without verification.”

Noting that experts have warned of the vulnerability of electronic voting machines, the plaintiffs requested that the judge order the defendants to collect and count votes by hand, using verifiable paper ballots, while maintaining voter anonymity and transparency “in a fashion observable to the public.”

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, who assisted with filing the lawsuit, reported news of the hearing Friday on “The Lindell Report.”

“This is historical news,” he said. “This is our first preliminary injunction, everybody, that started a month and a half ago. … A judge is really gonna look at the evidence! It’s amazing!

BREAKING: Mike Lindell announces his team is getting preliminary injunctions in 8 states next week "to get machines out of our elections once and for all!" pic.twitter.com/k3M5w7ZaHT

— RSBN 🇺🇸 (@RSBNetwork) April 9, 2022
Lindell, a vocal opponent of electronic voting machines, announced in April that he would help file preliminary injunctions in several states, including Alabama, Louisiana, Texas, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Colorado.

“The preliminary injunctions are to get machines out of our elections once and for all,” Lindell said.

In recent months, the issue of election integrity has been brought back to the forefront following the release of “2000 Mules.” The film, with its explosive allegations of ballot trafficking during the 2020 election, raised questions among voters of all persuasions regarding the legitimacy of the current administration.

Maybe there is some hope.

Some. There's plenty of RINOs and establishment/crony aligned republicans in AZ that have worked
diligently to prevent election fraud from being investigated or prevented, probably because both they
and the dems have benefited from it. (Remember we had a (R) member of the Maricopa county board
of supervisors, which is majority republican, have to resign because he was secretly recorded
pointing out  that some of the other supervisor's elections were probably helped by the same fraud issues that
affected the presidential election, and that blocking the investigation was self-serving.)

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/disabled-voters-file-lawsuit-claiming-wisconsin-high-courts-ruling-barring-help-returning-ballots-violates-u-s-constitution/

https://lawforward.org/

Actual group behind the lawsuit

They are behind alot of the cases in WI obstructing the audits, investigations, and fighting election security and integrity.

Left cold

What is wrong with mailing them in? Do they ever go anywhere? If they can go to store or Dr they don't have a case

Basically when the wi Supreme Court found ballot harvesting against the state constitution. Law forward went out and found 4 neck-down paralyzed people (simplification), and convinced them that they could no longer vote by dictating what to write to their caregiver and having them drop it in the mailbox. And unless they sue they loose the right to vote.

I dont know if they actually have standing as they haven't been denied the right to vote as of yet...

Law forward are trying to get  a court ruling or even a temp injunction that ballot assistance is part of the right to vote. Thus facebook paid ballot harvestors are allowed.

I would imagine WEC "could" do something along the lines of visiting special election deputies for truly disabled folks just like they were supposed to be doing for nursing homes, but i have little faith in wec actually making a sensible decision or coherent argument in court.

We will have to see howthis pans out. Hopefully slapped down with extreme swiftness but who knows anymore

Not against the State Constitution, against current voting laws.

And to clarify a bit more, these are the exact people who would fit under the "indefinitely confined" language in the law and as such, can be assisted by special clerks and are exempt from Voter ID requirements.  This lawsuit should be a big nothingburger but I will never underestimate the judiciary's ability to fuck things up.

Well thats the crux i guess.

If wec will state that they are capable of supplying all documented disabled folks with special election deputies to assist in disability voting, then law forward have no case.

But wec enabled the prior fraud to happen, and have been against election reform to the point gableman suggested disbanding wec was the only way to secure wi elections.

Wec doesn't want ballot harvesting to end and has been hamstrung by wi Supreme Court.

Now wec is sued to allow "ballot assistance" in fed court....

If wec says they cant supply election deputies to the disabled then courts will likely find ballot assistance a component of the right to vote. And lefty groups will declare any and all excuses for ballot assistance on what amounts to be a massive scale by private partisan groups. And we will be back to 2000 mules again with groups intetested in election integrity left scrambling after elections trying to prove individual voters weren't disabled enough to warrant assistance and with no legal repercussions regardless.

But i am not sure the disabled have legal standing, as they haven't tried to vote and been turned down yet.

For example, unless i am mistaken, citizens of awb states haven't been able to sue a state gov orgs over a state awb unless prosecuted or denied a banned firearm. Because they dont have standing untill actually deprived of their argued rights.

But i am not a lawyer.

And also we live in clown world now.

While you are correct in you understanding of "material injury in fact" being a component of standing to sue against prima facie regulations, I've never seen it stop a lefty judge from doing whatever the fuck he wanted.

I would not be surprised at all to see an unserious jurist slap a "the laws are all unconstitutional bring back the harvesting!!!" ruling on something like this in defiance of the WI SC and the US Constitution (the plenary power of the state legislature to set the rules for Presidential elections without interference from any other party including the judiciary or state executive branch).

Worth a repost and bump.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/breaking-dominion-voting-machiens-fail-el-paso-co-co-logic-accuracy-test-hand-recount/

BREAKING: Dominion Voting Machines FAIL Testing for Colorado Secretary of State Recount — Major Discrepancy Reported with Logic and Accuracy Testing

Dominion Voting machines in El Paso County, Co. have reportedly produced large numbers of adjudications in their Logic and Accuracy test for the upcoming hand recount of the 2022 Primary election.  The recount was ordered (and paid for) by some of the candidates, including Mesa Clerk Tina Peters and El Paso senate candidate Linda Zamora Wilson, who had her election inexplicably overturned AFTER it had been called by local news without any explanation.

According to Jim Wiley of ColoradoRecount.com:

The L&A consisted of 4,000 ballots.  2,200, around 60%, were reportedly kicked out for adjudication.  Two Dominion employees were present and it still can’t be run correctly.  Teams of judges are reviewing the ballots as part of the adjudication process.

TRENDING: EPSTEIN’S SEX CLIENTS: Gateway Pundit Files Legal Action to Unseal and Identify The Global Elite Scumbags That Abused Trafficked Minors

The candidates were required to pay for the cost of the recount, including $10,000 allocated to “vendor programming/support”

Breaking: Dominion voting machines fail logic & accuracy test in El Paso County, CO recount. Almost 60% of test ballots sent to adjudication

— George (@BehizyTweets) July 29, 2022

No. That’s not what the new law is about.

Go read 3 USC 15, and compare it to the proposed new law. There is some scary shit in there and it has nothing to do with the VP’s authority to certify anything.

My credentials are that I can read.

Please cite the applicable sections of the US Constitution or US Code giving the VP the authority claimed by these “constitutional scholars”.

1. Do you know what an L&A test is?
2. Do you know what a test deck is?
3. Did you know test decks intentionally include errors and votes (such as write-ins) that require manual adjudication?
4. Do you know that the most likely reason for the failure of an L&A test is human error in configuring the election project?
5. Regardless of what happens in El Paso County, that kook Tina Peters still lost the statewide election by a wide margin.

Lol at the lengths you nevertrumpers go to to defend fraudulent elections.

I don’t see anybody defending fraudulent elections.

I do see people pointing out areas where those who think it was, are wrong.

No, in this case, it's you that is.

Still waiting for the citation giving Pence the authority to de-certify the election.

Of course, other than because “constitutional scholars” said so.

What I see is N_Ts desperately trying to gaslight people into believing a stolen election wasn't stolen.

lol, man those are some serious boomer memes.

Thank you. I worked hard on them.

Not surprising that my questions are being avoided.  

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/update-withheld-records-reveal-19000-mail-ballots-illegally-received-deadline-maricopa-county-2020-election/

UPDATE: Withheld Records Reveal 19,000 Mail-In Ballots Illegally Received AFTER Deadline in Maricopa County 2020 Election

A Maricopa County 2020 election report from Verity Vote used public records requests to discover that more than 20,000 ballots were illegally counted.

Arizona’s 2020 Presidential Election was decided by less than 10,500 votes.

The Gateway Pundit reported on this finding earlier in May.

After numerous records requests and months of waiting for responses, Verity Vote found that Maricopa County received and counted tens of thousands of ballots after the election day deadline.

This evidence was not mentioned by the weak Arizona Attorney General during his failed investigation into the 2020 Election.

There was also a spike in votes accepted and counted in the days after the November 3rd Presidential Election.

🚨#2020Election QUESTION🚨

Hey @stephen_richer @Adrian_Fontes @Garrett_Archer

Can I please get your spin on this article? I'm sure you'll have some "reasonable" explanation for this just like everything else.

cc:@gayla415 pic.twitter.com/YgxOexw8sy

— 🇺🇸AZ West Deplorable 🌟🌟🌟🇺🇸 (@AZRed65) July 29, 2022

The Epoch Times reported,

Voters were instructed to mail ballots by Oct. 27 to be sure their ballots arrived on time. By Oct. 30, the number of ballots coming by mail dropped sharply, but then spiked the day after the election.

On Oct. 28, the county received 58,500 ballots from the post office, then:

Oct. 29: 14,500
Oct. 30: 10,500
Oct. 31: 6,000
Nov. 1: 1,500
Nov. 2: 1,000
Nov. 3: 2,500—Election Day. In order to be counted and valid, the ballot must be received by the county no later than 7 p.m.
Nov. 4: 18,000 late, invalid ballots
Nov. 5: 1,000 late, invalid ballots
Nov. 6: 1,500 late, invalid ballots
Yet, Maricopa County rejected just 934 ballots for lateness.

This can be explained by Dinesh D’Souza and True the Vote’s “2000 Mules” investigation, which discovered a nationwide ballot trafficking ring that was used to steal the 2020 Election through unsecured dropboxes. The film explains how the ballot Mules created a large influx of late-early ballots to overwhelm the system and rush ballots through the counting process.

Starting the day after election day, 18,000 votes — far more than the margin of victory — were illegally counted after the deadline.

Pre-covid, most states had the cutoff to receive mail in ballots as the end of business on the Friday before an election. This allowed them to be processed before the in person votes. This was changed by pretty much every state to close of business on election day. This of course would lead to a shit show where late votes would be counted instead of being thrown out

Please tell us how the evidence is wrong, as you have entire voting blocks/cities planning to overturn their local/regional results from the 2020 Election. Tell us how those cities are werong

TGP citing Epoch Times citing 2000 Mules. For fucks sake people.

2000 Mules, pass it on!

They might not be, I don’t know. But at this point, a stance on the 2020 election, one way or the other, has become nothing more than a platform to gain points for future political points, and less about the actual truth.

But the last several pages have been focused on the authorities of the VP when it comes to his role in counting electoral votes, the process for challenging electoral votes, the new proposed bi-partisan legislation to change the electoral count act, and the fact that the important parts thereof are sailing completely over the heads of people who are convinced that Pence had the authority to “de-certify” the election.

Already provided in another thread. You can look up Eastman's take on it yourself.

don't feed him any more

Attached File