Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 4
Posted: 8/17/2018 2:55:17 PM EDT
Do you think its realistically possible for the US to stabilize Mexico and end the violence
and running gun battles between the cartels and Mexican military? Or do you think
having US troops on Mexican soil would just increase the violence to a level the US
would simply pull out after a few years with things even worse than before.

The recent running gun battle of 10 cartel gun trucks with M2 .50 caliber machine guns,
RPGs and .50 caliber Barrett rifles VS the Mexican Army shows the issues involved. It would
take great resolve, as the violence would quickly be brought directly home here in the US.

We spent a great deal of blood and money in both Iraq and Afghanistan while right on our border
Mexico has become a failed state. Some will say end the war on drugs!! That would have grave
consequences on the US in the long term and undermine the fabric of society. Plus it would have
little impact on the cartels or the violence.

With Mexico a failed state on the US border, and illegals flooding into the US, should the US do something
to stabilize the country? Is it even possible to stabilize Mexico? Or is the US military too small and weak to
do it, and does the American public lack the backbone and long term fortitude to wage such a war, especially
if it will lead to immediate attacks on main street USA?
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 2:55:54 PM EDT
[#1]
not with today's ROE...
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 2:56:50 PM EDT
[#2]
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 2:56:53 PM EDT
[#3]
Not worth it.
We could, but it would be so costly in blood, time and treasure that it would end up being a phyric victory.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 2:57:16 PM EDT
[#4]
If everyone is dead it's stable right?  
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 2:58:16 PM EDT
[#5]
Cheaper for the taxpayer and safer for the personnel to just use them to secure the border instead.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 2:59:40 PM EDT
[#6]
Simpler and cheaper to build a wall and associated defenses.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 2:59:59 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It's a culture issue.
View Quote
Agreed 100%.

The issue is that due to their proximity to the US their problems are now undermining
our Republic, and if left unchecked could lead to the end of our Republic as we know it.

So, what do we do?
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:01:01 PM EDT
[#8]
Doesn't address the underlying cause.  The billions in US drug traffic dollars going down there.  As long as that income stream exists, someone will service the trade.  You put the US military in that situation and the drug money will just contaminate them as well.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:01:24 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
not with today's ROE...
View Quote
Bingo.  Is it possible?  Yes.  Do we have the will to do what's necessary?  No, and haven't for a long time.  This is why America will fall, we lack the fortitude to make the hard decisions & carry out the actions to safeguard our country.
The best we could hope for, would be that by some miracle .gov actually starts enforcing the border between U.S. & Mexico, but this country is too undermined by stupidity for even that to be a realistic outcome.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:01:47 PM EDT
[#10]
Haven't we defeated Mexico twice already and kept the nice parts?  I think retooling our "War on Drugs" would fix Mexico more cheaply than an invasion.  If drugs are produced and A and C is hooked on them, B is fucked.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:02:34 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It's a culture issue.
View Quote
BOOM.....FUKKING nailed it.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:02:45 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Cheaper for the taxpayer and safer for the personnel to just use them to secure the border instead.
View Quote
Agreed.
The only issue then is the problem never goes away, and you have a failed country filled with chaos
on the other side of the wall. Eventually the Leftists will let the wall fall into disrepair and stop securing
the border.......if the wall is ever even built.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:02:52 PM EDT
[#13]
Nothing could stabilize that country, there are too many low-IQ mestizos in the population.  Look at a world map of average IQ and the relationship between IQ and shit hole becomes pretty obvious and hard to refute.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:03:11 PM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Doesn't address the underlying cause.  The billions in US drug traffic dollars going down there.  As long as that income stream exists, someone will service the trade.  You put the US military in that situation and the drug money will just contaminate them as well.
View Quote
Could the military kill a whole lot of people, smash shit and wreak havoc. Yes.

Root problem remains.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:03:28 PM EDT
[#15]
Minefields and interlocking fields of fire on the border. The only thing we would actually send into Mexico would be Minuteman IIIs.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:04:02 PM EDT
[#16]
In a word no.  While there is turmoil in Mexico, sending in troops by invitation from the Mexican Government would have the same result of a LEO going on a domestic call.  All the factions in Mexico would find common ground to drive out the gringos.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:04:12 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Doesn't address the underlying cause.  The billions in US drug traffic dollars going down there.  As long as that income stream exists, someone will service the trade.  You put the US military in that situation and the drug money will just contaminate them as well.
View Quote
Agreed that segments of the US military would certainly come under the influence of the drug money in short order.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:05:43 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
In a word no.  While there is turmoil in Mexico, sending in troops by invitation from the Mexican Government would have the same result of a LEO going on a domestic call.  All the factions in Mexico would find common ground to drive out the gringos.
View Quote
agreed...
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:05:54 PM EDT
[#19]
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:06:02 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Simpler and cheaper to build a wall and associated defenses.
View Quote
Yep, build wall, fortify it with troops etc  and let fuck all happen in Mexico.  Not our problem to solve.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:06:20 PM EDT
[#21]
No.

ETA: Unless that “military force” was directed at the drug culture in the US.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:07:43 PM EDT
[#22]
Going to require a wholesale change in the hearts and minds of the Mexican people. Something that only a wholly new religious tradition can accomplish, over multiple generations.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:08:38 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Agreed 100%.

The issue is that due to their proximity to the US their problems are now undermining
our Republic, and if left unchecked could lead to the end of our Republic as we know it.

So, what do we do?
View Quote
Build the fucking wall
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:09:30 PM EDT
[#24]
Not without Roman/British Empire methods and morals.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:10:45 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Doesn't address the underlying cause.  The billions in US drug traffic dollars going down there.  As long as that income stream exists, someone will service the trade.  You put the US military in that situation and the drug money will just contaminate them as well.
View Quote
While I don't disagree that this is a likely scenario, I wonder why this doesn't really appear to have happened in Afghanistan?
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:11:55 PM EDT
[#26]
Not with any strategy we have been using for the last 100 years or so.

It would take measuring against the linchpin and a US military presence probably forever to maintain it.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:12:51 PM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
In a word no.  While there is turmoil in Mexico, sending in troops by invitation from the Mexican Government would have the same result of a LEO going on a domestic call.  All the factions in Mexico would find common ground to drive out the gringos.
View Quote
And things on our side of the border would probably quickly go hot as part of a heavily leftist funded "anti war" movement.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:14:00 PM EDT
[#28]
FPNI, some people just need to be killed
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:15:21 PM EDT
[#29]
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:17:07 PM EDT
[#30]
Quoted:

Build the fucking wall
View Quote
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:17:45 PM EDT
[#31]
The people we fought in the ME didn't have the immediate access to US civilians that cartels have.  I have no doubt that the cartel violence would spill over the border the second US troops start kicking ass.  We don't have the stomach for it.  While we are jumping through hoops to minimize collateral damage they will be shooting up schools and assassinating public figures.

Better to secure the border.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:19:29 PM EDT
[#32]
Yes the US military is very capable, and it is possible within the confines of "military power".  Politically, NO.  Carpet bombing cities and Sherman's March are no longer an acceptable option.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:21:19 PM EDT
[#33]
OP's original question reminds me of Clancy's book, "Clear and Present Danger".  Frankly I thought the special forces incursion into that shithole was the real and true "war on drugs" that should occur.  This BS about counseling, clever slogans, and political posturing is useless.

I think the belief that the cartels will disappear with the legalization of drugs is folly.  These organized crime groups have gotten too powerful and will merely branch out into some of their already existing venues of profit.  They've almost become a political force in Mexico, and they will want to hold on to that power.  I also believe that they will just tweak their business model in the drug trade to compete with whatever screwed up system the U.S. government would come up with as it relates to "legalized" drugs.  These drugs will still cost money, and the feds will want their fair share...for the welfare of the people, of course.  The cartels will just be a competing faction in this process, and they bring a lot of experience with them in how to "get around" taxes, government control, etc.

Mexico is on our physical border.  They are a threat, though maybe not the direct military threat of say, a Soviet Union of the past.  I don't think a full-on military assault is necessary at this time, but some strategic CIA, special forces, etc. action might actually be effective if executed properly.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:21:32 PM EDT
[#34]
How is it that we are still asking this question after 100 years of "empirical data" on the subject?  

It reminds me of the quote often found here pertaining to commie/socialist states......I guess we just haven't "done it the right way" yet.

So yea, let's spend a couple more trillion to find out the answer for the 12th time and then repeat the same mistake all over again in 10 - 20 years.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:22:11 PM EDT
[#35]
The US could stabilize any country on the planet using our military force.

That being said, no one is willing to go through the lengths required to do so, as it was borderline politically incorrect 200 years ago let alone now.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:22:45 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It's a culture issue.
View Quote
Exactly.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:23:05 PM EDT
[#37]
You would have to take out the cartels, corrupt members of the Mexican government, corrupt Police as well.as corrupt military.  Would be a pretty big undertaking for sure.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:23:46 PM EDT
[#38]
Do we want another nation building blunder right on our border?

#buildthewall
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:23:49 PM EDT
[#39]
Yes, if we're talking about old school hardcore colonialism.

Otherwise, no.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:24:26 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Agreed 100%.

The issue is that due to their proximity to the US their problems are now undermining
our Republic, and if left unchecked could lead to the end of our Republic as we know it.

So, what do we do?
View Quote
How about we quit kissing their ass.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:24:38 PM EDT
[#41]
What is there of value to stabilize? Its broken and you want to buy it?
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:25:04 PM EDT
[#42]
When has a occupation force trying to do the hearts and minds thing ever worked?

There is a huge demand in the US for drugs. As long as that demand is here, the supply will rise to meet it.

I would almost be willing to make the argument that the war on drugs is part of what caused the problems in Mexico.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:25:59 PM EDT
[#43]
Why should the US do anything in that sewer?
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:27:17 PM EDT
[#44]


The answer is very simple... Manifest Destiny
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:27:59 PM EDT
[#45]
Anything is possible, but not everything is practical.

It would require three things - none of which we have the national will to do.

First, total interdiction and eradication of the sources of drugs thereby cutting the cartels off from the source of their product.

Two, the elimination of demand in the US (and Canada).

Third, overwhelming military force and complete control of Mexico.

An included task is the elimination and continuing suppression of corruption.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:28:39 PM EDT
[#46]
OP, terrible idea.  Not worth the expense in either men or materiel.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:29:52 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
not with today's ROE...
View Quote
First post has it.

The US Military has the capability. The United States does not have the political will or the unity necessary.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:29:56 PM EDT
[#48]
No the cartels have too much to lose
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:30:04 PM EDT
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Cheaper for the taxpayer and safer for the personnel to just use them to secure the border instead.
View Quote
I agree with this. Lock the entire border down. Starve the cartels of money and they will go away.

To answer OPs question yes we could militarily pacify Mexico. We do not have the will to spill that much Mexican blood. Our loses would be in the 10s of thousands. Mexican loses would be well in to the 100s of thousands. We just don’t want to do that.
Link Posted: 8/17/2018 3:30:26 PM EDT
[#50]
We aren't stoping violence and drug production in Afghanistan.  We aren't going to stop it in Mexico where our own $$$ would fight against us.

It isn't worth it.

You could spend 1/10 of the money strengthening our border and policies.  Not lose a fraction of the lives or cause any turmoil in our own country.

Once it hits the news that American Soldiers are dying in Mexico buy Narcos funded by American's drug habit, you're going to have US fighting US in the states.  Good citizens will turn on suspected drug users.  The war on drugs will be fueled by that hatred and now you have Johnny Law fiercely going after Americans with less .gov restrictions.
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 4
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top