User Panel
|
|
This is bullshit, honestly. They're doing this just because he peddles dumb conspiracy theories. Fuck them.
Alex Jones, while lightweight crazy, doesn't deserve this at all. |
|
Socialist doing modern day book burning, and dumb asses here go along with it. Is Alex nutter than squirrel shit? YEP. Should they censor him? NO
|
|
|
Yep the liberals found a way around the whole 'first amendment" problem. Just use companies to silence their opposition instead of the government.
|
|
Quoted:
This dude was hoping there was no shirt underneath the first one https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/346339/0E742C45-2535-4653-814B-AC92A3FF68A1-631771.JPG View Quote |
|
Quoted:
His show exists to make him money on brain supplements he sells to his listeners, not because he has some ground-breaking real news stories. His lawyer admitted he was a performance artist ffs. Then again he does play to his audience of pizzagate conspiracy believers. So, what else are they going to listen to on these platforms? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Dissenting thought must be surprised for the progressive future, amirite? Then again he does play to his audience of pizzagate conspiracy believers. So, what else are they going to listen to on these platforms? |
|
Quoted:
I banned the irrelevant blow hard a long time ago. He has more Fake News than CNN. Remember this jem? Proof that Podesta was abusing kids and Hillary participated? It was going to change everything and put him and Hillary in jail. He claimed this was am picture leaked from Podesta pedo island and taken when Bill and Hillary were there. http://www.afterhourtechs.com/misc/pianolesson_fake.jpg But it was really just a cover of a piano lesson book. 100% fake news bullshit from Alex Jones. http://www.afterhourtechs.com/misc/pianolesson.png View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted:
I told you guys like Anglin, Spencer, or Cantwell weren't the end of this. This is the new (old) strategy, first they de-platform(de-person) you, then the demonize you, then they kill you. When they kill you its like you never existed then. Same old story, old as time. Better get ready, because ARFCOM won't be up forever. They'll get Southern, Gavin, Molyneux, and the like next. View Quote |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Legal precedent is already out there. You can bury your head in your ass all you want, but the rules are established and we can either fight to win and fix them or lose. There is no honor in death. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: When does google end and the govt begin? There is no more town square. Facebook and google and YouTube is the town square. Sorry it's the truth. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
GD "we want less goverment" GD "we need goverment intervention" All of these companies have turned a blind eye to things for years, claiming protections intended for public platforms - crime, fraud, arms trafficking, slavery, terrorism. "Oh, you can't expect us to police all of that proactively, we don't exercise editorial control!" They've always been on shaky ground with haphazardly enforcing their own rules in a way that agrees with their political bent, but this is a step too far. You can't have "we're not responsible" while targeting people for political de-platforming, bans, shadow bans, suspensions, etc. They want it to be their platform, their rules? Fine. We'll throw their sorry asses in prison for willingly refusing to take down threats, criminal solicitations, and foreign combatant propaganda. It's one or the other. You cannot have both in a nation of laws. Alex Jones is a nutball but this is not going to fly. |
|
Quoted:
Aye but as they are a private entity, they are lawfully able to do so. Just like this forum, you can be censored on a whim, it's up to the people who own/run it. Neither are protected and "popular" or "most used" doesn't change that. View Quote |
|
Second time timed posted this. GD is obsesseded with “private business” their rules, I don’t give a f, etc. All of these companies are public, traded on the Dow and nasdaq. GD dreams of private company rules do not apply. I posted this 2 pages ago, but GD idicocy dreams of “private company don’t care” continue to exist. Good luck with your retirement accounts, the knowledge here of public versus private companies is amazing.
|
|
Quoted:
Second time timed posted this. GD is obsesseded with “private business” their rules, I don’t give a f, etc. All of these companies are public, traded on the Dow and nasdaq. GD dreams of private company rules do not apply. I posted this 2 pages ago, but GD idicocy dreams of “private company don’t care” continue to exist. Good luck with your retirement accounts, the knowledge here of public versus private companies is amazing. View Quote |
|
Not sure if this has been posted yet (been busy), but this is probably the most accurate analysis on the interwebs.
Enjoy The War on InfoWars: A Rant ---> Mods, add a BitChute tool Edited I wish I could edit that out from 5.20 on... HOLY SHIT |
|
Quoted:
GD "we want less goverment" GD "we need goverment intervention" View Quote Property rights are for adjudicating disputes inside one camp. They're not relevant in war, and war is not a single martial act conducted with arms alone. It's the period where multiple camps arise and envision a new range of means. The governments of new camps contend across varied terrain, some of which is the body of prewar organizations. Banning weaponizing old government is like banning JHPs and DPICM - dumb. |
|
Quoted:
We want less communists. We will use all means available to reach that goal. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
Telling property owners what they can do with their stuff is an infringement on property rights. Property rights are for adjudicating disputes inside one camp. They're not relevant in war, and war is not a single martial act conducted with arms alone. It's the period where multiple camps arise and envision a new range of means. The governments of new camps contend across varied terrain, some of which is the body of prewar organizations. Banning weaponizing old government is like banning JHPs and DPICM - dumb. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
GD "we want less goverment" GD "we need goverment intervention" Property rights are for adjudicating disputes inside one camp. They're not relevant in war, and war is not a single martial act conducted with arms alone. It's the period where multiple camps arise and envision a new range of means. The governments of new camps contend across varied terrain, some of which is the body of prewar organizations. Banning weaponizing old government is like banning JHPs and DPICM - dumb. Anti-Trust: Yea or Nay? What constitutes a monopoly/cartel? ETA: How much government involvement are you willing to tolerate in the creation of a monopoly/cartel? |
|
You guys are obsessed with defending the economic power of people that want to destroy you, and even consider it a virtue. Then you act dumbfounded when they use their power for political ends. No wonder conservatism was getting its ass kicked until Trump showed up.
I'm sure the silicon valley venture capital people and tech CEOs appreciate some conservative from flyover country doing free PR for them |
|
Quoted: Two questions... Anti-Trust: Yea or Nay? What constitutes a monopoly/cartel? ETA: How much government involvement are you willing to tolerate in the creation of a monopoly/cartel? View Quote At the policy level there are good arguments for both sides, though social platforms aren't quite physical monopolies. I think it's better to hope new platforms (e.g. Mastodon vs Twitter or the Myspace/Facebook/Snaps&Insta timeline) rise to naturally outcompete the old. But the difference between Trump & the dissident right vs the NRO neocon clan is the recognition that power precedes policy. If the IC-subsidized-Facebook narrative is the justification our more fastidious comrades need to tell themselves to get out of bed and win, that's what we should say. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Whatever the politicians we own or they own say it is. The first casualty of war is truth. At the policy level there are good arguments for both sides, though social platforms aren't quite physical monopolies. I think it's better to hope new platforms (e.g. Mastodon vs Twitter or the Myspace/Facebook/Snaps&Insta timeline) rise to naturally outcompete the old. But the difference between Trump & the dissident right vs the NRO neocon clan is the recognition that power precedes policy. If the IC-subsidized-Facebook narrative is the justification our more fastidious comrades need to tell themselves to get out of bed and win, that's what we should say. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Two questions... Anti-Trust: Yea or Nay? What constitutes a monopoly/cartel? ETA: How much government involvement are you willing to tolerate in the creation of a monopoly/cartel? At the policy level there are good arguments for both sides, though social platforms aren't quite physical monopolies. I think it's better to hope new platforms (e.g. Mastodon vs Twitter or the Myspace/Facebook/Snaps&Insta timeline) rise to naturally outcompete the old. But the difference between Trump & the dissident right vs the NRO neocon clan is the recognition that power precedes policy. If the IC-subsidized-Facebook narrative is the justification our more fastidious comrades need to tell themselves to get out of bed and win, that's what we should say. They still do. Sorry if I sound sceptical about their impartiality as a private entity... Don't even get me started on Blue Origin or Space X. |
|
Social media is a form of information distribution of a scale that is unprecedented. It is faster and gather reaching than television and radio, both of which are already regulated. Microsoft was broken up for few and less egregious violations than facebook, twitter and other social media platforms. These private companies have just as much control as big oil, railroad barons, and other resources of the past. The internet is a resource, and now facebook has created a virtual resource of social media that is just as much a part of life as drake bling water wether we like it or not. I think facebook and social media is orwellian in its potential influence.
I’m not sure what needs to be done. Certainly facebook, twitter than all social media, should be legally forced into transparency when they censor viewpoints and speech. That is the minimum first step that should be taken. If government and business are going to continue to use social media as a primary communication tool, then these websites should be regulated like TV, radio, telephone and the like. |
|
How does a dupe make it seven pages?
At this very moment in time the dupe is directly above the original and on page one. Make me a Mod. |
|
|
Quoted:
You guys are obsessed with defending the economic power of people that want to destroy you, and even consider it a virtue. Then you act dumbfounded when they use their power for political ends. No wonder conservatism was getting its ass kicked until Trump showed up. I'm sure the silicon valley venture capital people and tech CEOs appreciate some conservative from flyover country doing free PR for them View Quote When we used radio we let them do their thing when we used print media we let them do their thing when we used early tv broadcasting we let them do their thing Now the age of digital communication and media along with social media? They control the narrative they control the systems and when we had just a small slice of that pie (just enough to get DJT elected) they pulled the rug right out from under us. |
|
This is the first day he has really been cleared off Youtube.
Somebody set up something else with clips and that was shut down. Monopolist MF'ers. Trust Sessions. |
|
|
|
Google has a near vertical monopoly on the means of dissemination of information. Old rules on market monopolies have to be updated for the information age.
We live in dangerous times and conservatives are in the crosshairs of these globalist tech mega corporations. Never believe that the government isn’t on their side in perpetuating and sustaining their power. |
|
Quoted: If only we were a free market. How about when Google colludes with government officials in return for government to pass legislation to protect their monopoly and funnel taxpayer dollars to them. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Google, Facebook, Netflix, etc spent millions of dollars lobbying for the government to regulate ISPs as public utilities in order to subsidize their own bandwidth. Fuck 'em. Hold those cocksuckers to their own standards. View Quote |
|
|
View Quote |
|
|
The Infowars official app is currently number 4 on the popularity chart under the category for news. Apple App Store.
As I said before I think his popularity since the election has skyrocketed and he may be getting more weekly viewers than all of the left wing MSM outlets combined. They might not be attempting to censor his viewpoints but rather his ability to compete regarding reach. |
|
|
He'll just go on another platform like Stern did. I really dont see the big deal. I agree its bullshit, but private companies are free to run their business the way they see fit. If they think AJones is bad for business, so be it. *shrug*
If anything he'll get more followers out of it. |
|
What the easiest way to listen to the show at a time of one's choosing?
|
|
Surprised to see that Podcast Addict pulled them down also, but it seems they just mirror itunes. I have the paid version on several devices and I'm looking for a competitor that does not censor content.
|
|
Quoted:
This is bullshit, honestly. They're doing this just because he peddles dumb conspiracy theories. Fuck them. Alex Jones, while lightweight crazy, doesn't deserve this at all. View Quote Failed To Load Title Publisher or platform? Can't be both. It's in the government rules. |
|
Quoted:
Is this moar “We have to become the Commies to beat the Commies?” View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.